Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a feasibility study

Peripheral Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate postoperative pain outcomes and adverse events after peripheral regional anesthesia (PRA) compared to no regional anesthesia (RA), placebo, or neuraxial anesthesia in children and adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis with an assessment of the risk of bias (Cochrane RoB 1) and certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

SETTING

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

PARTICIPANTS

Adults and children undergoing heart surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Any kind of PRA compared to no RA or placebo or neuraxial anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In total, 33 RCTs (2,044 patients) were included-24 of these had a high risk of bias, and 28 were performed in adults. Compared to no RA, PRA may reduce pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery (mean difference [MD] -0.81 points, 95% CI -1.51 to -0.10; I2 = 92%; very low certainty evidence). Peripheral regional anesthesia, compared to placebo, may reduce pain intensity at rest (MD -1.36 points, 95% CI -1.59 to -1.13; I2 = 54%; very low certainty evidence) and during movement (MD -1.00 points, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.67; I² = 72%; very low certainty evidence) 24 hours after surgery. No data after pediatric cardiac surgery could be meta-analyzed due to the low number of included trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to no RA or placebo, PRA may reduce pain intensity at rest and during movement. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously because the certainty of evidence is only very low.

Pain management after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: A systematic review with procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations

BACKGROUND

Pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy can be difficult to treat, and if inadequately managed can lead to respiratory complications, prolonged hospital stays and chronic pain.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.

DESIGN

A systematic review using PROcedure-SPECific Pain Management (PROSPECT) methodology.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews published in the English language until November 2020 assessing postoperative pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Databases.

RESULTS

Of 319 eligible studies, 209 randomised controlled trials and three systematic reviews were included in the final analysis. Pre-operative, intra-operative and postoperative interventions that reduced postoperative pain included paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intravenous magnesium, intravenous dexmedetomidine and parasternal block/infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

The analgesic regimen for cardiac surgery via sternotomy should include paracetamol and NSAIDs, unless contraindicated, administered intra-operatively and continued postoperatively. Intra-operative magnesium and dexmedetomidine infusions may be considered as adjuncts particularly when basic analgesics are not administered. It is not clear if combining dexmedetomidine and magnesium would provide superior pain relief compared with either drug alone. Parasternal block/surgical site infiltration is also recommended. However, no basic analgesics were used in the studies assessing these interventions. Opioids should be reserved for rescue analgesia. Other interventions, including cyclo-oxygenase-2 specific inhibitors, are not recommended because there was insufficient, inconsistent or no evidence to support their use and/or due to safety concerns.

Practice Advisory for Preoperative and Intraoperative Pain Management of Cardiac Surgical Patients: Part 2

Pain after cardiac surgery is of moderate to severe intensity, which increases postoperative distress and health care costs, and affects functional recovery. Opioids have been central agents in treating pain after cardiac surgery for decades. The use of multimodal analgesic strategies can promote effective postoperative pain control and help mitigate opioid exposure. This Practice Advisory is part of a series developed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) Quality, Safety, and Leadership (QSL) Committee's Opioid Working Group. It is a systematic review of existing literature for various interventions related to the preoperative and intraoperative pain management of cardiac surgical patients. This Practice Advisory provides recommendations for providers caring for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This entails developing customized pain management strategies for patients, including preoperative patient evaluation, pain management, and opioid use-focused education as well as perioperative use of multimodal analgesics and regional techniques for various cardiac surgical procedures. The literature related to this field is emerging, and future studies will provide additional guidance on ways to improve clinically meaningful patient outcomes.

Comparison of regional anesthetic techniques for postoperative analgesia after adult cardiac surgery: bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Patients usually suffer acute pain after cardiac surgery. Numerous regional anesthetic techniques have been used for those patients under general anesthesia. The most effective regional anesthetic technique was still unclear.

Methods

Five databases were searched, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library. The efficiency outcomes were pain scores, cumulative morphine consumption, and the need for rescue analgesia in this Bayesian analysis. Postoperative nausea, vomiting and pruritus were safety outcomes. Functional outcomes included the time to tracheal extubation, ICU stay, hospital stay, and mortality.

Results

This meta-analysis included 65 randomized controlled trials involving 5,013 patients. Eight regional anesthetic techniques were involved, including thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), erector spinae plane block, and transversus thoracic muscle plane block. Compared to controls (who have not received regional anesthetic techniques), TEA reduced the pain scores at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h both at rest and cough, decreased the rate of need for rescue analgesia (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.016-0.55), shortened the time to tracheal extubation (MD = -181.55, 95% CI: -243.05 to -121.33) and the duration of hospital stay (MD = -0.73, 95% CI: -1.22 to -0.24). Erector spinae plane block reduced the pain score 6 h at rest and the risk of pruritus, shortened the duration of ICU stay compared to controls. Transversus thoracic muscle plane block reduced the pain scores 6 and 12 h at rest compared to controls. The cumulative morphine consumption of each technique was similar at 24, 48 h. Other outcomes were also similar among these regional anesthetic techniques.

