Evaluation of resazurin-based assay for rapid detection of polymyxin-resistant gram-negative bacteria

Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations

Infectious diseases pose a formidable global challenge, compounded by the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Consequently, researchers are actively exploring novel antimicrobial compounds as potential solutions. This endeavor underscores the pivotal role of methods employed for screening and evaluating antimicrobial activity-a critical step in discovery and characterization of antimicrobial agents. While traditional techniques such as well-diffusion, disk-diffusion, and broth-dilution are commonly utilized in antimicrobial assays, they may encounter limitations concerning reproducibility and speed. Additionally, a diverse array of antimicrobial assays including cross-streaking, poisoned-food, co-culture, time-kill kinetics, resazurin assay, bioautography, etc., are routinely employed in antimicrobial evaluations. Advanced techniques such as flow-cytometry, impedance analysis, and bioluminescent technique may offer rapid and sensitive results, providing deeper insights into the impact of antimicrobials on cellular integrity. However, their higher cost and limited accessibility in certain laboratory settings may present challenges. This article provides a comprehensive overview of assays designed to characterize antimicrobial activity, elucidating their underlying principles, protocols, advantages, and limitations. The primary objective is to enhance understanding of the methodologies designed for evaluating antimicrobial agents in our relentless battle against infectious diseases. By selecting the appropriate antimicrobial testing method, researchers can discern suitable conditions and streamline the identification of effective antimicrobial agents.

Resazurin microplate test method for rapid determination of colistin resistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii isolates

BACKGROUND

Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates are extremely important pathogens for hospital-acquired infections.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of the resazurin microplate assay (REMA) for the rapid determination of colistin resistance.

METHODS

Susceptibility for colistin was investigated in vitro by the broth microdilution method (BMD) and the resazurin microplate assay (REMA) on 106 carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.

RESULTS

The results of both test methods were compared, and the categorical agreement between them was found to be 100%. No minor, major, or very major discrepancy was observed between the 2 methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important advantages of REMA are that the results are obtained within 6 hours compared to the reference method, that it is easy to evaluate because it is colorimetric, and that the susceptibility result can be reported to the clinician on the same day as bacterial identification.

A capillary-based centrifugal indicator equipped with in situ pathogenic bacteria culture for fast antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial resistance has become a major global health threat due to the misuse and overuse of antibiotics. Rapid, affordable, and high-efficiency antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is among the effective means to solve this problem. Herein, we developed a capillary-based centrifugal indicator (CBCI) equipped with an in situ culture of pathogenic bacteria for fast AST. The bacterial incubation and growth were performed by macro-incubation, which seamlessly integrated the capillary indicator. Through simple centrifugation, all the bacterial cells were confined at the nanoliter-level capillary column. The packed capillary column height could linearly reflect the bacterial count, and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined based on the difference in the column height between the drug-added groups and the control group. The AST results could easily be determined by the naked eye or smartphone imaging. Thus, the CBCI realized the combination of macro-bacterial incubation and early micro assessment, which accelerated the phenotypic AST without complex microscopic counting or fluorescent labelling. The whole operation process was simple and easy to use. AST results could be determined for E. coli ATCC strains within 3.5 h, and the output results for clinical samples were consistent with the hospital reports. We expect this AST platform to become a useful tool in limiting antimicrobial resistance, especially in remote/resource-limited areas or in underdeveloped countries.

Effects of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with photodithazine® on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Studies in biofilms and experimental model with Galleria mellonella

Staphylococcus aureus infections are a severe health problem due to the high mortality rate. Conventional treatment of these infections is via the administration of antibiotics. However, its indiscriminate use can select resistant microorganisms. Thus, it is necessary to develop alternatives for antibiotic therapy. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT), a therapeutic method that associates a photosensitizer (PS), a light source with adequate wavelength to the PS, interacts with molecular oxygen generating reactive oxygen species responsible for cell inactivation, is a viable alternative. This work aimed to analyze, in vitro and in vivo, the action of aPDT with PS Photodithazine® (PDZ) on the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain. In the in vitro method, the S. aureus biofilm was incubated with PDZ at 50 and 75 μg.mL-1 for 15 min, adopting the light dose of 25, 50, and 100 J/cm2. In addition, PS interaction, formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), bacterial metabolism, adhesion, bacterial viability, and biofilm structure were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Subsequently, the strain was inoculated into models of Galleria mellonella, and the survival curve, health scale, blood cell analysis, and CFU/mL of S. aureus in the hemolymph were analyzed after aPDT. In the in vitro results, bacterial reduction was observed in the different PDZ concentrations, highlighting the parameters of 75 μg.mL-1 of PDZ and 100 J/cm2. As for in vivo results, aPDT increased survival and stimulated the immune system of G. mellonella infected by S. aureus. aPDT proved effective in both models, demonstrating its potential as an alternative therapy in treating MRSA bacterial infections.

