The use of PCR/Electrospray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry (PCR/ESI-TOF-MS) to detect bacterial and fungal colonization in healthy military service members

Rapid detection of pulmonary nocardiosis by metagenomic next generation sequencing

We retrospectively analyzed 3 cases of pulmonary nocardiosis. Patients were identified by metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, from January 2019 to April 2022. All patients had underlying diseases, and were in immunocompromised state, with membranous nephropathy, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), respectively. Symptoms common to all cases included fever, cough and expectoration. Chest computed tomography (CT) presented patchy shadows or nodules, with or without cavitation lesions, or pleural effusion. mNGS detected Nocardia spp. via bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) or blood samples from patients. All the patients were discharged with recovery after using the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and remained without evidence of disease during regular follow-ups. mNGS may be a tool for rapid and accurate detection and identification of pulmonary nocardiosis, but interpreting the mNGS results should be more cautious because the mNGS assay can also detect colonization.

Proteome-Based Serotyping of the Food-Borne Pathogens Salmonella Enterica by Label-Free Mass Spectrometry

Food-borne diseases caused by Salmonella enterica of 2500 serovars represent a serious public health problem worldwide. A quick identification for the pathogen serovars is critical for controlling food pollution and disease spreading. Here, we applied a mass spectrum-based proteomic profiling for identifying five epidemiologically important Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars (Enteritidis, Typhimurium, London, Rissen and Derby) in China. By label-free analysis, the 53 most variable serovar-related peptides, which were almost all enzymes related to nucleoside phosphate and energy metabolism, were screened as potential peptide biomarkers, and based on which a C5.0 predicted model for Salmonella enterica serotyping with four predictor peptides was generated with the accuracy of 94.12%. In comparison to the classic gene patterns by PFGE analysis, the high-throughput proteomic fingerprints were also effective to determine the genotypic similarity among Salmonella enteric isolates according to each strain of proteome profiling, which is indicative of the potential breakout of food contamination. Generally, the proteomic dissection on Salmonella enteric serovars provides a novel insight and real-time monitoring of food-borne pathogens.

Streptococcus pneumoniae prevalence in nasopharynx, oropharynx and gingival sulcus in Brazilian adults:A preliminary study

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of S. pneumoniae colonization in three different sites in healthy adults: nasopharynx, oropharynx and gingival sulcus.

METHODS

Two-hundred and sixty five adults, aged 20-60 years, who attended dental clinics in one public university (n = 106) and one military institution (n = 159) were enrolled in this study. Pneumococcal detection was performed by direct culture (DC) and PCR for lytA gene after a broth enrichment step. Capsular types were determined by sequential multiplex PCR.

RESULTS

We identified 18 (6.8%) pneumococcal carriers among 265 adults by PCR, but only one (0.4%) pneumococcal strain was isolated by DC method. Oropharynx (17; 6.4%) was the main source of S. pneumoniae. Colonization of gingival sulcus and nasopharynx was found in 4 (1.5%) and 2 (0.8%) adults, respectively. Nine distinct capsular types were detected from 9 adults and co-colonization with 2 serotypes was confirmed in 4 (1.5%) subjects. Factors associated with carriage were being females, low level of schooling, non-military and regular medication. We observed a low (6.8%) pneumococcal carriage prevalence, but oropharyngeal samples yielded more sensitive results, especially by the PCR-based detection methodology.

CONCLUSION

Gingival sulcus was found to be a possible reservoir for S. pneumoniae independently of the oropharynx or nasopharynx colonization.

A novel concentration gradient microfluidic chip for high-throughput antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacteria

Antibiotic resistance has become a serious threat to food safety and public health globally. Therefore, the development of a sensitive, quick, and simple method for antibiotic susceptibility testing is an urgent and crucial need. A novel concentration gradient microfluidic chip was designed in this work to generate antibiotic concentration gradient, culture bacteria, and produce fluorescence emission. An in-house-assembled fluorescence detection platform was constructed, and experiments were conducted to verify the linearity of the generated concentration gradient, explore the appropriate incubation time and flow rate for the microfluidic chip, and study the effect of long-term acid-based food processing on antibiotic susceptibility testing. Experimental results show that the concentration gradient generated by the microfluidic chip exhibited good linearity, stability, and controllability. The appropriate flow rate and incubation time for the microfluidic chip were 2 μL/min and 5 h, respectively. The use of this microfluidic chip for testing antibiotic resistance of Salmonella to ofloxacin and ampicillin generated results that were completely consistent with test results obtained using the gold-standard method. Furthermore, Salmonella showed greater sensitivity to antibiotics under strong acid conditions, confirming the potential influence of acid-based food processing on antibiotic susceptibility testing of real samples. The designed microfluidic chip provides a high-throughput, sensitive, and rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing method that combines the microfluidic chip and the fluorescence detection platform. The application of this method would facilitate determination of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains for clinicians and researchers, and enable monitoring of changes in bacterial resistance during food processing.

How do I manage nocardiosis?

BACKGROUND

Nocardiosis is a rare infection that is often difficult to treat and may be life-threatening. There is no consensus on its management.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to provide the current evidence for the diagnosis and management of individuals with nocardiosis, and to propose a management approach for this uncommon infection.

