1
|
Dawoud C, Gidl D, Widmann KM, Pereyra D, Harpain F, Kama B, Riss S. Endosonographic monitoring of Sphinkeeper ® prostheses movements: does physical activity have an impact? Updates Surg 2024; 76:169-177. [PMID: 37640968 PMCID: PMC10805872 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01636-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
The Sphinkeeper® procedure for treating faecal incontinence (FI) may be associated with potential implant migration (IM) and dislocation (ID), with considerable variations regarding their occurrence and effects on consecutive functional outcome. This study assessed IM and ID following the Sphinkeeper® procedure and its correlation with physical activity. This was a prospective observational clinical study of ten patients undergoing Sphinkeeper® operation due to FI between August 2020 and November 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna. Patients were followed-up after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Each follow-up visit included endosonographic monitoring of protheses location and manometric examinations. Additionally, functional outcome and physical activity were assessed using validated standardized questionnaires. The median number of prostheses implanted was 10 (IQR 9-10). The St. Mark's incontinence (SMS) score improved significantly until the last follow-up (p = 0.049), without observing a significant effect on the physical SF-12 score. The median rate of implants leading to IM and ID was 3 (range 1-4) and 2 (range 1-2) after 3 months of follow-up. A strong association of deltaSMS with number of dislocated prostheses at one month after Sphinkeeper® implantation was observed (r = 0.654, p = 0.078). Physical activity, assessed by the international physical activity questionnaire, did not have an impact on the correct prosthesis placement (1 month: p = 0.527; 2 months: p = 0.886; 3 months: p = 0.180; 6 months: p = 0.111). IM and ID of Sphinkeeper® prostheses occurred frequently early after surgery and affected functional outcome negatively. Physical activity did not have an influence on the implants displacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Dawoud
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Gidl
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kerstin Melanie Widmann
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Pereyra
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Felix Harpain
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Berfin Kama
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Riss
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dawoud C, Widmann KM, Pereyra D, Harpain F, Riss S. Long-term outcome after SphinKeeper® surgery for treating fecal incontinence-who are good candidates? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:456. [PMID: 38052934 PMCID: PMC10698116 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03188-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The efficacy of the novel SphinKeeper® procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) is not yet well defined. This study aimed to assess long-term functional outcomes after SphinKeeper® surgery. METHODS We included 32 patients with FI (28 female), who were operated at a tertiary referral center between August 2018 and September 2021. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated prospectively using validated questionnaires before and after surgery. Additionally, endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry were conducted prior and after SphinKeeper® implantation. Predictive parameters for treatment success were defined. RESULTS The mean follow-up time was 22.62 ± 8.82 months. The St. Mark's incontinence score decreased significantly after surgery (median preoperative = 19 (IQR 17-22) versus median last follow-up = 12 (IQR 8-16), p = 0.001). Similarly, physical short-form health survey showed a significant improvement after SphinKeeper® implantation (p = 0.011). Patients with a higher degree of internal sphincter defect showed an improved objective therapy success (r = 0.633, p = 0.015) after SphinKeeper® operation, whereas the type and severity of FI had no impact on the functional outcome. Notably, a higher number of dislocated prostheses (r = 0.772, p = 0.015) showed a significant correlation with reduced improvement of incontinence. CONCLUSION The SphinKeeper® procedure showed a significant long-term functional improvement in over half of the patients. Patients with a higher internal sphincter defect benefited most, whereas dislocation of the prostheses was associated with less favorable results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Dawoud
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kerstin Melanie Widmann
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Pereyra
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Felix Harpain
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Riss
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Remes-Troche JM, Coss-Adame E, García-Zermeño KR, Gómez-Escudero O, Amieva-Balmori M, Gómez-Castaños PC, Charúa-Guindic L, Icaza-Chávez ME, López-Colombo A, Morel-Cerda EC, Pérez Y López N, Rodríguez-Leal MC, Salgado-Nesme N, Sánchez-Avila MT, Valdovinos-García LR, Vergara-Fernández O, Villar-Chávez AS. The Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2023; 88:404-428. [PMID: 38097437 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/01/2024]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence is the involuntary passage or the incapacity to control the release of fecal matter through the anus. It is a condition that significantly impairs quality of life in those that suffer from it, given that it affects body image, self-esteem, and interferes with everyday activities, in turn, favoring social isolation. There are no guidelines or consensus in Mexico on the topic, and so the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología brought together a multidisciplinary group (gastroenterologists, neurogastroenterologists, and surgeons) to carry out the «Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence» and establish useful recommendations for the medical community. The present document presents the formulated recommendations in 35 statements. Fecal incontinence is known to be a frequent entity whose incidence increases as individuals age, but one that is under-recognized. The pathophysiology of incontinence is complex and multifactorial, and in most cases, there is more than one associated risk factor. Even though there is no diagnostic gold standard, the combination of tests that evaluate structure (endoanal ultrasound) and function (anorectal manometry) should be recommended in all cases. Treatment should also be multidisciplinary and general measures and drugs (lidamidine, loperamide) are recommended, as well as non-pharmacologic interventions, such as biofeedback therapy, in selected cases. Likewise, surgical treatment should be offered to selected patients and performed by experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Remes-Troche
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico.
| | - E Coss-Adame
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - K R García-Zermeño
- Gastroenterología y Motilidad Digestiva, CIGMA, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - O Gómez-Escudero
- Clínica de Gastroenterología, Endoscopía Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Hospital Ángeles de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - M Amieva-Balmori
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - P C Gómez-Castaños
- Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
| | - L Charúa-Guindic
- Práctica privada, Coloproctología del Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M E Icaza-Chávez
- Hospital Christus Muguerza Faro del Mayab, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico
| | - A López-Colombo
- UMAE Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Manuel Ávila Camacho, IMSS Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - E C Morel-Cerda
- Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | - M C Rodríguez-Leal
- Hospital Ángeles Valle Oriente, IMSS UMAE 25, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - N Salgado-Nesme
- Departamento de Cirugía, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Mexico City,Mexico
| | - M T Sánchez-Avila
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - L R Valdovinos-García
- Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - O Vergara-Fernández
- Departamento de Cirugía Colorrectal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|