Antibiotic prescription consistent with guidelines in emergency department is associated with 30-day survival in severe community-acquired pneumonia

Survival at 3, 6 and 12 months in patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia in Colombia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study is to assess the survival rates of individuals diagnosed with Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) post-hospitalization in Colombia. Additionally, explore potential risk factors associated with decreased long-term survival.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a hospital in Colombia, evaluating survival at 3, 6 and 12 months in CAP patients, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Stratifications were made by age, sex, comorbidity, and severity. The comparison of survival curves was performed using the Log-Rank test, a multivariate analysis with Cox regression was performed to study possible risk factors that affected 12-month survival in patients with CAP.

RESULTS

3688 subjects were admitted, with a mortality of 16.3 % per year. Survival at three, six, and twelve months was 92.9 % (95 % CI 92-93 %), 88.8 % (95 % CI 87-90 %), and 84.2 % (95 % CI 82-85 %), respectively. Analysis stratified by pneumonia severity index, 12-month survival was 98.7 % in Class I, 95.6 % in Class II, 87.41 % in Class III, 77.1 % in Class IV, and 65.8 % in class-V (p < 0.001). Cox-regression showed that being male (HR = 1.44; 95 % CI 1.22‒1.70; p < 0.001), an elevated pneumonia severity index (HR = 4.22; 95 % CI 1.89‒9.43; p < 0.001), a high comorbidity index (HR = 2.29; 95 % CI 1.89‒2.84; p < 0.001) and vasopressor requirement (HR = 2.22; 95 % CI < 0.001) were associated with a lower survival at twelve months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Survival in patients with CAP who require hospitalization decreases at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, being lower in patients older than 65 years, men, high comorbidity, and in subjects with severe presentation of the disease.

Guideline-Concordant Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Hospitalized Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

A commonly used guideline for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the joint American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guideline. We aimed to investigate the effect of guideline-concordant therapy in the treatment of CAP.

Methods

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus from 2007 to December 2023. We screened citations, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicate. Primary outcomes were mortality rates, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were guideline adherence, readmission, clinical cure rate, and adverse complications. We performed random-effect meta-analysis to estimate the overall effect size and assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistics.

Results

We included 17 observational studies and 82 240 patients, of which 10 studies were comparative and pooled in meta-analysis. Overall guideline adherence rate was 65.2%. Guideline-concordant therapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in 30-day mortality rate (crude odds ratio [OR], 0.49 [95% confidence interval .34-.70; I2 = 60%]; adjusted OR, 0.49 [.37-.65; I2 = 52%]) and in-hospital mortality rate (crude OR, 0.63 [.43-.92]; I2 = 61%). Due to significant heterogeneity, we could not assess the effect of guideline-concordant therapy on length of stay, ICU admission, readmission, clinical cure rate, and adverse complications.

Conclusions

In hospitalized patients with CAP, guideline-concordant therapy was associated with a significant reduction in mortality rate compared with nonconcordant therapy; however, there was limited evidence to support guideline-concordant therapy for other clinical outcomes. Future studies are needed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of current guideline recommendations.

Evaluating Antibiotic Treatment Guideline Adherence to Ongoing Antibiotic Stewardship in a Tertiary Care Setting: A Retrospective Observational Study

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is widely regarded as an increasing threat to global public health. Antibiotic treatment guidelines have been increasingly recognized as an effective tool to guide appropriate prescriptions and help curtail antibiotic resistance. The present study aimed to assess physician's adherence to hospital antibiotic treatment guideline recommendations in Nepal and determine predictive variables with a significant association. This was a retrospective, monocentric observational review to investigate the adherence to endorsed guidelines using the medical records of adults admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, or skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) from January 2018 to December 2019. Of the 2,077 medical records that were reviewed (954 UTI, 754 pneumonia, and 369 SSTI), 354 (17%) met the study inclusion criteria, which included 87 UTI, 180 pneumonia, and 87 SSTI patients. Among eligible patients with antibiotic prescriptions, the following were adherent to guideline recommendations: 33 (37.9%) UTI, 78 (43.3%) pneumonia, and 23 (26.4%) SSTI. The overall extent of adherence to hospital antibiotic treatment guidelines for the use of antibiotics among adult inpatients diagnosed with these common infections was 37.9%. Patients who received ceftriaxone (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.18-3.71, p=0.012) and levofloxacin (OR = 4.63, 95% CI = 1.30-16.53, p=0.018) had significantly higher adherence to treatment guidelines. This study revealed a low adherence rate despite the availability of updated guidelines for antibiotic prescriptions. The findings confer an urgent need to confront antibiotic prescription patterns in such tertiary care centers for tailored interventions to improve adherence to antibiotic guidelines.

