Differential rates of intravascular uptake and pain perception during lumbosacral epidural injection among adults using a 22-gauge needle versus 25-gauge needle: a randomized clinical trial

Lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate vs. nonparticulate steroid: an evidence-informed review on shifting gear to a personalized medicine paradigm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an evidence-informed review weighing the pros and cons of particulate vs. nonparticulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI).

RECENT FINDINGS

The relative use of nonparticulate vs. particulate steroids for lumbar TFESI has risen recently in light of catastrophic consequences reported for the latter during cervical TFESI. Among various causes of spinal cord infarct, an exceedingly rare event in the lower lumbar spine, embolization of particulate steroid is among the least likely. Case reports have documented cases of spinal cord infarct during lower lumbar TFESI with both particulate and nonparticulate steroids, with database reviews finding no difference in complication rates. There is some evidence for superiority of particulate over nonparticulate steroids in well-designed studies, which could lead to increase steroid exposure (i.e. more injections) and treatment failure resulting in surgical and/or opioid management when nonparticulate steroids are utilized.

SUMMARY

Similar to a paradigm shift in medicine, a personalized approach based on a shared decision model and the consequences of treatment failure, should be utilized in deciding which steroid to utilize. Alternatives to ESI include high-volume injections with nonsteroid solutions, and the use of hypertonic saline, which possesses anti-inflammatory properties and has been shown to be superior to isotonic saline in preliminary clinical studies.

A review of epidural and non-epidural contrast flow patterns during fluoroscopic and CT-guided epidural steroid injections

Epidural steroid injections are commonly performed using fluoroscopic or CT guidance. With both modalities, the injection of contrast material is necessary before steroid administration to ensure adequate epidural flow and exclude non-epidural flow. While fluoroscopic guidance is conventional, CT is utilized at some centers and can be particularly helpful in the setting of challenging or postoperative anatomy. It is important for proceduralists to be adept at evaluating contrast media flow patterns under both modalities. The goal of this review article is to describe and provide examples of epidural and non-epidural flow patterns on both conventional fluoroscopy and CT. Specific non-epidural patterns discussed include intrathecal flow, intradural/subdural flow, vascular uptake, flow into the retrodural space of Okada, inadvertent facet joint flow, and intradiscal flow.