1
|
Byrnes A, Flynn R, Watt A, Barrimore S, Young A. Sustainability of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in gastrointestinal surgery: A scoping review. J Eval Clin Pract 2024; 30:217-233. [PMID: 37957803 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based intervention that is well-recognised across multiple surgical specialties as having potential to lead to improved patient and hospital outcomes. Little is known about sustainability of ERAS programmes. AIMS This review aimed to describe available evidence evaluating sustainability of ERAS programmes in gastrointestinal surgery to understand: (a) how sustainability has been defined; (b) examine determinants of sustainability; (c) identify strategies used to facilitate sustainability; (d) identify adaptations to support sustainability; and (e) examine outcomes measured as indicators of sustainability of ERAS programmes. METHODS This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Research databases (PubMed, Embase, CINHAL) and the grey literature were searched (inception to September 2022) for studies reporting sustainability of ERAS programmes in gastrointestinal surgery. Included articles reported an aspect of sustainability (i.e., definition, determinants, strategies, adaptations, outcomes and ongoing use) at ≥2 years following initial implementation. Aspects of sustainability were categorised according to relevant frameworks to facilitate synthesis. RESULTS The search strategy yielded 1852 records; first round screening excluded 1749, leaving 103 articles for full text review. Overall, 22 studies were included in this review. Sustainability was poorly conceptualised and inconsistently reported across included studies. Provision of adequate resources was the most frequently identified enabler to sustainability (n/N = 9/12, 75%); however, relatively few studies (n = 4) provided a robust report of determinants, with no study reporting determinants of sustainability and strategies and adaptations to support sustainability alongside patient and service delivery outcomes. CONCLUSION Improved reporting, particularly of strategies and adaptations to support sustainability is needed. Refinement of ERAS reporting guidelines should be made to facilitate this, and future implementation studies should plan to document and report changes in context and corresponding programme changes to help researchers and clinicians sustain ERAS programmes locally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Byrnes
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rachel Flynn
- Health Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Amanda Watt
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sally Barrimore
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
| | - Adrienne Young
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gu X, Shen X, Chu JH, Fang TT, Jiang L. Frailty, Illness Perception and Lung Functional Exercise Adherence in Lung Cancer Patients After Thoracoscopic Surgery. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:2773-2787. [PMID: 37936716 PMCID: PMC10627072 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s435944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Lung cancer patients will have lung damage after surgery, need rehabilitation exercise. Common-sense model has shown the impact of patients' perception of illness on health behaviors. However, for patients with lung cancer after thoracoscopic surgery, there has been no relevant exploration of disease perception. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical status of patients with lung cancer patients who have undergone thoracoscopic surgery, and to explore the correlation between frailty, disease perception, and lung functional exercise compliance. Methods The cross-sectional study included 218 patients with lung cancer after thoracoscopic surgery. We collected participants' frailty, disease perception, exercise adherence, and relevant clinical information. T-test, Chi-square, Linear regression, Pearson's correlation, and mediation analysis were used for statistical analysis of patient data. Results We analyzed the data by disease perception with high and low median scores and found significant differences in lymphatic dissection, stool within three days, pain, thoracic drainage tube placement time. Linear regression results show that, after controlling for confounding factors, frailty and disease perception were significantly associated with pulmonary function exercise compliance. The higher the frailty score, the worse the compliance, and the higher the disease perception negative score, the less exercise. Illness perception played a partially mediating role in the association between frailty and lung functional exercise adherence. Conclusion Frailty and disease perception have an impact on exercise adherence, therefore, we need to consider these factors in the intervention to improve exercise compliance after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Gu
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xia Shen
