Bisoprolol transdermal patch for perioperative care of non-cardiac surgery in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Managing postoperative atrial fibrillation after open-heart surgery using transdermal β1 blockers

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after open-heart surgery is a non-negligible complication. We aimed to describe the efficacy of a transdermal patch of bisoprolol for managing POAF and flutter in thoracic surgical procedures.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 384 patients who underwent open-heart surgery at our hospital and received oral bisoprolol to prevent POAF. Among them, 65 patients (16.9%) also received a 4-mg transdermal patch of bisoprolol to control the heart rate due to POAF. We applied the bisoprolol transdermal patch when the heart rate was > 80 bpm and removed it at ≤ 60 bpm; an additional patch was applied when the heart rate was > 140 bpm. Heparin calcium injections were administered twice daily for anticoagulation between 2 and 6 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average number of prescriptions for transdermal patches of bisoprolol during hospitalization was 1.8 ± 1.1 (1-5). The median first prescription date was on postoperative day 2 (range: days 0-37). Sinus rhythm recovered within 24 h in 18 patients (27.7%). Eight patients (12.3%) were switched to continuous landiolol infusion because of persistent tachycardia. In three patients, the transdermal patch was removed owing to severe bradycardia. Fifteen patients experienced persistent atrial fibrillation and were treated with electrical cardioversion during hospitalization. We did not observe any serious complications that could be directly attributed to bisoprolol transdermal patch use.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-use bisoprolol transdermal patch may help control the heart rate during the initial treatment of POAF after open-heart surgery.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an up-to-date snapshot of the clinical drug development pipeline

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex cardiac disease with highly variable phenotypic expression and clinical course most often caused by sarcomeric gene mutations resulting in left ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis, hypercontractility, and diastolic dysfunction. For almost 60 years, HCM has remained an orphan disease and still lacks a disease-specific treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes recent preclinical and clinical trials with repurposed drugs and new emerging pharmacological and gene-based therapies for the treatment of HCM.

EXPERT OPINION

The off-label drugs routinely used alleviate symptoms but do not target the core pathophysiology of HCM or prevent or revert the phenotype. Recent advances in the genetics and pathophysiology of HCM led to the development of cardiac myosin adenosine triphosphatase inhibitors specifically directed to counteract the hypercontractility associated with HCM-causing mutations. Mavacamten, the first drug specifically developed for HCM successfully tested in a phase 3 trial, represents the major advance for the treatment of HCM. This opens new horizons for the development of novel drugs targeting HCM molecular substrates which hopefully modify the natural history of the disease. The role of current drugs in development and genetic-based approaches for the treatment of HCM are also discussed.

By discontinuing beta-blockers before an exercise test we may precipitate a rebound phenomenon

BACKGROUND

There is a need to analyse the current approach to beta-blocker (BB) use in relation to exercise-based stress tests.

OBJECTIVE

We compared various guidelines regarding recommending abrupt vs gradual discontinuation of BB prior to exercise tests. We also analyse the shortcomings of the currently recommended approach and suggest a new approach to avoid BB rebound.

METHODS

A narrative review is used to analyse this topic due to lack of valid randomized clinical trials.

RESULTS

Omitting the BB therapy prior to exercise-based test has been recommended in guidelines for many years. Although reasonable, this approach has potential disadvantages since sudden BB withdrawal may induce a rebound phenomenon, which is, also, acknowledged in several guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed inconsistency among relevant guidelines; there is no homogenous approach regarding BB use before exercise tests. Most guidelines recommend BB withdrawal for a couple of days before the test; they do not advise BB dose tapering. This approach is not standardised and raises the risk of BB rebound phenomenon both before and during the test. Therefore, we suggest using the half the prescribed BB dose at the usual time of administration (in the morning, prior to the exercise test).