Exploring the concept and structure of obstetric triage: a qualitative content analysis

Experiences of implementing and working with obstetric emergency triage: A qualitative study among Swedish midwifes, auxiliary nurses, and obstetricians

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric emergency triage is a relatively new form of emergency triage and is not yet implemented in Sweden. Adaptations enables safe assessment of the childbearing woman, fetus and labor status. Failure to identify severely ill childbearing women and women post childbirth has repeatedly led to adverse outcomes. Introducing obstetric emergency triage constitutes a profound alteration in management that may challenge preconceived notions on how to provide best care. This study aimed at exploring and describing obstetric staff's experiences of working with obstetric emergency triage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen obstetricians, midwives and auxiliary nurses at an obstetric emergency department in eastern Sweden were recruited by purposeful sampling. Individual qualitative interviews underwent inductive qualitative content analysis according to Graneheim and Lundman.

RESULTS

An overarching theme - A new mindset - emerged from the analysis, comprising the four categories: Implications for the individual caregiver's own work, An improved organization, Improved patient care. Initial skepticism to triage changed towards a positive attitude during implementation, identifying barriers and facilitators for successful implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

This first study exploring Swedish obstetric staff's perception of obstetric emergency triage as a working method suggests that, given time for implementation, a new mindset in obstetric emergency care might develop. Triage provides structure and a sense of control through a clear and quick overview of childbearing women seeking emergency care and enhances teamwork by improving communication. Triage directs attention toward aberrations and promotes reflection and action, improving patient safety.

Antepartum Emergency Department Use and Associations with Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in a Large Hospital System

Objectives

Prenatal care in the United States has remained unchanged for decades, with pregnant patients often experiencing high rates of hospital emergency department (ED) visits. It is unknown how many of these ED visits are potentially preventable with better access to timely and effective outpatient or home prenatal care. This multihospital health system quality improvement study was undertaken to analyze patient risk factors for acute antepartum hospital use as well as associations with adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.

Methods

The retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health record and administrative data on ED visits in the 270 days before a delivery admission for alive, singleton births at nine system hospitals over 52 months. We use logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of hospital use by patient demographic and clinical characteristics and present the association of acute antepartum hospital use with maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.

Results

Overall, 17.5% of 68,200 patients had antepartum ED visits, including 248 inpatient admissions, with significant variation between hospitals. As compared to non-Hispanic white patients, Hispanic and especially non-Hispanic Black and Medicaid patients had significantly higher odds of acute antepartum hospital use as did patients with preexisting conditions. Birth outcomes were significantly (p < 0.01) worse among individuals with antepartum hospital utilization.

Conclusion

Acute antepartum hospital use was concentrated among lower income, minority patients, and those with chronic conditions with significant variation across system hospitals. There is a need for research into innovations in prenatal care that are best at reaching our most vulnerable patients, reducing preventable hospital utilization, and improving birth outcomes.