Efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency as a method of dorsal root ganglia stimulation for treatment of non-neuropathic pain: a systematic review

Transforaminal Steroid Injection After Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency (DRG-PRF): Impact on Pain Intensity and Disability

INTRODUCTION

Dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (DRG-PRF) is frequently used for the treatment of chronic lumbar radicular pain with good outcomes in terms of pain management. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is often administered immediately after DRG-PRF to increase the anti-inflammatory effects, but support for the synergic mechanism is lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of TFESI immediately after DRG-PRF and its possible role on pain intensity and patient disability.

METHODS

A database of patients who underwent DRG-PRF with or without TFESI immediately after DRG-PRF was retrospectively analysed; propensity score matching was applied to the analysis to reduce possible bias. Pain intensity (numerical rating scale [NRS]) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded pre-operatively and at the 1- and 3-month follow-up in the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were included in this retrospective analysis, 126 patients in the DRG-PRF + TFESI group and 126 patients in the DRG-PRF group after propensity score matching. Both groups displayed a significant reduction in pain intensity (NRS score reduction; p < 0.0001) and improvement in the ODI (p < 0.0001) from baseline at the 3-month follow-up. Interestingly, the use of TFESI after DRG-PRF was not associated with any clinical benefit as no difference in NRS and ODI was found between the two groups at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed a significant pain reduction and disability improvement after DRG-PRF in patients with lumbar radicular pain. Interestingly, no positive role of TFESI immediately after DRG-PRF was observed. These findings suggest that DRG-PRF provides substantial pain relief, and no added benefit is obtained with subsequent steroid injection. Future prospective studies with expanded follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

A Comparison Between the Efficacy of Trigeminal Ganglion Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Ultrasound-Guided Maxillary-Mandibular Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and objective Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating disorder characterized by acute episodic attacks of pain that significantly impair patients' quality of life and overall functioning. Initial therapeutic strategies to treat this condition include pharmacological options, particularly carbamazepine. In cases with resistance to dose escalation and polypharmacy, interventional procedures may be warranted. The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of trigeminal ganglion (TG) radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) and ultrasound (US)-guided maxillary/mandibular (max/mand) nerve pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for treating TN, based on the findings at six months post-treatment. The secondary aims were to assess the impact of these interventions on drug consumption and interventional safety based on adverse events. Methods This prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted at a single pain clinic. Forty-four patients were randomized into two groups. Group RFT received TG RFT at 60 °C, 65 °C, and 70 °C for 60 seconds each, whereas Group PRF received max/mand PRF for 240 seconds. Pain relief was assessed by using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and intervention effectiveness on medication consumption was evaluated by using the Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS III). The rates of intervention-related adverse events were also compared. Results Both RFT and PRF significantly alleviated pain at one and six months post-treatment compared to baseline (p<0.05). No statistical differences were found in the NRS and MQS III scores between the groups. At six months, 77.3% of RFT patients and 63.9% of PRF patients experienced at least 50% pain relief, with no statistically significant difference. Hypoesthesia occurred in two RFT patients, and masseter weakness was observed in one patient, while no adverse events were reported in the PRF group. Conclusions TG RFT and max/mand PRF are effective treatments for TN. US-guided max/mand PRF, which avoids RFT-associated complications and radiation exposure, may be the superior and preferable option. In this study, the potential space between the coronoid process and maxilla was used to access the maxillary nerve during the maxillary block and PRF procedures, in contrast to the classical approach through the mandibular notch. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to gain deeper insights into the topic.

Dorsal root ganglion-pulsed neuromodulation radiofrequency treatment has significant clinical efficacy in chronic spinal-origin pain, bringing noticeable improvement in symptoms and sleep quality for patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic spinal-origin pain poses a substantial clinical challenge, prompting the investigation of novel treatment modalities. This study aims to evaluate the potential application of spinal nerve dorsal root ganglion (DRG) radiofrequency treatment in addressing chronic spinal-origin pain.

METHODS

The study encompassed patients undergoing treatment for chronic spinal-origin pain, with a particular focus on those experiencing pain localized in specific regions. Inclusion criteria comprised patients with conditions such as a herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis leading to compression of descending or exiting nerve roots, accompanied by reported radicular pain in the lower limb.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in comparability between the two groups (p > 0.05). The clinical effective rate in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05). The VAS scores of the study group at 2 weeks and 1 month after treatment were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). The PSQI index of the study group after treatment was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Spinal nerve DRG radiofrequency treatment has significant clinical efficacy in chronic spinal-origin pain, bringing noticeable improvement in symptoms and sleep quality for patients. The occurrence of complications is relatively low, and it can be reduced through strict operational standards and preoperative and postoperative management. However, caution should be exercised in its widespread application, but it is worthy of broad clinical use.

