Contributions of substitutions and indels to the structural variations in ancient protein superfamilies

Zero-shot prediction of mutation effects with multimodal deep representation learning guides protein engineering

Mutations in amino acid sequences can provoke changes in protein function. Accurate and unsupervised prediction of mutation effects is critical in biotechnology and biomedicine, but remains a fundamental challenge. To resolve this challenge, here we present Protein Mutational Effect Predictor (ProMEP), a general and multiple sequence alignment-free method that enables zero-shot prediction of mutation effects. A multimodal deep representation learning model embedded in ProMEP was developed to comprehensively learn both sequence and structure contexts from ~160 million proteins. ProMEP achieves state-of-the-art performance in mutational effect prediction and accomplishes a tremendous improvement in speed, enabling efficient and intelligent protein engineering. Specifically, ProMEP accurately forecasts mutational consequences on the gene-editing enzymes TnpB and TadA, and successfully guides the development of high-performance gene-editing tools with their engineered variants. The gene-editing efficiency of a 5-site mutant of TnpB reaches up to 74.04% (vs 24.66% for the wild type); and the base editing tool developed on the basis of a TadA 15-site mutant (in addition to the A106V/D108N double mutation that renders deoxyadenosine deaminase activity to TadA) exhibits an A-to-G conversion frequency of up to 77.27% (vs 69.80% for ABE8e, a previous TadA-based adenine base editor) with significantly reduced bystander and off-target effects compared to ABE8e. ProMEP not only showcases superior performance in predicting mutational effects on proteins but also demonstrates a great capability to guide protein engineering. Therefore, ProMEP enables efficient exploration of the gigantic protein space and facilitates practical design of proteins, thereby advancing studies in biomedicine and synthetic biology.

Insertion-Deletion Events Are Depleted in Protein Regions with Predicted Secondary Structure

A fundamental goal in evolutionary biology and population genetics is to understand how selection shapes the fate of new mutations. Here, we test the null hypothesis that insertion-deletion (indel) events in protein-coding regions occur randomly with respect to secondary structures. We identified indels across 11,444 sequence alignments in mouse, rat, human, chimp, and dog genomes and then quantified their overlap with four different types of secondary structure-alpha helices, beta strands, protein bends, and protein turns-predicted by deep-learning methods of AlphaFold2. Indels overlapped secondary structures 54% as much as expected and were especially underrepresented over beta strands, which tend to form internal, stable regions of proteins. In contrast, indels were enriched by 155% over regions without any predicted secondary structures. These skews were stronger in the rodent lineages compared to the primate lineages, consistent with population genetic theory predicting that natural selection will be more efficient in species with larger effective population sizes. Nonsynonymous substitutions were also less common in regions of protein secondary structure, although not as strongly reduced as in indels. In a complementary analysis of thousands of human genomes, we showed that indels overlapping secondary structure segregated at significantly lower frequency than indels outside of secondary structure. Taken together, our study shows that indels are selected against if they overlap secondary structure, presumably because they disrupt the tertiary structure and function of a protein.

Persistent homology reveals strong phylogenetic signal in 3D protein structures

Changes that occur in proteins over time provide a phylogenetic signal that can be used to decipher their evolutionary history and the relationships between organisms. Sequence comparison is the most common way to access this phylogenetic signal, while those based on 3D structure comparisons are still in their infancy. In this study, we propose an effective approach based on Persistent Homology Theory (PH) to extract the phylogenetic information contained in protein structures. PH provides efficient and robust algorithms for extracting and comparing geometric features from noisy datasets at different spatial resolutions. PH has a growing number of applications in the life sciences, including the study of proteins (e.g. classification, folding). However, it has never been used to study the phylogenetic signal they may contain. Here, using 518 protein families, representing 22,940 protein sequences and structures, from 10 major taxonomic groups, we show that distances calculated with PH from protein structures correlate strongly with phylogenetic distances calculated from protein sequences, at both small and large evolutionary scales. We test several methods for calculating PH distances and propose some refinements to improve their relevance for addressing evolutionary questions. This work opens up new perspectives in evolutionary biology by proposing an efficient way to access the phylogenetic signal contained in protein structures, as well as future developments of topological analysis in the life sciences.

