Management of overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a low resource setting: a real world report from Nigeria

Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Children: The Role of Endoscopy and the Sheffield Scoring System in a Resource-Limited Setting

Objective

To document the clinical presentation, endoscopic diagnosis, and Sheffield scores of children with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding who were referred for endoscopy at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. The participants who needed endoscopy based on clinical criteria and according to the Sheffield scores were also documented.

Methods

This study analyzed the records of 111 children with GI bleeding retrospectively from January 2013 to January 2021, while 9 children were recruited prospectively from February 2021 to March 2022. Receiver operating curves and area under the curve were generated to test the ability of the Sheffield scores to predict rebleeds, mortality, and the need for endoscopic intervention for upper GI bleeds.

Results

One hundred and twenty participants were recruited. Ninety-one (75.8%) presented with upper GI bleeding (UGIB), while 29 (24.2%) had lower GI bleeding (LGIB). Only 70 (58.3%) (53 UGIB and 17 LGIB) had endoscopy performed. For UGIB, 5 (9.4%) had no source of the bleeding identified at endoscopy, 12 (22.6%) had variceal bleeding, and 36 (67.9%) had nonvariceal bleeding. Colonoscopy revealed juvenile polyps in 5 (29.4%), indeterminate colitis in 5 (29.4%), ulcerative colitis in 4 (23.5%), Crohn's disease in 1 (5.9%), and hemorrhoids in 2 (11.8%) participants, respectively. The Sheffield score was ≥8 in 42 (46.1%) of the participants who presented only with UGIB (hematemesis and melena). The scores were significantly related to the type of bleeds, rebleeds, and deaths (P = 0.00).

Conclusion

The clinical and endoscopic findings in this study are similar to those reported previously. The Sheffield scoring was useful in assessing Nigerian children. However, due to limited access and other restraints, endoscopy was not performed on all the study participants even when the scoring system was suggestive. The availability, and therefore, utility of GI endoscopy in this setting are still suboptimal. The need for the provision of adequate equipment and resources and the training of personnel is thus recommended.

Indications and Findings of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Gastrointestinal disease is a significant global health problem. Symptoms related to digestive system diseases negatively affect quality of life and impose a significant economic impact. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms are common in the Ethiopian population, and the associated pathologies are diverse. Real-time endoscopic visualization of the upper gastrointestinal tract is crucial for diagnosis. However, local data on the indications for endoscopic evaluation and the common underlying pathologies are limited. This study aimed to assess the common indications and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings of patients presenting to Saint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing the complete records of patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation between January 2012 and December 2019. A structured checklist was used to screen records for completeness. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 25. Chi-square test was used to compare variables, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

Results

A total of 5753 patients underwent complete upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic evaluation during the study period. The median age of the patients was 37 years. Males accounted for 63.4% of the patients. Dyspepsia (27.8%) was the most common indication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation, followed by upper gastrointestinal bleeding (17.1%), and screening for varices (16.8%). Esophageal varices (35.8%), gastritis (18.1%), and duodenal ulcers (10.6%) were the most common pathologies found on esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, respectively. Common upper gastrointestinal pathologies are predominant among males and patients in their third decade of life.

Conclusion

Dyspepsia was the most common indication for endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Esophageal varices were the most common pathological finding, followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastritis, portal hypertensive gastropathy, duodenal ulcer, and hiatal hernia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy remains a vital tool for the diagnosis of pathologies of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Prevalence of gastrointestinal bleeding and frequency of selected predictors of mortality on the medical emergency ward at Mulago hospital

BACKGROUND

There was no data on the prevalence of Gastrointestinal bleeding (GI) among patients admitted on the emergency ward at Mulago hospital. This was partly because the medical records were not adequately completed as designed.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of gastrointestinal bleeding and the frequency of selected predictors of mortality on the emergency ward.

METHODS

This was a chart review incorporating quality improvement methods in the process of data collection. The health care team was educated on documentation of gastrointestinal bleeding while being assessed weekly for knowledge and practice of completion of the Casualty Assessment form (CAF) from which a documented diagnosis of GI bleeding and selected predictors of mortality were looked for.

