Pre-existing cardiovascular disease rather than cardiovascular risk factors drives mortality in COVID-19

Outcomes of Covid-19 among patients with ischemic heart disease: A propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Prior research has linked cardiovascular diseases with higher COVID-19 mortality and worse hospital outcomes, particularly in severe heart failure. Large population-based data regarding the impact of pre-existing ischemic heart disease (IHD) on COVID-19 outcomes is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of COVID-19 infection on IHD hospital mortality and other outcomes.

METHODS

The study included a patient cohort from the 2020 and 2021 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Propensity score matching was used to match the study cohort (COVID-19 with IHD) to controls (COVID-19 without IHD) using a 1:1 matching ratio. The outcomes analyzed were in-hospital mortality, rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), acute myocardial injury (AMI), cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, pulmonary embolism (PE), ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charges.

RESULTS

A total of 2,532,652 patients met the inclusion criteria (1,199,008 females [47.3 %), predominantly Caucasian 1,456,203 (57.5 %); mean [SD] age 63, (5.4), including 29,315 (1.1 %) patients with a history of IHD. Following propensity matching, 4,772 COVID-19 patients with and without IHD were matched. IHD patients had higher rates of AMI (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.75, 95 % CI 3.27-4.31, p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (aOR 2.89, 95 % CI 1.60-5.19, p < 0.001), VT (aOR 3.26, 95 % CI 2.48-4.29, p < 0.001), and VF (aOR 2.23, 95 % CI 1.25-3.99, p < 0.001). The odds ratios of in-hospital mortality, AKI, PE, mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, and resource use were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

A history of IHD does not impact COVID-19 mortality but increases the risk of in-hospital cardiac complications.

The Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Due to COVID-19 Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that produces respiratory symptoms and has serious consequences for people's cardiovascular systems (CVS). It is a severe issue and a major task not only for health care experts but also for governments to contain this pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh member of the human coronavirus family to be implicated in this zoonotic outbreak. COVID-19's CV interactions are comparable to those of SARS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), and influenza. Those who have COVID-19 and underlying cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are at a higher risk of serious illness and mortality, and disease has been linked to several direct and indirect CV consequences. COVID-19 causes CVDs such as arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, myocarditis, stress-cardiomyopathy, and acute myocardial damage (AMD) as a consequence of acute coronary syndrome. The provision of CV care may expose health care professionals to risk as they become hosts or vectors of viral transmission. It binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor, causing constitutional and pulmonary signs in the beginning, and then as the infection advances, it affects other organs such as the gastrointestinal tract, CVS, neurological system, and so on. COVID-19 mortality is increased by underlying CVDs comorbidities.

[Association of cardiovascular disease with hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients]

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between the in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19 and the history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) using data from the Russian registry of patients with COVID-19.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 758 patients with COVID-19 (403 men, 355 women) aged from 18 to 95 years (median, 61 years), successively hospitalized in the COVID hospital of the Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology from April through June 2020. Death predictors were studied using single- and multivariate regression analyses with the SPSS Statistics, Version 23.0 software.

RESULTS

During the stay in the hospital, 59 (7.8 %) patients with COVID-19 died, 677 (89.3 %) were discharged, and 22 (2.9 %) were transferred to other hospitals. The univariate regression analysis showed that the increase in age per decade was associated with a 92% increase in the risk of death [relative risk (RR), 1.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58-2.34; p <0.001], and an increase in the number of CVDs increases the risk of death by 71% (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.42-2.07; p<0.001). The presence of one or more CVDs or specific diseases [atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure (CHF), ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, history of cerebrovascular accidents], as well as diabetes mellitus were associated with a higher risk of fatal outcome during the hospitalization for COVID-19. The presence of any CVD increased the risk of in-hospital death by 3.2 times. However, when the model was adjusted for age and sex, this association lost its strength, and only the presence of CHF was associated with a 3-fold increase in the risk of death (RR, 3.16; 95 % CI, 1.64-6.09; p=0.001). Age was another independent predictor of death (RR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.08; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A history of CVD and the CVD number and severity are associated with a higher risk of death during the hospitalization for COVID-19; the independent predictors of in-hospital death are an age of 80 years and older and CHF.

