1
|
Schøler PN, Søndergaard J, Barfod S, Nielsen AS. Danish feasibility study of a new innovation for treating alcohol disorders in primary care: the 15-method. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:34. [PMID: 35227207 PMCID: PMC8884098 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01639-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background The 15-method: a new brief intervention tool for alcohol problems in primary care has shown promising results in Sweden for mild to moderate alcohol use disorders. The present study evaluated the 15-method’s usability, organizational integration, and overall implementation feasibility in Danish general practice in preparation for a large-scale evaluation of the method’s effectiveness in identifying and treating alcohol problems in general practice. Methods Five general practices in the Central and Southern Region of Denmark participated: seven general practitioners (GPs), eight nurses. Participants received a half day of training in the 15-method. Testing of implementation strategies and overall applicability ran for 2 months. A focus group interview and two individual interviews with participating GPs along with five individual patient interviews concluded the study period. Results Results indicate that implementation of the 15-method is feasible in Danish general practice. The healthcare professionals and patients were positive about the method and its possibilities. The method was considered a new patient centered treatment offer and provided structure to a challenging topic. An interdisciplinary approach was much welcomed. Results indicate that the method is ready for large scale evaluation. Conclusions Implementation of the 15-method is considered feasible in Danish general practice and large-scale evaluation is currently being planned.
Collapse
|
2
|
Recruitment in Health Services Research-A Study on Facilitators and Barriers for the Recruitment of Community-Based Healthcare Providers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph181910521. [PMID: 34639820 PMCID: PMC8508262 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
In health services research, the recruitment of patients is oftentimes conducted by community-based healthcare providers. Therefore, the recruitment of these healthcare providers is a crucial prerequisite for successful patient recruitment. However, recruiting community-based healthcare providers poses a major challenge and little is known about its influencing factors. This qualitative study is conducted alongside a health services research intervention trial. The aim of the study is to investigate facilitators and barriers for the recruitment of community-based healthcare providers. A qualitative text analysis of documents and semi-structured interviews with recruiting staff is performed. An inductive–deductive category-based approach is used. Our findings identify intrinsic motivation and interest in the trial’s aims and goals as important facilitating factors in healthcare provider recruitment. Beyond that, extrinsic motivation generated through financial incentives or collegial obligation emerged as a conflicting strategy. While extrinsic motivation might aid in the initial enrollment of healthcare providers, it rarely resulted in active trial participation in the long run. Therefore, extrinsic motivational factors should be handled with care when recruiting healthcare providers for health services research intervention trials.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bjerregaard AL, Dalsgaard EM, Bruun NH, Norman K, Witte DR, Stovring H, Maindal HT, Sandbæk A. Effectiveness of the population-based 'check your health preventive programme' conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2021; 76:24-31. [PMID: 34145078 PMCID: PMC8666817 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-216581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Health checks have been suggested as an early detection approach aiming at lowering the risk of chronic disease development. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a health check programme offered to the general population, aged 30–49 years. Methods The entire population aged 30–49 years (N=26 216) living in the municipality of Randers, Denmark, was invited to a health check during 5 years. A pragmatic household cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in 10 505 citizens. The intervention group (IG, N=5250) included citizens randomised to the second year and reinvited in the 5th year. The comparison group (CG, N=5255) included citizens randomised to the 5th year. Outcomes were modelled cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; self-reported physical activity (PA) and objectively measured cardio respiratory fitness (CRF); self-rated health (short-form 12 (SF-12)), self-rated mental health (SF-12_Mental Component Score (MCS)) and, registry information on sick-leave and employment. Due to low participation, we compared groups matched on propensity scores for participation when reinvited. Results Participation in the first health check was 51% (N=2698) in the IG and 40% (N=2120) in the CG. In the IG 26% (N=1340) participated in both the first and second health checks. No intervention effects were found comparing IG and CG. Mean differences were (95% CI): modelled CVD risk: −0.052 (95% CI −0.107 to 0.003)%, PA: −0.156 (−0.331 to 0.019) days/week with 30 min moderate PA, CRF: 0.133 (−0.560 to 0.826) mL O2/min/kg, SF-12: −0.003 (−0.032 to 0.026), SF-12_MCS: 0.355 (-0.423 to 1.132), sick leave periods ≥3 weeks: −0.004 (−0.025 to 0.017), employment: −0.004 (−0.032 to 0.024). Conclusions Preventive health checks offered to the general population, aged 30–49 years, had no effects on a wide range of indicators of chronic disease risk. Trial registration number NCT02028195.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Louise Bjerregaard
- Public Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark .,Steno Diabetes Center Zealand, Holbaek, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Daniel R Witte
- Public Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.,Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Helle Terkildsen Maindal
