Systematic review and meta-analysis: the advantage of endoscopic Mayo score 0 over 1 in patients with ulcerative colitis

Editorial: Mucosal healing with steroids: Once upon a time in ulcerative colitis

This article is linked to Fukuda et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18013 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18111

Disease Clearance as a New Outcome in Ulcerative Colitis: a Systematic Review and Expert Consensus

The concept of disease clearance has been proposed as a potential target in ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a systematic review to investigate the role of disease clearance, defined as a composite outcome including simultaneous clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission of disease in the management of patients with UC. Based on the literature data, statements regarding disease clearance were developed and voted on by the members of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD) according to a Delphi methodology. A definition of disease clearance was proposed to standardize its use in clinical practice and clinical trials and to provide practical recommendations for its implementation as a therapeutic target in UC.

Drug Optimization in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Global Survey

Background/Objectives: The treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) is challenging. Although there are commonly used guidelines, therapy optimization is not standardized. We conducted a survey to investigate the management and treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate UC. Methods: Physicians with experience in treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) were invited to participate in an anonymous, multiple-choice survey between June and July 2023. The survey addressed various issues of patient care such as patient monitoring, treatment optimization, follow-up, treatment decision making, and therapy de-escalation. Results: The survey included 222 physicians (59.9% men; mean age = 50.4 years) from 66 countries worldwide. Gastroenterologists were the most represented specialists (89.6%), followed by surgeons (3.2%), and internal medicine doctors (2.7%). Two-thirds of the participants (66.7%) had >10 years of experience in the field of IBD. The combination of oral (≥4 g/day) and rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was the preferred choice when optimizing therapy. Budesonide MMX (41.8%) and systemic steroids (39.9%) were preferred in patients who failed 5-ASA. Treatment decisions were predominantly based on endoscopic (99.0%) or clinical (59.8%) activity. A significant percentage of clinicians did not optimize therapy in the case of increased fecal calprotectin alone (45.1%) or radiological/ultrasound activity (39.8%) alone. Conclusions: The guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate UC are well accepted in clinical practice. Endoscopic remission remains the main therapeutic target, followed by clinical remission. Fecal calprotectin and intestinal ultrasound still elicit complaints from physicians.

Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in Ulcerative Proctitis Compared to Left Sided Colitis and Pancolitis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative proctitis (UP), though associated with high symptom burden and poor quality of life, is excluded from most of the randomized controlled trials in UC, including the OCTAVE trials. We aimed to analyse the effectiveness of tofacitinib in UP, and compare it to that in left sided colitis (LSC) and pancolitis (PC).

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. Patients with either steroid-dependent or refractory ulcerative colitis, who received tofacitinib, were divided into three groups based on the disease extent [UP, LSC and PC]. The primary outcome was comparison of proportion of patients in clinical remission in the three groups, at weeks 8, 16 and 48. Safety outcomes were reported using incidence rate per patient year of exposure.

RESULTS

Clinical remission was achieved in 47%(15/32), 24%(23/94), and 43%(23/54) of patients at week 8, 56%(18/32), 37%(35/94), and 56%(30/54) of patients at week 16, and 59%(19/32), 38%(36/94), and 24%(13/54) of patients at week 48 in groups UP, LSC and PC, respectively. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were significantly higher in patients in groups UP at week 48. Five (15%) patients with UP were primary non-responders to tofacitinib at week 16, while three (9%) patients had secondary loss of response at week 48. The probability of sustained clinical response was highest in patients with UP. Patients with UP had the lowest incidence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of tofacitinib in inducing and maintaining clinical remission is greater in patients with UP compared to LSC and PC.

The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity score is superior to reflecting long-term prognosis in ulcerative colitis patients treated with vedolizumab

The scoring systems commonly used to assess endoscopic disease severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) in clinical research and practice include the Mayo endoscopic score (MES), ulcerative colitis endoscopic severity index (UCEIS), and degree of ulcerative colitis burden of luminal inflammation (DUBLIN). We aimed to assess and compare the predictive efficacy of the MES, DUBLIN score and UCEIS score for prognosis in UC patients treated with vedolizumab (VDZ). Seventy-four UC patients who treated with VDZ from September 2021 to February 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. We used the MES, DUBLIN and UCEIS score to evaluate endoscopic findings. The predictive capability of these 3 scores for surgery or therapeutic escalation was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The mean MES, DUBLIN and UCEIS score significantly improved from 2.83 ± 0.38, 7.80 ± 1.82 and 6.24 ± 1.51 to 2.07 ± 0.88, 5.57 ± 2.68, and 3.72 ± 2.12, respectively (P < .001). Lower pre-therapeutic UCEIS scores were associated with favorable short-term outcomes. Importantly, the post-therapeutic UCEIS score showed the best predictive capability with an area under curve of 0.871 (95% confidence interval: 0.767-0.976), specificity of 0.654, sensitivity of 0.900, and cutoff value of 3.5. A UCEIS score of ≥ 4 after treatment was correlated with surgical operation or treatment escalation. The UCEIS score is superior to the MES and DUBLIN score in reflecting short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis in UC patients treated with VDZ, and clinical remission could be defined as a UCEIS score ≤ 3.

