Cardioprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning with postconditioning on donor hearts in patients undergoing heart transplantation: a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Organ Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has shown great advantages in protecting organs from ischemia-reperfusion loss and applied research on RIC continues to increase. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively investigate the value of RIC for different organ transplantation.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to November 1, 2023, for randomized controlled trials investigating whether RIC has an advantage in organ transplantation (including heart, lung, liver, and kidney) compared with controls. The primary outcomes varied according to the transplanted organ, including liver transplantation (graft loss, early allograft dysfunction, acute kidney injury, days in hospital, and mortality); kidney transplantation (delayed graft function, acute rejection (AR), graft loss, 50% decrease in serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, days in hospital, and mortality); heart and lung transplantation (AR, mortality). Two investigators independently selected suitable trials, assessed trial quality, and extracted the data.

RESULTS

A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, including six kidney transplants, three liver transplants, and one heart and lung transplant each, with 561 RIC cases and 564 controls, and a total of 1125 patients. The results showed that RIC did not reduce mortality in transplant patients compared with controls (liver transplant: RR0.9, 95% confidence interval [0.31-2.66]; kidney transplant: RR 0.76, 95% confidence interval [0.17-3.33]), graft failure rate (liver transplantation: RR 0.3, 95% confidence interval [0.07, 1.19]; kidney transplantation: RR 0.89, 95% confidence interval [0.35, 2.27]), length of hospital stay (liver transplantation: standard mean difference [SMD] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [-0.15, 0.42]; kidney transplantation: SMD -0.1, 95% confidence interval [-0.3, 0.11]). In addition, RIC did not improve early liver function after liver transplantation (RR 0.97, 95% confidence interval [0.55,1.7]), acute kidney injury after liver transplantation (RR 1.17 95% confidence interval [0.9, 1.54]), delayed functional recovery after renal transplantation (RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval [0.62, 1.15]), AR rate (RR 1.04, 95% confidence interval [0.72, 1.49]), 50% serum creatinine decline rate (RR 1.1, 95% confidence interval [0.88, 1.37]), glomerular filtration rate 3 months after surgery (SMD 0.13, 95% confidence interval [-0.05, 0.31]) and postoperative 12 months glomerular filtration rate (SMD 0.13, 95% confidence interval [-0.06, 0.31]).

CONCLUSION

Remote ischemic modulation does not improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing organ transplantation (heart, lung, liver, and kidney).

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on lung function after surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects organs from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Recent trials showed that RIPC improved gas exchange in patients undergoing lung or cardiac surgery. We performed a systematic search to identify randomized controlled trials involving RIPC in surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the PaO2/FIO2 (P/F) ratio at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were A-a DO2, the respiratory index, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (MV), incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and serum cytokine levels. The analyses included 71 trials comprising 7854 patients. Patients with RIPC showed higher P/F ratio than controls (mean difference [MD] 36.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.8 to 60.4, I2 = 69%). The cause of heterogeneity was not identified by the subgroup analysis. Similarly, A-a DO2 (MD 15.2, 95% CI - 29.7 to - 0.6, I2 = 87%) and respiratory index (MD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.34 to - 0.01, I2 = 94%) were lower in the RIPC group. Additionally, the RIPC group was weaned from MV earlier (MD - 0.9 h, 95% CI - 1.4 to - 0.4, I2 = 78%). Furthermore, the incidence of ARDS was lower in the RIPC group (relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89, I2 = 0%). Serum TNFα was lower in the RIPC group (SMD - 0.6, 95%CI - 1.0 to - 0.3 I2 = 87%). No significant difference was observed in interleukin-6, 8 and 10. Our meta-analysis suggested that RIPC improved oxygenation after surgery under general anesthesia.Clinical trial number: This study protocol was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (registration number: UMIN000030918), https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035305.