Outcomes of patients with active cancers and pre-existing cardiovascular diseases infected with SARS-CoV-2

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection on patient with concomitant active cancer and CVD.

METHODS

The researchers extracted and analyzed data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database between January 1, 2020, and July 22, 2022. They included only patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as a positive test by PCR 21 days before and 5 days after the day of index hospitalization. Active cancers were defined as last cancer drug administered within 30 days of index admission. The "Cardioonc" group consisted of patients with CVD and active cancers. The cohort was divided into four groups: (1) CVD (-), (2) CVD ( +), (3) Cardioonc (-), and (4) Cardioonc ( +), where (-) or ( +) denotes acute SARS-CoV-2 infection status. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including acute stroke, acute heart failure, myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality. The researchers analyzed the outcomes by different phases of the pandemic and performed competing-risk analysis for other MACE components and death as a competing event.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 418,306 patients, of which 74%, 10%, 15.7%, and 0.3% had CVD (-), CVD ( +), Cardioonc (-), and Cardioonc ( +), respectively. The Cardioonc ( +) group had the highest MACE events in all four phases of the pandemic. Compared to CVD (-), the Cardioonc ( +) group had an odds ratio of 1.66 for MACE. However, during the Omicron era, there was a statistically significant increased risk for MACE in the Cardioonc ( +) group compared to CVD (-). Competing risk analysis showed that all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the Cardioonc ( +) group and limited other MACE events from occurring. When the researchers identified specific cancer types, patients with colon cancer had higher MACE.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the study found that patients with both CVD and active cancer suffered relatively worse outcomes when they had acute SARS-CoV-2 infection during early and alpha surges in the United States. These findings highlight the need for improved management strategies and further research to better understand the impact of the virus on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Echocardiography and laboratory outcomes of COVID-19 in children with a history of Kawasaki disease: a preliminary observation

Background

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus has been associated with cardiovascular sequelae including multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) in children. Patients with a prior history of Kawasaki disease, may be more susceptible to changes in echocardiographic or laboratory findings after COVID-19. The objective of this study was to investigate the echocardiographic and laboratory findings in children with a prior history of Kawasaki disease after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Materials and methods

In this study, we performed a retrospective chart review of 41 children younger than 18 years old who were diagnosed with COVID-19 from April to August of 2022 and had a prior history KD. We included echocardiography and blood draw data obtained at the last outpatient follow-up at our hospital for KD, and within 4 months of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Echocardiographic data obtained from 82 age-matched and gender matched controls were also included for comparison.

Results

We found that COVID-19 resulted in slightly higher RCA Z-scores within the first month after infection (mean ± SE, 1.20 ± 0.18 vs. 0.83 ± 0.18, p = 0.030), although this increase did not result in coronary artery dilatation, defined as a Z-score of at least 2.5. In addition, we found that degree of RCA dilatation after COVID-19 infection was negatively correlated with the change in monocyte percentage (Pearson's correlation coefficient-0.363, p = 0.020). Moreover, RCA Z-score changes were lower in patients who received at least one dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine when compared those who did not receive any (mean ± SE, -0.23 ± 0.16 vs. 0.39 ± 0.17, p = 0.031).

Conclusion

In this pilot study we found that COVID-19 infection resulted in slightly higher RCA Z-scores in children with a prior history of KD, although not large enough to be classified as coronary aneurysms. While these changes could be the result of measurement imprecision or interobserver variation, further study of the cardiac outcomes of COVID-19 infection in children with a prior history of KD are needed in the future.

Association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease, mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

Background

Pre-existing cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors are common in patients with COVID-19 and there remain concerns for poorer in-hospital outcomes in this cohort. We aimed to analyse the relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular disease, mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in a prospective, multicentre observational study.