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiang-Hui Chu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ting-Ting Fang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Huadong Sanatorium, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tan P, Huo M, Zhou X, Zhao B. The safety and effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:6535-6545. [PMID: 37389596 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04963-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To systematically review and analyze the safety and effectiveness of ERAS in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and other databases to identify all randomized controlled studies and cohorts. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale to assess the study quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance weighting method. RESULTS This study included 15 studies involving a total of 2591 older patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries with 1480 in the ERAS group. The ERAS group had a lower incidence of postoperative complications than the control group (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.42-0.65). Length of stay was 3.37 days lower in the ERAS group than in the control group (P < 0.01). And the ERAS protocol reduced the patient's postoperative VAS score (P < 0.01). Meanwhile, there was a lack of evidence of significant differences between the ERAS group and the control group in total bleeding and 30-day readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of the ERAS program in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries is safe and effective. However, there is still a lack of standardization of protocols across institutions and centers for orthopedic surgery for older patients. Identifying ERAS components that are beneficial to older patients and developing ERAS protocols that are appropriate for older adults may further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiya Tan
- School of Nursing, Dalian University, No. 24 Luxun Road, Zhongshan District, Dalian, China
| | - Miao Huo
- School of Nursing, Dalian University, No. 24 Luxun Road, Zhongshan District, Dalian, China
| | - Xiaohua Zhou
- School of Nursing, Dalian University, No. 24 Luxun Road, Zhongshan District, Dalian, China
| | - Bolun Zhao
- School of Nursing, Dalian University, No. 24 Luxun Road, Zhongshan District, Dalian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jin Z, Rismany J, Gidicsin C, Bergese SD. Frailty: the perioperative and anesthesia challenges of an emerging pandemic. J Anesth 2023; 37:624-640. [PMID: 37311899 PMCID: PMC10263381 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03206-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Frailty is a complex and multisystem biological process characterized by reductions in physiological reserve. It is an increasingly common phenomena in the surgical population, and significantly impacts postoperative recovery. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of frailty, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations for frailty care. We will also discuss the different models of postoperative care, including enhanced recovery pathways, as well as elective critical care admission. With discoveries of new effective interventions, and advances in healthcare information technology, optimized pathways could be developed to provide the best care possible that meets the challenges of perioperative frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaosheng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Level 4, Room 060, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA
| | - Joshua Rismany
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Level 4, Room 060, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA
| | - Christopher Gidicsin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Level 4, Room 060, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA
| | - Sergio D Bergese
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Level 4, Room 060, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lambert J, Mair T, Arujunan K, Shugaba A, Uwadiae H, Livesey A, Ahmad R, Sgourakis G, Gaffney C, Subar D. The effect of the enhanced recovery programme on long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:239. [PMID: 37337084 PMCID: PMC10279559 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02968-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery programmes are associated with improved short-term outcomes following liver surgery. The impact of enhanced recovery programmes on medium- and long-term outcomes is incompletely understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on long-term survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases. METHODS At a tertiary hepatobiliary centre, we analysed short-, medium- and long-term outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. A five-year retrospective review was carried out comparing the enhanced recovery programme to standard care. RESULTS A total of 172 patients were included in the analysis: 87 on standard care and 85 on an enhanced recovery programme. Open surgery was performed in 122 patients: 74 (85.1%) and 48 (56.5%) patients in the standard care and enhanced recovery programme, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in the median (IQR) length of hospital stay in the enhanced recovery programme compared with standard care (7 (5) days vs. 8 (3) days, p = 0.0009). There was no significant difference in survival between standard care and the Enhanced Recovery Programme at one (p = 0.818), three (p = 0.203), and five years (p = 0.247). CONCLUSION An enhanced recovery programme was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay. There was no effect on the one-, three- and five-year survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Lambert
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
- Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK
| | - Thomas Mair
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| | - Kalaiyarasi Arujunan
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| | - Abdulwarith Shugaba
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
- Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK
| | - Harmony Uwadiae
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| | - Anne Livesey
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| | - Rami Ahmad
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| | - Georgios Sgourakis
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| | - Christopher Gaffney
- Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK.
