A scoping review of risk factors for urinary incontinence in older men

Defining and prioritizing modifiable risk factors towards the co-creation of a urinary incontinence self-management intervention for older men: A sequential multimethod study protocol

Urinary incontinence (UI), characterized by involuntary urine leakage is a chronic, embarrassing and stigmatizing condition that is under-reported and under-treated). UI is under-prioritized and under-researched, particularly in older men (defined here as men 65+), and there have been calls for more targeted research focusing on this specific group. No existing self-management interventions focus on the needs of older men and none incorporate the perspectives of older men into their development. Furthermore, health inequalities and disparities in continence services for men, and a low level of health seeking behavior in men with UI make it crucial to incorporate their perspectives into intervention development to ensure optimal outcomes. The study will identify risk factors for UI that are potentially amenable to self-management in older men, assess their self-efficacy in managing UI, and determine what modifiable risk factors older men feel are pragmatic to include as part of a self-management program. We will conduct and report a sequential multi-method design consisting of a Delphi study among healthcare experts and a survey among older men with UI, according to the Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES) Checklist and the Checklist for Reporting Of Survey Studies (CROSS). A geographically dispersed, multidisciplinary group of 30 health care professionals (urologists, geriatricians, family physicians, and nurses) involved in continence care and a representative sample of at least 128 ethnically diverse older men will participate in a Delphi survey and an older men's survey respectively. The healthcare experts will evaluate an evidence-synthesized list of UI risk factors to determine those potentially amenable to self-management. Delphi rounds will be repeated until consensus threshold of 75% is reached. Thereafter, older men recruited via stratified sampling of population subgroups will rate a list of expert-identified potentially modifiable risk factors to indicate which factors they deem practicable and can prioritize. Older men's survey questionnaires will capture information on patients' characteristics (socio-demographics and UI-related items). The Geriatric Self-Efficacy Index for UI (GSE-UI Index) as well as a Likert scale to assess perceived capability and willingness to modify the expert-identified UI modifiable risk factors will be included. Data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.

Association between sarcopenia and urinary dysfunction in patients with dysphagia

INTRODUCTION

The objective was to determine the relationship between sarcopenia and urinary dysfunction in patients with dysphagia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 460 Japanese Sarcopenic Dysphagia Database participants. Urinary dysfunction was defined as either urinary incontinence or urethral catheter use. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed the association between urinary dysfunction and sarcopenia, calf circumference (CC), handgrip strength (HGS), and Barthel Index (BI). Logistic regression analysis was performed for urinary dysfunction adjusted for age, sex, setting, and CCI in addition to BI and HGS or CC or sarcopenia (model 1) or FILS and BI (model 2).

RESULTS

The mean age was 80.8 ± 10.5 years and urinary dysfunction in 137 participants. Urinary dysfunction was not associated with sarcopenia (123 versus 281, p = 0.440) but was associated with CC (27.4 ± 4.2 versus 28.5 ± 3.9, p = 0.009), HGS (9.7 ± 7.9 versus 14.4 ± 9.3, p < 0.001), and BI (19.9 ± 0.3 versus 20.3 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed urinary dysfunction was associated with HGS (OR: 0.968, CI: 0.938, 0.998) and BI (OR: 0.955, CI: 0.943, 0.966). The cutoff was 19 kg for men (sensitivity 0.786, specificity 0.56, Area Under Curve (AUC) 0.689) and 6.1 kg for women (sensitivity 0.493, specificity 0.774, AUC 0.639) in HGS and 27.5 points in BI (sensitivity 0.781, specificity 0.604, AUC 0.740).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia was not associated with urinary dysfunction. However, HGS and BI were related to urinary dysfunction.

Dialysis for older adults: why should the targets be different?

The number of patients aged > 75-years treated by dialysis continues to increase, particularly in developed countries. Haemodialysis is a well-established treatment with national and international clinical guidelines designed to provide patients with optimal treatment. However, these were developed when the dialysis population was younger, and less co-morbid. This change in patient demographics questions whether these guideline targets still apply to older patients. More patients now start dialysis with residual kidney function and could benefit from a less frequent dialysis schedule. Older patients have a lower thirst drive, so lower interdialytic gains, reduced appetite, muscle mass and physical activity would potentially allow starting dialysis with less frequent sessions a practical option. Similarly, patients with residual kidney function and lower metabolic activity may not need to meet current dialyser Kt/Vurea clearance targets to remain healthy. Instead, some elderly patients may be at risk of malnutrition and might need liberalisation of the low salt, potassium and phosphate dietary restrictions, or even additional supplements to ensure adequate protein intake. Although a fistula is the preferred vascular access, a forearm fistula may not be an option due to vascular disease, while a brachial fistula can potentially compromise cardiovascular reserve, so a dialysis catheter becomes the de facto access, especially in patients with limited life expectancy. Thus, clinical guideline targets designed for a younger less co-morbid dialysis population may not be equally applicable to the older patient initiating dialysis, and so a more individualised approach to dialysis prescription and vascular access is required.

Exploring Early, Middle, and Late Loss in Basic Activities of Daily Living among Nursing Home Residents: A Multicenter Observational Study

Nursing home (NH) residents commonly face limitations in basic activities of daily living (BADLs), following a hierarchical decline. Understanding this hierarchy is crucial for personalized care. This study explores factors associated with early, middle, and late loss in BADLs among NH residents. A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in 30 NHs in Catalonia, Spain. Dependent variables were related to limitations in BADLs: early loss (self-care-related BADLs: personal hygiene, dressing, or bathing), middle loss (mobility-related BADLs: walking or wheelchair handling, toileting, and transferring), and late loss (eating). Independent variables were based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment and institutional factors. Logistic regression was used for the multivariate analyses. The study included 671 older adults. Early loss in BADLs was significantly associated with urinary incontinence, cognitive impairment, and falls. Middle loss in BADLs was linked to fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, ulcers, and cognitive impairment. Late loss in BADLs was associated with fecal incontinence, the NH not owning a kitchen, neurological disease, cognitive impairment, dysphagia, polypharmacy, and weight loss. These findings highlight the need to address geriatric syndromes, especially cognitive impairment and bladder/bowel incontinence. Monitoring these syndromes could effectively anticipate care dependency. The presence of kitchens in NHs may help to address limitations to eating, allowing for potential personalized meal adaptation.

Urinary incontinence and life-space activity/mobility additively increase the risk of incident disability among older adults

OBJECTIVES

To examine the associations of a combination of urinary incontinence (UI) and life-space activity/mobility with the risk of incident disability among community-dwelling older adults.

STUDY DESIGN

The participants were 12,808 older adults for the cross-sectional study and 12,516 older adults who completed the follow-up assessment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

UI was assessed using a questionnaire. Life-space activity/mobility was evaluated using total, physical, and social scores on the Active Mobility Index (AMI). Participants were classified into four groups (high AMI total score + no UI; high AMI total score + UI; low AMI total score + no UI; low AMI total score + UI). Incident disability was extracted from the Japanese Long-Term Care System.

RESULTS

During the 24-month follow-up, 562 participants (4.5 %) developed disability. Those with a low AMI score + no UI (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95 % confidence interval, 1.07-1.71) and those with a low AMI score + UI (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95 % confidence interval, 1.56-2.56) had a higher risk of incident disability than those with a high AMI score + no UI in the follow-up analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of UI and low AMI score was associated with an increased risk of incident disability, whereas having UI but a high AMI score was not associated with an increased risk of incident disability. Our findings may help identify older adults at high risk of developing disabilities.