Transitioning to Del Nido cardioplegia for all-comers: the next switching gear?

Efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac procedures with prolonged aortic crossclamp time

OBJECTIVE

Equivalent myocardial protection and clinical outcomes have been shown with the use of del Nido cardioplegia (DC) compared with blood cardioplegia (BC) in adult isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and valve patients. However, its safety and efficacy in cardiac procedures with aortic crossclamp times >90 minutes is still unknown.

METHODS

From May 2014 to September 2019, 2506 adult patients at our center underwent cardiac surgery requiring prolonged aortic crossclamp time defined as 90 minutes or longer. Myocardial protection was achieved with BC in 1955 patients and DC in 551 patients. Two surgeons used DC exclusively and 5 used blood exclusively over the study period. BC was delivered anterograde and retrograde whereas DC was delivered anterograde only. Propensity score matching of several preoperative characteristics, including primary cardiac pathology, yielded 526 well matched pairs. Emergency and reoperative cases were included. Troponin T levels were drawn at 12 hours postoperative in all patients. Clinical data were extracted from our local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of crossclamp time stratification.

RESULTS

For the propensity score-matched cohort, the median crossclamp time was longer in the BC compared with the DC group (114 [interquartile range (IQR), 100-145] minutes for DC vs 153 [IQR, 122-200] minutes for BC; P < .0001) whereas intraoperative peak glucose was higher with BC (173 [IQR, 147-200] g/dL for DC vs 197 [IQR, 171-228] g/dL for BC; P < .001). In addition, perioperative mortality (3.4% vs 3.0%; P = .7273), stroke (3.2% vs 2.1%; P = .2504), renal failure (6.5% vs 4.6%; P = .1767), atrial fibrillation (34% vs 31.4%, P = .3575), intra-aortic balloon pump use (5.3% vs 4.6%, P = .5694), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use (3.0% vs 2.9%, P = .8596) did not differ between DC and BC. Postoperative troponin T levels were 0.53 (IQR, 0.30-0.96) ng/mL and 0.62 (IQR, 0.38-1.07) ng/mL for DC and BC, respectively (P = .0024). Subgroup analysis revealed higher troponin T levels with DC for crossclamp times between 150 and 180 minutes. Survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 93.3%, 91.1%, and 78.7% for DC and 94.5%, 91.8%, and 81.5% for BC, respectively (P = .5140).

CONCLUSIONS

In adult cardiac surgical procedures with aortic crossclamp times >90 minutes, comparable myocardial protection, perioperative mortality and morbidity, and distant survival were observed with the use of DC compared with BC. Higher troponin levels were seen in DC patients with crossclamp times between 150 and 180 minutes, but this was not associated with increased mortality.

Novel Strategies to Improve the Cardioprotective Effects of Cardioplegia

The use of cardioprotective strategies as adjuvants of cardioplegic solutions has become an ideal alternative for the improvement of post-surgery heart recovery. The choice of the optimal cardioplegia, as well as its distribution mechanism, remains controversial in the field of cardiovascular surgery. There is still a need to search for new and better cardioprotective methods during cardioplegic procedures. New techniques for the management of cardiovascular complications during cardioplegia have evolved with new alternatives and additives, and each new strategy provides a tool to neutralize the damage after ischemia/reperfusion events. Researchers and clinicians have committed themselves to studying the effect of new strategies and adjuvant components with the potential to improve the cardioprotective effect of cardioplegic solutions in preventing myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury during cardiac surgery. The aim of this review is to explore the different types of cardioplegia, their protection mechanisms, and which strategies have been proposed to enhance the function of these solutions in hearts exposed to cardiovascular pathologies that require surgical alternatives for their corrective progression.