Structural Dynamics Predominantly Determine the Adaptability of Proteins to Amino Acid Deletions

The insertion or deletion (indel) of amino acids has a variety of effects on protein function, ranging from disease-forming changes to gaining new functions. Despite their importance, indels have not been systematically characterized towards protein engineering or modification goals. In the present work, we focus on deletions composed of multiple contiguous amino acids (mAA-dels) and their effects on the protein (mutant) folding ability. Our analysis reveals that the mutant retains the native fold when the mAA-del obeys well-defined structural dynamics properties: localization in intrinsically flexible regions, showing low resistance to mechanical stress, and separation from allosteric signaling paths. Motivated by the possibility of distinguishing the features that underlie the adaptability of proteins to mAA-dels, and by the rapid evaluation of these features using elastic network models, we developed a positive-unlabeled learning-based classifier that can be adopted for protein design purposes. Trained on a consolidated set of features, including those reflecting the intrinsic dynamics of the regions where the mAA-dels occur, the new classifier yields a high recall of 84.3% for identifying mAA-dels that are stably tolerated by the protein. The comparative examination of the relative contribution of different features to the prediction reveals the dominant role of structural dynamics in enabling the adaptation of the mutant to mAA-del without disrupting the native fold.

DIMPLE: deep insertion, deletion, and missense mutation libraries for exploring protein variation in evolution, disease, and biology

Insertions and deletions (indels) enable evolution and cause disease. Due to technical challenges, indels are left out of most mutational scans, limiting our understanding of them in disease, biology, and evolution. We develop a low cost and bias method, DIMPLE, for systematically generating deletions, insertions, and missense mutations in genes, which we test on a range of targets, including Kir2.1. We use DIMPLE to study how indels impact potassium channel structure, disease, and evolution. We find deletions are most disruptive overall, beta sheets are most sensitive to indels, and flexible loops are sensitive to deletions yet tolerate insertions.

Insertions and Deletions (Indels): A Missing Piece of the Protein Engineering Jigsaw

Over the years, protein engineers have studied nature and borrowed its tricks to accelerate protein evolution in the test tube. While there have been considerable advances, our ability to generate new proteins in the laboratory is seemingly limited. One explanation for these shortcomings may be that insertions and deletions (indels), which frequently arise in nature, are largely overlooked during protein engineering campaigns. The profound effect of indels on protein structures, by way of drastic backbone alterations, could be perceived as "saltation" events that bring about significant phenotypic changes in a single mutational step. Should we leverage these effects to accelerate protein engineering and gain access to unexplored regions of adaptive landscapes? In this Perspective, we describe the role played by indels in the functional diversification of proteins in nature and discuss their untapped potential for protein engineering, despite their often-destabilizing nature. We hope to spark a renewed interest in indels, emphasizing that their wider study and use may prove insightful and shape the future of protein engineering by unlocking unique functional changes that substitutions alone could never achieve.

Insertions and deletions in protein evolution and engineering

Protein evolution or engineering studies are traditionally focused on amino acid substitutions and the way these contribute to fitness. Meanwhile, the insertion and deletion of amino acids is often overlooked, despite being one of the most common sources of genetic variation. Recent methodological advances and successful engineering stories have demonstrated that the time is ripe for greater emphasis on these mutations and their understudied effects. This review highlights the evolutionary importance and biotechnological relevance of insertions and deletions (indels). We provide a comprehensive overview of approaches that can be employed to include indels in random, (semi)-rational or computational protein engineering pipelines. Furthermore, we discuss the tolerance to indels at the structural level, address how domain indels can link the function of unrelated proteins, and feature studies that illustrate the surprising and intriguing potential of frameshift mutations.

