Awareness of limited joint mobility in type 2 diabetes in general practice in the Netherlands: an online questionnaire survey

Diabetic cheiroarthropathy in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes with positive anti-nuclear antibodies: a case report from Sudan

Background

Diabetic cheiroarthropathy, also known as limited joint mobility, is one of the long-standing complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). It affects 8-50% of patients with type 1 diabetes and is also seen in type 2 diabetic patients. Consequently, it can mimic many rheumatological diseases and is often underdiagnosed. The authors present a case of a long-standing poorly controlled diabetes with diabetic cheiroarthropathy and diabetic neuropathy, along with positive ANA in the absence of any correlated autoimmune or rheumatological diseases.

Case presentation

A 52-year-old female patient with poorly controlled diabetes (her last HbA1c reading was 9.5%) presented to the Rheumatology clinic with flexion deformities of the fingers. The patient has impaired vibration, two-point discrimination, and pinprick sensation in gloves and stock distribution, indicating peripheral neuropathy, entrapment neuropathy in the forms of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, and the diagnosis of diabetic cheiroarthropathy was made. Additionally, she has a positive prayer sign and a tabletop sign. Despite the absence of symptoms and signs of autoimmune disorders, this patient has positive anti-nuclear antibodies global (ANA positive by indirect immuno-fluorescence (IIF) 1\320 nucleolar pattern) with a negative: ANA profile, rheumatoid factor (RF) and anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA).

Conclusion

Regular and careful hand examination should be part of clinical assessment for diabetic patients as it could be a very simple and useful screening tool for diabetic cheiroarthropathy. Physicians can use this condition as a mirror for microvascular complications of diabetes. This allows for early detection and appropriate interventions to prevent further progression of diabetes-related complications. It is also essential to consider the presence of positive ANA in diabetic cheiroarthropathy despite the absence of any rheumatological and autoimmune diseases.

The Danish Diabetes Musculoskeletal Cohort: Non-Responder Analysis of an Electronic Survey Using Registry Data

Purpose

To conduct a non-responder analysis on a musculoskeletal (MSK) electronic questionnaire.

Methods

Individuals aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM), and attended an ambulatory DM clinic formed the sample frame. They were invited to complete an electronic musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions and symptoms questionnaire booklet using a secured electronic email system. Individuals whose secured email box was not active at the time were discarded. Using the Central Person Registry number, a unique number assigned to all Danish residents, we linked the sample frame to different registries to learn more about non-responders. Non-responders were either individuals who did not respond to a single question and those who responded “No” to the first question about willing to participate. We calculated descriptive statistics for each characteristic. Univariate logistic regression models were conducted to determine the relationship between each characteristic and non-responder status.

Results

The response rate was 36% (n = 3812). Individuals with type 2 DM (OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.8–2.2)), secondary DM (1.9 (1.3–2.8)) or unspecified DM (2.1 (1.8–2.4)) were more likely to be non-responders than individuals with Type 1 DM. Also, individuals aged 70–79 (1.3 (1.1–1.6)) and 80 years and older (5.9 (4.5–7.7)) were more likely to be non-responders than 18–29 years old individuals. However, individuals aged 40–49 (1.5 (1.2–1.8)), 50–59 (1.5 (1.3–1.8)) or 60–69 (1.4 (1.1–1.6)) were more likely to be responders than 18–29 years old individuals. Individuals with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 1 (2.0 (1.3.2.9) or CCI of 2 (1.7 (1.1–2.5) were more likely to be responders than individuals with a CCI of 0. Lastly, individuals who were currently outside of the workforce (1.6 (2.4–2.9) or had unknown/missing socioeconomic status (3.9 (2.8–5.3) were more likely to be non-responders than individuals who were working.

Conclusion

Although we did find a non-response bias, this cohort will be an important source to determine the prevalence and consequences of MSK conditions in a secondary care DM population.

Musculoskeletal Conditions in Patients With Diabetes: A Narrative Review

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a multisystem disease that affects millions of people worldwide. The vascular and cardiac effects of DM have been well-studied, but little is known about the prevalence of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions in patients with DM. This review provides an in-depth analysis of a cross-sectional study investigating the presence of several common MSK disorders in patients with DM. This review also analyzes current literature to update health care professionals about the MSK conditions associated with DM.

Relationships within and between lower and upper extremity dysfunction in people with diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with systemic musculoskeletal system impairments suggesting concurrent development of lower and upper extremity musculoskeletal problems. This study aims to examine relationships between lower and upper extremity function in people with DM.

METHODS

Sixty people with type 2 DM and peripheral neuropathy [mean (standard deviation); 67(6) years old, DM duration 14(10) yrs] completed the following measures: 1) Self-reports of function: Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM; higher = better function) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI; lower = better function), 2) Range of motion (goniometry): ankle dorsiflexion and shoulder flexion, and 3) Strength: unilateral heel rise power (UHR, 3D kinetics) and hand grip dynamometry. Pearson correlations examined associations between lower and upper extremity measures, p < .05.

RESULTS

Forty of 60 (67%) reported pain/disability in both the foot/ankle and shoulder and 95% of study participants had some limitation in foot or shoulder function. Significant between extremity correlations: FAAM and SPADI (r = -0.39), ankle dorsiflexion and shoulder flexion range of motion (r = 0.35), and UHR and hand grip strength (r = 0.40). Significant within extremity correlations: FAAM and UHR (r = .47) and SPADI with shoulder flexion (r = -0.44).

CONCLUSION

Upper and lower extremity inter- and intra-relationships indicate systemic musculoskeletal impairments in people with DM. Healthcare practitioners should consider the potential for concurrent and disabling musculoskeletal problems in people with DM.

Limited joint mobility of the hand correlates incident hospitalisation with infection in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

Limited joint mobility (LJM) of the hand is one of the important complications of diabetes. Diabetes is a risk factor for hospitalisation with infection. This study investigated the relationship between LJM of the hand and the incidence of hospitalisation with infection in type 2 diabetic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LJM of hand was defined as the 'prayer sign' or 'table test'. The association between LJM of the hand and incident hospitalisations was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. The number of incident hospitalisations was small over the course of the study, which we compensated for by calculating propensity scores using age, body mass index, sex, duration of diabetes, creatinine, smoking status, haemoglobin A1c and dyslipidaemia.

RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study of 502 patients with type 2 diabetes, 102 patients had LJM of the hand. These patients were, on average, older and had worse renal function and glycaemic control, and a higher proportion of microangiopathy significantly. During the study period, 56 patients were hospitalised with infection. A Cox regression analysis showed that LJM of the hand was associated with an increased probability of incident hospitalisation with infection after adjustment for covariates (HR = 1.65 [95% CI 1.60-1.70], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal that LJM of the hand is associated with incident of hospitalisation with infection. A diagnosis of LJM of the hand might, therefore, be a useful indicator for assessing the risk of hospitalisation with infection in type 2 diabetic patients.