Method

This prospective, multicentre observational study included consecutive patients of age ≥18 in their index hospitalisation with laboratory-proven COVID-19 in Australia. Patients with suspected but not laboratory-proven COVID-19 and patients with no available past medical history were excluded. The primary exposure was pre-existing cardiovascular disease, defined as a composite of coronary artery disease, heart failure or cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation or flutter, severe valvular disease, peripheral arterial disease and stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical cardiovascular complications (new onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, high-grade atrioventricular block, sustained ventricular tachycardia, new heart failure or cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, myocarditis or myopericarditis, pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest) and myocardial injury.

Results

1,567 patients (mean age 60.7 (±20.5) years and 837 (53.4%) male) were included. Overall, 398 (25.4%) patients had pre-existing cardiovascular disease, 176 patients (11.2%) died, 75 (5.7%) had clinical cardiovascular complications and 345 (37.8%) had myocardial injury. Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease had significantly increased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 1.76 95% CI: 1.21-2.55, p = 0.003) and myocardial injury (aOR: 3.27, 95% CI: 2.23-4.79, p < 0.001). There was no significant association between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and in-hospital clinical cardiovascular complications (aOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.58-2.09, p = 0.766). On mediation analysis, the indirect effect and Sobel test were significant (p < 0.001), indicating that the relationship between pre-existing cardiovascular disease and in-hospital mortality was partially mediated by myocardial injury. Apart from age, other cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension had no significant impact on mortality, clinical cardiovascular complications or myocardial injury.

Conclusions

Pre-existing cardiovascular disease is associated with significantly higher mortality in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. This relationship may be partly explained by increased risk of myocardial injury among patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease which in turn is a marker associated with higher mortality.

Clinical Outcomes of Anticoagulant Therapy in COVID-19 Patients with Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review

The COVID-19 infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 is a healthcare crisis that has led to unparalleled disruption and has impacted healthcare services, leading to significant morbidity and mortality in the worldwide population. Insufficient data on the management of COVID-19 complications such as hypercoagulability and the controversy about the benefits of anticoagulant therapy are major challenges encountered by clinicians, especially for patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and are still debatable. Therefore, we endeavored to conduct a systematic review to assess the clinical outcomes of prior anticoagulant therapy in patients with COVID-19 having pre-existing CVD. Electronic searches of the PubMed database and EBSCO Information Services were carried out, and all relevant articles were employed. Seven articles with data from 21,989 subjects were included. Despite the promised clinical outcomes of anticoagulant therapy, the results of the current systematic review indicated insignificant improvements in the reduction of mortality rate or ICU admission among patients with COVID-19 having pre-existing CVD. Furthermore, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) were favored over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to better action and less side effects. In conclusion, the findings are controversial as we did not statistically analyze the results. The data showed inconsistent information with no clear effect of anticoagulant use before patient hospitalization or decreasing COVID-19 severity, particularly in those with CVD. Further studies including randomized controlled trials are required to describe the best course as well as optimal dose of anticoagulant use in the treatment of patients with COVID-19, particularly those with comorbidities such as CVD.

Outcomes of Patients with Active Cancers and Pre-Existing Cardiovascular Diseases Infected with SARS-CoV-2

Objective To determine the impact of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection on patient with concomitant active cancer and CVD. Methods The researchers extracted and analyzed data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database between January 1, 2020, and July 22, 2022. They included only patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as a positive test by PCR 21 days before and 5 days after the day of index hospitalization. Active cancers were defined as last cancer drug administered within 30 days of index admission. The "Cardioonc" group consisted of patients with CVD and active cancers. The cohort was divided into four groups: (1) CVD (-), (2) CVD (+), (3) Cardioonc (-), and (4) Cardioonc (+), where (-) or (+) denotes acute SARS-CoV-2 infection status. The primary outcome of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including acute stroke, acute heart failure, myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality. The researchers analyzed the outcomes by different phases of the pandemic and performed competing-risk analysis for other MACE components and death as a competing event. Results The study analyzed 418,306 patients, of which 74%, 10%, 15.7%, and 0.3% had CVD (-), CVD (+), Cardioonc (-), and Cardioonc (+), respectively. The Cardioonc (+) group had the highest MACE events in all four phases of the pandemic. Compared to CVD (-), the Cardioonc (+) group had an odds ratio of 1.66 for MACE. However, during the Omicron era, there was a statistically significant increased risk for MACE in the Cardioonc (+) group compared to CVD (-). Competing risk analysis showed that all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the Cardioonc (+) group and limited other MACE events from occurring. When the researchers identified specific cancer types, patients with colon cancer had higher MACE. Conclusion In conclusion, the study found that patients with both CVD and active cancer suffered relatively worse outcomes when they had acute SARS-CoV-2 infection during early and alpha surges in the United States. These findings highlight the need for improved management strategies and further research to better understand the impact of the virus on vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparison of COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis and Viral Myocarditis Pathology

