Effectiveness of a health-social partnership program for discharged non-frail older adults: a pilot study

A health-social service partnership programme for improving the health self-management of community-dwelling older adults: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study protocol

BACKGROUND

The ageing population requires seamless, integrated health and social care services in the community to promote the health of older adults. However, inadequate financial resources, a lack of clear operational guidelines, and various organisational work cultures may affect the implementation quality and sustainability of these services. As a unique approach, this study seeks to examine the preliminary effects of a health-social partnership programme on the health self-management of community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong. Additionally, the study seeks to ascertain key insights into the mechanisms and processes required to implement and sustain a self-care management programme in broader practice in community settings.

METHODS

This study will use a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. During the 3-month programme, subjects in the intervention group will receive four Zoom video conference sessions and four telephone calls conducted by a health-social service team that will include a nurse case manager, community workers, general practitioners, a Chinese medicine practitioner, and social workers. Subjects in the control group will receive a monthly social telephone call from a trained research assistant to rule out the possible social effect of the intervention. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework (i.e. RE-AIM framework) will be used to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness outcomes. Of the five dimensions included in the RE-AIM framework, only effectiveness and maintenance outcomes will be collected from both the intervention and control groups. The outcomes of the other three dimensions-reach, adoption, and implementation-will only be collected from subjects in the intervention group. Data will be collected pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months after the intervention is completed to evaluate the maintenance effect of the programme.

DISCUSSION

This programme will aim to enhance health-promoting self-care management behaviours in older adults dwelling in the community. This will be the first study in Hong Kong to use the hybrid effectiveness-implementation design and involve key stakeholders in the evaluation and implementation of a health self-management programme using a health-social service partnership approach. The programme, which will be rooted in the community, may be used as a model, if proven successful, for similar types of services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04442867. Submitted 19 June 2020.

Effect of a telecare-based intervention on stress levels in informal caregivers of older adults: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Significance

Due to caregiving commitments, caregivers of older adults may not have the time to make use of the onsite community services available to them during the day. With the support of advanced technology, telecare could be a convenient and easily accessible channel for providing individualized caregiving advice to caregivers.

Objective

The aim of the study is to describe a research protocol that highlights the development of a telecare-based intervention program for reducing stress levels in informal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

It is a randomized controlled trial. The study is supported by two community centers. The study participants will be randomly assigned to either the telecare-based intervention group or the control group. The former will receive a 3-month program comprised of three components: online nurse case management supported by a health and social care team, an online resource center, and a discussion forum. The latter will receive the usual services that provided by the community centers. Data will be collected at two time points - pre-intervention (T1) and post-intervention (T2). The primary outcome is stress levels, while secondary outcomes include self-efficacy, depression levels, quality of life, and caregiving burden.

Discussion

Besides taking care of one or more older adults, informal caregivers have to deal with work, chores, and take care of their children. This study will add valuable information to the knowledge gap on whether telecare-based interventions with the support of an integrated health-social team can alleviate the stress levels of informal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults. If successful, policymakers and healthcare professionals should consider incorporating telecare modalities in a primary health setting for informal caregivers to correspond with them, to relieve their caregiving stress and promote a healthy life.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT05636982.

How can we define social care and what are the levels of true integration in integrated care? A narrative review

Purpose

Integrated health and social care initiatives are increasing and health and social care systems are aiming to improve health and social outcomes in disadvantaged groups. There is a global dialogue surrounding improving services by shifting to an integrated health and social care approach. There is consensus of what is “health care”; however, the “social care” definition remains less explored. The authors describe the state of “social care” within the current integrated care literature and identify the depth of integration in current health and social care initiatives.

Design/methodology/approach

A narrative literature review, searching Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases and grey literature (from 2016 to 2021), employing a search strategy, was conducted.

Findings

In total. 276 studies were eligible for full-text review, and 33 studies were included and categorised in types: “social care as community outreach dialogues”, “social care as addressing an ageing population”, “social care as targeting multimorbidity and corresponding social risks factors” and “social care as initiatives addressing the fragmentation of services”. Most initiatives were implemented in the United Kingdom. In total, 21 studies reported expanding integrated governance and partnerships; 27 studies reported having health and social care staff with clear integrated governance; 17 had dedicated funding and 11 used data-sharing and the integration of systems’ records.

