1
|
San L, He Z, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Cao W, Ren J, Han T, Li B, Wang G, Wang Y, Hou J. Genetic Diversity and Signatures of Selection in the Roughskin Sculpin ( Trachidermus fasciatus) Revealed by Whole Genome Sequencing. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:1427. [PMID: 37998026 PMCID: PMC10669622 DOI: 10.3390/biology12111427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
The roughskin sculpin (Trachidermus fasciatus) is an endangered fish species in China. In recent years, artificial breeding technology has made significant progress, and the population of roughskin sculpin has recovered in the natural environment through enhancement programs and the release of juveniles. However, the effects of released roughskin sculpin on the genetic structure and diversity of wild populations remain unclear. Studies on genetic diversity analysis based on different types and numbers of molecular markers have yielded inconsistent results. In this study, we obtained 2,610,157 high-quality SNPs and 494,698 InDels through whole-genome resequencing of two farmed populations and one wild population. Both farmed populations showed consistent levels of genomic polymorphism and a slight increase in linkage compared with wild populations. The population structure of the two farmed populations was distinct from that of the wild population, but the degree of genetic differentiation was low (overall average Fst = 0.015). Selective sweep analysis showed that 523,529 genes were selected in the two farmed populations, and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the selected genes were related to amino acid metabolism, which might be caused by artificial feeding. The findings of this study provide valuable additions to the existing genomic resources to help conserve roughskin sculpin populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lize San
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Zhongwei He
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Yufeng Liu
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Yitong Zhang
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Wei Cao
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Jiangong Ren
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Tian Han
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Ocean College, Hebei Agricultural University, Qinhuangdao 066009, China
| | - Bingbu Li
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Guixing Wang
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Yufen Wang
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| | - Jilun Hou
- Hebei Key Laboratory of the Bohai Sea Fish Germplasm Resources Conservation and Utilization, Beidaihe Central Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
- Bohai Sea Fishery Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Qinhuangdao 066100, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bull JK, Stanford BCM, Bokvist JK, Josephson MP, Rogers SM. Environment and genotype predict the genomic nature of domestication of salmonids as revealed by gene expression. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20222124. [PMID: 36475438 PMCID: PMC9727666 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Billions of salmonids are produced annually by artificial reproduction for harvest and conservation. Morphologically, behaviourally and physiologically these fish differ from wild-born fish, including in ways consistent with domestication. Unlike most studied domesticates, which diverged from wild ancestors millennia ago, salmonids offer a tractable model for early-stage domestication. Here, we review a fundamental mechanism for domestication-driven differences in early-stage domestication, differentially expressed genes (DEGs), in salmonids. We found 34 publications examining DEGs under domestication driven by environment and genotype, covering six species, over a range of life-history stages and tissues. Three trends emerged. First, domesticated genotypes have increased expression of growth hormone and related metabolic genes, with differences magnified under artificial environments with increased food. Regulatory consequences of these DEGs potentially drive overall DEG patterns. Second, immune genes are often DEGs under domestication and not simply owing to release from growth-immune trade-offs under increased food. Third, domesticated genotypes exhibit reduced gene expression plasticity, with plasticity further reduced in low-complexity environments typical of production systems. Recommendations for experimental design improvements, coupled with tissue-specific expression and emerging analytical approaches for DEGs present tractable avenues to understand the evolution of domestication in salmonids and other species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James K. Bull
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
| | | | - Jessy K. Bokvist
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4,Fisheries and Oceans Canada, South Coast Area Office, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada V9T 1K3
| | - Matthew P. Josephson
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
| | - Sean M. Rogers
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4,Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre, Bamfield, British Columbia, Canada V0R 1B0
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
How well do genetic markers inform about responses to intraspecific admixture? A comparative analysis of microsatellites and RADseq. BMC Genom Data 2021; 22:22. [PMID: 34182923 PMCID: PMC8237422 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-021-00974-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fitness consequences of intraspecific genetic admixture can vary from positive to negative depending on the genetic composition of the populations and environmental conditions. Because admixture has potential to influence the success of management and conservation efforts, genetic similarity has been suggested to be used as a proxy to predict the outcome. Studies utilizing microsatellites (a neutral marker) to investigate associations between genetic distance and admixture effects show conflicting results. Marker types that yield information on genome-wide and/or adaptive variation might be more useful for predicting responses to inter-population hybridization. In this study we utilized published data for three populations of pike (Esox lucius) to investigate associations between offspring performance (hatching success) and parental genetic similarity in experimentally purebred and admixed families, based on neutral (microsatellites), genome-wide neutral (RADseq SNPs), and adaptive (SNPs under selection) markers. Results Estimated similarity varied among the markers, likely reflecting differences in their inherent properties, but was consistently higher in purebred than admixed families. A significant interaction between marker type and admixture treatment reflected that neutral SNPs yielded higher estimates than adaptive SNPs for admixed families whereas no difference was found for purebred families, which indicates that neutral similarity was not reflective of adaptive similarity. When all samples were pooled, no association between similarity and performance was found for any marker. For microsatellites, similarity was positively correlated with hatching success in purebred families, whereas no association was found in admixed families; however, the direction of the effect differed between the population combinations. Conclusions The results strengthen the notion that, as of today, there is no proxy that can reliably predicted the outcome of admixture. This emphasizes the need of further studies to advance knowledge that can shed light on how to safeguard against negative consequences of admixture, and thereby inform management and promote conservation of biological diversity. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12863-021-00974-3.
Collapse
|