Increased incidence of metachronous gastric neoplasm after endoscopic resection in patients with synchronous gastric neoplasm

Early gastric cancer of young patients treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection: focusing on the different characteristics and prognosis of elderly patients

BACKGROUND

A small portion of patients are diagnosed with early gastric cancer (EGC) and undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at a young age. However, their clinical outcomes are rarely known.

AIM

We investigated to identify the feasibility and clinical outcomes of ESD for EGC focusing on young patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outscomes of patients who had undergone ESD for the treatment of EGC at < 50 years of age. We enrolled patients who had been diagnosed with EGC and had undergone ESD between 2006 and 2020. We divided them by age as follows: ≤ 50 and > 50 years into the young age (YA) and other age (OA) groups, respectively.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1681 patients underwent ESD for EGC (YA group: 124 [7.4%], OA group: 1557 [92.6%]). The YA group had less severe atrophy and more undifferentiated (37.1% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001) and diffuse type (25% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001) histology. The curative resection rate was not significantly different between the groups. However, among 1075 patients who had achieved curative resection and had been followed-up for > 12 months, the YA group had a lower incidence of MGN (5.2% vs. 17.5%, P = 0.004) and MGC (2.6% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.019) than those exhibited by the OA group. The YA group was a significant negative predictor of MGN (odds ratio [OR]: 2.983, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.060-8.393, P = 0.038), and marginally negative predictor in MGC (OR: 3.909, 95% CI: 0.939-16.281, P = 0.061).

CONCLUSION

ESD is a favorable and effective therapeutic modality for EGC patients aged < 50 years, once curative resection is achieved.

External validation of the FAMISH predicting score for early gastric cancer with endoscopic submucosal dissection

OBJECTIVE

To externally validate the robustness of the FAMISH predicting score designed to estimate the risk of metachronous gastric lesions (MGLs) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 618 patients with EGC who underwent curative ESD at two tertiary referral teaching hospitals between January 2014 and December 2019. FAMISH score was a composite indicator of age, sex, family history, corpus intestinal metaplasia, synchronous lesions, and H. pylori infection. Discrimination, calibration, and risk stratification of these scores were assessed. Associations between MGL characteristics and FAMISH scores were also explored.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 60 months, 83 of 618 patients (13.4%) developed MGL. The discrimination ability according to the area under the curve was 0.708 (95% CI, 0.645-0.772) for predicting the 5-year MGL. The calibration results showed good consistency between the predicted and actual MGL (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P  > 0.05). In terms of risk stratification, the 5-year MGL rates were 4.1% (95% CI, 1.6%-6.5%), 10.8% (95% CI, 7.2%-14.3%), and 32.1% (95% CI, 20.9%-41.7%) in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively ( P  < 0.001). For patients with MGL, the curative resection rate of ESD was significantly higher in the low- and intermediate-risk groups than in the high-risk group (100% vs. 80%, P  = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

The FAMISH predicting score was externally validated and can be generalized to an independent patient population. This adjuvant tool can assist in individual clinical decision-making.

The optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Due to the possible metachronous recurrence of gastric neoplasia, surveillance gastroscopy is mandatory after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia. However, there is no consensus on the surveillance gastroscopy interval. This study aimed to find an optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy and to investigate the risk factors for metachronous gastric neoplasia.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed retrospectively in patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia in 3 teaching hospitals from June 2012 to July 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; annual surveillance vs. biannual surveillance. The incidence of metachronous gastric neoplasia was identified, and the risk factors for metachronous gastric neoplasia were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the 1,533 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia, 677 patients were enrolled in this study (annual surveillance 302, biannual surveillance 375). Metachronous gastric neoplasia was observed in 61 patients (annual surveillance 26/302, biannual surveillance 32/375, P = 0.989), and metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma was observed in 26 patients (annual surveillance 13/302, biannual surveillance 13/375, P = 0.582). All the lesions were removed by endoscopic resection successfully. In a multivariate analysis, severe atrophic gastritis on gastroscopy was an independent risk factor for metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4‒10.1; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Meticulous observation to detect the metachronous gastric neoplasia is necessary for patients with severe atrophic gastritis during follow-up gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia. Annual surveillance gastroscopy might be enough after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia.

Comparative molecular subtypes of index and metachronous gastric adenocarcinomas: a study of 42 Korean patients

To date, there have been no studies comparing the molecular subtypes of Index gastric cancers (IGCs) and metachronous gastric cancers (MGCs). We evaluated a cohort of 42 patients with 43 IGCs and 45 MGCs. Molecular subtyping was performed by immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, E-cadherin, p53, and Epstein-Barr virus- (EBV-) in situ hybridization (ISH). Gastric adenocarcinomas were classified into 5 subtypes: EBV-associated, MMR deficient (MMRD), E-cadherin aberrant, p53-aberrant [p53(+)], and p53 non-aberrant [p53(neg)]. All IGCs had been successfully treated by either surgery (19%) or endoscopic resection (81%). The mean interval between IGCs and MGCs was 85 months. Among the IGCs, EBV-associated, MMRD, E-cadherin-aberrant, p53(+), and p53(neg) molecular subtypes represented 2 (5%), 4 (9%), 2 (5%), 21 (49%), and 14 (32%) of the cases, respectively. Two cases had concomitant p53(+) and aberrant E-cadherin molecular subtypes. Among metachronous cancers, EBV-associated, MMRD, E-cadherin-aberrant, p53(+), and p53(neg) molecular subtypes represented 3 (7%), 11 (24%), 0 (0%), 22 (49%), and 9 (20%) cases. Concomitant p53(+) was observed in 1 EBV-associated and 2 MMRD MGCs. Although, there was no significant difference in the frequency of most molecular subtypes in IGCs and MGCs, the number of MMRD gastric cancers more than doubled in the MGC group. Half of the MGCs had a divergent molecular subtype compared to that of the IGCs. Notably, the interval between the development of IGCs and MGCs was significantly longer in patients with divergent molecular subtypes (P = 0.010). All 4 patients with MMRD IGC developed MMRD MGCs. Although the concept of mucosal field cancerization may explain the matching molecular subtypes in early-developing MGCs, the presence of divergent subtypes in late-occurring MGCs suggests a shift in the carcinogenic mechanism affecting the residual mucosa possibly related to Helicobacter pylori eradication.