- Public Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.,Health Promotion, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Annelli Sandbæk
- Public Health, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.,Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Westen-Lagerweij NA, Meeuwsen EG, Croes EA, Meijer E, Chavannes NH, Willemsen MC. The referral of patients to smoking cessation counselling: perceptions and experiences of healthcare providers in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:583. [PMID: 34140004 PMCID: PMC8210508 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06618-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few European smokers receive professional counselling when attempting to quit smoking, resulting in suboptimal success rates and poor health outcomes. Healthcare providers in general practice play an important role in referring smokers to smoking cessation counselling. We chose the Netherlands as a case study to qualitatively explore which factors play a role among healthcare providers in general practice with regard to referral for smoking cessation counselling organised both inside and outside general practice. Methods We conducted four focus groups and 18 telephone interviews, with a total of 31 healthcare providers who work in general practice. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify relevant factors related to referral behaviours, and each factor was linked to one of the three main components of the COM-B behaviour model (i.e., capability, opportunity and motivation) as well as the six sub-components of the model. Results Dutch healthcare providers in general practice typically refer smokers who want to quit to counselling inside their own general practice without actively discussing other counselling options, indicating a lack of shared decision making. The analysis showed that factors linked to the COM-B main components ‘capability’ and ‘opportunity’, such as healthcare providers’ skills and patients’ preferences, play a role in whether patients are referred to counselling inside general practice. Factors linked to all three COM-B components were found to play a role in referrals to counselling outside general practice. These included (knowledge of) the availability and quality of counselling in the region, patients’ requests, reimbursement, and sense of urgency to refer. The identified factors can both act as barriers and facilitators. Conclusions The findings of this research suggest that more smokers can be reached with smoking cessation counselling if implementation interventions focus on: (i) equipping healthcare providers with the knowledge and skills needed to refer patients; (ii) creating more opportunities for healthcare providers to refer patients (e.g., by improving the availability and reimbursement of counselling options); and (iii) motivating healthcare providers to discuss different counselling options with patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06618-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi A van Westen-Lagerweij
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Elisabeth G Meeuwsen
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Esther A Croes
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Meijer
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc C Willemsen
- The Netherlands Expertise Centre for Tobacco Control, Trimbos Institute, PO Box 725, 3500 AS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Grady MA, Conigliaro J, Levak S, Morley J, Kapoor S, Ritter M, Marini C, Morgenstern J. "I Felt I Was Reaching a Point with My Health": Understanding Reasons for Engagement and Acceptability of Treatment Services for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 12:21501327211003005. [PMID: 33733921 PMCID: PMC7983431 DOI: 10.1177/21501327211003005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES Despite increasing need, there are large gaps in provision of care for unhealthy alcohol use. Primary care practices have become increasingly important in providing services for unhealthy alcohol use, yet little is known about the reasons patients engage in these services and their views on acceptability of such programs. The purpose of this study was to examine primary care patients' reasons for engagement, experiences with, and acceptability of a primary care practice-based program for treating unhealthy alcohol use. METHODS This qualitative study was conducted in a primary care practice that was developing a collaborative care model for treating unhealthy alcohol use in primary care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 primary care patients. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Findings suggest that patients engaged for both internal (concerns about drinking and health) and external reasons (family or provider concern). Patient experiences in the program were shaped by their affective responses (enjoyable, enlightening), as well as therapeutic benefits (gaining new insights about drinking; staff/provider support). Acceptability was driven by core program elements (medication, therapy, integration) as well as positive impacts on drinking cognition and behavior and flexible, patient-centered approaches. CONCLUSIONS Offering flexible and comprehensive programs with mutiple elements and both abstinence and moderation goals could also improve patient engagement and views on acceptability. Primary care practices will need to be thoughtful about the resources needed to implement these programs in terms of staffing, training, and program support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A O'Grady
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Joseph Conigliaro
- Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.,Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | | | - Jeanne Morley
- Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.,Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Sandeep Kapoor
- Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.,Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Jon Morgenstern
- Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.,Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|