A prospective observational study comparing two supraglottic airway devices in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

A Simpler Method for Choosing Adult i-gel Size: An Evaluation of Real-World Prehospital Data

OBJECTIVE

The i-gel supraglottic airway device (Intersurgical, Berkshire, UK) is commonly used in the United States and worldwide for prehospital airway management. Previous research has suggested that a sex-based method of size selection (4.0 for female patients and 5.0 for male patients) is superior to a weight-based method in patients undergoing elective anesthesia. Our objective was to compare a sex-based i-gel size selection strategy with a weight-based strategy using real-world prehospital data.

METHODS

The ESO Data Collaborative 2018 to 2022 dataset was used. All initial i-gel insertion attempts in patients > 18 years of age were evaluated for inclusion. Insertion attempts were excluded if age, sex, weight, success, or device size was not documented. Logistic regression was used to compare the rate of insertion failure on the first attempt for the group placed in alignment with the weight-based but not sex-based method with the group placed in alignment with the sex-based but not weight-based method.

RESULTS

After the application of the exclusion criteria, 39,867 initial i-gel insertion attempts were included. The overall rate of failure was 6.5% (2,585/39,867). The rate of unsuccessful i-gel placement was similar when i-gel devices were placed in alignment with a sex-based size selection method in comparison to i-gel placement in alignment with a weight-based selection strategy (6.0% vs. 6.4%). Logistic regression analysis did not reveal a significant difference between groups (odds ratio: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.23).

CONCLUSION

The use of a sex-based method of i-gel size selection may be equivalent with respect to the rate of unsuccessful i-gel placement on the first attempt in comparison to a weight-based method.

Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management. Part II

The Airway Management section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), and the Spanish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) present the Guide for the comprehensive management of difficult airway in adult patients. Its principles are focused on the human factors, cognitive processes for decision-making in critical situations, and optimization in the progression of strategies application to preserve adequate alveolar oxygenation in order to enhance safety and the quality of care. The document provides evidence-based recommendations, theoretical-educational tools, and implementation tools, mainly cognitive aids, applicable to airway management in the fields of anesthesiology, critical care, emergencies, and prehospital medicine. For this purpose, an extensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA-R guidelines and was analyzed using the GRADE methodology. Recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology. Recommendations for sections with low-quality evidence were based on expert opinion through consensus reached via a Delphi questionnaire.

Implementation and use of a supraglottic airway device in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by firefighter first responders - A prospective feasibility study

Aim

We wanted to assess the implementation and use of a supraglottic airway (SGA) for on-call firefighter first responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods

We trained 502 firefighter first responders, located at 35 fire stations in the South-East of Norway, in the use of SGA during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Training consisted of 45 minutes of theoretical and practical training in small groups.Primary outcome was successful ventilation with SGA assessed by both firefighter first responders and first paramedic arriving on-scene. Secondary outcomes included time expenditure and complications related to the procedure, evaluation of the training, and descriptive characteristics of the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Results

An SGA was used by firefighter first responders in 23 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, and successful ventilation was achieved in 20 (87%) cases. Air-leak was described in the three unsuccessful cases. The median procedural time was 30 seconds (IQR = 15-40), with no observed procedural complications. Firefighter first responders arrived in median time 9 minutes (IQR = 6-10 min) before the ambulance. They performed chest compressions on all patients and 6 (26%) of the patients received shock with semi-automatic external defibrillator. After training, all participants were able to successfully ventilate a manikin with the SGA. The cost of the SGA equipment for all fire stations was 3955 GBP.

Conclusion

Implementation of an SGA for firefighter first responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest management seems feasible, safe and can be introduced with limited amount of training and limited use of resources.

A retrospective comparison of the King Laryngeal Tube and iGel supraglottic airway devices: a study for the CARES surveillance group

OBJECTIVE

Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used during the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in the United States and worldwide. In this study, we aimed to compare the neurologic outcomes of OHCA patients managed with the King Laryngeal Tube (King LT) to the neurologic outcomes of patients managed with the iGel.

METHODS

We used the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) public use research dataset for our analysis. Non-traumatic OHCA cases with attempted EMS resuscitation enrolled from 2013-2021 were included. We used two-level mixed effects multivariable logistic regression analyses with treating EMS agency as the random effect to determine the association between supraglottic airway device and outcome. The primary outcome was survival with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2 at discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge. Age, sex, calendar year of OHCA, initial ECG rhythm, witnessed status (unwitnessed, bystander witnessed, 9-1-1 responder witnessed), bystander CPR, response interval, and OHCA location (private/home, public, institutional) were used as covariables.

RESULTS

In comparison to use of the King LT, use of the iGel was associated with greater neurologically favorable survival (aOR: 1.45 [1.33, 1.58]). In addition, use of the iGel was associated with greater survival to hospital admission (1.07 [1.02, 1.12]) and survival to hospital discharge (1.35 [1.26, 1.46]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to the body of literature suggesting that use of the iGel during OHCA resuscitation is associated with better outcomes than use of the King LT.

Supraglottic airway device to improve ventilation success and reduce pulmonary aspiration during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation by basic life support rescuers: a randomised cross-over human cadaver study

Objectives: Early airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prevents aspiration of gastric contents. Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard to protect airways, but supraglottic airway devices (SGA) may provide some protection with less training. Bag-mask ventilation (BMV) is the most common method used by rescuers. We hypothesized that SGA use by first rescuers during CPR could increase ventilation success rate and also decrease intragastric pressure and pulmonary aspiration.Methods: We performed a randomized cross-over experimental trial on human cadavers. Protocol A: we assessed the rate of successful ventilation (chest rise), intragastric pressure, and CPR key time metrics. Protocol B: cadaver stomachs were randomized to be filled with 300 mL of either blue or green serum saline solution through a Foley catheter. Each rescuer was randomly assigned to use SGA or BMV during a 5-minute standard CPR period. Then, in a crossover design, the stomach was filled with the second colour solution and another 5-minute CPR period was performed using the other airway method. Pulmonary aspiration, defined as the presence of coloured solution below the vocal cords, was assessed by a blinded operator using bronchoscopy. A generalized linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis.Results: Protocol A: Forty-eight rescuers performed CPR on 11 cadavers. Median ventilation success was higher with SGA than BMV: 75.0% (IQR: 59.8-87.3) vs. 34.7% (IQR: 25.0-50.0), (p = 0.003). Gastric pressure and differential (maximum minus minimum) gastric pressure were lower in the SGA group: 2.21 mmHg (IQR: 1.66; 2.68) vs. 3.02 mmHg (IQR: 2.02; 4.22) (p = 0.02) and 5.70 mmHg (IQR: 4.10; 7.60) vs. 8.05 mmHg (IQR: 5.40; 11.60) (p = 0.05). CPR key times were not different between groups. Protocol B: Ten cadavers were included with 20 CPR periods. Aspiration occurred in 2 (20%) SGA procedures and 5 (50%) BMV procedures (p = 0.44).Conclusion: Use of SGA by rescuers improved the ventilation success rate, decreased intragastric pressure, and did not affect key CPR metrics. SGA use by basic life support rescuers appears feasible and efficient.