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant loss of life and severe disability, justifying the expedited testing and approval of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. While found to be safe and effective, there have been increasing reports of myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccine administration. The acute events have been severe enough to require admission to the intensive care unit in some, but most patients fully recover with only rare deaths reported. The pathways involved in the development of vaccine-associated myocarditis are highly dependent on the specific vaccine. COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis is believed to be primarily caused by uncontrolled cytokine-mediated inflammation with possible genetic components in the interleukin-6 signaling pathway. There is also a potential autoimmune component via molecular mimicry. Many of these pathways are similar to those seen in viral myocarditis, indicating a common pathophysiology. There is concern for residual cardiac fibrosis and increased risk for the development of cardiomyopathies later in life. This is of particular interest for patients with congenital heart defects who are already at increased risk for fibrotic cardiomyopathies. Though the risk for vaccine-associated myocarditis is important to consider, the risk of viral myocarditis and other injury is far greater with COVID-19 infection. Considering these relative risks, it is still recommended that the general public receive vaccination against COVID-19, and it is particularly important for congenital heart defect patients to receive vaccination for COVID-19.

Cardiac abnormalities in Long COVID 1-year post-SARS-CoV-2 infection

BACKGROUND

Long COVID is associated with multiple symptoms and impairment in multiple organs. Cross-sectional studies have reported cardiac impairment to varying degrees by varying methodologies. Using cardiac MR (CMR), we investigated a 12-month trajectory of abnormalities in Long COVID.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate cardiac abnormalities 1-year post-SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

534 individuals with Long COVID underwent CMR (T1/T2 mapping, cardiac mass, volumes, function and strain) and multiorgan MRI at 6 months (IQR 4.3-7.3) since first post-COVID-19 symptoms. 330 were rescanned at 12.6 (IQR 11.4-14.2) months if abnormal baseline findings were reported. Symptoms, questionnaires and blood samples were collected at both time points. CMR abnormalities were defined as ≥1 of low left or right ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), high left or right ventricular end diastolic volume, low 3D left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), or elevated native T1 in ≥3 cardiac segments. Significant change over time was reported by comparison with 92 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Technical success of multiorgan and CMR assessment in non-acute settings was 99.1% and 99.6% at baseline, and 98.3% and 98.8% at follow-up. Of individuals with Long COVID, 102/534 (19%) had CMR abnormalities at baseline; 71/102 had complete paired data at 12 months. Of those, 58% presented with ongoing CMR abnormalities at 12 months. High sensitivity cardiac troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide were not predictive of CMR findings, symptoms or clinical outcomes. At baseline, low LVEF was associated with persistent CMR abnormality, abnormal GLS associated with low quality of life and abnormal T1 in at least three segments was associated with better clinical outcomes at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

CMR abnormalities (left entricular or right ventricular dysfunction/dilatation and/or abnormal T1mapping), occurred in one in five individuals with Long COVID at 6 months, persisting in over half of those at 12 months. Cardiac-related blood biomarkers could not identify CMR abnormalities in Long COVID.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04369807.

Cardio-cerebrovascular complications in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Recent studies have highlighted the cardio-cerebrovascular manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the likelihood of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular manifestations among patients with COVID-19-positive individuals in South Korea.