Evaluation of resazurin microplate method for rapid detection of vancomycin and linezolid resistance in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin and linezolid resistance among enterococci is an increasing problem due to a lack of alternative antibiotics. Early identification of vancomycin-resistant and linezolid-resistant strains can help prevent the spread of resistance to these antibiotics. Hence, early, rapid and accurate detection of vancomycin and linezolid resistance is critical.

OBJECTIVES

The resazurin microplate method (RMM) was developed for detecting vancomycin and linezolid susceptibility among Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) clinical isolates, and its performance was further evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 209 non-duplicate clinical isolates and three strains from the faeces of domestic animals, including 142 E. faecalis (71 linezolid non-susceptible and 71 linezolid susceptible) and 70 E. faecium (23 vancomycin non-susceptible, 23 vancomycin susceptible, 12 linezolid non-susceptible and 12 linezolid susceptible), were tested using RMM.

RESULTS

The susceptibility of E. faecium to vancomycin was detected within 5 h, with high susceptibility (23/23) and specificity (23/23). The susceptibility of E. faecalis and E. faecium to linezolid was detected within 4 h, with specificities of 98.59% and 100% and susceptibilities of 94.37% and 58.33% for E. faecalis and E. faecium, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RMM had a good positive predictive value for the detection of vancomycin-non-susceptible E. faecium and linezolid-non-susceptible E. faecalis. It thus has the potential to become an alternative method for the rapid screening of these resistant pathogens in clinical practice.

Rapid ResaCeftazidime-Avibactam Enterobacterales NP Test: Rapid Detection of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility in Enterobacterales

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, has good antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) producing class A and C and some class D carbapenemases, but in recent years, the emergence of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria is growing. Therefore, rapid, accurate, and timely detection of CZA is necessary for clinical anti-infection treatment. In this study, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test was developed; its principle is that metabolically active bacteria (CZA-resistant strains) can change resazurin-PrestoBlue, a viability colorant, from blue to purple or pink in the presence of CZA, whereas CZA-susceptible strains cannot. We used 178 Enterobacterales isolates to evaluate the performance of this test. This test allowed the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to CZA to be detected within 4.5 h with an overall performance of 96% category agreement (CA), 7% major errors (MEs), and 0% very major errors (VMEs). Performance for Escherichia coli included 100% CA and 0% MEs and VMEs. Performance for Klebsiella pneumoniae included 99% CA and 2% MEs and 0% VMEs. Performance for Enterobacter cloacae included 87% CA, 25% MEs, and 0% VMEs. Moreover, this test is both economical ($1.0106 per isolate) and convenient, as it only requires basic laboratory equipment. In a word, the rapid ResaCeftazidime-avibactam Enterobacterales NP test is rapid and feasible, which may provide certain backing for the rapid screening and timely treatment of CZA-resistant strains in the clinic.

Colorimetric assays for the rapid and high-throughput screening of antimicrobial peptide activity against diverse bacterial pathogens

With the post-antibiotic era rapidly approaching, naturally-sourced antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a prime resource for restocking our antibiotic medicine cupboard. The efficiency of identification requires high-throughput screens that can identify bioactive peptides present within abundant natural-products chemical-space. While there are multiple amenable and high sensitivity colorimetric-based screening approaches available, resazurin-based assays are cost-effective, peptide compatible, and expedient, allowing one to screen a multitude of AMPs in a high-throughput fashion. Herein, we provide a detailed protocol for the optimization and use of resazurin assays for AMP testing, providing key experimental insight, and highlight pitfalls to be avoided.

Global Prevalence and Molecular Epidemiology of mcr-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The continuing rise in infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria is one of the most serious public health issues in today's societies. Colistin is a last-resort antimicrobial medication used to treat infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacteria; therefore resistance to this antibiotic is extremely hazardous. The current study aimed to evaluate the global prevalence and distribution of colistin resistance genes among human clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a systematic review.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. For further evaluation, all original English-language articles that demonstrated colistin resistance in E. coli clinical isolates published between 2000 and 2020 were examined.

RESULTS

Out of 4857 initial articles, after various stages of review and evaluation, 190 related articles were selected. More than 79 % of the publications selected in this research were published from 2014 to 2020. In Asia, Europe, America, Africa, and Oceania, the prevalence of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) producing colistin-resistant E. coli was 66.72%, 25.48%, 5.19%, 2.27%, and 0.32 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The recent widespread spreading of E. coli strains harboring mcr conferring colistin resistance, especially in Asia and Europe, is concerning and needs more attention.

