Trends in the number and the quality of trial protocols involving children submitted to a French Institutional Review Board

Descriptive study of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care pediatric hospital in México from 2014 to 2017

INTRODUCTION

In Pediatrics, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) affect morbidity and mortality. In Mexico, the characteristics of ADRs and suspect drugs have not been described in hospitalized children.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the frequency of ADRs and describe them, as well as suspect drugs, in a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Mexico.

METHODS

A total of 1,649 Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gómez ADR reports were analyzed. Completeness of the information was assessed, and ADRs severity and seriousness were assigned based on NOM-220-SSA1-2012, with causality being established according to the Naranjo algorithm. ADRs were classified with WHO Adverse Drug Reaction Terminology (WHO-ART). The drugs involved in ADRs were categorized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. Descriptive analysis was performed using the SPSS 20 statistical package.

RESULTS

Of all the reports, 5.8% lacked sufficient information for the analysis (grade 0). ADRs frequency ranged from 2.12% to 8.07%. ADRs occurred most commonly in children (56.9%), in the female gender (52%), in subjects with normal BMI Z-score (46.6%) and malnutrition (35.3%), diagnosed with neoplasms (72.2%) and in the Emergency Department (70.0%). ADRs were severe in 14.4% of cases, in 81.0% they were serious and 2.1% were classified as definite. Most common serious ADR was febrile neutropenia (44.5%). The 0.7% of patients recovering with sequelae; 1.1% died (with the medication being associated) and 70.3% were admitted to the hospital as a result of an ADR. Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents were more commonly associated with serious ADRs.

CONCLUSION

ADRs affected morbidity and mortality, which is why strengthening pharmacovigilance programs in Mexican pediatric hospitals is necessary.

The Current Landscape of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter Clinical Trials: A Report of 348 Studies Registered With ClinicalTrials.gov

OBJECTIVES

This analysis sought to systematically characterize trial-level patterns in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) by using the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

BACKGROUND

Despite an abundance of clinical trials in this field, there is a lack of high-level evidence guiding management of AF/AFL.

METHODS

We queried all closed, phase II to IV interventional trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database through October 2016 that enrolled patients known to have AF/AFL. Published trials were evaluated for methodological quality, using the 3-item Jadad scale (range: 0 to 5, where 5 = highest quality).

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 465 uniquely registered studies, of which 348 directly studied AF/AFL. Of those studies, 173 (50%) were published, enrolling a median of 190 patients from a median of 15 sites. The volume of published trials increased over time (7% prior to 2008 vs. 41% from 2014 to 2016; p < 0.001 for trend). Of the completed trials, 29% remain unpublished. Industry sources accounted for most funding (54%). Recurrence of AF/AFL was the most common endpoint (45%), whereas rates of primary clinical endpoints were low (13%). The mean Jadad score of published trials of pharmacological approaches (n = 112) was 4.0 ± 1.4. Of the 61 AF/AFL trials involving ablation or device therapies, 69% were randomized, 28% were single-arm studies, and patient, proceduralist, and event-ascertainment blinding was used in 16%, 4%, and 44%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary trials of AF/AFL are often multicenter and modest in size. The primary study endpoint is commonly recurrence of arrhythmia, even in high-quality and late-phase trials. Although methodological quality is high in trials of pharmacologic approaches, trials of AF/AFL ablation and device therapies variably employ randomization and blinding.