Methods

A cohort database for COVID-19 from the National Health Insurance Service was used which included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between January 1 and June 4, 2020. Individuals who tested COVID-19 positive, notwithstanding the severity of the disease, were designated as cases. COVID-19- negative individuals were used as controls for the study. The exclusion criteria included people who had a history of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases between 2015 and 2019. A new diagnosis of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications was considered the primary endpoint. The adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of development of complications was estimated using log-link Poisson regression. The model was adjusted at two levels, the first one included age and sex while the second included age, sex, residence area, and level of income. The hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis while adjusting for all demographic variables and covariates.

Results

Significant results were obtained for acute conditions, such as ischemic heart disease and cerebral hemorrhage. The IRR of COVID-19- positive individuals compared with that of controls for the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease was 1.78 (1.57-2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]) when adjusted for age and sex. HR was calculated as 3.02 (2.19-4.17; 95% CI) after adjusting for the covariates. In case of cerebral hemorrhage, the adjusted IRR was 2.06 (1.25-3.40; 95% CI) and the adjusted HR was 4.08 (0.90-19.19; 95% CI).

Conclusion

The findings of our study suggest that COVID-19 infection can be a significant risk factor for acute cardiovascular complications, such as ischemic heart disease and acute cerebrovascular complications, such as cerebral infarction, after properly adjusting for covariates.

COVID-19 and the heart

BACKGROUND

There is evidence for a bi-directional relationship between COVID-19 and the cardiovascular (CV) system.

SOURCE OF DATA

Published literature.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Pre-existing heart failure (HF) increases the risk of mortality with COVID-19. CV complications are recognized, including increased rates of acute coronary syndromes, HF, arrhythmia and myocarditis. Drugs targeting the angiotensin system are safe and may provide prognostic benefit.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Vaccination as a cause of myocarditis remains a key area of contention.

GROWING POINTS

As the pandemic progresses, we are gaining more data about the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the CV system: long COVID, and medium-to-long-term increases in CV risk.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Large-scale longitudinal studies will shed light on long-term CV outcomes with COVID-19. Furthermore, the differential effects of COVID-19 variants on the CV system must be investigated.

Relationship Between Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease and Death and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD) is perceived as a risk factor for poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. We sought to determine whether CVD is associated with in-hospital death and cardiovascular events in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

This study used data from a multicenter cohort of adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units at 68 centers across the United States from March 1 to July 1, 2020. The primary exposure was CVD, defined as preexisting coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation/flutter. Myocardial injury on intensive care unit admission defined as a troponin I or T level above the 99th percentile upper reference limit of normal was a secondary exposure. The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular events (cardiac arrest, new-onset arrhythmias, new-onset heart failure, myocarditis, pericarditis, or stroke) within 14 days.

RESULTS

Among 5133 patients (3231 male [62.9%]; mean age 61 years [SD, 15]), 1174 (22.9%) had preexisting CVD. A total of 1178 (34.6%) died, and 920 (17.9%) had a cardiovascular event. After adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, history of smoking, and comorbidities, preexisting CVD was associated with a 1.15 (95% CI, 0.98-1.34) higher odds of death. No independent association was observed between preexisting CVD and cardiovascular events. Myocardial injury on intensive care unit admission was associated with higher odds of death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.61-2.31]) and cardiovascular events (adjusted odds ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.47-2.24]), regardless of the presence of CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

CVD risk factors, rather than CVD itself, were the major contributors to outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19. The occurrence of myocardial injury, regardless of CVD, and its association with outcomes suggests it is likely due to multiorgan injury related to acute inflammation rather than exacerbation of preexisting CVD.

REGISTRATION

NCT04343898; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343898.

Approach to Thromboprophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in COVID-19: Global Updates and Clinical Insights from India

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) frequently occurs in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and is associated with increased mortality. Several global guidelines recommended prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation rather than intermediate-intensity or therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19-related acute or critical illness without suspected or confirmed VTE. Even though standard doses of thromboprophylaxis are received, many cases of thrombotic complications are reported; hence, appropriate and adequate thromboprophylaxis is critical for the prevention of VTE in COVID-19. In spite of an increased prevalence of VTE in Indian patients, sufficient data on patient characteristics, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach for VTE in COVID is lacking. In this article, we review the available global literature (search conducted up to 31 May 2021) and provide clinical insights into our approach towards managing VTE in patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, in this review, we summarize the incidence and risk factors for VTE with emphasis on the thromboprophylaxis approach in hospitalized patients and special populations with COVID-19 and assess clinical implications in the Indian context.

