Evaluation of Influenza A H1N1 infection and antiviral utilization in a tertiary care hospital

Leonurine protects against influenza A virus infection-induced pneumonia in mice

Influenza A virus (H1N1), a swine-origin influenza A virus, causes seasonal epidemics that result in severe illnesses and deaths. Leonurine has been reported to function as an anti-inflammatory agent with protective effects on nervous, urinary and cardiovascular systems. However, the therapeutic effects of leonurine on the pneumonia caused by H1N1 infection remain unclear. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed to evaluate the lung injuries of mice infected by H1N1. The amount of immune cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to evaluate the alteration of multiple cytokines in lung tissues. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay was performed to investigate the ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels of certain genes. The protein levels in toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (TLR4/NF-κB) signaling were estimated by western blot assay. Leonurine treatment significantly inhibited the mortality caused by H1N1 infection. Leonurine treatment (60 mg/kg) alleviated the lung injuries caused by virus infection. The inflammatory cell accumulation and cytokine expression were inhibited by the leonurine administration. Leonurine inhibited the mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the lung homogenates at day 5 postinfection. Leonurine regulated the TLR4/NF-κB signaling in the lung homogenates of H1N1-infected mice at day 5 postinfection. Leonurine protects against H1N1 infection-induced pneumonia in mice.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of influenza A and B virus infection in adult Australian hospitalised patients

BACKGROUND

Influenza B is often perceived as a less severe strain of influenza. The epidemiology and clinical outcomes of influenza B have been less thoroughly investigated in hospitalised patients. The aims of this study were to describe clinical differences and outcomes between influenza A and B patients admitted over a period of 4 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of all laboratory confirmed influenza patients ≥18 years at two tertiary hospitals in South Australia. Patients were confirmed as influenza positive if they had a positive polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) test of a respiratory specimen. Complications during hospitalisation along with inpatient mortality were compared between influenza A and B. In addition, 30 day mortality and readmissions were compared. Logistic regression model compared outcomes after adjustment for age, Charlson index, sex and creatinine levels.

RESULTS

Between January 2016-March 2020, 1846 patients, mean age 66.5 years, were hospitalised for influenza. Of whom, 1630 (88.3%) had influenza A and 216 (11.7%) influenza B. Influenza B patients were significantly younger than influenza A. Influenza A patients were more likely be smokers with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) than influenza B. Complications, including pneumonia and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were similar between two groups, however, septic shock was more common in patients with influenza B. Adjusted analyses showed similar median length of hospital stay (LOS), in hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and readmissions between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Influenza B is less prevalent and occurs mostly in younger hospitalised patients than influenza A. Both strains contribute equally to hospitalisation burden and complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCR) no ACTRN12618000451202 date of registration 28/03/2018.