Using the Evolutionary History of Proteins to Engineer Insertion-Deletion Mutants from Robust, Ancestral Templates Using Graphical Representation of Ancestral Sequence Predictions (GRASP)

Analyzing the natural evolution of proteins by ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) can provide valuable information about the changes in sequence and structure that drive the development of novel protein functions. However, ASR has also been used as a protein engineering tool, as it often generates thermostable proteins which can serve as robust and evolvable templates for enzyme engineering. Importantly, ASR has the potential to provide an insight into the history of insertions and deletions that have occurred in the evolution of a protein family. Indels are strongly associated with functional change during enzyme evolution and represent a largely unexplored source of genetic diversity for designing proteins with novel or improved properties. Current ASR methods differ in the way they handle indels; inclusion or exclusion of indels is often managed subjectively, based on assumptions the user makes about the likelihood of each recombination event, yet most currently available ASR tools provide limited, if any, opportunities for evaluating indel placement in a reconstructed sequence. Graphical Representation of Ancestral Sequence Predictions (GRASP) is an ASR tool that maps indel evolution throughout a reconstruction and enables the evaluation of indel variants. This chapter provides a general protocol for performing a reconstruction using GRASP and using the results to create indel variants. The method addresses protein template selection, sequence curation, alignment refinement, tree building, ancestor reconstruction, evaluation of indel variants and approaches to library development.

Expanded analyses of the functional correlations within structural classifications of glycoside hydrolases

Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are greatly diverse in sequences and functions, but systematic studies of GH relationships based on structural information are lacking. Here, we report that GHs have multiple evolutionary origins and are structurally derived from 27 homologous superfamilies and 16 folds, but GHs are highly biased to distribute in a few superfamilies and folds. Six of these superfamilies are widely encoded by archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes, indicating that they may be the most ancient in origin. Most superfamilies vary in enzyme function, and some, such as the superfamilies of (β/α)₈-barrel and (α/α)₆-barrel structures, exhibit extreme functional diversity; this is highly positively correlated with sequence diversity. More than one-third of glycosidase activities show a phenomenon of convergent evolution, especially the degradation functions of GHs on polysaccharides. The GHs of most superfamilies have relatively narrow environmental distributions, normally with the highest abundance in host-associated environments and a distribution preference for moderate low-temperature and acidic environments. Overall, our expanded analysis facilitates an understanding of complex GH sequence-structure-function relationships and may guide our screening and engineering of GHs.

Estimating Change in Foldability Due to Multipoint Deletions in Protein Structures

Insertions/deletions of amino acids in the protein backbone potentially result in altered structural/functional specifications. They can either contribute positively to the evolutionary process or can result in disease conditions. Despite being the second most prevalent form of protein modification, there are no databases or computational frameworks that delineate harmful multipoint deletions (MPD) from beneficial ones. We introduce a positive unlabeled learning-based prediction framework (PROFOUND) that utilizes fold-level attributes, environment-specific properties, and deletion site-specific properties to predict the change in foldability arising from such MPDs, both in the non-loop and loop regions of protein structures. In the absence of any protein structure dataset to study MPDs, we introduce a dataset with 153 MPD instances that lead to native-like folded structures and 7650 unlabeled MPD instances whose effect on the foldability of the corresponding proteins is unknown. PROFOUND on 10-fold cross-validation on our newly introduced dataset reports a recall of 82.2% (86.6%) and a fall out rate (FR) of 14.2% (20.6%), corresponding to MPDs in the protein loop (non-loop) region. The low FR suggests that the foldability in proteins subject to MPDs is not random and necessitates unique specifications of the deleted region. In addition, we find that additional evolutionary attributes contribute to higher recall and lower FR. The first of a kind foldability prediction system owing to MPD instances and the newly introduced dataset will potentially aid in novel protein engineering endeavors.