The impact of a non-restrictive Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the emergency department of a secondary-level Italian hospital

Evidence supporting the effectiveness of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Programs in the emergency department (ED) setting is limited. We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the efficacy of an AMS program in an ED and a short-stay observation unit. The intervention included periodic prospective audits (twice a week), conducted by four infectious disease consultants. Primary outcomes included the difference in the hospital mortality rate, antibiotic consumption, and the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, before March 2020-February 2021 and after March 2021-February 2022 when the program was implemented. Interrupted time-series analysis was performed to assess the effect of our program. During the 12-month program, we performed 152 audits and evaluated 366 antibiotic therapies out of a total of 853 patients admitted. In the intervention period, we observed a non-statistically significant decrease in total antibiotic consumption, with a change in level of - 31.2 defined daily dose/100 patient-days (PD) (p = 0.71). Likewise, we found no significant variations in the rate of BSI due to MDR Gram-positive (CT - 0.02 events/PD, p = 0.84), MDR Gram-negative bacteria (CT 0.08, p = 0.71), or Candida spp. (CT 0.008, p = 0.86). Conversely, we found a significant decrease in the mortality rate between the pre- and post-intervention periods (- 1.98 deaths/100 PD, CI - 3.9 to - 0.007, p = 0.049). The Antibiotic Stewardship Program in the ED was associated with a significant decrease in the mortality rate. More high-quality studies are needed to determine the most effective ASP strategies in this unique setting.

Interventions to improve outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common infection associated with high morbimortality and a highly deleterious impact on patients' quality of life and functionality. We comprehensively review the factors related to the host, the causative microorganism, the therapeutic approach and the organization of health systems (e.g. setting for care and systems for allocation) that might have an impact on CAP-associated outcomes. Our main aims are to discuss the most controversial points and to provide some recommendations that may guide further research and the management of patients with CAP, in order to improve their outcomes, beyond mortality.

AREA COVERED

In this review, we aim to provide a critical account of potential measures to improve outcomes of CAP and the supporting evidence from observational studies and clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

CAP is associated with high mortality and a highly deleterious impact on patients' quality of life. To improve CAP-associated outcomes, it is important to understand the factors related to the patient, etiology, therapeutics, and the organization of health systems.

Multidisciplinary Collaboration for the Optimization of Antibiotic Prescription: Analysis of Clinical Cases of Pneumonia between Emergency, Internal Medicine, and Pharmacy Services

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is a lung parenchyma acute infection usually treated with antibiotics. Increasing bacterial resistances force the review and control of antibiotic use criteria in different health departments.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the adequacy of antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia in patients initially attended at the emergency department and then admitted to the internal medicine service of the Alto Deba Hospital-Osakidetza Basque Country Health Service (Spain).

METHODS

Observational, retrospective study, based on the review of medical records of patients with community-acquired pneumonia attended at the hospital between January and May 2021. The review was made considering the following items: antimicrobial treatment indication, choice of antibiotic, time of administration of the first dose, adequacy of the de-escalation-sequential therapy, duration of treatment, monitoring of efficacy and adverse effects, and registry in the medical records. The review was made by the research team (professionals from the emergency department, internal medicine, and pharmacy services).

RESULTS

Fifty-five medical records were reviewed. The adequacy of the treatments showed that antibiotic indication, time of administration of the first dose, and monitoring of efficacy and adverse effects were the items with the greatest agreement between the three departments. This was not the case with the choice of antibiotic, de-escalation/sequential therapy, duration of treatment, and registration in the medical record, which have been widely discussed. The choice of antibiotic was optimal in 63.64% and might have been better in 25.45%. De-escalation/oral sequencing might have been better in 50.91%. The treatment duration was optimal in 45.45% of the patients and excessive in 45.45%.

DISCUSSION

The team agreed to disseminate these data among the hospital professionals and to propose audits and feedback through an antibiotic stewardship program. Besides this, implementing the local guideline and defining stability criteria to apply sequential therapy/de-escalation was considered essential.

Antibiotic Stewardship und Pneumonie

Die Pneumonie ist eine sehr häufige und potenziell tödliche Erkrankung. Es werden 3 Entitäten (ambulant erworbenen = CAP, nosokomial erworben = HAP und Pneumonie unter Immunsuppression) unterschieden von denen insbesondere die CAP und die HAP für die Umsetzung von Antibiotic Stewardship(ABS)-Strategien, den rationalen Umgang mit Antibiotika, gut geeignet sind. Die Durchführung einer mikrobiologischen Diagnostik vor Start einer Antibiotikatherapie bei Pneumonie, die stationär behandelt werden muss, wird stark empfohlen. Eine Risikostratifizierung der Patienten und der Schweregrad der Erkrankung sind entscheidend für die kalkulierte Antibiotikaauswahl und die Applikationsform. Bei COVID-19-Patienten ohne septischen Schock kann aufgrund der niedrigen Rate von bakteriellen Superinfektionen auf eine empirische Antibiotikatherapie verzichtet werden. Eine Reevaluation der Antibiotikatherapie nach 48–72 h mit gezielter Deeskalation unter Beachtung der Klinik und Mikrobiologie, Absetzen bei Fehlindikation und die Begrenzung der Therapiedauer sind essenzielle ABS-Strategien zur Optimierung des klinischen Outcomes bei CAP und HAP mit dem Ziel, die Antibiotikaresistenzentwicklung sowie die Toxizität für den Patienten möglichst gering zu halten. Der Einsatz von Biomarkern wie Procalcitonin kann in bestimmten Situationen ein frühzeitiges Absetzen der Therapie begünstigen oder die Diagnose einer bakteriellen Superinfektion bei COVID-19 unterstützen.