RESULTS

Of the 1881 CAF assessed, 278 had a documented diagnosis of GI bleeding, resulting in a prevalence of 6.8%. Of the patients with GI bleeding, 14.1% had age greater than 60 years, 24.0% had a systolic blood pressure less than 100mmHg and 44.5% had a heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of GI bleeding on the medical emergency ward of Mulago hospital is high. This calls for strategies for resuscitative management of this life-threatening medical emergency. Among the selected predictors of mortality, tachycardia was most frequent followed by hypotension. These should always be assessed in a patient with GI bleeding and resuscitative measures with blood transfusion and intravenous fluids undertaken to correct them.

Endoscopic Findings in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Ogun State, Nigeria

Introduction

Although the global incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) appears to have reduced substantially in the past few decades, acute UGIB still carries significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. There are currently no published data on UGIB in Ogun State, Nigeria. This study examined the endoscopic findings in patients with UGIB in Ogun State. 

Methodology

The study was a retrospective cross-sectional survey of patients with UGIB who had upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at three endoscopy centers in Ogun State, Southwest Nigeria, from January 2015 to December 2021. Patients’ data, which included age, gender, and endoscopic findings, were extracted from the endoscopy registers into a spreadsheet and analyzed statistically. Summary statistics included means ± standard deviation for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Categorical variables were compared for differences by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. The statistical significance cutoff was p-value <0.05.

Results

A total of 171 had endoscopy for UGIB during the period under review but 168 had complete data. Out of the 168, 113 (67.3%) were males, giving a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. The mean age of the patients was 52.4 ± 18.1 years, with an age range of 7-85 years. The modal age group was ≥60 years (75; 39.9%). The most common endoscopic finding was peptic ulcer disease (77; 45.8%), followed by esophagogastric varices (27; 16.1%), erosive mucosal disease (25; 14.9 %), portal hypertensive gastropathy (15; 8.9%), suspected malignancies (11; 6.6%), hemorrhagic gastritis (7; 4.2%), gastric antral vascular ectasia (2; 1.2%), and Mallory-Weiss tear (1; 0.6%), respectively. Forty-four patients (26.2%) had no lesion that could explain UGIB. 

Conclusion

Peptic ulcer disease was the most common cause of UGIB among our patient population, and the elderly male patients were the most affected.

Endotherapy for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH) is a common GI emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Triaging cases on the basis of patient-related factors, restrictive blood transfusion strategy, and hemodynamic stabilization are key initial steps for the management of patients with NVUGIH. Endoscopy remains a vital step for both diagnosis and definitive management. Multiple studies and guidelines have now defined the optimum timing for performing the endoscopy after hospitalization, to better the outcome. Conventional methods for achieving endoscopic hemostasis, such as injection therapy, contact, and noncontact thermal therapy, and mechanical therapy, such as through-the-scope clips, have reported to have 76 to 90% efficacy for primary hemostasis. Newer modalities to enhance hemostasis rates have come in vogue. Many of these modalities, such as cap-mounted clips, coagulation forceps, and hemostatic powders have proved to be efficacious in multiple studies. Thus, the newer modalities are recommended not only for management of persistent bleed and recurrent bleed after failed initial hemostasis, using conventional modalities but also now being advocated for primary hemostasis. Failure of endotherapy would warrant radiological or surgical intervention. Some newer tools to optimize endotherapy, such as endoscopic Doppler probes, for determining flow in visible or underlying vessels in ulcer bleed are now being evaluated. This review is focused on the technical aspects and efficacy of various endoscopic modalities, both conventional and new. A synopsis of the various studies describing and comparing the modalities have been outlined. Postendoscopic management including Helicobacter pylori therapy and starting of anticoagulants and antiplatelets have also been outlined.

