Retrospective study of quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Effects of anterior quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effectiveness of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB3) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), both of which have been documented to provide relief during abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This prospective observational study, conducted between February and July 2023, included 96 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients were divided into three groups: QLB3, ESPB, and control (no block) and received the corresponding nerve block in the preanesthetic room for regional block. Cumulative morphine consumption during the initial 24 h after PCNL, numerical rating scale resting/movement scores, intraoperative remifentanil usage, rescue analgesic requirements, time when the first analgesic was requested, and postoperative nausea and vomiting scores were documented and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Total median morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was similar in the QLB3 and ESPB groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, 7 mg [(Q1-Q3) 7-8.5]; ESPB, 8 mg [6.5-9]; control, 12.5 [10-17]; P < 0.001). Similarly, median intraoperative remifentanil consumption did not differ between the block groups but was higher in the control group (QLB3, 1082 µg [IQR 805.5-1292.7]; ESPB, 1278 µg [940.2-1297.5]; control, 1561 µg [1315-2068]; P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving rescue analgesic medication was similar in the block groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, n = 9 [30%]; ESPB, n = 14 [46.7%]; control, n = 21 [70%]; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

QLB3 and ESPB were adequate and comparable in providing postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after PCNL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05822492).

Is quadratus lumborum block combined with low dose-spinal anesthesia an effective alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia in high-risk patients has many complications and needs long preoperative preparations and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combined low-dose spinal anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at the urology department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals in Cairo, Egypt, from January 2021 to January 2022. The study included 60 patients of ASA ll-lll scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All patients received low-dose spinal anesthesia (5 mg bupivacaine) and QLB (QL1-QL2-QL3) approaches. The primary observation parameter was the efficacy of this technique as an alternative to general anesthesia. The secondary parameters measured were evaluation of need for intraoperative narcotics, postoperative pain score (VAS), and patients satisfaction as assessed using a 5-point Likert Scale.

RESULTS

None of the patients was given general anesthesia, and intraoperative sedation was given to nineteen patients (32.2%). No hemodynamic changes were observed in all patients. There was a significant correlation between the use of intraoperative sedation and stone site, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay. Pain intensity on VAS at rest and movement was low until the 24th postoperative hour. Patient satisfaction score was 3, 4, and 5 in 1 (1.7%), 4 (6.7%), and 55 (91.6%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined low-dose spinal anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block is an effective alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing PCNL procedures with good postoperative analgesia. Patients with lower calyceal punctures have a lower incidence of intraoperative sedation requirements.

Perioperative Analgesic Efficiency of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Epidural Analgesia in Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy

Background and Aim: Multimodal analgesia is currently used for perioperative pain management after Radical cystectomy (RC). This study aimed to compare quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and thoracic epidural block (TEA) in patients subjected to RC. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study included 34 patients with bladder cancer subjected to RC under general anesthesia, divided into two groups. The Quadratus Group (n=17) underwent bilateral ultrasound-guided continuous QLB, and the Epidural Group (n=17) underwent continuous TEA. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by VAS score, and the secondary outcomes were total morphine consumption during the first 48 hours after surgery, postoperative nausea score, and patient satisfaction. Results: There were no differences between the two groups in postoperative VAS scores starting immediately after surgery up to 48 hours. Reduction of VAS score after QLB was delayed compared to that after TEA. The two groups had a comparable number of patients requesting rescue analgesia (p = 0.271) and total postoperative morphine consumption (p = 0.976) in the remaining patients. The nausea score was significantly lower in the Quadratus Group than in the Epidural Group (p = 0.020). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the satisfaction score (p=0.612). Few mild complications were detected in the two studied groups. Conclusion: QLB and TEA are safe and effective in managing postoperative pain after radical cystectomy with similar analgesic profiles. QLB was more effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Infrainguinal Fascia Iliaca Nerve Block for Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Replacement: A Double-blinded, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block has been described as an effective option for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hip replacement with single injection described as providing analgesia for up to 24 h. We hypothesize that a TQL block, when compared to fascia iliaca block (FIB), will provide better analgesia and less motor block in the initial 24-h postoperative period.

Patients and Methods

Fifty patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery, ASA I–III, were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in group A received spinal anesthesia followed by FIB. Patients in group B received spinal anesthesia followed by TQLB. Postoperative pain scores and motor block were assessed at 6 and 24 hours. The primary outcome measure was 24 h total morphine consumption. Secondary outcome measures included pain score (VNS) and motor block (modified Bromage scale) at 6 and 24 h postoperatively.

Results

There was no statistical difference in morphine consumption between the two groups (p-value 0.699). There was no difference in pain scores at 6 h (p-value 0.540) or 24 h (p-value 0.383). There was no difference in motor block at 6 h (p-value 0.497) or at 24 h (p-value 0.773).

Conclusion

Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block along with spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery does not reduce opioid consumption or motor weakness when compared to fascia iliaca block. The results and conclusion apply to a dose of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine used in each group.

The Effect of Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Background

This study aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Methodology

A total of 40 patients aged between 18 and 60 who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-II and scheduled for unilateral PCNL were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in Group QLB (n = 20) received a single-shot QLB with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine in the preoperative period. No intervention was performed in the control group (Group C, n = 20). Dermatomes affected by the block procedure were evaluated in the preoperative period in the group of patients who were administered the block procedure. General anesthesia was administered to all patients in both groups. In the postoperative period, opioid consumption, pain scores, side effects related to opioid consumption, and additional analgesic requirements were recorded.

Results

Opioid consumption was significantly lower in Group QLB compared to Group C at all times (p < 0.05). Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores during the movement were significantly lower in Group QLB compared to Group C at all times (p < 0.05). VAS scores at rest were reported to be significantly lower in Group QLB compared to Group C, except for the eighth and twelfth hours (p < 0.05). The requirement for additional analgesic agents was significantly lower in Group QLB compared to Group C (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

QLB reduced postoperative opioid consumption and VAS scores by providing more effective analgesia compared to the control group in patients who underwent PCNL.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in patients receiving percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anaesthesia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the overall efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block combined with general anaesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

The study included 76 patients who underwent PCNL at our hospital between October 2018 and October 2019. The patients were randomly divided into the study group (ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block combined with general anaesthesia, 38 cases) and the control group (general anaesthesia, 38 cases). The intra-operative estimated blood loss, operative time and intra-operative anaesthetic usage were recorded. Moreover, the effective pressing times of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) and the dosage of sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) were observed within 48 hours after operation.

RESULTS

The dosage of propofol and remifentanil, the time of intestinal exhaust recovery time and the hospital study in the study group were lower than those in the control group. The HR and MAP of the two groups, with a trend towards gradual decrease at T0 and T1, were lower than those at T0. At 2, 6, 8 and 24 hours after operation, the visual analogue scale/score (VAS) of the study group was lower than that of the control group. The analgesic rescue rate, the dosage of sufentanil and the effective PCA compression times in the study group were lower than those in the control group. The total incidence of adverse reactions in postanaesthesia care unit in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (8/38 vs 18/38).

CONCLUSION

The combination of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block and general anaesthesia effectively exerts beneficial outcomes in terms of validly reducing the dose of tranquilisers and anaesthetic analgesics during PCNL, which is able to treat patients with anaesthetic mode of low opioids.