SOURCES

We systematically searched the medical literature on nocardiosis for studies published between 2010 and 2020 and describing ten or more individuals.

CONTENT

Nocardiosis, a primarily opportunistic infection which may occur in immunocompetent persons, most commonly involves the lungs and frequently disseminates to other sites including the central nervous system. The reference standard for Nocardia species identification is molecular biology, and the preferred method for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is broth microdilution. Monotherapy seems appropriate for patients with primary skin nocardiosis or non-severe pulmonary disease; we reserve a multidrug regimen for more severe infections. Species identification and AST results are often missing at initiation of antibiotics. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the preferred agent for initial therapy, because Nocardia is very often susceptible to this agent, and because it has been the keystone of nocardiosis treatment for years. Linezolid, to which Nocardia is almost always susceptible, may be an alternative. When combination therapy is required, the repertoire of companion drugs includes third-generation cephalosporins, amikacin and imipenem. Therapeutic modifications should take into account clinical response to initial therapy and AST results. Treatment duration of 6 months is appropriate for most situations, but longer durations are preferred for disseminated nocardiosis and shorter durations are reasonable in low-risk situations. Secondary prophylaxis may be considered in selected individuals with permanent immunosuppression.

IMPLICATIONS

We hereby provide the clinician with an easy-to-use algorithm for the management of individuals with nocardiosis. We also illuminate gaps in evidence and suggest future research directions.

Nocardia colonization in contrast to nocardiosis: a comparison of patients' clinical characteristics

Information on Nocardia colonization of the lower respiratory tract is scarce. The current study is aimed at comparing clinical characteristics between individuals with Nocardia colonization and those with nocardiosis. All patients with Nocardia isolation between 2007 and 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Israel were included. Nocardia isolation was based on biochemical tests together with phenotypic susceptibility and resistance patterns until 2011 and on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer from 2012. We defined nocardiosis as a clinically evident infection related to the isolation of the bacteria, which required antibiotic therapy. We defined colonization as Nocardia isolation with no clinical evidence of disease. The medical charts of all included individuals were independently reviewed by an infectious disease specialist to ensure adequate classification. Logistic regression models were fitted to compare clinical characteristics between the groups. Fifteen (20%) of the 75 Nocardia isolations met the criteria for colonization. Of those, 13 (87%) had background illnesses. Having a chronic pulmonary disease was associated with increased likelihood of Nocardia colonization, in contrast to nocardiosis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-15.48, p = 0.040), while an inverse association was found with corticosteroid therapy (adjusted OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.74, p = 0.015). Nocardia colonization of the lower respiratory tract accounts for a substantial proportion of all Nocardia isolations. Individuals colonized with Nocardia typically have chronic pulmonary disease and are less frequently treated with corticosteroid than patients with nocardiosis.

Nocardia polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after lung transplantation: A prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Transplant recipients are at risk of pulmonary nocardiosis, a life-threatening opportunistic infection caused by Nocardia species. Given the limitations of conventional diagnostic techniques (i.e., microscopy and culture), a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay was developed to detect Nocardia spp. on clinical samples. While this test is increasingly being used by transplant physicians, its performance characteristics are not well documented. We evaluated the performance characteristics of this test on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples from lung transplant recipients (LTRs).

METHODS

We prospectively included all BAL samples from LTRs undergoing bronchoscopy at our institution between December 2016 and June 2017 (either surveillance or clinically-indicated bronchoscopies). Presence of microbial pathogens was assessed using techniques available locally (including microscopy and 10-day culture for Nocardia). BAL samples were also sent to the French Nocardiosis Observatory (Lyon, France) for the Nocardia PCR-based assay. Transplant physicians and patients were blinded to the Nocardia PCR results.

RESULTS

We included 29 BAL samples from 21 patients (18 surveillance and 11 clinically-indicated bronchoscopies). Nocardiosis was not diagnosed in any of these patients by conventional techniques. However, Nocardia PCR was positive in five BAL samples from five of the patients (24%, 95% confidence interval: 11-45%); four were asymptomatic and undergoing surveillance bronchoscopy, and one was symptomatic and was later diagnosed with influenza virus infection. None of the five PCR-positive patients died or were diagnosed with nocardiosis during the median follow-up of 21 months after the index bronchoscopy (range: 20-23 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, Nocardia PCR was positive on BAL fluid from one fourth of the LTRs. Nocardia PCR-based assays should be used with caution on respiratory samples from LTRs because of the possible detection of airway colonization using this technique. Larger studies are required to determine the usefulness of the Nocardia PCR-based assay in transplant recipients.