Clinical impact of del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: A prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to assess the benefits of del Nido cardioplegia compared with cold blood cardioplegia solution in terms of myocardial protection during adult cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A total of 474 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, heart valve surgery, thoracic aortic surgery, or combined procedures were randomized to the del Nido cardioplegia group (n = 234) or the cold blood cardioplegia solution group (n = 240) after provided informed consent. The primary end points assessed inotropic support requirements, severe cardiovascular events, and troponin trend within the first 48 hours of intensive care unit stay. Reperfusion arrhythmias, aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, and other clinical perioperative variables were considered as secondary end points.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found regarding postoperative inotropic support requirements or the incidence of severe cardiovascular events. The del Nido cardioplegia group showed a higher return to spontaneous sinus rhythm (P< .001), a lower number of defibrillation attempts (P< .001), and an earlier peak troponin value in the postoperative period. Peak blood glucose levels and intravenous insulin requirements were significantly lower in the del Nido cardioplegia group. We found no significant differences regarding aortic crossclamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time. We did observe a lower incidence of postoperative stroke in the del Nido cardioplegia group (2.6% vs 6.7%; P= .035).

CONCLUSIONS

del Nido cardioplegia can be used safely and with comparable outcomes compared with traditional cardioplegia solutions. Additional advantages over glycemic control, reperfusion arrhythmias, and its comfortable redosing interval make del Nido an interesting alternative for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery. A significant decrease in postoperative stroke will require further research to shed light on the results of this study. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Re-Dosing del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: Perfusion characteristics and outcomes--Is there an optimal redosing strategy?

OBJECTIVES

del Nido cardioplegia is utilized for myocardial protection in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery; however, no standardized re-dosing protocol exists. We describe perfusion characteristics and clinical outcomes in adult cardiac surgery patients who were re-dosed with del Nido cardioplegia.

METHODS

Chart review was performed for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery (specific inclusion/exclusion criteria below) who received exactly two doses of del Nido cardioplegia from 2012 to 2019; n = 542 patients. The main outcome was a composite endpoint comprised of operative mortality, myocardial infarction, post-operative cardiac support device (CSD), and postoperative decrease in ejection fraction (EF), which was analyzed via multivariable logistic regression (MVLR). A secondary analysis evaluated postoperative vasoactive-inotropic scores (VIS) via gamma log link regression (GLLR) as a more physiologic indication of myocardial recovery.

RESULTS

MVLR demonstrated that increased total cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was associated with a positive composite outcome (p < .001), whereas time between doses (p = .237) and the volume of each dose was not (p = .626). GLLR also demonstrated that prolonged CBP, decreased EF, congestive heart failure at time of surgery, and low hematocrit at the start of the surgery were all associated with higher VIS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, variations in re-dosing strategy for del Nido cardioplegia do not affect postoperative outcomes and increased CPB time is associated with increased operative mortality, myocardial infarction, need for post-operative CSDs, and reduced postoperative EF, and increased VIS, irrespective of the re-dosing strategy. Further studies are warranted to to identify additional patient and operative characteristics that predispose to complications.

Del Nido cardioplegia for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and update meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although the application of del Nido cardioplegia solution (DNC) in adult cardiac surgery is accumulating, the feasibility and safety of this myocardial protection strategy in adults remains controversial. We aimed to update our previous meta-analysis to determine the myocardial protective effect of DNC versus conventional cardioplegia (CC) in adult cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases through November 2020.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven observational studies and four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 21,779 patients were identified. The DNC group was associated with decreased postoperative cardiac enzymes [troponin T (cTnT) and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB)] [standardized mean differences (SMD): -0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.99 to -0.19, p = 0.004], cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (MD: -9.31, 95% CI: -13.10 to -5.51, p < 0.00001), aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time (MD: -7.20, 95% CI: -10.31 to -4.09, p < 0.00001), and cardioplegia volume (SMD: -1.95, 95% CI: -2.46 to -1.44, p < 0.00001). Intraoperative defibrillation requirement was less in the DNC group [relative risk (RR): 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.75, p = 0.0007]. The pooled analysis revealed no significant difference in operative mortality among the patients assigned to DNC and those undergoing CC.