Conclusions

TEA seems the most effective regional postoperative anesthesia for patients after cardiac surgery by reducing the pain scores and decreasing the rate of need for rescue analgesia.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, ID: CRD42021276645.

Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Sequential Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Simultaneous Bilateral Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Simultaneous bilateral pulmonary resection via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) was safe and feasible for the treatment of bilateral multiple pulmonary nodules. But, it should be noted that considerable postoperative pain at the bilateral surgical site was a crucial issue. The safety and efficacy of bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) have been reported for postoperative analgesia. But, whether bilateral sequential TPVB can be safely and effectively used in simultaneous bilateral UVATS remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of bilateral sequential TPVB after simultaneous bilateral UVATS.

Study Design and Methods

In this study, 80 participants scheduled for UVATS will be randomly allocated to the bilateral sequential TPVB group (G₂) and the control group (G₁). The patient of G₂ will be performed bilateral TPVB at 2 time-points: before the start of the first side of pulmonary resection and before the start of the contralateral pulmonary resection. G₁ will only receive standard analgesia protocol. The primary outcome is the numeric rating scale score during coughing at 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes include the Prince Henry Pain Score scores, sufentanil consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, levels of inflammatory factors, and the Quality of Recovery-40 scores at different time points, as well as chronic pain at postoperative day (POD) 90.

Discussion

This is the first prospective trial to determine the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided bilateral sequential TPVB for postoperative analgesia following simultaneous bilateral UVATS. This study also intended to evaluate the effect of this intervention on postoperative quality of recovery and inflammation levels. The final results will provide clinical evidence related to bilateral sequential TPVB, and promote the application of that acting as a more appropriate analgesic method for simultaneous bilateral UVATS.

Effects of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Postoperative Anxiety and Depression for Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Radical Surgery

This study is aimed at investigating the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) on the occurrence of chronic postoperative pain, postoperative anxiety, and depression in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery. A total of 120 patients who underwent thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery in our hospital from June 2019 to March 2021 were included. There were 62 males and 58 females, with an age of 18-75 years old and a body mass index of 20-28 kg/m2. Patients were divided into two groups using the random number table method, TPVB group (n = 60) and normal saline group (control group, n = 60). Two-point nerve block was performed at T5-6 and T6-7 levels. Patients in the TPVB group received nerve block with 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride, while those in the control group received 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline. The numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during movement at 24 and 48 hours after surgery and the number of times the button on the patient-controlled analgesia pressed at 24 h after surgery in two groups were recorded. All patients were followed up by outpatient visits or phone visits at 1 year after surgery and assessed using Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) pain scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). According to the inclusion, exclusion, and drop-out criteria, 108 patients were finally included, with 52 patients in the TPVB group and 56 patients in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, height, body weight, body mass index, ASA classification, and operation time (P > 0.05). NRS pain scores at 24 h (P = 0.0108) and 48 h (P = 0.0000) after surgery, the number of times pressing patient-controlled analgesia at 24 h after surgery (P = 0.0000), the LANSS scores (P = 0.0000), HADS anxiety score (P = 0.0000), and depression scores (P = 0.0000) at 1 year after surgery in the TPVB group were both significantly lower than those in the control group. To sum up, ultrasound-guided TPVB can effectively relieve pain at 48 hours after thoracoscopic lung cancer radical surgery and chronic postoperative pain at 6 months after V thoracoscopic lung cancer radical surgery.

Opioid-free anesthesia compared to opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic radical colectomy with pain threshold index monitoring: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the depth of intraoperative analgesia with non-opioid anesthesia. This study evaluated whether opioid-free anesthesia can provide an effective analgesia-antinociception balance monitored by the / pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy.

METHODS

We enrolled 102 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colectomy with general anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups to receive opioid-free anesthesia (group OFA) with dexmedetomidine (loading dose with 0.6 μg·kg^-1 for 10 min and then 0.5 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 continuous infusion) and sevoflurane plus bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.2 μg·kg^-1 dexmedetomidine and 0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side) or opioid-based anesthesia (group OA) with remifentanil, sevoflurane, and bilateral paravertebral blockade (0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml per side). The primary outcome variable was pain intensity during the operation, as assessed by the pain threshold index with the multifunction combination monitor HXD- I. Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Student's t-test. The secondary outcomes were wavelet index, lactic levels, and blood glucose concentration during the operation. The visual analog scale (VAS), rescue analgesic consumption, and side-effects of opioids after surgery were further assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients were included in the analysis. Analysis revealed that the intraoperative pain threshold index readings were not significantly different between the groups from incision to the end of the operation (P = 0.06). Furthermore, similar changes in the brain wavelet index readings were observed in the OFA and OA groups. There was no statistical difference in VAS scores between the groups (P > 0.05); however, non-opioid anesthesia did reduce the rescue analgesic consumption after operation (P < 0.05). In the OFA group, the blood glucose levels increased by 20% compared to baseline and were significantly higher than those in the OA group (P < 0.001). The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting, urine retention, intestinal paralysis and pruritus were not significantly different from those in the OA group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that compared to the opioid anesthesia regimen, our opioid-free anesthesia regimen achieved an equally effective intraoperative pain threshold index in laparoscopic radical colectomy. The incidence of opioid-related adverse reactions was not different between regimens, and intraoperative blood glucose levels were higher with opioid-free anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1900021223, 02/02/2019, Title: " Opioid-free anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial ". Website: hppts:// www.chictr.ogr.cn.

