Lithotomy versus jack-knife position on haemodynamic parameters assessed by impedance cardiography during anorectal surgery under low dose spinal anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

General anesthesia with local infiltration reduces urine retention rate and prolongs analgesic effect than spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy

Introduction

Postoperative pain and complications pose significant challenges following a hemorrhoidectomy. Attaining effective anesthesia with minimal complications is crucial. The ideal anesthesia method for ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of general anesthesia plus local infiltration (GAL) is associated with lower complications and reduced pain compared to spinal anesthesia (SA) in the context of hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

This retrospective single-center cohort study, conducted in a tertiary medical center in East Asia, evaluated excisional hemorrhoidectomies performed between January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2023, utilizing GAL or SA. Data on the six most common complications-pain, constipation, acute urine retention (AUR), bleeding, nausea, and headache-were extracted from medical records. A total of 550 hemorrhoidectomies were included: 220 in the GAL group and 330 in the SA group. Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups.

Results

The AUR rate was significantly lower in the GAL group compared to the SA group (15.5% vs. 32.1%, P < 0.001). Although the proportion of pain scores ≥4 did not differ significantly between the GAL and SA groups (36.2% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.429), the pain score curve indicated a stable trend. Overall, the GAL group exhibited a lower rate of adverse effects (56.9% vs. 67.4%, P = 0.023). There were no significant differences in the rates of other complications and emergency department readmission between the GAL and SA groups.

Discussion

GAL emerges as a favorable choice for anesthesia in hemorrhoidectomy, demonstrating a lower incidence of urine retention and a prolonged analgesic effect in multiple hemorrhoidectomies. These findings support the conclusion that GAL represents an optimal anesthetic method for enhancing the postoperative experience in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.

Hypotension in Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

INTRODUCTION

Despite preoperative optimization, hemodynamic instability can be a major challenge during adrenalectomy. Even brief episodes of intraoperative hypotension can be associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare intraoperative hemodynamic parameters between posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) and transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TPA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing PRA and TPA without conversion or concomitant intraabdominal pathology from 2008 to 2019. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined by mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg or the need for ≥1 intravenous vasopressors at least 30 min after anesthetic induction.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 patients met the inclusion criteria; 33 (30.6%) had pheochromocytoma, 26 (24.1%) had aldosterone excess, 8 (7.4%) had corticosteroid excess, and 41 (38.0%) had nonfunctioning adrenal tumors. Of these, 68 (63.0%) underwent PRA and 40 (37.0%) underwent TPA. Age, sex, body mass index, preinduction blood pressure, number of preoperative antihypertensives, and histopathological diagnosis were similar in the two groups. Tumor size was greater in the TPA group. The presence of pheochromocytoma was an independent risk factor for hypotension. Multivariate analysis revealed that PRA was associated with a higher risk of experiencing a mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.27-15.54, P = 0.02) and the need for ≥1 intravenous vasopressors (odds ratio 9.97, 95% confidence interval 3.34-29.78, P < 0.001) compared with TPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PRA offers several advantages over TPA, it carries a greater risk of intraoperative hypotension. A prospective trial is required to validate these findings. Nevertheless, institution of risk reduction strategies is encouraged to be considered for individuals undergoing PRA.

Effect of Carbohydrate-Enriched Drink Compared to Fasting on Hemodynamics in Healthy Volunteers. A Randomized Trial

Fasting prior to surgery can cause dehydration and alter hemodynamics. This study aimed to determine the impact of a carbohydrate-enriched drink (NutriciaTM Pre-op®) on selected hemodynamical parameters, measured in a non-invasive manner. We enrolled 100 healthy volunteers and measured their weight, height, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), thoracic fluid content (TFC), thoracic fluid index (TFCI), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume variation (SVV), stroke index (SI), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), heather index (HI), systolic time ration (STR), systemic time ratio index (STRI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) by a Niccomo™ device, implementing the impedance cardiography (ICG) method. Measurements were performed at the beginning of the study, and after 10 h and 12 h. We randomly allocated participants to the control group and the pre-op group. The pre-op group received 400 mL of Nutricia™ preOp®, as suggested in the ERAS guidelines, within 10 h of the study. Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the two groups, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. We did not observe any changes in hemodynamical parameters, blood pressure, and heart rate between the groups. We have proven that carbohydrate-enriched drink administration did not have a significant impact on the hemodynamical parameters of healthy volunteers.