Efficiency of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy with Photodithazine® on MSSA and MRSA Strains

Staphylococccus aureus is a ubiquitous and opportunistic bacteria associated with high mortality rates. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) is based on the application of a light source and a photosensitizer that can interact with molecular oxygen, forming Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) that result in bacterial inactivation. This study aimed to analyze, in vitro, the action of aPDT with Photodithazine^® (PDZ) in methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. The strains were incubated with PDZ at 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg/L for 15 min and irradiated with fluences of 25, 50, and 100 J/cm². The internalization of PDZ was evaluated by confocal microscopy, the bacterial growth by counting the number of colony-forming units, as well as the bacterial metabolic activity post-aPDT and the production of ROS. In both strains, the photosensitizer was internalized; the production of ROS increased when the aPDT was applied; there was a bacterial reduction compared to the control at all the evaluated fluences and concentrations; and, in most parameters, it was obtained complete inactivation with significant difference (p < 0.05). The implementation of aPDT with PDZ in clinical strains of S. aureus has resulted in its complete inactivation, including the MRSA strains.

Evaluation of the rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test for rapid colistin resistance detection in lactose non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria

Introduction. Colistin is one of the last-resort antibiotics for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) lactose non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.Gap Statement. As the rate of colistin resistance is steadily rising, there is a need for rapid and accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods for colistin. The Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test has recently been developed for rapid detection of colistin resistance in P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.Aim. The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test in comparison with the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.Methodology. The Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test was performed using a total of 135 P. aeruginosa (17 colistin-resistant and 118 colistin-susceptible) and 66 A. baumannii isolates (32 colistin-resistant and 34 colistin-susceptible), in comparison with the reference BMD method.Results. The categorical agreement of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test with the reference BMD method was 97.5 % with a major error rate of 0 % (0/152) and a very major error (VME) rate of 10.2 %. The VME rate was higher (23.5 %) when calculated separately for P. aeruginosa isolates. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 89.8 and 100 %, respectively.Conclusion. The Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test performed better for A. baumannii than for P. aeruginosa.

Current and emerging polymyxin resistance diagnostics: A systematic review of established and novel detection methods

The emergence of polymyxin resistance, due to transferable mcr genes, threatens public and animal health as there are limited therapeutic options. As polymyxin is one of the last-line antibiotics, there is a need to contain the spread of its resistance to conserve its efficacy. Herein, we describe current and emerging polymyxin resistance diagnostics to inform faster clinical diagnostic choices. A literature search in diverse databases for studies published between 2016 and 2020 was performed. English articles evaluating colistin resistance methods/diagnostics were included. Screening resulted in the inclusion of 93 journal articles. Current colistin resistance diagnostics are either phenotypic or molecular. Broth microdilution is currently the only gold standard for determining colistin MICs (minimum inhibitory concentration). Phenotypic methods comprise of agar-based methods such as CHROMagar™ Col-APSE, SuperPolymyxin, ChromID^® Colistin R, LBJMR and LB medium; manual MIC-determiners viz., UMIC, MICRONAUT MIC-Strip and ComASP Colistin; automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems such as BD Phoenix, MICRONAUT-S, MicroScan, Sensititre and Vitek 2; MCR-detectors such as lateral flow immunoassay (LFI) and chelator-based assays including EDTA- and DPA-based tests, that is, combined disk test, modified colistin broth-disk elution (CBDE), Colispot, and Colistin MAC test as well as biochemical colorimetric tests, that is, Rapid Polymyxin NP test and Rapid ResaPolymyxin NP test. Molecular methods only characterize mobile colistin resistance; they include PCR, LAMP and whole-genome sequencing. Due to the faster turnaround time (≤3 h), improved sensitivity (84%-100%) and specificity (93.3%-100%) of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin NP test and Fastinov^® , we recommend this test for initial screening of colistin-resistant isolates. This can be followed by CBDE with EDTA or the LFI as they both have 100% sensitivity and a specificity of ≥94.3% for the rapid screening of mcr genes. However, molecular assays such as LAMP and PCR may be considered in well-equipped clinical laboratories.

RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP® Test for Rapid Detection of Polymyxin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii

A homemade and culture-based test, relying on the visual detection of the reduction of the resazurin reagent (a cell viability indicator), has been developed for the rapid detection of polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Here, we evaluated the industrial version of this test, the RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test (Liofilchem, Italy). A well-characterized panel of 68 clinical A. baumannii strains (36 polymyxin-susceptible, 26 polymyxin-resistant A. baumannii, and 6 colistin-heteroresistant isolates) of worldwide origin was tested. All the colistin-susceptible A. baumannii isolates gave negative results according to the RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test, except for a single isolate that gave a false-positive result. Out of the 26 colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains, 25 were correctly identified as colistin resistant using the RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test. Only a single colistin-resistant A. baumannii strain gave a false-negative result. Additionally, the six colistin-heteroresistant isolates tested gave positive results. Altogether, the sensitivity and the specificity of the test were found to be 96% and 97%, respectively. The turn-around-time of this easy-to-perform test was 3-4h, which showed excellent reliability for identification of polymyxin resistance in A. baumannii. The RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test allows a rapid differentiation between polymyxin-susceptible and -resistant A. baumannii isolates, which may contribute to optimization of the use of polymyxins for treating infections due to multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.