Bacterial diversity and community characteristics of the sinus and dental regions in adults with odontogenic sinusitis

Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis Microbiology Compared With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Subtypes of sinusitis have different symptoms and prognoses due to different pathogens. Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) mainly occurs unilaterally and is different from chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) usually occurring bilaterally in terms of clinical characteristics. However, comprehensive microbiological comparisons between OMS and CRS have never been systematically conducted and most comparisons are methodologically biased. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the microbiology associated with OMS and CRS through a meta-analysis approach in order to provide evidence for differential diagnosis of OMS and CRS from a microbiological perspective.

METHODS

The databases PubMed and CNKI were searched from their inception to July 2023. A random-effects model was employed to derive the pooled prevalence estimates of the identified bacterial species or genera.

RESULTS

The 17 represented studies included 6 concerning OMS, 12 concerning CRS, and 4 concerning normal sinus, yielding 191, 610, and 92 samples, respectively. Though not statistically significant, the prevalence of Peptostreptococcus and Prevotella was generally higher in OMS compared to CRS. Notably, Fusobacterium was identified as the only genus with a significantly higher prevalence in OMS compared to CRS.

CONCLUSION

Fusobacterium was significantly more prevalent in OMS compared with CRS, while Staphylococcus aureus was more prevalent in CRS than in OMS. Such differences in bacterial profile may partly explain the distinct pathology observed and contribute to the development of novel strategies for diagnosis and therapeutic interventions in OMS.

Expert consensus on odontogenic maxillary sinusitis multi-disciplinary treatment

ABSTARCT

Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) is a subtype of maxillary sinusitis (MS). It is actually inflammation of the maxillary sinus that secondary to adjacent infectious maxillary dental lesion. Due to the lack of unique clinical features, OMS is difficult to distinguish from other types of rhinosinusitis. Besides, the characteristic infectious pathogeny of OMS makes it is resistant to conventional therapies of rhinosinusitis. Its current diagnosis and treatment are thus facing great difficulties. The multi-disciplinary cooperation between otolaryngologists and dentists is absolutely urgent to settle these questions and to acquire standardized diagnostic and treatment regimen for OMS. However, this disease has actually received little attention and has been underrepresented by relatively low publication volume and quality. Based on systematically reviewed literature and practical experiences of expert members, our consensus focuses on characteristics, symptoms, classification and diagnosis of OMS, and further put forward multi-disciplinary treatment decisions for OMS, as well as the common treatment complications and relative managements. This consensus aims to increase attention to OMS, and optimize the clinical diagnosis and decision-making of OMS, which finally provides evidence-based options for OMS clinical management.

Endo-Periodontal Lesions-An Overlooked Etiology of Odontogenic Sinusitis

The aim of this study was to analyze the oral etiology of patients with odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) and to compare the differences in demographic data, clinical symptoms, extent of sinus involvement, bone penetration of the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) between different etiologies. A retrospective investigation was conducted on 103 patients with ODS recruited from Beijing TongRen Hospital. All enrolled patients underwent sinus CT, nasal endoscopy, and oral examination. A comparison of the patients' clinical symptoms, the extent of involvement of the sinuses, and bone resorption of the MSF according to odontogenic etiologies was conducted. Follow-up was based on symptoms and clinical examination. The most common odontogenic etiologies were endo-periodontal lesions (EPLs, 49.5%), apical periodontitis (AP, 32.0%), and periodontitis (PE, 8.7%). There were statistically significant differences in age (p = 0.002), sex (p = 0.036), inflammation involving the ethmoid sinus (p = 0.037), and bone penetration of the MSF (p < 0.001) between the AP, EPL, and PE groups. There were no significant differences in sinusitis symptoms (p > 0.005) among patients with different odontogenic etiologies. In conclusion, EPL is a neglected oral etiology with a destructive effect on the bone of the MSF, which deserves more attention in diagnosis and treatment.