The effect of continuous intercostal nerve block vs. single shot on analgesic outcomes and hospital stays in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting surgery is accompanied by severe pain. Although continuous intercostal nerve block (CINB) has become one of the multimodal analgesic techniques in single port thoracoscopic surgery, its effects on MIDCAB are unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of CINB and single shot on analgesic outcomes and hospital stays in patients undergoing MIDCAB in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out at Peking University Third Hospital, China. Two hundred and sixteen patients undergoing MIDCAB were divided into two groups: a CINB group and a single block (SI) group. The primary outcome was postoperative maximal visual analog scale (VAS); secondary outcomes included the number of patients with maximal VAS ≤ 3, the demand for and consumed doses of pethidine and tramadol, and the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays. The above data and the area under the VAS curve in the 70 h after extubation for the two subgroups (No. of grafts = 1) were also compared.

RESULTS

The maximum VAS was lower in the CINB group, and there were more cases with maximum VAS ≤ 3 in the CINB group: CINB 52 (40%) vs. SI 17 (20%), P = 0.002. The percentage of cases requiring tramadol and pethidine was less in CINB, P = 0.001. Among all patients, drug doses were significantly lower in the CINB group [tramadol: CINB 0 (0-100) mg vs. SI 100 (0-225) mg, P = 0.0001; pethidine: CINB 0 (0-25) mg vs. SI 25 (0-50) mg, P = 0.0004]. Further subgroup analysis showed that the area under the VAS curve in CINB was smaller: 28.05 in CINB vs. 30.41 in SI, P = 0.002. Finally, the length of ICU stay was shorter in CINB than in SI: 20.5 (11.3-26.0) h vs. 22.0 (19.0-45.0) h, P = 0.011.

CONCLUSIONS

CINB is associated with decreased demand for rescue analgesics and shorter length of ICU stay when compared to single shot intercostal nerve block. Additional randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to support these findings.

Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Review of the Literature

With our population getting older and sicker, we are witnessing a steady increase in the volume of cardiothoracic procedures performed. As the role of anesthesiologists continues to shift towards being perioperative physicians, it is crucial to tailor the anesthetic to manage the surgical pain in both intraoperative and postoperative periods. In cardiac surgery, poorly controlled surgical pain can lead to opioid-induced hyperalgesia as well as chronic pain syndrome. As current practice encourages early extubation and decreased length of stay, clinicians have increasingly steered away from heavy intraop narcotic therapy over the past two decades. To blunt the sympathetic response and postoperative pain control, some have been using various fascial plane nerve blocks to reduce opioid use during surgery. These blocks are considered very safe to perform and do not lead to hemodynamic changes seen in neuraxial blockades. In this review article, we provide a brief overview of each of the commonly used blocks and summarize and discuss the latest clinical data for each of the common blocks and their efficacy in the setting of cardiothoracic surgery.

Efficacy of Preoperative Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Cardiac Surgery Requiring Full Heparinization: A Propensity-Matched Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of preoperative bilateral paravertebral block (PVB) with general anesthesia (GA) in contributing to early extubation and decreasing opioid consumption in cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A propensity score-matched retrospective study.

SETTING

A single tertiary medical center between January 2018 and December 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing isolated first-time aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting with full sternotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

A cohort of 44 patients who received PVB with GA (PVB group) was matched with 44 patients who underwent similar surgery with GA only (GA only group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The completion rate of extubation in the operating room was significantly greater in the PVB group (65.9%) than in the GA only group (43.2%; p = 0.032). The completion rate of extubation within eight hours after surgery also was significantly greater in the PVB group (86.4%) than in the GA only group (68.2%; p = 0.042). The median amount of intraoperative fentanyl administered was significantly less in the PVB group (4.8 µg/kg; interquartile range [IQR], 3.3-7.2) than in the GA only group (8.4 µg/kg; IQR, 5.4-12.7; p < 0.001). The median amount of postoperative fentanyl administered was significantly less in the PVB group (6.8 µg/kg; IQR, 3.9-10.6) than in the GA only group (8.1 µg/kg; IQR, 6.2-15.9; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that preoperative bilateral PVB combined with GA contributed to early extubation in isolated first-time aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting and in the reduction of intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl consumption.