Different levels of healing in inflammatory bowel diseases: mucosal, histological, transmural, barrier and complete healing

Mucosal healing on endoscopy has emerged as a key prognostic parameter in the management of patients with IBD (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis/UC) and can predict sustained clinical remission and resection-free survival. The structural basis for this type of mucosal healing is a progressive resolution of intestinal inflammation with associated healing of ulcers and improved epithelial barrier function. However, in some cases with mucosal healing on endoscopy, evidence of histological activity in mucosal biopsies has been observed. Subsequently, in UC, a second, deeper type of mucosal healing, denoted histological healing, was defined which requires the absence of active inflammation in mucosal biopsies. Both levels of mucosal healing should be considered as initial events in the resolution of gut inflammation in IBD rather than as indicators of complete transmural healing. In this review, the effects of anti-inflammatory, biological or immunosuppressive agents as well as small molecules on mucosal healing in clinical studies are highlighted. In addition, we focus on the implications of mucosal healing for clinical management of patients with IBD. Moreover, emerging techniques for the analysis of mucosal healing as well as potentially deeper levels of mucosal healing such as transmural healing and functional barrier healing of the mucosa are discussed. Although none of these new levels of healing indicate a definitive cure of the diseases, they make an important contribution to the assessment of patients' prognosis. The ultimate level of healing in IBD would be a resolution of all aspects of intestinal and extraintestinal inflammation (complete healing).

Higher Adalimumab Trough Levels Are Associated with Histologic Remission and Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

(1) Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in endoscopic remission have persistent histologic activity, which is associated with worse outcomes. There are limited data on the association between adalimumab drug concentrations and histologic outcomes using validated histologic indices. We aimed to assess the relationship between adalimumab concentrations and the Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI). (2) Patients from a tertiary IBD center from 2013 to 2020 with serum adalimumab (ADA) trough concentrations measured during maintenance therapy (≥14 weeks) and a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsies performed within 90 days of drug level were included. Blinded histologic scoring using the RHI was performed. Primary analysis assessed the relationship between adalimumab drug concentrations and histologic remission using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. (3) In 36 patients (26 Crohn's Disease, 9 ulcerative colitis, 1 indeterminate), median adalimumab concentrations were higher (17.3 ug/mL, 12.2-24.0) in patients with histologic remission compared to those without (10.3 ug/mL, 6.8-13.9, p = 0.008). The optimal ADA concentration identified using the Youden threshold was ≥16.3 ug/mL (sensitivity 70%, specificity 90%). Patients with ADA ≥ 16.3 ug/mL had higher histologic remission rates (78%) compared to lower ADA concentrations (14%, p= 0.002), as well as higher mucosal healing rates (86%) compared to lower levels (12%, p = 0.001). Symptoms correlated weakly and non-significantly with both histologic (RHI) scores (r = 0.25, p = 0.2) and adalimumab concentrations (r = 0.05, p = 0.8). (4) The current study demonstrated that higher serum adalimumab concentrations (≥16.3 ug/mL) are needed for histologic remission and mucosal healing assessed using the RHI.

Benefits and Challenges of Treat-to-Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

There is notable disparity between symptomatology and disease activity in a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and escalation of treatment based on symptoms alone can fail to significantly alter the course of disease. The STRIDE-II position statement, published in 2021 by the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) initiative of the International Organisation for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) provides the most current recommendations for a treat-to-target (T2T) approach in IBD. Despite the benefits offered by a T2T approach in IBD, there are numerous drawbacks and current limitations to its widespread implementation in real-world clinical practice. Owing to the lack of a standardised definition of MH, outcome data are heterogeneous and limit the comparability of existing data. Further, studies investigating the likelihood of achieving MH with a T2T approach are limited and largely retrospective. Evidence of the real-world feasibility of tight monitoring is currently minimal and demonstrates sub-optimal adherence among patients. Further, the few studies on the acceptability and uptake of a T2T approach in real-world practice demonstrate the need for increased acceptability on both patients' and clinicians' behalf. Real-world applicability is further limited by the need for repeated endoscopic assessments of MH as well as a lack of guidance on how to incorporate the various treatment targets into therapeutic decision-making. We aim to review the benefits and challenges of the T2T approach and to discuss potential solutions to further patient care.