Oropharyngeal colonization: epidemiology, treatment and ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention

Oropharyngeal (OP) colonization and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) mechanisms are tightly linked. A significant within-population variation in OP colonization has been described, with its composition being dependent from patients' severity. For instance, healthy subjects have a very low rate in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) colonization, while its rate rises in comorbid patients, reaching high proportions in ICU patients. Various factors can be put forward to explain the modifications of hospital acquired OP. ICU patients might suffer from underlying diseases; the gastric reflux induced by the presence of nasogastric tubes and the patients' position influences OP colonization; salivary composition might influence OP content, as it modulates bacterial adhesion and induces reversible bacterial changes enhancing bacterial binding. The transition from OP colonization to VAP has been shown in numerous studies, with the digestive tract acting as a filter, or as a reservoir. Some therapies have been investigated to modulate OP colonization, in order to reduce the risk for VAP. Among those, mammalian antimicrobial peptides have been shown effective in reducing GNB colonization in healthy subjects, but failed in preventing VAP in ICU patients. The widely used chlorhexidine was tested in numerous trials. Data on its efficacy are conflicting, and meta-analyses yield discordant results. Above all, several drawbacks have aroused: a poor tolerance of concentrated solutions; an increased risk of death in the less severe patients; and a reduced susceptibility towards chlorhexidine of number of VAP pathogens. Proanthocyanidins, used to prevent Escherichia coli adhesion to the urothelium, have been tested in mice model of pneumonia with interesting results. Some complementary data are needed before moving to clinical research. Future research paths should include a reappraisal of OP colonization; finding better formulations for chlorhexidine; define the best populations to target oral decontamination and developing other strategies to prevent and treat OP colonization.

Nocardia infections in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nocardia spp. is a gram-positive bacteria that may cause infections in humans. Nocardiosis has been described since the early years of transplantation. This review aims to provide an overview of present knowledge regarding posttransplant nocardiosis, with a focus on recent findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nocardiosis is not rare among transplant recipients, especially after thoracic transplantation and/or in case of intense immunosuppressive regimen or use of tacrolimus. Low-dose cotrimoxazole is not effective to prevent nocardiosis. Although lung is the most common site of infection, more than 40% of organ transplant patients have a disseminated infection. As central nervous system involvement is frequent (about 1/3 of the patients) and possibly asymptomatic, brain imaging is mandatory. Diagnosis relies on direct examination and culture; molecular species identification is useful to guide treatment. Although cotrimoxazole is the drug for which we have the strongest clinical experience, other antibiotics such as linezolid, parenteral cephalosporins, carbapenems, and amikacin can be used to treat nocardiosis. Although treatment duration has historically been set to at least 6 months, shorter durations (<120 days) seem associated with a good outcome in selected patients.

SUMMARY

Physicians in charge of transplant patients should be aware of nocardiosis. Diagnosis and management of transplant recipients with nocardiosis require a multidisciplinary approach.

Clinical Assessment of a Nocardia PCR-Based Assay for Diagnosis of Nocardiosis

The diagnosis of nocardiosis, a severe opportunistic infection, is challenging. We assessed the specificity and sensitivity of a 16S rRNA Nocardia PCR-based assay performed on clinical samples. In this multicenter study (January 2014 to April 2015), patients who were admitted to three hospitals and had an underlying condition favoring nocardiosis, clinical and radiological signs consistent with nocardiosis, and a Nocardia PCR assay result for a clinical sample were included. Patients were classified as negative control (NC) (negative Nocardia culture results and proven alternative diagnosis or improvement at 6 months without anti-Nocardia treatment), positive control (PC) (positive Nocardia culture results), or probable nocardiosis (positive Nocardia PCR results, negative Nocardia culture results, and no alternative diagnosis). Sixty-eight patients were included; 47 were classified as NC, 8 as PC, and 13 as probable nocardiosis. PCR results were negative for 35/47 NC patients (74%). For the 12 NC patients with positive PCR results, the PCR assay had been performed with respiratory samples. These NC patients had chronic bronchopulmonary disease more frequently than did the NC patients with negative PCR results (8/12 patients [67%] versus 11/35 patients [31%]; P = 0.044). PCR results were positive for 7/8 PC patients (88%). There were 13 cases of probable nocardiosis, diagnosed solely using the PCR results; 9 of those patients (69%) had lung involvement (consolidation or nodule). Nocardia PCR testing had a specificity of 74% and a sensitivity of 88% for the diagnosis of nocardiosis. Nocardia PCR testing may be helpful for the diagnosis of nocardiosis in immunocompromised patients but interpretation of PCR results from respiratory samples is difficult, because the PCR assay may also detect colonization.

Field Wound Care: Prophylactic Antibiotics

Adequate management of wounds requires numerous interventions, one of which is the appropriate use of antimicrobials to attempt to minimize the risk of excess morbidity or mortality without increasing toxicity or multidrug resistant bacterial acquisition. There are numerous recommendations and opinions for not only the use of systemic prophylactic antimicrobials, but also the agent, dose, route, and duration. To best address the implementation of systemic antimicrobials in a field scenario, one must weigh the factors that go into that decision and then determine the best agents possible. The epidemiologic triangle (ie, the host, the agent, and the environment) forms the basis for selecting the correct prophylactic antibiotic for field wound care. Extreme conditions can be encountered in both military and nonmilitary systems, requiring a unique selection process to make the right antibiotic choice. A modifiable weighted matrix, recommended previously for point of injury combat casualty care, assists in selecting the best oral and intravenous/intramuscular agent based on the epidemiologic risk determination.