| | - Daren Subar
- BRIDGES Research Group, Department of General and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
- Lancaster Medical School, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu B, Liu S, Zheng T, Lu D, Chen L, Ma T, Wang Y, Gao G, He S. Neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery ERAS for geriatric patients undergoing elective craniotomy: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30043. [PMID: 35984154 PMCID: PMC9388027 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Population aging is an unprecedented, multifactorial, and global process that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize perioperative care. The first neurosurgical ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy has contributed to a shortened postoperative hospital stay, accelerated functional recovery, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced medical care cost in adult patients aged 18 to 65 years compared with conventional perioperative care. However, ERAS protocols for geriatric patients over 65 years of age undergoing cranial surgery are lacking. In this paper, we propose a novel ERAS protocol for such patients by reviewing and summarizing the key elements of successful ERAS protocols/guidelines and optimal perioperative care for geriatric patients described in the literature, as well as our experience in applying the first neurosurgical ERAS protocol for a quality improvement initiative. This proposal aimed to establish an applicable protocol for geriatric patients undergoing elective craniotomy, with evidence addressing its feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy. This multimodal, multidisciplinary, and evidence-based ERAS protocol includes preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative assessment and management as well as outcome measures. The implementation of the current protocol may hold promise in reducing perioperative morbidity, enhancing functional recovery, improving postoperative outcomes in geriatric patients scheduled for elective craniotomy, and serving as a stepping stone to promote further research into the advancement of geriatric patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bolin Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xi’an International Medical Center, Xi’an, China
| | - Shujuan Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Tao Zheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xi’an International Medical Center, Xi’an, China
| | - Dan Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xi’an International Medical Center, Xi’an, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xi’an International Medical Center, Xi’an, China
| | - Tao Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xi’an International Medical Center, Xi’an, China
| | - Yuan Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Guodong Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Shiming He
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xi’an International Medical Center, Xi’an, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
- *Correspondence: Shiming He, Department of Neurosurgery, Xi’an International Medical Center, No. 777 Xitai Road, Xi’an 710100, China (e-mail: ; )
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Decreasing Readmissions After Ileostomy Creation Through a Perioperative Quality Improvement Program. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:e797-e804. [PMID: 35421028 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Readmission after ileostomy creation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery creates a significant burden on health care cost and patient quality of care, with a 30-day readmission rate of 40%. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of our perioperative quality improvement program, Decreasing Readmissions After Ileostomy Creation. DESIGN Perioperative interventions were administered to patients who underwent ileostomy creation. SETTINGS A single tertiary care academic center. PATIENTS Eighty patients participated in this program from February 2020 to January 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were 30-day readmission rates and causes of readmission, which were compared to a historical national database. