Unblended disjoint tree merging using GTM improves species tree estimation

Recent progress on methods for estimating and updating large phylogenies

With the increased availability of sequence data and even of fully sequenced and assembled genomes, phylogeny estimation of very large trees (even of hundreds of thousands of sequences) is now a goal for some biologists. Yet, the construction of these phylogenies is a complex pipeline presenting analytical and computational challenges, especially when the number of sequences is very large. In the past few years, new methods have been developed that aim to enable highly accurate phylogeny estimations on these large datasets, including divide-and-conquer techniques for multiple sequence alignment and/or tree estimation, methods that can estimate species trees from multi-locus datasets while addressing heterogeneity due to biological processes (e.g. incomplete lineage sorting and gene duplication and loss), and methods to add sequences into large gene trees or species trees. Here we present some of these recent advances and discuss opportunities for future improvements. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Genomic population structures of microbial pathogens'.

Disjoint Tree Mergers for Large-Scale Maximum Likelihood Tree Estimation

The estimation of phylogenetic trees for individual genes or multi-locus datasets is a basic part of considerable biological research. In order to enable large trees to be computed, Disjoint Tree Mergers (DTMs) have been developed; these methods operate by dividing the input sequence dataset into disjoint sets, constructing trees on each subset, and then combining the subset trees (using auxiliary information) into a tree on the full dataset. DTMs have been used to advantage for multi-locus species tree estimation, enabling highly accurate species trees at reduced computational effort, compared to leading species tree estimation methods. Here, we evaluate the feasibility of using DTMs to improve the scalability of maximum likelihood (ML) gene tree estimation to large numbers of input sequences. Our study shows distinct differences between the three selected ML codes—RAxML-NG, IQ-TREE 2, and FastTree 2—and shows that good DTM pipeline design can provide advantages over these ML codes on large datasets.

Using Constrained-INC for Large-Scale Gene Tree and Species Tree Estimation

Incremental tree building (INC) is a new phylogeny estimation method that has been proven to be absolute fast converging under standard sequence evolution models. A variant of INC, called Constrained-INC, is designed for use in divide-and-conquer pipelines for phylogeny estimation where a set of species is divided into disjoint subsets, trees are computed on the subsets using a selected base method, and then the subset trees are combined together. We evaluate the accuracy of INC and Constrained-INC for gene tree and species tree estimation on simulated datasets, and compare it to similar pipelines using NJMerge (another method that merges disjoint trees). For gene tree estimation, we find that INC has very poor accuracy in comparison to standard methods, and even Constrained-INC(using maximum likelihood methods to compute constraint trees) does not match the accuracy of the better maximum likelihood methods. Results for species trees are somewhat different, with Constrained-INC coming close to the accuracy of the best species tree estimation methods, while being much faster; furthermore, using Constrained-INC allows species tree estimation methods to scale to large datasets within limited computational resources. Overall, this study exposes the benefits and limitations of divide-and-conquer strategies for large-scale phylogenetic tree estimation.

Phylogeny Estimation Given Sequence Length Heterogeneity

Phylogeny estimation is a major step in many biological studies, and has many well known challenges. With the dropping cost of sequencing technologies, biologists now have increasingly large datasets available for use in phylogeny estimation. Here we address the challenge of estimating a tree given large datasets with a combination of full-length sequences and fragmentary sequences, which can arise due to a variety of reasons, including sample collection, sequencing technologies, and analytical pipelines. We compare two basic approaches: (1) computing an alignment on the full dataset and then computing a maximum likelihood tree on the alignment, or (2) constructing an alignment and tree on the full length sequences and then using phylogenetic placement to add the remaining sequences (which will generally be fragmentary) into the tree. We explore these two approaches on a range of simulated datasets, each with 1000 sequences and varying in rates of evolution, and two biological datasets. Our study shows some striking performance differences between methods, especially when there is substantial sequence length heterogeneity and high rates of evolution. We find in particular that using UPP to align sequences and RAxML to compute a tree on the alignment provides the best accuracy, substantially outperforming trees computed using phylogenetic placement methods. We also find that FastTree has poor accuracy on alignments containing fragmentary sequences. Overall, our study provides insights into the literature comparing different methods and pipelines for phylogenetic estimation, and suggests directions for future method development. [Phylogeny estimation, sequence length heterogeneity, phylogenetic placement.]