Deep learning model for distinguishing Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 and 1 in patients with ulcerative colitis

The aim of this study was to address the issue of differentiating between Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 and MES 1 using a deep learning model. A dataset of 492 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who demonstrated MES improvement between January 2018 and December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center was utilized. Specifically, two representative images of the colon and rectum were selected from each patient, resulting in a total of 984 images for analysis. The deep learning model utilized in this study consisted of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based encoder, with two auxiliary classifiers for the colon and rectum, as well as a final MES classifier that combined image features from both inputs. In the internal test, the model achieved an F1-score of 0.92, surpassing the performance of seven novice classifiers by an average margin of 0.11, and outperforming their consensus by 0.02. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to be 0.97 when considering MES 1 as positive, with an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.98. In the external test using the Hyperkvasir dataset, the model achieved an F1-score of 0.89, AUROC of 0.86, and AUPRC of 0.97. The results demonstrate that the proposed CNN-based model, which integrates image features from both the colon and rectum, exhibits superior performance in accurately discriminating between MES 0 and MES 1 in patients with UC.

Prophylactic Treatment with Vedolizumab in the Prevention of Postoperative Recurrence (POR) in High-Risk Crohn's Patients

About 50% of Crohn's Disease (CD) patients undergo an intestinal resection during their lifetime. Although the patients experience a fairly long period of well-being after the intestinal resection, they presented a postoperative recurrence (POR) in 40% of cases within 5 years. In this case series, we aimed to evaluate the incidence of POR in CD patients with high risk for early POR, prophylactically treated with Vedolizumab. All consecutive CD patients (followed from 2017 to 2020) who underwent ileocolonic resection after the loss of response at anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α (anti-TNFα) and with one or more risk factors for early POR were included. POR was defined as a Rutgeerts score (Ri) > 1 at the colonoscopic evaluation. All the included patients underwent a Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) at least one year after the surgical resection. Six patients (4 Female; 2 Males) were included. At the first endoscopic evaluation, all patients were in endoscopic remission (5 patients Ri 0; 1 patient Ri 1). No stenosis nor other intestinal wall changes or complications were observed at MRE. Five patients underwent colonoscopy over two years of follow-up (median: 32 months; range 25-33). The Ri score was 0 in four patients, while the fifth patient showed severe endoscopic relapse. The same patient presented a clinical relapse (Harvey-Bradshaw index = 10) with a flare of disease in the colonic mucosa. These data suggest that early post-operative treatment with Vedolizumab could be a valuable strategy to be submitted to a prospective controlled trial for preventing POR.

Usefulness of texture and color enhancement imaging in assessing mucosal healing in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic remission is known to be defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) of ≤1 in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, some individuals experience relapse even after showing endoscopic remission under white-light imaging (WLI), and no tool exists that can detect these individuals. The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) in the assessment of inflammation in patients with UC.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-arm, observational study conducted at a university hospital. From January 2021 to December 2021, 146 UC patients with endoscopic remission were enrolled. Images were evaluated by WLI, TXI, and pathologic evaluation, followed by prognostic studies. The primary endpoint of the study was the cumulative relapse of UC in each TXI score. The secondary endpoints were the association between TXI and pathologic scores, predictors of relapse, and interobserver agreement between the MES and TXI scores.

RESULTS

Patients with TXI score 2 had significantly lower UC relapse-free rates than did those with TXI scores 0-1 (log-rank test, P < .01). When pathologic remission was defined as Matts grade ≤2, the rate of pathologic remission decreased significantly with higher TXI scores (P = .01). In multivariate analysis, TXI score 2 was the only risk factor for UC relapse (P < .01; hazard ratio, 4.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-10.04). Interobserver agreement on the TXI score was good (κ = 0.597-0.823).

CONCLUSION

TXI can be used to identify populations with poor prognosis in MES 1, for whom treatment intensification has been controversial.

Disease clearance in ulcerative colitis: Setting the therapeutic goals for future in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis, one of the phenotypic patterns of inflammatory bowel disease, should be considered a progressive disease with an increased risk of complications if intestinal inflammation is not adequately controlled. The advent of new lines of treatment for this condition has changed and expanded the therapeutic goals to modify its natural history and evolution. The concept of "disease clearance" in ulcerative colitis aims to achieve clinical and biological remission as well as mucosal healing (endoscopic, histological, and in future molecular) in these patients. This review provides the available data on each of the goals of disease clearance in ulcerative colitis to be considered for application in clinical practice in the coming years.