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the effectiveness of this quality improvement program. RESULTS Eighty patients were enrolled in this prospective quality improvement program. The mean age was 52 (±15.06) years. The most common indication for patients undergoing creation of an ileostomy was colorectal cancer (40%; n = 32). The overall 30-day readmission rate was 8.75% (n = 7) throughout the study period, which was significantly lower than historical cohort data (20.10%; p = 0.01). Among the 7 readmitted patients, 3 (3.75%) were readmitted due to dehydration. The most significant associated risk factor for all-cause readmission was urgent/emergent operative status, which was associated with an increased risk of readmission ( p = 0.01). The 3 readmitted patients with dehydration had a mean Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction risk score of 11.71 points, compared to 9.59 points in nondehydrated patients, who did not require readmission ( p = 0.38). LIMITATIONS This study is limited by its small sample size (N = 80). CONCLUSIONS The Decreasing Readmissions After Ileostomy Creation program has been successful in reducing both the all-cause readmission rate and readmission due to dehydration both within an academic tertiary care referral center and in comparison with historical readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B894 . DISMINUCIN DE LA READMISIN DESPUS DE LA CREACIN DE UNA ILEOSTOMA MEDIANTE UN PROGRAMA DE MEJORA DE LA CALIDAD PERIOPERATORIA ANTECEDENTES:La readmisión después de la creación de una ileostomía en pacientes de cirugía colorrectal crea una carga significativa sobre el costo de la atención médica y la calidad de la atención del paciente, con una tasa de readmisión a los 30 días que llega al 40%.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar la implementación de nuestro programa de mejora de la calidad perioperatoria que disminuyen los reingresos después de la creación de ileostomía.DISEÑO:Se administraron intervenciones perioperatorias a pacientes que se sometieron a la creación de una ileostomía.AJUSTE:Se trataba de un único centro académico de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Participaron 80 pacientes en este programa desde febrero de 2020 hasta enero de 2021.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los principales resultados medidos fueron las tasas de reingreso a los 30 días y las causas de reingreso, que se compararon con una base de datos histórica nacional. Se utilizaron estadísticas descriptivas para evaluar la eficacia de este programa de mejora de la calidad.RESULTADOS:Ochenta pacientes se inscribieron en este programa prospectivo de mejora de la calidad. La edad media fue de 52 (± 15,06) años. La indicación más común para los pacientes que se sometieron a la creación de una ileostomía fue el cáncer colorrectal (40%, n = 32). La tasa general de reingreso a los 30 días fue del 8,75% (n = 7) durante todo el período de estudio, lo que fue significativamente más bajo que los datos históricos de la cohorte (20,10%, p = 0,01). Entre los 7 pacientes readmitidos, tres (3,75%) fueron readmitidos por deshidratación. El factor de riesgo asociado más significativo para la readmisión por todas las causas fue el estado operatorio urgente / emergencia, que se asoció con un mayor riesgo de readmisión (p = 0,01). Los tres pacientes readmitidos con deshidratación tuvieron una puntuación de riesgo promedio de readmisión por deshidratación después de la predicción de ileostomía de 11,71 puntos, en comparación con los pacientes no deshidratados, que no requirieron readmisión (media, 9,59 puntos, p = 0,38).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra (n = 80).CONCLUSIONES:El programa de disminución de las readmisiones después de la creación de una ileostomía ha logrado reducir tanto la tasa de readmisión por todas las causas como la readmisión por deshidratación, tanto dentro de un centro académico de referencia de atención terciaria como en comparación con las tasas históricas de readmisión. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B894 . (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).
Collapse
|
8
|
[Elective colorectal fast-track resections-Treatment adherence due to coordination by specialized nursing personnel]. Chirurg 2021; 93:499-508. [PMID: 34468784 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01484-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Fast-track treatment pathways reduce the frequency of postoperative complications in elective colorectal resections by approximately 40% and due to the rapid recovery reduce the postoperative duration of hospitalization by approximately 50%. Specialized nursing personnel (enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS, nurses) have already been appointed internationally to accompany and monitor the execution of multimodal perioperative treatment. In November 2018 a fast-track assistant was appointed in the Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery of the Municipal Clinic in Solingen for coordination of the fast-track treatment pathway. The results confirmed that a high adherence to perioperative fast-track treatment concepts can also be achieved in the German healthcare system by the assignment of specialized nursing personnel, with the known advantages for patients, nursing personnel, physicians and hospital sponsors.
