Efficacy comparison of multi-phase CT and hepatotropic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia: a prospective cohort study

A comparative study of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of intrahepatic lesion

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of both gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for focal liver lesions, especially for the detection of small (<2 cm) intrahepatic lesions. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS before liver resection and compared Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS in the detection of focal liver lesions. A total of 216 patients were included, and 309 lesions were found. The sensitivity values of MRI and CEUS for the main lesion were both more than 95%, and the coincidence rates were both more than 80%. Regarding lesions <2 cm, 135 such lesions were detected by MRI, whereas only 85 were detected by CEUS. For lesions <2 cm, the sensitivity, specificity, and coincidence rates of MRI were significantly better than those of CEUS. Among 27 patients, 50 more lesions were detected by MRI than CEUS, 56% (28/50) of which were malignant. For the large lesion, the diagnostic performance is similar between Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI and CEUS, and the sensitivity and coincidence rates of both methods are high. Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI is likely to detect small (<2 cm) focal intrahepatic lesions.

Hydrogen Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) in Differential Diagnosis of Intracranial Tumors: A Systematic Review

Meningioma, glioma, and metastases are the most common intracranial tumors in clinical practice. In order to improve the prognosis of patients, timely diagnosis and early treatment are crucial. Hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) imaging can noninvasively display the biochemical information of tissues in vivo and has been applied to identify and diagnose intracranial tumors. We want to comprehensively evaluate 1H-MRS identify and diagnose intracranial tumors by meta-analysis. Some databases such as PubMed and Cochrane Library were used to systematically search articles that were about identifying and diagnosing intracranial tumors with 1H-MRS. Then, weighted mean difference (WMD) was used as an effect size to conduct meta-analysis. There are altogether nine articles, including 533 patients. Results of meta-analysis: The Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios in the LGG group were significantly lower than those in the HGG group (WMD = -0.69, 95% CI (-0.92, -0.45), P < 0.001, WMD = -0.76, 95% CI (-1.03, -0.48), P < 0.001). The Cho/Cr ratio of tumor and peritumor in the HGG group was significantly different from that in the metastasis group (0.68, 95% CI (-1.27, 2.62), P < 0.001, WMD = 0.94, 95% CI (0.41, 1.47), P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the tumor and peritumor NAA/Cr ratio between the HGG group and metastasis group (WMD = -0.64, 95% CI (-1.63, 0.34), P=0.31, WMD = -0.22, 95% CI (-0.59, 0.15), P=0.24). 1H-MRS can provide metabolic information of different intracranial tumors and can effectively diagnose and differentiate glioma and metastasis. 1H-MRS can also provide a reliable basis for the classification of glioma, and has certain clinical application value.

Novel Strategy for Diagnosis of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia Using Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid: Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Elastography

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is the second most frequent benign liver tumor, and it is a fiber-rich stiff lesion. Typically, FNH can be diagnosed by imaging without biopsy. However, liver biopsy and diagnostic resection may be required to differentiate atypical FNH from other liver tumors, such as hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). Therefore, improved noninvasive diagnostic methods are needed. We experienced 2 cases where combination of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helped diagnose FNH. A 36-year-old woman and 17-year-old boy with liver tumors measuring 40 mm in diameter each showed hypointense nodule centers, indicating a central scar, surrounded by hyperintense signals during the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. To rule out HCA, we performed MRE and liver biopsy. On MRE, the mean stiffness of the mass was 11.6 kPa (mean stiffness of the background liver was 1.7 kPa) and 11.1 kPa (mean stiffness of the background liver was 2.4 kPa) in the first and second patients, respectively. Histological examination of both specimens showed CK7-positive bile-ductular proliferations, abundant fibrous tissue, and few Ki-67-positive cells. Based on these results, we diagnosed these tumors as FNH. Combination of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and MRE can evaluate the character and stiffness of lesion and help in the diagnosis of FNH.

Diagnostic value of morphological enhancement patterns in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to distinguish focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma

OBJECTIVES

To describe the different morphological enhancement patterns of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI) and to determine their added value in their differential diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of imaging findings in 185 benign hepatocellular lesions (154 FNH; 31 HCA) in 108 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI was performed by two independent reviewers. Six patterns on HBP were recorded: 1) homogeneous enhancement; 2) peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense central core; 3) peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core; 4) central core enhancement with hypointense periphery; 5) heterogeneous enhancement; and 6) the absence of enhancement.

RESULTS

Peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense central core and peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core showed the highest specificity for the diagnosis of FNH (100% and 96.8%, respectively). The absence of enhancement and central core enhancement with hypointense periphery were only present in 0.6% and 1.9% of FHN, respectively. All other patterns were observed with similar frequencies in FNH (22.1% to 26.6%). Six HCA showed contrast uptake on the HBP: homogeneous (6.5%), peripheral ring-like enhancement with hyperintense central core (3.2%) and heterogeneous (9.7%).

CONCLUSION

Both FNH and HCA may demonstrate enhancement in the HBP of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, limiting its specificity. A significant improvement in specificity can be achieved by the evaluation of morphological enhancement patterns: Peripheral ring-like enhancement with hypointense or hyperintense central core was highly specific for FNH diagnosis. On the other hand, the absence of HBP enhancement makes the diagnosis of FNH unlikely.

Hepatic tumors: pitfall in diagnostic imaging

On computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hepatocellular tumors are characterized based on typical imaging findings. However, hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular carcinoma can show uncommon appearances at CT and MRI, which may lead to diagnostic challenges. When assessing focal hepatic lesions, radiologists need to be aware of these atypical imaging findings to avoid misdiagnoses that can alter the management plan. The purpose of this review is to illustrate a variety of pitfalls and atypical features of hepatocellular tumors that can lead to misinterpretations providing specific clues to the correct diagnoses. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Evaluation of texture analysis for the differential diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenoma on contrast-enhanced CT images

PURPOSE

To explore the value of CT texture analysis (CTTA) for differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, IRB-approved study conducted in a single institution. A search of the medical records between 2008 and 2017 revealed 48 patients with 70 HCA and 50 patients with 62 FNH. All lesions were histologically proven and with available pre-operative CECT imaging. Hepatic arterial phase (HAP) and portal venous phase (PVP) were used for CTTA. Textural features were extracted using a commercially available research software (TexRAD). The differences between textural parameters of FNH and HCA were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the AUROC were calculated. CTTA parameters showing significant difference in rank sum test were used for binary logistic regression analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

On HAP images, mean, mpp, and skewness were significantly higher in FNH than in HCA on unfiltered images (p ≤ 0.007); SD, entropy, and mpp on filtered analysis (p ≤ 0.006). On PVP, mean, mpp, and skewness in FNH were significantly different from HCA (p ≤ 0.001) on unfiltered images, while entropy and kurtosis were significantly higher in FNH on filtered images (p ≤ 0.018). The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the mean, mpp, and entropy of medium-level and coarse-level filtered images on HAP were independent predictors for the diagnosis of HCA and a model based on all these parameters showed the largest AUROC (0.824).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple explored CTTA parameters are significantly different between FNH and HCA on CECT.