CONCLUSION

In adult cardiac surgery, compared to CC, myocardial protection used with DNC yield similar or better short-term clinical outcomes. More high-quality trials and RCTs reflecting long-term follow-up morbidity and mortality are required in the future to confirm these findings.

Del Nido Cardioplegia in Ascending Aortic Surgery

Del Nido cardioplegia offers equivalent myocardial protection and clinical outcomes to blood cardioplegia in adult isolated CABG and valve patients, but the safety and efficacy of del Nido in complex cases with prolonged aortic cross-clamp times is still unknown. 443 patients at our center underwent replacement of the ascending aorta using either del Nido (n = 182) or blood (n = 261) cardioplegia. Two surgeons used del Nido exclusively and 6 used blood exclusively over the study period. Propensity matching of preoperative characteristics yielded 172 well matched pairs. Emergency and reoperative cases were included. Clinical data were extracted from our local database. Troponin levels were drawn at 12 hours postop in all patients. Rates of perioperative mortality (4.7% vs 5.2%), stroke (5.8% vs 7.0%), renal failure (11.6% vs 12.2%), atrial fibrillation (36.0% vs 31.4%), intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (2.3% vs1.2%), and extra corporeal membrane oxygenation use (4.7% vs 4.1%) did not differ between blood and del Nido groups. Postop Troponin T levels were 0.50[0.35, 0.86] ng/mL and 0.40[0.20, 0.70] ng/mL for blood and del Nido, respectively (P < 0.0001). Postop echocardiography was available in 333 of 344 (96.8%) patients, and there was no difference in change in EF from pre- to postop between blood 0.0[-6.0, 5.0]% and del Nido 0.0 [-6.0, 3.5]% (P = 0.201). Subgroup analysis of patients with aortic cross-clamp time greater than 180 minutes (blood = 77, del Nido = 27) revealed no difference in troponins, ejection fraction, or clinical outcomes. Five-year survival was 85.9[76.8, 91.7]% and 79.8[71.2, 86.1]% for blood and del Nido, respectively (P = 0.151). In ascending aortic surgery with prolonged operative times, no differences were observed in myocardial protection or clinical outcomes with the use of del Nido cardioplegia compared to blood cardioplegia.

Del Nido versus warm blood cardioplegia in adult patients with a low ejection fraction

Background

Del Nido cardioplegia was recently introduced to adult cardiac surgery with encouraging results. The effect of Del Nido cardioplegia in patients with low ejection fraction (EF) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of Del Nido cardioplegia in adult patients with low EF compared to intermittent warm blood cardioplegia.

Results

During 2018 and 2019, 73 adult patients with an EF of ≤ 40% underwent cardiac surgery using Del Nido cardioplegia. The patients were compared to a historical cohort of consecutive patients with low EF who had intermitted warm blood cardioplegia (n = 81). Patients who had Del Nido cardioplegia had significantly lower EuroSCORE II (2.73 (1.7–4.1) vs. 4.5 (2.4–7.4), P = 0.004). There were no differences in creatinine clearance and preoperative echocardiographic data between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were non-significantly lower with Del Nido cardioplegia. There were no differences in stroke and postoperative echocardiographic data between the groups. No hospital mortality was reported in both groups. Peak troponin levels were significantly higher in patients who had Del Nido cardioplegia (0.88 (0.58–1.47) vs. 0.7 (0.44–1.01) ng/dL; P = 0.01); however, after multivariable regression analysis, cardiopulmonary bypass time was the only predictor of postoperative troponin level (coefficient 0.005 (95% CI: 0.003–0.008); P < 0.001). ICU stay was significantly longer in patients who had Del Nido cardioplegia (4 (3–6) vs. 2(1–4) days, P < 0.001), while postoperative hospital stay did not differ between the groups. After multivariable regression, the use of intermittent warm blood cardioplegia was significantly associated with shorter ICU stay (coefficient − 1.80 (95% CI − 3.06 – -0.55); P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Prolonged ICU was reported with Del Nido cardioplegia; however, there were no differences in the duration of hospital stay and the clinical outcomes between the groups. Despite the proven efficacy of intermittent warm blood cardioplegia, the use of Del Nido cardioplegia might be safe in patients with low EF.