Collapse
|
9
|
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Older Adults Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:1020-1028. [PMID: 34214055 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery is increasingly applied in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of enhanced recovery protocols on clinical outcomes including hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery. DATA SOURCES This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and trial registry databases were searched (January 1980 to April 2020). STUDY SELECTION Two researchers independently screened all articles for eligibility. Randomized controlled trials evaluating enhanced recovery protocols in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery were included. INTERVENTION The enhanced recovery protocol was utilized. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes of interest were functional decline and delirium. Other outcomes studied were length of stay, complications, readmission, mortality, gut function, mobilization, pain, reoperation, quality of life, and psychological status. RESULTS Seven randomized trials (n = 1277 participants) were included. In terms of hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes, functional decline was reported in 1 study with benefits reported in enhanced recovery after surgery participants, and meta-analyses showed reduced incidence of delirium (risk ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.98). Meta-analyses also showed reduction in urinary tract infections (risk ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90), time to first flatus (standardized mean differences, -1.00; 95% CI, -1.98 to -0.02), time to first stool (standardized mean differences, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.42), time to mobilize postoperatively (standardized mean differences, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.58), time to achieve pain control (standardized mean differences, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.28), and hospital stay (mean differences, -2.20; 95% CI, -3.46 to -0.94). LIMITATIONS The small number of randomized trials in older adults is a limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS Enhanced recovery protocols in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery appear to reduce the incidence of delirium and functional decline, 2 important hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes, as well as to improve other clinical outcomes. Future research should measure these geriatric syndromes and focus on high-risk older adults including those with frailty.
Collapse
|
10
|
Harji D, Mauriac P, Bouyer B, Berard X, Gille O, Salut C, Rullier E, Celerier B, Robert G, Denost Q. The feasibility of implementing an enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3194-3201. [PMID: 34736803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a complex operative procedure, reserved for patients with locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies. PE is associated with a high index of post-operative morbidity. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programmes have been successful in improving postoperative outcomes, however, its application in PE has not been studied. The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility and short-term impact of ERAS on PE. METHODS A dedicated PE ERAS programme was developed reflecting the complexity of differing subtypes of PE. A prospective cohort study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of implementing our PE ERAS between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint of this study was overall compliance with the ERAS programme. RESULTS 145 patients were enrolled into our PE ERAS programme, with 86 (56.2%) patients undergoing a soft tissue PE, 27 (17.6%) a vascular PE and 32 (20.9%) a bony PE. The median overall compliance to the PE ERAS programme was 70% (IQR 55.5-88.8). There were no observed differences between overall compliance to the PE ERAS programme between different subtypes of PE (p = 0.60). Patients with higher compliance with the PE ERAS programme had a shorter LoS (p < 0.001), less post-operative morbidity (p < 0.001), reduced severity of Clavien-Dindo grade of morbidity (p < 0.001) and fewer readmissions (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The principles of ERAS can be readily applied to patients undergoing PE, with high adherence to the ERAS programme associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deena Harji
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Mauriac
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Benjamin Bouyer
- Département de Chirurgie Rachidienne, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Xavier Berard
- Département de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Gille
- Département de Chirurgie Rachidienne, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Cécile Salut
- Département D'imagerie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Eric Rullier
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Bertrand Celerier
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Département D'urologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Quentin Denost
