The PhyR homolog RSP_1274 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is involved in defense of membrane stress and has a moderate effect on RpoE (RSP_1092) activity

The Regulatory Functions of the Multiple Alternative Sigma Factors RpoE, RpoHI, and RpoHII Depend on the Growth Phase in Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Bacterial growth, under laboratory conditions or in a natural environment, goes through different growth phases. Some gene expressions are regulated with respect to the growth phase, which allows bacteria to adapt to changing conditions. Among them, many gene transcriptions are controlled by RpoHI or RpoHII in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. In a previous study, it was proven that the alternative sigma factors, RpoE, RpoHI, and RpoHII, are the major regulators of oxidative stress. Moreover, the growth of bacteria reached a stationary phase, and following the outgrowth, rpoE, rpoHI, and rpoHII mRNAs increased with respect to the growth phase. In this study, we demonstrated the regulatory function of alternative sigma factors in the rsp_0557 gene. The gene rsp_0557 is expressed with respect to the growth phase and belongs to the RpoHI/RpoHII regulons. Reporter assays showed that the antisigma factor ChrR turns on or over the RpoE activity to regulate rsp_0557 expression across the growth phase. In the exponential phase, RpoHII and sRNA Pos19 regulate the expression of rsp_0557 to an appropriate level under RpoE control. In the stationary phase, RpoHI and Pos19 stabilize the transcription of rsp_0557 at a high level. During outgrowth, RpoHI negatively regulates the transcription of rsp_0557. Taken together, our data indicate that these regulators are recruited by cells to adapt to or survive under different conditions throughout the growth phase. However, they still did not display all of the regulators involved in growth phase-dependent regulation. More research is still needed to learn more about the interaction between the regulators and the process of adapting to changed growth conditions and environments.

Immune evasion and persistence in enteric bacterial pathogens

The major function of the mammalian immune system is to prevent and control infections caused by enteropathogens that collectively have altered human destiny. In fact, as the gastrointestinal tissues are the major interface of mammals with the environment, up to 70% of the human immune system is dedicated to patrolling them The defenses are multi-tiered and include the endogenous microflora that mediate colonization resistance as well as physical barriers intended to compartmentalize infections. The gastrointestinal tract and associated lymphoid tissue are also protected by sophisticated interleaved arrays of active innate and adaptive immune defenses. Remarkably, some bacterial enteropathogens have acquired an arsenal of virulence factors with which they neutralize all these formidable barriers to infection, causing disease ranging from mild self-limiting gastroenteritis to in some cases devastating human disease.

Stress response modulation: the key to survival of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria during poultry processing

The control of bacterial contaminants on meat is a key area of interest in the food industry. Bacteria are exposed to a variety of stresses during broiler processing which challenge bacterial structures and metabolic pathways causing death or sublethal injury. To counter these stresses, bacteria possess robust response systems that can induce shifts in the transcriptome and proteome to enable survival. Effective adaptive responses, such as biofilm formation, shock protein production and metabolic flexibility, require rapid induction and implementation at a cellular and community level to facilitate bacterial survival in adverse conditions. This review aims to provide an overview of the scientific literature pertaining to the regulation of complex adaptive processes used by bacteria to survive the processing environment, with particular focus on species that impact the quality and safety of poultry products like Campylobacter spp., Salmonella enterica and Pseudomonas spp.

The potential role of adherence factors in probiotic function in the gastrointestinal tract of adults and pediatrics: a narrative review of experimental and human studies

Numerous studies point to the important role of probiotic bacteria in gastrointestinal health. Probiotics act through mechanisms affecting enteric pathogens, epithelial barrier function, immune signaling, and conditioning of indigenous microbiota. Once administered, probiotics reach the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the host through bacterial surface molecules, here called adhesion factors, which are either strain- or specie-specific. Probiotic adhesion, through structural adhesion factors, is a mechanism that facilitates persistence within the gastrointestinal tract and triggers the initial host responses. Thus, an understanding of specific probiotic adhesion mechanisms could predict how specific probiotic strains elicit benefits and the potential of adherence factors as a proxy to predict probiotic function. This review summarizes the present understanding of probiotic adherence in the gastrointestinal tract. It highlights the bacterial adhesion structure types, their molecular communication with the host and the consequent impact on intestinal diseases in both adult and pediatric populations. Finally, we discuss knockout/isolation studies as direct evidence for adhesion factors conferring anti-inflammatory and pathogen inhibition properties to a probiotic.What is known: Probiotics can be used to treat clinical conditions.Probiotics improve dysbiosis and symptoms.Clinical trials may not confirm in vitro and animal studies.What is new: Adhesion structures may be important for probiotic function.Need to systematically determine physical characteristics of probiotics before selecting for clinical trials.Probiotics may be genetically engineered to add to clinical efficacy.

Adaptation of the Alphaproteobacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides to stationary phase

Exhaustion of nutritional resources stimulates bacterial populations to adapt their growth behaviour. General mechanisms are known to facilitate this adaptation by sensing the environmental change and coordinating gene expression. However, the existence of such mechanisms among the Alphaproteobacteria remains unclear. This study focusses on global changes in transcript levels during growth under carbon-limiting conditions in a model Alphaproteobacterium, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, a metabolically diverse organism capable of multiple modes of growth including aerobic and anaerobic respiration, anaerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis and fermentation. We identified genes that showed changed transcript levels independently of oxygen levels during the adaptation to stationary phase. We selected a subset of these genes and subjected them to mutational analysis, including genes predicted to be involved in manganese uptake, polyhydroxybutyrate production and quorum sensing and an alternative sigma factor. Although these genes have not been previously associated with the adaptation to stationary phase, we found that all were important to varying degrees. We conclude that while R. sphaeroides appears to lack a rpoS-like master regulator of stationary phase adaptation, this adaptation is nonetheless enabled through the impact of multiple genes, each responding to environmental conditions and contributing to the adaptation to stationary phase.