The Incidence of New Persistent Opioid Use Following Cardiac Surgery via Sternotomy

BACKGROUND

In recent years, increased attention has turned toward the risk of chronic opioid use after surgery. In this nationwide cohort study, we examined the rate of new persistent opioid use after cardiac surgery by sternotomy.

METHODS

All opioid-naive patients undergoing heart surgery by sternotomy from 2005 to 2018 in Iceland were included in the study. Naivety was defined as not filling an opioid prescription within 6 months before surgery. Persistent opioid use was defined as filling at least 1 opioid prescription during the first 90 days after surgery and another 90 to 180 days after the operation. In addition to estimating the incidence of new persistent opioid use, differences in patient characteristics, survival, and readmission rates were compared between the group with and without new persistent opioid use.

RESULTS

Of 1227 patients who underwent cardiac surgery by sternotomy during the study period, 925 were included in the study. Of those, 4.6% developed new persistent opioid use. When only patients who filled an opioid prescription after surgery were included, 10.1% developed new persistent opioid use. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, and nitrates were associated with increased risk for new persistent opioid use. Patients with new persistent opioid use did not have higher rates of readmission nor all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of new persistent opioid use after cardiac surgery was 4.6%. Future steps should identify strategies to minimize the development of new persistent opioid use.

Effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery

Objective

To evaluate the effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block on early postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing radical thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

Ninety patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer were divided into 2 groups: the general anesthesia group (GA group, n = 45) and the TPVB group (TP group, n = 45). The primary outcome was the decline rate of the 6-min walking test (6MWT); the second outcomes were as follows: absolute value and the completion rate of 6MWT, postoperative analgesia deficiency and pain scores, oxycodone consumption, sleep quality, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, and the hospital stay.

Results

Compared with the GA group, the TP group had a lower decline rate of the 6MWT on POD1 and POD2. The walking distance on POD1 and POD2 in the TP group was significantly longer than that in the GA group; the completion rate at POD1 in the TP group was higher than that in the GA group. The pain scores and oxycodone consumption at POD1 in the TP group were lower than the GA group. The sleep quality in the TP group was higher than the GA group.

Conclusions

TPVB can significantly improve postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical lung cancer surgery, which is helpful for promoting the early recovery of patients.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900026213. Registered 26 Sept. 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43733.

Incorporation of the Transverse Thoracic Plane Block Into a Multimodal Early Extubation Protocol for Cardiac Surgical Patients

Background

The aim for early extubation remains an important goal in cardiac surgical patients. Therefore, employment of a multimodal approach to pain management that includes a transverse thoracic plane block was retrospectively examined at a single-center tertiary care hospital on the effects of time to extubation, opioid consumption, and length of stay in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.

Methods

Blocks were performed on all cardiac surgical patients except for those undergoing left ventricular assist device placement, thoracic transplant, emergent surgery, or redo sternotomy. Following additional exclusions for intra- and postoperative complications unrelated to anesthesia, final analysis was conducted on 75 patients per group. Multimodal pain management included intravenous analgesics and transverse thoracic plane block where patients received 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine + epinephrine bilaterally under ultrasound guidance prior to incision.

Results

Following transverse thoracic plane block and multimodal analgesics, 50.6% of patients were extubated in the operation room versus 8.6% in the control group. Intraoperative opioids were decreased, and intensive care unit and total length of stay were reduced by 5 hours and 1 day, respectively, in block patients as compared with controls. Postoperative opioids were not significantly different. There were no reported complications directly attributed to the block.

Conclusions

The transverse thoracic plane block and multimodal regimen for patients undergoing median sternotomy resulted in a significant number of patients extubated in the operation room without an increase in postoperative re-intubations. Moreover, the block appears to be a quick and safe procedure to utilize on cardiac surgery patients.

The analgesic efficacy of paravertebral block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

INTRODUCTION

The analgesic efficacy of paravertebral block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the analgesic efficacy of paravertebral block for patients with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

METHODS

We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing analgesic efficacy of paravertebral block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy are included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Five RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group after percutaneous nephrolithotomy, paravertebral block is associated with the decrease in analgesic consumption (standard mean difference (Std. MD) = -1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.18 to -0.92; P < .00001) and additional analgesics (risk ratio (RR) = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.44; P = .0003), prolonged time to first analgesic requirement (Std. MD = 1.51; 95% CI = 0.26 to 2.76; P = .02). There is no statistical difference of adverse events including nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.11 to 2.35; P = .38), or itching (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.26 to 1.81; P = .45) between 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Paravertebral block is effective for pain control after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.