1
|
Acampora M, Paleologo M, Graffigna G, Barello S. Uncovering influential factors in human antibiotic prescribing: a meta-synthesis study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. J Hosp Infect 2024; 144:28-55. [PMID: 38092303 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify modifiable determinants (facilitators and barriers) related to the choice of prescribing antibiotics in human medicine across clinical settings. Enhanced management of antibiotics can help slow the spread of resistant bacteria. A qualitative meta-synthesis approach was used, according to Sandelowski and Barroso's method. Included studies were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Findings were extracted and organized to form a qualitative meta-summary. The Theoretical Domains Framework, the Capabilities-Opportunities-Motivation (COM-B) model and the Behaviour Change Wheel were used as a coding matrix for data interpretation. The analysis of 63 included studies revealed barriers and facilitators in 12 of 14 domains specified by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Prescribers' capabilities, motivation and opportunities were found to be the main drivers of antibiotic prescribing behaviour. Knowledge, skills, beliefs, expectations, the influence of patients and colleagues, organizational culture and infrastructure characteristics have a significant impact on prescribing behaviours. A comprehensive inventory of factors related to antibiotic prescribing has been compiled. Interventions to promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing should take a systemic approach rather than focusing solely on individual-level variables. Furthermore, the adoption of co-design approaches for such interventions is desirable to ensure greater applicability and sustainability in the real-world context of organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Acampora
- EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano e Cremona, Milan and Cremona, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Paleologo
- EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano e Cremona, Milan and Cremona, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Graffigna
- EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano e Cremona, Milan and Cremona, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy; Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Cremona, Cremona, Italy
| | - S Barello
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rutten JJS, Smalbrugge M, van Buul LW, van Eijk J, Geerlings SE, Natsch S, Sloane PD, van der Wouden JC, Hertogh CMPM, Gerritsen DL. A Process Evaluation of an Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention for Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:146-154.e9. [PMID: 38173264 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the internal and external validity of a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) evaluating a decision tool with supportive interventions for the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing homes (NHs), and to identify facilitators and barriers in implementing this antibiotic stewardship intervention. DESIGN Mixed-methods process evaluation study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Physicians, nursing staff, client council members, and residents of Dutch NHs. METHODS We used cRCT data of the ANNA study (Antibiotic Prescribing and Non-prescribing in Nursing Home Residents With Signs and Symptoms Ascribed to Urinary Tract Infection). In addition, we sent out an online evaluation questionnaire, conducted semistructured interviews with physicians and nursing staff, and consulted client council members. RESULTS Internal validity was lowered: control group physicians participated in several non-study-related activities regarding UTI. External validity was good: almost all intervention components had a high fidelity (52%-74%) and were perceived as relevant (physicians: 7.2-8.6 of 10, nursing staff: 6.5-8.5 of 10) and feasible (physicians: 7.5 of 10, nursing staff 6.4 of 10), with feasibility for residents with dementia and urine incontinence needing attention. The most common reason for deviating from the advice generated by the decision tool was an unclear illness presentation. Identified facilitators to implementation were confidence in the intervention, repeated intervention encounter, and having "champions" in the NH. Barriers were limited involvement of nursing staff, unstable nursing teams, residents' and representatives' belief that antibiotics should be prescribed, and a low antibiotic prescribing threshold within the NH culture. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Lowered internal validity may have reduced the study effect. Attention should be paid to the feasibility of the intervention in residents with dementia and urinary incontinence. Improvement opportunities for implementation were higher nursing staff involvement and repeated intervention offering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanine J S Rutten
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Smalbrugge
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura W van Buul
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jorna van Eijk
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne E Geerlings
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Natsch
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Philip D Sloane
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Johannes C van der Wouden
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cees M P M Hertogh
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Debby L Gerritsen
- Department of Primary and Community care, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sánchez X, Latacunga A, Cárdenas I, Jimbo-Sotomayor R, Escalante S. Antibiotic prescription patterns in patients with suspected urinary tract infections in Ecuador. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295247. [PMID: 38033109 PMCID: PMC10688952 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary tract infections (UTI) are among the most common cause to prescribe antibiotics in primary care. Diagnosis is based on the presence of clinical symptoms in combination with the results of laboratory tests. Antibiotic therapy is the primary approach to the treatment of UTIs; however, some studies indicate that therapeutics in UTIs may be suboptimal, potentially leading to therapeutic failure and increased bacterial resistance. METHODS This study aimed to analyze the antibiotic prescription patterns in adult patients with suspected UTIs and to evaluate the appropriateness of the antibiotic prescription. This is a cross-sectional study of patients treated in outpatient centers and in a second-level hospital of the Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) in a city in Ecuador during 2019. The International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision (ICD-10) was used for the selection of the acute UTI cases. The patients included in this study were those treated by family, emergency, and internal medicine physicians. RESULTS We included a total of 507 patients in the analysis and 502 were prescribed antibiotics at first contact, constituting an immediate antibiotic prescription rate of 99.01%. Appropriate criteria for antibiotic prescription were met in 284 patients, representing an appropriate prescription rate of 56.02%. Less than 10% of patients with UTI had a urine culture. The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were alternative antibiotics (also known as second-line antibiotics), such as ciprofloxacin (50.39%) and cephalexin (23.55%). Factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for UTIs were physician age over forty years, OR: 2.87 (95% CI, 1.65-5.12) p<0.0001, medical care by a general practitioner, OR: 1.89 (95% CI, 1.20-2.99) p = 0.006, not using point-of-care testing, OR: 1.96 (95% CI, 1.23-3.15) p = 0.005, and care at the first level of health, OR: 15.72 (95% CI, 8.57-30.88) p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study indicate an appropriate prescription rate of 56.02%. Recommended antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin for UTIs are underutilized. The odds for inappropriate antibiotic prescription were 15.72 times higher at the first level of care compared to the second. Effective strategies are needed to improve the diagnosis and treatment of UTIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Sánchez