Effect of del nido cardioplegia use on kidney injury after coronary bypass operations

OBJECTIVE

After cardiac surgery, acute kidney injury is observed at a rate of 5-30%, and the second most common cause of acute kidney injury in intensive care units is cardiac surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of del Nido cardioplegia solution use on postoperative acute kidney injury development in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting operation with cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent an elective coronary artery bypass grafting operation with cardiopulmonary bypass in our clinic between March 15, 2019, and March 15, 2020, were included in the study retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as those who received del Nido cardioplegia solution (Group 1) and blood cardioplegia (Group 2), and factors affecting the development of renal failure were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 350 consecutive patients were included in the study. There were 156 patients in the del Nido cardioplegia group and 194 patients in the blood cardioplegia group. Among the patient group, 74 (21.1%) patients developed acute kidney injury. The total acute kidney injury development rate was significantly higher in Group 2 (p=0.018). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, advanced age (OR 1.128; 95%CI 1.044-1.217; p=0.042), increased blood product use (OR 1.318; 95%CI 1.154-1.998; p=0.019), preoperative creatinine elevation (OR 2.434; 95%CI 1.655-4.639; p=0.005), and increased cardioplegia volume (OR 1.254; 95%CI 1.109-2.980; p=0.009) were independent predictors of acute kidney injury.

CONCLUSION

With this study, we showed that the use of del Nido cardioplegia solution can reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury.

Comparison of del Nido Cardioplegia vs blood cardioplegia in adult aortic surgery is the single-dose cardioplegia technique really advantageous?

BACKGROUND

/objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the operative and early postoperative results of the use of del Nido Cardioplegia solution (dNCS) with traditional blood cardioplegia (BC) in adult aortic surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was performed on 118 patients who underwent aortic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) between January 2016 and June 2020. Patients were divided in to two groups according to the type of cardioplegia solution used. Cardiac arrest was achieved in Group 1 (n = 65) with traditional BC and in Group 2 (n = 53) with dNCS. Operative and postoperative outcomes of the patients were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patient demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. dNCS group showed significantly lower aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time (73.3 vs. 87.5 min, P = 0.001), cardioplegia volume (1323.9 ± 368.5 vs. 2773.8 ± 453.8 ml, P< 0.001), defibrillation rate (44.4%vs. 69.2%, P = 0.006), drainage amount (412 ± 73.2 vs. 446.9 ± 95.1 ml, P = 0.026) and inotropic support need (37% vs. 55.3%, P = 0.046). Also dNCS group had significantly lower high sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) levels at 6th (203.5 ± 68.6 vs. 275.7 ± 76.2 ng/L, P< 0.001) and 24th (253.1 ± 101 vs. 293.4 ± 80.1 ng/L, P = 0.017) postoperative hours. And dNCS group showed significantly higher hematocrit levels at 6th (25.1 ± 3.2 vs. 22.5 ± 2.5%, P< 0.001) and 24th (25.8 ± 2.7 vs. 24.6 ± 2.8%, P = 0.024) postoperative hours. Times of intensive care unit stay, durations of intuabation and hospital stay times were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative ejection fraction values (P = 0.714).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional BC, dNCS provided significantly shorter ACC times, reduced the need for intraoperative defibrillation, lowered postoperative hsTnI levels with comparable early clinical outcomes for adult patients undergoing aortic surgery. dNCS is a safe and efficient alternative to the traditional BC solution in adult aortic cardiac surgery.