Strategies for Cardio-Oncology Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose of review

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare and has disproportionately affected the marginalized populations. Patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease (cardio-oncology population) are uniquely affected. In this review, we explore the current data on COVID-19 vulnerability and outcomes in these patients and discuss strategies for cardio-oncology care with a focus on healthcare innovation, health equity, and inclusion.

Recent findings

The growing evidence suggest increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with comorbid cancer and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, de novo cardiovascular complications such as myocarditis, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, heart failure, and thromboembolic events have increasingly emerged, possibly due to an accentuated host immune response and cytokine release syndrome.

Summary

Patient-centric policies are helpful for cardio-oncology surveillance like remote monitoring, increased use of biomarker-based surveillance, imaging modalities like CT scan, and point-of-care ultrasound to minimize the exposure for high-risk patients. Abundant prior experience in cancer therapy scaffolded the repurposed use of corticosteroids, IL-6 inhibitors, and Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 vaccine timing and dose frequency present a challenge due to overlapping toxicities and immune cell depletion in patients receiving cancer therapies. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic laid bare social and ethnic disparities in healthcare but also steered in innovation to combat problems of patient outreach, particularly with virtual care. In the recovery phase, the backlog in cardio-oncology care, interplay of cancer therapy-related side effects, and long COVID-19 syndrome are crucial issues to address.

The impact of chronic cardiovascular disease on COVID-19 clinical course

Background

According to previous univariate analyses, chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been associated with worse prognoses in severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, in the presence of a complex system, such as a human organism, the use of multivariate analyses is more appropriate and there are still few studies with this approach.

Aim

Using a significant sample of patients hospitalized in a single center, this study aimed to evaluate, whether the presence of CVD was an independent factor in death due to COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We also aimed to identify the clinical and laboratory predictors of death in an isolated group of cardiac patients.

Methods

This case-control study was conducted with patients admitted to a tertiary hospital and affected by COVID-19 in 2020. Variables were collected from the Brazilian surveillance system of hospitalized cases (SIVEP-Gripe) and electronic medical records. Multivariate logistic regressions with backward elimination were performed to analyze, whether CVD was an independent risk factor for death, and variables with P < 0.05 remained in the final model.

Results

A total of 2675 patients were analyzed. The median age was 60.4 years, and 55.33% of the patients were male. Odds ratios showed that age (OR 1.059), male sex (OR 1.471), Down syndrome (OR 54.980), diabetes (OR 1.626), asthma (OR 1.995), immunosuppression (OR 2.871), obesity (OR 1.432), chronic lung disease (OR 1.803), kidney disease (OR 1.789), and neurological diseases (OR 2.515) were independently associated with death. Neither the presence of heart disease nor the isolated analysis of each chronic CVD element (systemic arterial hypertension, congenital heart disease, previous acute myocardial infarction and cardiac surgery, obstructive coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, and pacemaker use) showed as independent risk factors for death. However, an analysis restricted to 489 patients with chronic CVD showed troponin T (TnT) as an independent predictor of death (OR 4.073).

Conclusions

Neither chronic CVD nor its subcomponents proved to be independent risk factors for death due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. A TnT level of 14 pg/mL was associated with a higher occurrence of death in the isolated group of patients with chronic heart disease.

Relevance for Patients

Patients with chronic CVD may require more attention in the context of COVID-19 due to higher proportions of these individuals having a more severe progression of disease. However, regarding mortality in these patients, further studies should be conducted concerning comorbidities and acute myocardial injury.