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Podda M, Sylla P, Baiocchi G, Adamina M, Agnoletti V, Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Arezzo A, Avenia N, Biffl W, Biondi A, Bui S, Campanile FC, Carcoforo P, Commisso C, Crucitti A, De'Angelis N, De'Angelis GL, De Filippo M, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Ercolani G, Fraga GP, Gabrielli F, Gaiani F, Guerrieri M, Guttadauro A, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi AK, Loffredo A, Meschi T, Moore EE, Ortenzi M, Pata F, Parini D, Pisanu A, Poggioli G, Polistena A, Puzziello A, Rondelli F, Sartelli M, Smart N, Sugrue ME, Tejedor P, Vacante M, Coccolini F, Davies J, Catena F. Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:35. [PMID: 34215310 PMCID: PMC8254305 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older patients, current guidelines do not incorporate optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and address only partially the associated specific challenges encountered in this population. This results in a wide variation and disparity in delivering a standard of care to this subset of patients. As the burden of rectal cancer in the elderly population continues to increase, it is crucial to assess whether current recommendations on treatment strategies for the general population can be adopted for the older adults, with the same beneficial oncological and functional outcomes. This multidisciplinary experts' consensus aims to refine current rectal cancer-specific guidelines for the elderly population in order to help to maximize rectal cancer therapeutic strategies while minimizing adverse impacts on functional outcomes and quality of life for these patients. METHODS The discussion among the steering group of clinical experts and methodologists from the societies' expert panel involved clinicians practicing in general surgery, colorectal surgery, surgical oncology, geriatric oncology, geriatrics, gastroenterologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endoscopists. Research topics and questions were formulated, revised, and unanimously approved by all experts in two subsequent modified Delphi rounds in December 2020-January 2021. The steering committee was divided into nine teams following the main research field of members. Each conducted their literature search and drafted statements and recommendations on their research question. Literature search has been updated up to 2020 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. A modified Delphi methodology was implemented to reach agreement among the experts on all statements and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The 2021 SICG-SIFIPAC-SICE-WSES consensus for the multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer aims to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: epidemiology, pre-intervention strategies, diagnosis and staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, watch and wait strategy, adjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous liver metastases, and emergency presentation of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- ASST Cremona, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur - University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, AULSS2 Trevigiana del Veneto, Vittorio Veneto, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- 1st General Surgery Unit, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Nicola Avenia
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Biondi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio C Campanile
- Department of Surgery, ASL VT - Ospedale "San Giovanni Decollato - Andosilla", Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Claudia Commisso
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Crucitti
- General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Cristo Re Hospital and Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, Regional General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi De'Angelis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | | | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Federica Gaiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ari K Leppaniemi
- Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrea Loffredo
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Tiziana Meschi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma Geriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, USA
| | | | | | - Dario Parini
- Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Pietro Valdoni Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza Università degli Studi di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Puzziello
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | - Michael E Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital and CPM sEUBP Interreg Project, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | | | - Marco Vacante
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Melegari G, Albertini G, Romani A, Malaguti S, Traccitto F, Giuliani E, Cavallini GM, Bertellini E, Barbieri A. Why should you stay one night? Prospective observational study of enhanced recovery in elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:1955-1961. [PMID: 32901431 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01690-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delirium is a severe condition that can arise in many contexts during hospitalization. The aim of this research was to measure the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients aged 75 years or older, with the exclusion of those with preexisting neurocognitive disorders (NCD), who underwent fast-track, moderate surgery. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study with patients ≥ 75 years of age who were eligible for fast-track, moderate surgery, without severe dementia, with a planned hospitalization of 24 h and with a physical status varying from very fit to vulnerable. The 4-item confusion assessment method (CAM4) was used to measure delirium. RESULTS Of the 209 eligible patients, 195 subjects were enrolled in the study. The percentage of the population with a CAM4 score above 0 before surgery was 2.56%; after surgery, the percentage was 10.25%; and on the following day, the percentage was 4.61%. There was a statistically significant difference in the CAM4 scores between immediately after surgery and at 24 h after surgery (p = 0.0172). CONCLUSION The data from this study support an enhanced recovery approach for elderly patients, in which after a minor surgical procedure with anaesthesia, a recovery period of one night in the hospital can contribute to normalizing the CAM4 score and reducing the incidence of delirium.
