Decision-making on the fly: a qualitative study of physicians in out-of-hospital emergency medical services

Decision Fatigue in Emergency Medicine: An Exploration of Its Validity

Emergency physicians face a relentless stream of complex, high-stakes decisions in a fast-paced and dynamic environment. The concept of decision fatigue, a phenomenon characterized by a decline in the quality of decision-making after a long sequence of choices, has garnered increasing attention within healthcare. Several investigations show that the number and complexity of decisions made during prolonged shifts correlate with increased self-reported fatigue; however, the effect on clinical decision quality is uncertain. Conversely, a subset of studies found no clear relationship between decision fatigue and errors in clinical judgment. Importantly, some researchers argue that decision fatigue may be mitigated by factors such as experience, training, and support systems. This narrative review highlights the existing literature on decision fatigue among emergency physicians and explores whether this concept holds as a valid concern or remains a myth in the context of their practice.

Electronic field protocols for prehospital care quality improvement in Lithuania: a randomized simulation-based study

BACKGROUND

Prehospital emergency care is complex and influenced by various factors, leading to the need for decision-support tools. Studies suggest that cognitive aids improve provider performance and patient outcomes in clinical emergencies. Electronic cognitive aids have rarely been investigated in prehospital care. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of the electronic field protocol (eFP) module on performance, adherence to the standard of care, and satisfaction of prehospital care providers in a simulated environment.

METHODS

This randomised simulation-based study was conducted at the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences in Kaunas, Lithuania. The simulation scenarios were developed to test 12 eFPs: adult resuscitation, pediatric resuscitation, delivery and postpartum care, seizures in pregnancy, stroke, anaphylaxis, acute chest pain, acute abdominal pain, respiratory distress in children, severe trauma, severe infection and sepsis, and initial neonatal evaluation and resuscitation. Sixteen prehospital practitioners with at least 3 years of clinical experience were randomly assigned to either use the eFP module or perform without it in each of the 12 simulated scenarios. Participant scores and adherence to standardised checklists were compared between the two performance modes. Participant satisfaction was measured through a post-simulation survey.

RESULTS

A total of 190 simulation sessions were conducted. Compared to the use of memory alone, the use of the eFP module significantly improved participants' performance in 10 out of the 12 simulation scenarios. Adherence to the standardised checklist increased from 60 to 85% (p < 0.001). Post-simulation survey results indicate that participants found the eFP module easy to use and relevant to prehospital clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that the eFP module as a cognitive aid can enhance prehospital practitioners' performance and adherence to the standard of care in simulated scenarios. These results highlight the potential of standardised eFPs as a quality improvement step in prehospital care in Lithuania.