Re-bleed and Mortality Amongst Patients Following Initial Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Single-Center Nigeria Study

Background and aim Clinical and endoscopic parameters are predictive of patient outcome following acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The study aimed to investigate factors related to re-bleed and mortality following initial endoscopy among Nigerian patients with recent upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Methods This is a cohort study of patients undergoing endoscopy for recent-onset UGIB at a referral endoscopy facility in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria, from April 2014 to November 2020. Patients' demographic and clinical data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, amount of blood transfusion, endoscopy results, and Rockall scores were retrieved from patients' charts. The re-bleed and mortality rates were noted on follow-up by telephone. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 (IMB Inc., Armonk, USA). Results A total of 560 patients had flexible video oesophagogastroduodenoscopy during the study period, and 46 (8.2%) of these were included in the study. Their age ranged from 28 years to 84 years (mean 58.6 ± 15.8 years) with 32 (69.6%) males and 14 (30.4%) females. Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastritis/gastric erosions were the leading endoscopic diagnoses in 24 (52.2%) and 12 (26.1%) patients, respectively. Multiple comorbidities (p=0.021) and higher ASA score (mean 3.0; 95% confidence interval CI: 2.47-3.53; p=0.021) are associated with re-bleed, which was recorded in seven (15.2%) patients. Four (8.7%) cases of mortality were recorded in patients with a mean full Rockall score of 4.25 (95% CI: 1.52-6.97; p=0.021). Conclusion Re-bleed is more common in patients with multiple comorbidities, ASA score of three or more, and bleeding gastro-oesophageal varices at initial endoscopy. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with a full Rockall score of more than three.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy experience of surgical trainees throughout rural Africa

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) is not routinely accessible in many parts of rural Africa. As surgical training expands and technology progresses, the capacity to deliver endoscopic care to patients improves. We aimed to describe the current burden of gastrointestinal (GI) disease undergoing GIE by examining the experience of surgical training related to GIE.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on GIE procedures performed by trainees with complete case logs during 5-year general surgery training at Pan-African Academy of Christian Surgeons (PAACS) sites. Cases were classified according to diagnosis and/or indication, anatomic location, intervention, adverse events, and outcomes. Comparisons were performed by institutional location and case volumes. Analysis was performed for trainee self-reported autonomy by post-graduate year and case volume experience.

RESULTS

Twenty trainees performed a total of 2181 endoscopic procedures. More upper endoscopies (N = 1,853) were performed than lower endoscopies (N = 325). Of all procedures, 546 (26.7%) involved a cancer or mass, 267 (12.2%) involved a report of blood loss, and 452 (20.7%) reported pain as a component of the diagnosis. Interventions beyond biopsy were reported in 555 (25%) procedures. Esophageal indications predominated the upper endoscopies, particularly esophageal cancer. Trainees in high-volume centers and in East Africa performed more interventional endoscopy and procedures focused on esophageal cancer. Procedure logs documented adverse events in 39 cases (1.8% of all procedures), including 16 patients (0.8%) who died within 30 days of the procedure. Self-reported autonomy improved with both increased endoscopy experience and post-graduate year.

CONCLUSIONS

GIE is an appropriate component of general surgery residency training in Africa, and adequate training can be provided, particularly in upper GI endoscopy, and includes a wide variety of endoscopic therapeutic interventions.

Profile and outcome of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding presenting to urban emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Tanzania

Background

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation with high morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of data on the profile and outcome of patients who present with UGIB to EDs, especially within limited resource settings where emergency medicine is a new specialty. We aim to describe the patient profile, clinical severity and outcomes of the patients who present with UGIB to the ED of tertiary referral hospitals in Tanzania.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive adult (≥18 years) patients presenting to the EDs of Muhimbili National Hospital (ED-MNH) and MUHAS Academic Medical Centre (ED-MAMC), in Tanzania with non-traumatic upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from July 2018 to December 2018. Patient demographic data, clinical presentation, and ED and hospital management provided were recorded. We used the clinical Rockall score to assess disease severity. The primary outcome of 7- day mortality was summarized using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of mortality.