METTL3 suppresses neuropathic pain via modulating N6-methyladenosine-dependent primary miR-150 processing

Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3)-modulated N6-methyladenosine (m6A) was recently identified as an important epigenetic regulation type during RNA processing and contributes to multiple pathological processes. Neuropathic pain (NP) is induced by a lesion of the somatosensory nervous system, and the detailed pathways by which METTL3/m6A regulated to modulate gene dysregulation and enable NP have remained unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the function of METTL3-mediated m6A methylation on miRNA maturation, and investigated how this regulation contributes to NP progression. A rat model characterized with typical NP was established by a spared nerve-injury (SNI) method. By analyzing the expression levels of METTL3 and m6A methylation, we found that METTL3, along with m6A methylation, was dramatically downregulated in NP rats in contrast to the sham ones. Functionally, enhanced METTL3 promoted the m6A methylation in total RNAs and inhibited NP progression, whereas silencing METTL3 suppressed m6A methylation and increased NP severity. Mechanistically, METTL3 accelerated miR-150 maturation via mediating m6A methylation of primiR-150 at locus 498, cooperating with the “m6A reader” YTHDF2. Meanwhile, miR-150 could directly target brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mRNA, and the METTL3/miR-150/BDNF regulatory pathway was finally established. Clinically, we proved that serum METTL3 mRNA was also downregulated in Shingles patients with NP, suggesting its diagnostic potential. In conclusion, we demonstrated an essential function of METTL3-regulated N6-methyladenosine during NP progression via modulating primiR-150 maturation. Serum METTL3 could effectively differentiate NP patients from healthy people, and is useful for dynamic monitoring of diseases after treatment. Therefore, the METTL3/miR-150/BDNF pathway may be a promising therapeutic target for NP patients.

Adjacent segment syndrome after failed back surgery: biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment

The adjacent segment syndrome is defined as the changes in the adjacent structures of an operated spinal level that produce symptoms of pain and disability, which worsen the quality of life of a patient. Pain management specialists must be aware of these biomechanical changes brought by spinal surgeries, as well as of the symptoms associated with pain after surgery, to reach an appropriate diagnosis and provide an adequate treatment. Specialized pain literature contains few reports on specific management of patients using the terms "adjacent segment syndrome, degeneration or disease"; most of the literature comes from surgical journals. It is necessary to perform studies with a population sample comprising patients with adjacent segment syndrome after spinal surgery, since almost all treatments applied in this group are extrapolated from those used in patients with pain originating in the same area but who have not previously undergon spine surgery. Therefore, we consider necessary for pain physicians to understand the underlying biomechanics, promote the diagnosis of this condition, and analyze possible treatments in patients with adjacent segment disease to alleviate their pain and improve their quality of life.

Long Non-coding RNA LINC01119 Promotes Neuropathic Pain by Stabilizing BDNF Transcript

Neuropathic pain (NP) is caused by primary injury or dysfunction of the peripheral and the central nervous system. Long non-coding RNAs were critical regulators involved in nervous system diseases, however, the precise regulatory mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to uncover the essential role of LINC01119 in NP progression and further clarify the underlying regulatory mechanism at post-transcriptional level. LINC01119 was significantly upregulated in rats of spare nerve injury (SNI) group compared to sham group. Functionally, silencing of LINC01119 significantly alleviated the neuropathic pain-induced hypersensitivity and reduced the increase in IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α caused by SNI. Mechanistically, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was identified as the functional target of LINC01119. Besides, an RNA binding protein, ELAVL1 could directly interact with LINC01119, and this formed LINC01119- ELAVL1 complex binds to BDNF mRNA, strengthening its RNA stability and increasing the expression level of BDNF at both transcript and protein levels. Clinically, serum LINC01119 was verified as a promising diagnostic biomarker for NP patients. LINC01119 induces NP progression via binding with ELAVL1 and increasing BDNF mRNA stability and expression level. Therefore, LINC01119 may serve as a promising diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for NP treatment.