Coronavirus disease 2019 and the cardiologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There continues to be extensive clinical and epidemiological data to suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with numerous different types of cardiac involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Myocardial injury has been reported in over 25% of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection and is not only associated with a worse prognosis but with higher mortality, approaching 40%. Currently proposed mechanisms of myocardial injury include direct viral infection, cytokine storm, endothelial inflammation, demand ischemia, interferon-mediated response and stress cardiomyopathy. COVID-19 infection is associated with new-onset arrhythmias and heart failure regardless of history of previous cardiovascular disease. Echocardiographic findings can be useful to predict mortality in COVID-19 patients and cardiac MRI is an effective tool to both assess COVID-19 induced myocarditis and to follow-up on cardiac complications of COVID-19 long-term. Although there is an association between COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis, pericarditis or arrhythmias, the risk appears lower when compared to risk attributable to the natural infection.

SUMMARY

Patients with cardiovascular disease are not only more likely to suffer from severe COVID-19 infection but are at increased risk for further complications and higher mortality. Further data compilation on current and emerging treatments of COVID-19 will have additional impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 infection.

The pathological maelstrom of COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a consequence of infection of the upper and lower respiratory tract with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 but often becomes a systemic disease, with important involvement of other organs. A bidirectional relationship exists between COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. On the one hand, preexisting comorbidities, in particular high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes and chronic cardiovascular conditions predispose to severe disease. On the other hand, biomarkers of myocardial injury are frequently raised in patients with COVID-19, along with arrhythmia and heart failure. Localized thrombosis is a common finding in the lungs but can also increase the occurrence of thrombotic events systemically. Thrombosis is consequent to different pathogenic mechanisms, which include endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis. Thrombocytopenia is common in patients with COVID-19 and alterations in platelet function participate in the pro-thrombotic phenotype. Involvement of the cardiovascular system in COVID-19 has important consequences during recovery from infection and the development of long COVID.

The Impact of Prior Antithrombotic use on Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and Severe COVID-19 Infection

OBJECTIVE

Our objective in this study was to determine the predictive factors of thromboembolic complications in patients with previous heart disease and severe covid-19 infection and the impact of previous use of antithrombotics on protection against these complications.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 158 patients with heart disease admitted to an intensive care unit for severe SARS-COV-2 infection. In order to determine the predictive factors, we used logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 158 patients, 22 were complicated by a thrombo-embolic event (13.9%), mean age of our population 64.03 (SD = 15.27), with a male predominance of 98 (62%). For the predictive factors of thromboembolic complications, and after multivariate analysis, we find the short duration of hospitalization (OR = 0.92; 95%CI (0.863-0.983), P = .014, previous use of antithrombotic drugs ((OR = 0.288, 95%CI (0.091-0.911), P = .034 for antiplatelet agents) and (OR = 0.322, 95% CI (0, 131-0.851), P = .021) for anticoagulants) as protective factors, and admission thrombocytosis as a risk factor (OR = 4.58, 95%CI (1.2-10.627), P = .021). D-dimer was not detected as a risk factor, and this can be explained by the characteristics of our population. Although prior use of antithrombotic drugs protects against thromboembolic complications during severe infection, there was no benefit in mortality.

CONCLUSION

Prior use of antithrombotic drugs is a protective factor against thromboembolic complications in patients with a history of heart disease but without effect on mortality.

A Review of Human Coronaviruses' Receptors: The Host-Cell Targets for the Crown Bearing Viruses

A novel human coronavirus prompted considerable worry at the end of the year 2019. Now, it represents a significant global health and economic burden. The newly emerged coronavirus disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the primary reason for the COVID-19 global pandemic. According to recent global figures, COVID-19 has caused approximately 243.3 million illnesses and 4.9 million deaths. Several human cell receptors are involved in the virus identification of the host cells and entering them. Hence, understanding how the virus binds to host-cell receptors is crucial for developing antiviral treatments and vaccines. The current work aimed to determine the multiple host-cell receptors that bind with SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses for the purpose of cell entry. Extensive research is needed using neutralizing antibodies, natural chemicals, and therapeutic peptides to target those host-cell receptors in extremely susceptible individuals. More research is needed to map SARS-CoV-2 cell entry pathways in order to identify potential viral inhibitors.