Originality/value

The authors' demonstrate that social care approaches are expanding beyond the elderly, and these models have been used to respond to multimorbidity [including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)], targeting priority groups and individuals with complex presentations.

Effect of a Mobile Health Application With Nurse Support on Quality of Life Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Mobile health (mHealth) smartphone apps are becoming increasingly popular among older adults, although the reactive care approach of these apps has limited their usability.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of an interactive mHealth program supported by a health-social partnership team on quality of life (QOL) among community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a 3-group, randomized clinical trial conducted in 5 community centers in Hong Kong from December 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022, with a last follow-up date of January 31, 2022. Participants included older adults aged at least 60 years who were living within the service area, used a smartphone, and had at least 1 of the following problems: chronic pain, hypertension, or diabetes. Data were analyzed from May 1 to 10, 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to the mHealth with interactivity (mHealth+I) group, mHealth group, or control group. Participants in the mHealth+I group received the mHealth app and nurse case management supported by a health-social partnership team. The mHealth group received the mHealth app only. The control group received no mHealth app or health-social care services.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the change in QOL from baseline to 3 months after completion of the intervention.

RESULTS

Among 221 participants (mean [SD] age 76.6 [8.0] years; 185 [83.7%] women), 76 were randomized to the control group, 71 were randomized to the mHealth group, and 74 were randomized to the mHealth+I group. The most common chronic diseases or problems were hypertension (147 participants [66.5%]), pain (144 participants [65.2%]), cataracts (72 participants [32.6%]), and diabetes (61 participants [27.6%]). At 3 months after the intervention and compared with the intervention group, there were no statistically significant differences in either the physical component summary (mHealth+I: β = -1.01 [95% CI, -4.13 to 2.11]; P = .53; mHealth: β = 0.22 [95% CI, -3.07 to 3.50]; P = .90) or the mental component summary (mHealth+I: β = -0.87 [95% CI, -4.42 to 2.69]; P = .63; mHealth: β = 1.73 [95% CI, -1.89 to 5.34]; P = .35) QOL scores. Only secondary outcomes, including self-efficacy (β = -2.31 [95% CI, -4.26 to -0.36]; P = .02), systolic blood pressure (β = -2.30 [95% CI, -5.00 to -0.13]; P = .04), pain levels (β = 1.18 [95% CI, 0.52 to 2.00]; P = .02), and health services utilization (β = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.32 to 2.09]; P = .048) improved in the mHealth+I group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found no difference in the primary outcome between the mHealth+I group and the control group confirming that there were no incremental benefits to adding interactivity in mHealth programs for older adults with chronic diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03878212.

A randomized controlled trial of an mHealth application with nursing interaction to promote quality of life among community-dwelling older adults

SIGNIFICANCE

Using mHealth apps alone at home without the support of healthcare experts could mean that older adults might not fully utilize the functions of the apps, recognize their benefits, and sustain their use. Incorporating an integrated health-social partnership model to support the app usage when further help is needed by the older adults might maximize the apps' benefits in the long term.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the benefits of adding nursing interaction supported by a health-social partnership model in the use of mHealth, and the sustained beneficial effects on psychological outcomes, including quality of life, self-efficacy, and depression, among older adults after the completion of the program.

METHODS

A three-arm, randomized controlled trial design was adopted. Community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain, hypertension, or diabetes, were randomly assigned to either the mHealth, mHealth with interactivity, or control group. Subjects in both the mHealth and the mHealth with interactivity groups received the mHealth application. In addition, the mHealth with interactivity group received support from a nurse case manager, who was supported by a health-social partnership team. mHealth apps and services from a nurse case manager were not provided to the control group. The primary outcome measure was quality of life, and secondary outcomes were self-efficacy and depression. Data were collected at pre-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2), and at 3 months post-intervention to measure the sustained effect of the program.

RESULTS

There were 74 mHealth+I, 71 mHealth, and 76 control group subjects enrolled in the program. No statistically significant between-group, within-group, and interaction effects between group and time in both physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were found among the three groups. The mHealth group showed an improvement in PCS and depression scores from T1 to T2, sustained at T3; while the mHealth+I group demonstrated improved self-efficacy from T1 to T2, with a decrease at T3.

CONCLUSION

Adding nurse-directed telephone calls may be of little to no benefit at all in the long term. Future studies may consider a longer intervention period to build and sustain quality of life and self-efficacy levels among community-dwelling older adults.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03878212.