Collapse
|
13
|
Boon K, Bislenghi G, D’Hoore A, Boon N, Wolthuis AM. Do older patients (> 80 years) also benefit from ERAS after colorectal resection? A safety and feasibility study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:1345-1352. [PMID: 32720244 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01655-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a standard Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program following colorectal resection in a geriatric population, aged 80 years and older. METHODS In this single-center before-after cohort study all patients aged 80 years and older were included after colorectal resection. Patients were divided in a pre-ERAS and an ERAS group, according to the type of perioperative care. Data were prospectively collected and analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was short-term complication rate. Secondary outcome parameters were length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality and readmission rate. RESULTS Over 4 years, 219 patients were included. Of those, 151 underwent colonic and 68 rectal resection, following the ERAS protocol perioperatively in 45 and 21 cases. There were no differences in complication rate, 30-day mortality or readmission rate in the pre-ERAS versus ERAS groups. LOS after colonic resection was reduced by 2.5 days in the ERAS group (p = 0.020). Laparoscopy was found to be an independent variable of LOS (p < 0.001, p = 0.009) and complication rate (p = 0.011, p < 0.001) for colonic and rectal surgery respectively. DISCUSSION A standard ERAS protocol is safe and feasible in older patients undergoing colorectal resection. Colon resection was related with shorter LOS without increasing morbidity, readmission rate nor 30-day mortality. No adverse outcome after rectal resection was found either. Laparoscopy was associated with lower complication rate and shorter LOS. CONCLUSION A laparoscopic approach within an ERAS protocol should be considered for colorectal resection in every patient regardless of age.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concepts or fast-track are supposed to accelerate recovery after surgery, reduce postoperative complications and shorten the hospital stay when compared to traditional perioperative treatment. METHODS Electronic search of the PubMed database to identify systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SR) comparing ERAS and traditional treatment. RESULTS The presented SR investigated 70 randomized controlled studies (RCT) with 12,986 patients and 93 non-RCT (24,335 patients) concerning abdominal, thoracic and vascular as well as orthopedic surgery. The complication rates were decreased under ERAS following colorectal esophageal, liver and pulmonary resections as well as after implantation of hip endoprostheses. Pulmonary complications were reduced after ERAS esophageal, gastric and pulmonary resections. The first bowel movements occurred earlier after ERAS colorectal resections and delayed gastric emptying was less often observed after ERAS pancreatic resection. Following ERAS fast-track esophageal resection, anastomotic leakage was diagnosed less often as well as surgical complications after ERAS pulmonary resection. The ERAS in all studies concerning orthopedic surgery and trials investigating implantation of a hip endoprosthesis or knee endoprosthesis reduced the risk for postoperative blood transfusions. Regardless of the type of surgery, ERAS shortened hospital stay without increasing readmissions. CONCLUSION Numerous clinical trials have confirmed that ERAS reduces postoperative morbidity, shortens hospital stay and accelerates recovery without increasing readmission rates following most surgical operations.
Collapse
|
15
|
Enhanced recovery program versus conventional care after colorectal surgery in the geriatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3166-3174. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07673-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
16
|
Fagard K, Wolthuis A, Verhaegen M, Flamaing J, Deschodt M. A retrospective observational study of enhanced recovery after surgery in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232857. [PMID: 32384120 PMCID: PMC7209103 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) in colorectal surgery have demonstrated beneficial effects on postoperative complications, return of bowel function, length of stay, and costs, without increasing readmissions or mortality. However, ERPs were not specifically designed for older patients and feasibility in older patients has been questioned. AIM The aim of this study was to assess ERP adherence and outcomes in older patients and to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and prolonged length of stay. METHOD Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (≥70 years) undergoing elective colorectal resection in a tertiary referral hospital in 2017. RESULTS Ninety-six patients were included. Adherence rates were above 80% in 18 of 21 ERP interventions considered. The lowest adherence rates were noted for preoperative carbohydrate loading and cessation of intravenous fluids. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥2) and prolonged postoperative length of stay (>75th percentile) were observed in 39.6% and 26.3%, respectively. Median length of stay was 7 days. The 30-day mortality, readmission and reoperation rates were 2.1%, 12.6% and 8.3%, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that polypharmacy and site of surgery were independent risk factors for postoperative complications, while higher age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class and preoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative length of stay. CONCLUSION ERP adherence in older patients undergoing colorectal resection is high and ERP is therefore considered feasible. Postoperative complications and prolonged postoperative length of stay are common, so at risk patients should be targeted with tailored geriatric interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katleen Fagard
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marleen Verhaegen
- Department of Anesthesia, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Flamaing
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mieke Deschodt
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|