Signal processing techniques applied to impedance cardiography ICG signals - a review

Over the last decade, Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems have been provided significant research focus by researchers. CAD systems have been developed in order to minimise visual errors, to compensate manual interpretation, and to help medical staff to take decisions swiftly. These systems have been considered as powerful tools for a reliable, automatic, and low-cost monitoring and diagnosis. CAD systems are based on analysis and classification of several physiological signals for detecting and assessing different diseases related to the corresponding organ. The implementation of these systems requires the application of several advanced signal processing techniques. Specifically, in cardiology, CAD systems have achieved promising results in providing an accurate and rapid detection of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Particularly, the number of works on signal processing field for impedance cardiography (ICG) signals starts to grow slowly in recent years. This paper presents a review study of signal processing techniques applied to the ICG signal for the denoising, the analysis, the classification and the characterisation purposes. This review is intended to provide researchers with a broad overview of the currently used signal processing techniques for ICG signal analysis, as well as to improve future research by applying other recent advanced methods.

Lithotomy versus Prone Position for Perianal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Studies objectively comparing lithotomy and prone positions regarding surgeon comfort, ergonomics, patient comfort, and position related complications are scarce.

Methods

The patients posted for surgery of either fistula in ano, hemorrhoids, or were included in this study. Subjective Mental Effort Questionnaire (SMEQ) and Local Experienced Discomfort (LED) scale were used to score the level of mental and physical stress among the operating surgeon, assistants, and the scrub nurse. Other parameters studied were the exposure of the operative site, patient comfort level, and position-related complications.

Results

Thirty patients were operated in each position. Mean ± standard deviation of jackknife prone vs. lithotomy surgeon SMEQ score (15.6 ± 10.4 vs. 107.0 ± 11.5, P < 0.05) and LED score (1.8 ± 1.5 vs. 6.7 ± 0.5, P < 0.05) were found to be statistically significant. Prone vs. lithotomy assistant SMEQ score (29.1 ± 13.1 vs. 100.6 ± 8.7, P < 0.05) and LED score (4.6 ± 1.1 vs. 7.4 ± 0.8, P < 0.05) were also found to be statistically significant. SMEQ (10.0 ± 0.0 vs. 20.6 ± 2.5, P < 0.05) and LED scores (1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 3.3 ± 0.5, P < 0.05) of scrub nurses and LED scores (2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 6.3 ± 0.7, P < 0.05) of patients were also statistically significant. Exposure of the operative site was significantly better in the prone position (5.0 vs. 2.1, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Significantly better SMEQ, LED, and exposure score suggests the superiority of jackknife prone position over the lithotomy in terms of significantly less mental and physical stress to the operating surgeon, assistant, and scrub nurse; better ergonomics, and excellent exposure.

Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Management of individuals with bleeding or thrombotic disorders undergoing abortion

Individuals who have bleeding disorders, thrombophilias, a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), or who are taking anticoagulation medication for other reasons may present for abortion. Clinicians should be aware of risk factors and histories concerning for excessive bleeding and thrombotic disorders around the time of abortion. This document will focus on how to approach abortion planning in these individuals. For first-trimester abortion, procedural abortion (sometimes called surgical abortion) is generally preferred over medical management for individuals with bleeding disorders or who are on anticoagulation. First-trimester procedural abortion in an individual on anticoagulation can generally be done without interruption of anticoagulation. The decision to interrupt anticoagulation for a second-trimester procedure should be individualized. Individuals at high risk for VTE can be offered anticoagulation post-procedure. Individuals with bleeding disorders or who are anticoagulated can safely be offered progestin intrauterine devices. Future research is needed to better assess quantitative blood loss and complications rates with abortion in these populations.

The effect of patient positions on perfusion index

Background

The optimal position for surgery is one in which the patient is provided the best possible surgical intervention and put at minimum risk. Different surgical positions may cause changes in tissue perfusion. This study investigates the relationship between surgical patient positions and perfusion index.

Methods

A sample of 61 healthy individuals with no peripheral circulatory disorders, chronic diseases, or anemia was included in this study. Participants held six different positions: supine, prone, 45-degree sitting-supine, 45-degree supine with legs lifted, Trendelenburg (45-degrees head down), and reverse Trendelenburg (45-degrees head up). Perfusion index values were then measured and recorded after individuals held their positions for five minutes.

Results

Participants’ perfusion index values were affected by different body positions (p < 0.05). Perfusion index was lowest in the sitting position (4.5 ± 2.5) and highest in individuals with Trendelenburg position (7.8 ± 3.8).

Conclusion

Different body positions can cause changes in tissue perfusion. This should be considered in patient follow-up along with the perfusion index.