Results

During the study period, 123 patients presented to one of the two EDs with an UGIB. The median age was 42 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 32–64 years), and 87 (70.7%) were male. Hematemesis with melena was the most frequently encountered ED complaint 39 (31.7%). Within 7 days, 23 (18.7%) patients died and one-third 8 (34.8%) of these died within 24 h. There were no ED deaths. About 65.1% of the patients had severe anemia but only 60 (48.8%) received blood transfusion in the ED. Amongst those with history of (h/o) esophageal varices 7(41.2%) did not receive octreotide. Upper GI endoscopy, was performed on 46 (37.4%) patients, of whom only 8 (17.4%) received endoscopy within 24 h (early UGI endoscopy). All patients who received early UGI endoscopy had a low or moderate clinical Rockall score i.e. < 3 and 3–4. No patient with scores of > 4 received early UGI endoscopy. Age > 40 years was a significant independent predictor of mortality (OR = 7.00 (95% CI 1.7–29.2). Having a high clinical Rockall score of ≥ 4 was a significant independent predictor of mortality (OR = 6.4 (95% CI 1.8–22.8).

Conclusions

In this urban ED in Sub-Saharan Africa, UGIB carried a high mortality rate. Age > 40 years and clinical Rockall score ≥ 4 were independent predictors of higher mortality. Future studies should focus on evaluating how to improve access to UGI endoscopy so as to improve outcomes.

Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performances of the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), modified GBS (mGBS) and AIMS65 in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB).

METHODS

This study enrolled 320 consecutive patients with AUGIB. Patients at high and low risks of developing adverse clinical outcomes (rebleeding, the need of clinical intervention and death) were categorized according to the GBS, mGBS and AIMS65 scoring systems. The outcome of the patients were the occurrences of adverse clinical outcomes. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of three scoring systems were compared.

RESULTS

Irrespective of the systems used, the high-risk groups showed higher rates of rebleeding, intervention and death compared with the low-risk groups (P < 0.05). For the prediction of rebleeding, AIMS65 (AUROC 0.735, 95% CI 0.667-0.802) performed significantly better than GBS (AUROC 0.672, 95% CI 0.597-0.747; P < 0.01) and mGBS (AUROC 0.677, 95% CI 0.602-0.753; P < 0.01). For the prediction of interventions, there was no significant difference among the three systems (GBS: AUROC 0.769, 95% CI 0.668-0.870; mGBS: AUROC 0.745, 95% CI 0.643-0.847; AIMS65: AUROC 0.746, 95% CI 0.640-0.851). For the prediction of in-hospital mortality, there was no significant difference among the three systems (GBS: AUROC 0.796, 95% CI 0.694-0.898; mGBS: AUROC 0.803, 95% CI 0.703-0.904; AIMS65: AUROC 0.786, 95% CI 0.670-0.903).

CONCLUSIONS

The three scoring systems are reliable and accurate in predicting the rates of rebleeding, surgery and mortality in AUGIB. However, AIMS65 outperforms GBS and mGBS in predicting rebleeding.

A comparison of propofol and midazolam/meperidine sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing interest in sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE). Prospective randomized studies comparing sedation properties and complications of propofol and midazolam/meperidine in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) are few.

AIM

To compare propofol and midazolam/meperidine sedation for UGE in terms of cardiopulmonary side effects, patient and endoscopist satisfaction and procedure-related times.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of propofol versus midazolam and meperidine in 100 patients scheduled for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The patients were divided into propofol and midazolam/meperidine groups. Randomization was generated by a computer. Cardiopulmonary side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxemia), procedure-related times (endoscopy time, awake time, time to hospital discharge), and patient and endoscopist satisfaction were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the cost, endoscopy time, or demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients. Awake time and time to hospital discharge were significantly shorter in the propofol group (6.58 ±4.72 vs. 9.32 ±4.26 min, p = 0.030 and 27.60 ±7.88 vs. 32.00 ±10.54 min, p = 0.019). Hypotension incidence was significantly higher in the propofol group (12% vs. 0%, p = 0.027). The patient and endoscopist satisfaction was better with propofol.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol may be preferred to midazolam/meperidine sedation, with a shorter awake and hospital discharge time and better patient and endoscopist satisfaction. However, hypotension risk should be considered with propofol, and careful evaluation is needed, particularly in cardiopulmonary disorders.