Molecular basis and clinical implications of HIFs in cardiovascular diseases

Oxygen maintains the homeostasis of an organism in a delicate balance in different tissues and organs. Under hypoxic conditions, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are specific and dominant factors in the spatiotemporal regulation of oxygen homeostasis. As the most basic functional unit of the heart at the cellular level, the cardiomyocyte relies on oxygen and nutrients delivered by the microvasculature to keep the heart functioning properly. Under hypoxic stress, HIFs are involved in acute and chronic myocardial pathology because of their spatiotemporal specificity, thus granting them therapeutic potential. Most adult animals lack the ability to regenerate their myocardium entirely following injury, and complete regeneration has long been a goal of clinical treatment for heart failure. The precise manipulation of HIFs (considering their dynamic balance and transformation) and the development of HIF-targeted drugs is therefore an extremely attractive cardioprotective therapy for protecting against myocardial ischemic and hypoxic injury, avoiding myocardial remodeling and heart failure, and promoting recovery of cardiac function.

Randomised sham-controlled double-blind trial evaluating remote ischaemic preconditioning in solid organ transplantation: a study protocol for the RIPTRANS trial

INTRODUCTION

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) using a non-invasive pneumatic tourniquet is a potential method for reducing ischaemia-reperfusion injury. RIPC has been extensively studied in animal models and cardiac surgery, but scarcely in solid organ transplantation. RIPC could be an inexpensive and simple method to improve function of transplanted organs. Accordingly, we aim to study whether RIPC performed in brain-dead organ donors improves function and longevity of transplanted organs.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

RIPTRANS is a multicentre, sham-controlled, parallel group, randomised superiority trial comparing RIPC intervention versus sham-intervention in brain-dead organ donors scheduled to donate at least one kidney. Recipients of the organs (kidney, liver, pancreas, heart, lungs) from a randomised donor will be included provided that they give written informed consent. The RIPC intervention is performed by inflating a thigh tourniquet to 300 mm Hg 4 times for 5 min. The intervention is done two times: first right after the declaration of brain death and second immediately before transferring the donor to the operating theatre. The sham group receives the tourniquet, but it is not inflated. The primary endpoint is delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney allografts. Secondary endpoints include short-term functional outcomes of transplanted organs, rejections and graft survival in various time points up to 20 years. We aim to show that RIPC reduces the incidence of DGF from 25% to 15%. According to this, the sample size is set to 500 kidney transplant recipients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by Helsinki University Hospital Ethics Committee and Helsinki University Hospital's Institutional Review Board. The study protocol was be presented at the European Society of Organ Transplantation congress in Copenhagen 14-15 September 2019. The study results will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed scientific journal for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03855722.

Getting an Early Start in Understanding Perinatal Asphyxia Impact on the Cardiovascular System

Perinatal asphyxia (PA) is a burdening pathology with high short-term mortality and severe long-term consequences. Its incidence, reaching as high as 10 cases per 1000 live births in the less developed countries, prompts the need for better awareness and prevention of cases at risk, together with management by easily applicable protocols. PA acts first and foremost on the nervous tissue, but also on the heart, by hypoxia and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury. Myocardial development at birth is still incomplete and cannot adequately respond to this aggression. Cardiac dysfunction, including low ventricular output, bradycardia, and pulmonary hypertension, complicates the already compromised circulatory status of the newborn with PA. Multiorgan and especially cardiovascular failure seem to play a crucial role in the secondary phase of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and its high mortality rate. Hypothermia is an acceptable solution for HIE, but there is a fragile equilibrium between therapeutic gain and cardiovascular instability. A profound understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the nervous and cardiovascular systems and a close collaboration between the bench and bedside specialists in these domains is compulsory. More resources need to be directed toward the prevention of PA and the consecutive decrease of cardiovascular dysfunction. Not much can be done in case of an unexpected acute event that produces PA, where recognition and prompt delivery are the key factors for a positive clinical result. However, the situation is different for high-risk pregnancies or circumstances that make the fetus more vulnerable to asphyxia. Improving the outcome in these cases is possible through careful monitoring, identifying the high-risk pregnancies, and the implementation of novel prenatal strategies. Also, apart from adequately supporting the heart through the acute episode, there is a need for protocols for long-term cardiovascular follow-up. This will increase our recognition of any lasting myocardial damage and will enhance our perspective on the real impact of PA. The goal of this article is to review data on the cardiovascular consequences of PA, in the context of an immature cardiovascular system, discuss the potential contribution of cardiovascular impairment on short and long-term outcomes, and propose further directions of research in this field.