In search of optimal cardioplegia for minimally invasive valve surgery

Cardioplegic solutions are used in cardiac surgery to achieve controlled cardiac arrest during operations, making surgery safer. Cardioplegia can either be blood or crystalloid based, with perceived pros and cons of each type. Whilst it is known that cardioplegia causes cardiac arrest, there is debate over which cardioplegic solution provides the highest degree of myocardial protection during arrest. Myocardial damage is measured post-operatively by biomarkers such as serum TnT, TnI or CK-MB. It is known that the outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery are comparable to full sternotomy valve operations. Despite there being a wide diversity in use of different cardioplegic solutions across the world, this comprehensive literature review found no superiority of one cardioplegic solution over the other for myocardial protection during minimally invasive valve procedures.

Myocardial Protection in Adult Cardiac Surgery With del Nido Versus Blood Cardioplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery is commonly achieved with either multidose blood cardioplegia or single-dose del Nido crystalloid cardioplegia.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of del Nido cardioplegia versus blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery.

METHOD

All English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar up to March 2020, to identify randomised control trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective analyses (with or without propensity matching) reporting any or all of the primary and secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (AoX) time; cardioplegia volume; need for defibrillation after AoX release; intraoperative glucose; postoperative myocardial enzyme release; postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS); postoperative blood transfusion; duration of mechanical ventilation; and length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (29) studies were included. There was no difference in the primary outcome of mortality between the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.72 [p=0.37]). del Nido cardioplegia was associated with significantly shorter CPB (mean difference [MD], -7.42 minutes; 95% CI, -12.53 to -2.31 [p=0.004]) and AoX times (MD, -6.39 minutes; 95% CI, -10.30 to -2.48 [p=0.001]), and lower cardioplegia volumes. Significantly fewer patients required defibrillation after AoX release in the del Nido group. Intraoperative glucose homeostasis was better preserved in the del Nido group. Postoperative cardiac troponin T release and the number of patients needing transfusions were less in the del Nido group. No differences were seen in postoperative LVEF, or in the incidence of AKI, stroke, AF, and LCOS. Duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of ICU and hospital stay were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this meta-analysis failed to find any mortality benefits with del Nido cardioplegia, significant benefits were seen in a number of intraoperative and postoperative variables. del Nido cardioplegia is a safe and favourable alternative to blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery.

DelNido cardioplegia versus St Thomas cardioplegia solution in double valve replacement: a single centre experience

INTRODUCTION

The role of cardioplegia cannot be underrated in cardiac surgery. St Thomas solution is the most widely used cardioplegic, but needs repeated dosing. Del Nido solution provides long duration of asystole with adequate protection; but has been used mainly in paediatric patients. This study was aimed to compare Del Nido cardioplegia with St Thomas cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgeries, requiring double valve replacement and compare the outcomes.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted over a time period spanning from January 2016 to December 2019. A total of 209 patients were included and were separated in two groups DC group (n = 114) and BC group (n = 95) on the basis of cardioplegic solution used. Del Nido solution was administered as single dose. Parameters noted were CPB time, cross clamp time, wean off bypass time, DC shocks given, inotropic support required, ventilation duration, duration of ICU and hospital stay.

RESULTS

There was significantly shorter aortic cross clamp time (72.6 ± 10.2 vs. 98.2 ± 9.2), CPB time (92.1 ± 12.3 vs.129.5 ± 11) and wean off bypass time (19.4 ± 5.9 vs. 31.3 ± 7.6) and less requirement of DC shocks (21.2% vs. 65.9%) in DC group. Inotropic requirement in immediate post-operative period was significantly less in DC group both on day of surgery (5.35 ± 1.44 vs. 7.52 ± 3.8) and 24 hours later (3.4 ± 2.12 vs. 2.18 ± 0.72). There was no significant difference in duration of ventilation, ICU and hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Del Nido can be used safely in long duration adult cardiac surgeries and in a single dose with better intra operative and immediate post-operative outcomes as compared to St Thomas solution.