- Centro de Investigación Para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito, Ecuador
- Community and Primary Care Research Group – Ecuador (CPCRG-E), Quito, Ecuador
| | - Alicia Latacunga
- Postgrado de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito, Ecuador
| | - Iván Cárdenas
- Postgrado de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito, Ecuador
| | - Ruth Jimbo-Sotomayor
- Centro de Investigación Para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito, Ecuador
- Community and Primary Care Research Group – Ecuador (CPCRG-E), Quito, Ecuador
| | - Santiago Escalante
- Centro de Investigación Para la Salud en América Latina (CISeAL), Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE), Quito, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuster A, Tigges P, Grune J, Kraft J, Greser A, Gágyor I, Boehme M, Eckmanns T, Klingeberg A, Maun A, Menzel A, Schmiemann G, Heintze C, Bleidorn J. GPs' Perspective on a Multimodal Intervention to Enhance Guideline-Adherence in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Qualitative Process Evaluation of the Multicentric RedAres Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1657. [PMID: 38136690 PMCID: PMC10740691 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12121657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common reasons patients seeking health care and antibiotics to be prescribed in primary care. However, general practitioners' (GPs) guideline adherence is low. The RedAres randomised controlled trial aims to increase guideline adherence by implementing a multimodal intervention consisting of four elements: information on current UTI guidelines (1) and regional resistance data (2); feedback regarding prescribing behaviour (3); and benchmarking compared to peers (4). The RedAres process evaluation assesses GPs' perception of the multimodal intervention and the potential for implementation into routine care. We carried out 19 semi-structured interviews with GPs (intervention arm). All interviews were carried out online and audio recorded. For transcription and analysis, Mayring's qualitative content analysis was used. Overall, GPs considered the interventions helpful for knowledge gain and confirmation when prescribing. Information material and resistance were used for patient communication and teaching purposes. Feedback was considered to enhance reflection by breaking routines of clinical workup. Implementation into routine practice could be enhanced by integrating feedback loops into patient management systems and conveying targeted information via trusted channels or institutions. The process evaluation of RedAres intervention was considered beneficial by GPs. It confirms the convenience of multimodal interventions to enhance guideline adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Schuster
- Institute of General Practice, Charite University Hospital Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Tigges
- Institute of General Practice, Charite University Hospital Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Julianna Grune
- Institute of General Practice, Charite University Hospital Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Kraft
- Institute of General Practice, Charite University Hospital Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexandra Greser
- Department of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Ildikó Gágyor
- Department of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Mandy Boehme
- Institute of General Practice, University Hospital Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany (J.B.)
| | | | | | - Andy Maun
- Institute of General Practice/Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Anja Menzel
- Institute of General Practice/Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Guido Schmiemann
- Department of Health Service Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Christoph Heintze
- Institute of General Practice, Charite University Hospital Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jutta Bleidorn
- Institute of General Practice, University Hospital Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany (J.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harbin NJ, Haug JB, Lindbæk M, Akselsen PE, Romøren M. A Multifaceted Intervention and Its Effects on Antibiotic Usage in Norwegian Nursing Homes. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1372. [PMID: 37760669 PMCID: PMC10526029 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12091372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
We explored the impact of an antibiotic quality improvement intervention across 33 nursing homes (NHs) in one Norwegian county, compared against four control counties. This 12-month multifaceted intervention consisted of three physical conferences, including educational sessions, workshops, antibiotic feedback reports, and academic detailing sessions. We provided clinical guiding checklists to participating NHs. Pharmacy sales data served as a measure of systemic antibiotic use. The primary outcome was a change in antibiotic use in DDD/100 BD from the baseline through the intervention, assessed using linear mixed models to identify changes in antibiotic use. Total antibiotic use decreased by 15.8%, from 8.68 to 7.31 DDD/100BD (model-based estimated change (MBEC): -1.37, 95% CI: -2.35 to -0.41) in the intervention group, albeit not a significantly greater reduction than in the control counties (model-based estimated difference in change (MBEDC): -0.75, 95% CI: -1.91 to 0.41). Oral antibiotic usage for urinary tract infections (UTI-AB) decreased 32.8%, from 4.08 to 2.74 DDD/100BD (MBEC: -1.34, 95% CI: -1.85 to -0.84), a significantly greater reduction than in the control counties (MBEDC: -0.9, 95% CI: -1.28 to -0.31). The multifaceted intervention may reduce UTI-AB use in NHs, whereas adjustments in the implementation strategy may be needed to reduce total antibiotic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolay Jonassen Harbin
- Antibiotic Center for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of General Practice Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Jon Birger Haug
- Department of Infection Control, Østfold Health Trust, Kalnes, 1714 Grålum, Norway;
| | - Morten Lindbæk
- Antibiotic Center for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of General Practice Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Per Espen Akselsen
- Norwegian Centre for Antibiotic Use in Hospitals, Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway;
| | - Maria Romøren
- Department of General Practice Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|