Clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes of community-acquired sepsis among adults: a single center, 1-year retrospective observational cohort study from Hungary

Diagnostic and Prognostic Utilities of Pancreatic Stone Protein in Patients with Suspected Sepsis

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic stone protein (PSP) is an emerging biomarker of sepsis that is secreted from pancreas sensing remote organ damages. We explored the diagnostic and prognostic utilities of PSP in patients with suspected sepsis. Methods: In a total of 285 patients (suspected sepsis, n = 148; sepsis, n = 137), we compared PSP with procalcitonin (PCT) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Sepsis diagnoses were explored using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses with area under the curves (AUCs). Clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and kidney replacement therapy [KRT]) were explored using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate analysis with hazard ratio (HR). Results: PCT and PSP were comparable for sepsis diagnosis (AUC = 0.71-0.72, p < 0.001). The sepsis proportion was significantly higher when both biomarkers increased than when either one or both biomarkers did not increase (89.0% vs. 21.3-47.7%, p < 0.001). Each biomarker quartile (Q1-Q4) differed significantly according to their SOFA score (all p < 0.001). Compared with Q1, the Q2-Q4 groups showed worse clinical outcomes (p = 0.002-0.041). Both biomarkers added to the SOFA score showed higher HRs than the SOFA score alone (3.3-9.6 vs. 2.8-4.2, p < 0.001-0.011), with nearly 2.5-fold higher HR (9.6 vs. 4.2) for predicting KRT. Conclusions: Although PCT and PSP did not independently predict clinical outcomes in the multivariate analysis, PSP demonstrated diagnostic and prognostic utilities in patients with suspected sepsis, especially for predicting kidney dysfunction. PSP, alone or in combination with PCT, would be a valuable tool that can be added to clinical assessments.

Systematic Literature Review of the Association of Fever and Elevated Temperature with Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients

Although most commonly associated with infection, elevated temperature and fever also occur in a variety of critically ill populations. Prior studies have suggested that fever and elevated temperature may be detrimental to critically ill patients and can lead to poor outcomes, but the evidence surrounding the association of fever with outcomes is rapidly evolving. To broadly assess potential associations of elevated temperature and fever with outcomes in critically ill adult patients, we performed a systematic literature review focusing on traumatic brain injury, stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), cardiac arrest, sepsis, and general intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Searches were conducted in Embase® and PubMed® from 2016 to 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including dual-screening of abstracts, full texts, and extracted data. In total, 60 studies assessing traumatic brain injury and stroke (24), cardiac arrest (8), sepsis (22), and general ICU (6) patients were included. Mortality, functional, or neurological status and length of stay were the most frequently reported outcomes. Elevated temperature and fever were associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and cardiac arrest but not in patients with sepsis. Although a causal relationship between elevated temperature and poor outcomes cannot be definitively established, the association observed in this systematic literature review supports the concept that management of elevated temperature may factor in avoidance of detrimental outcomes in multiple critically ill populations. The analysis also highlights gaps in our understanding of fever and elevated temperature in critically ill adult patients.

Composition and changes of blood microbiota in adult patients with community-acquired sepsis: A pilot study from bench to bedside

Background

Characteristics of the blood microbiota among adult patients with community-acquired sepsis are poorly understood. Our aim was to analyze the composition of blood microbiota in adult patients with community-acquired sepsis, and correlate changes with non-septic control patients.

Methods

A prospective observational study was carried out by including adult patients hospitalized for community-acquired sepsis at our center between January and November 2019, by random selection from a pool of eligible patients. Study inclusion was done on the day of sepsis diagnosis. Community acquisition was ascertained by a priori exclusion criteria; sepsis was defined according to the SEPSIS-3 definitions. Each included patient was matched with non-septic control patients by age and gender in a 1:1 fashion enrolled from the general population. Conventional culturing with BacT/ALERT system and 16S rRNA microbiota analysis were performed from blood samples taken in a same time from a patient. Abundance data was analyzed by the CosmosID HUB Microbiome software.

Results

Altogether, 13 hospitalized patients were included, 6/13 (46.2%) with sepsis and 7/13 (53.8%) with septic shock at diagnosis. The most prevalent etiopathogen isolated from blood cultures was Escherichia coli, patients mostly had intraabdominal septic source. At day 28, all-cause mortality was 15.4% (2/13). Compared to non-septic control patients, a relative scarcity of Faecalibacterium, Blautia, Coprococcus and Roseburia genera, with an abundance of Enhydrobacter, Pseudomonas and Micrococcus genera was observed among septic patients. Relative differences between septic vs. non-septic patients were more obvious at the phylum level, mainly driven by Firmicutes (25.7% vs. 63.1%; p<0.01) and Proteobacteria (36.9% vs. 16.6%; p<0.01). The alpha diversity, quantified by the Chao1 index showed statistically significant difference between septic vs. non-septic patients (126 ± 51 vs. 66 ± 26; p<0.01). The Bray-Curtis beta diversity, reported by principal coordinate analysis of total hit frequencies, revealed 2 potentially separate clusters among septic vs. non-septic patients.

Conclusion

In adult patients with community-acquired sepsis, specific changes in the composition and abundance of blood microbiota could be detected by 16S rRNA metagenome sequencing, compared to non-septic control patients. Traditional blood culture results only partially correlate with microbiota test results.

Developing a new sepsis screening tool based on lymphocyte count, international normalized ratio and procalcitonin (LIP score)

Exploring an effective sepsis screening tool that can be widely implemented is important for improving the prognosis of sepsis worldwide. This study aimed to develop a new simple screening tool for sepsis (LIP scoring system) that includes the peripheral blood lymphocyte count, international normalized ratio, and procalcitonin level. In a single-center, prospective, observational study, 444 acute sepsis inpatients and 444 nonsepsis inpatients were ultimately included based on the Sepsis-3 and exclusion criteria. The differences in the Lym, INR, PCT level and other clinical biomarkers were compared between the two groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to establish a LIP screening tool for sepsis with a combination of biomarkers. The Kappa and McNemar tests were used to evaluate the differences between the LIP screening results (LIP score ≥ 3) and Sepsis-3 criteria (SOFA score ≥ 2). Logistic regression analysis showed that the lymphocyte count, INR, PCT level, platelets, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and prothrombin time (PT) were independent risk factors for the development of sepsis. The ROC analysis showed that the lymphocyte count, INR, and PCT level had high area under the ROC curve values (AUROC (95% CI): Lym 0.84 (0.810-0.860), INR 0.921 (0.902-0.938), PCT level 0.928 (0.909-0.944)). The LIP tool had satisfactory screening efficacy for sepsis (sensitivity, 92.8%; specificity, 94.1%), and a LIP score equal to or greater than 3 points had good agreement with Sepsis-3 criteria in the diagnosis of sepsis (Kappa = 0862 in the Kappa test and P = 0.512 in the McNemar test). The LIP tool has satisfactory sensitivity and specificity for sepsis screening, and it can be used for rapid screening of patients with sepsis in outpatient and emergency departments or in economically underdeveloped areas with limited resources.

Oxygen therapy for sepsis and prevention of complications

Patients with sepsis have a wide range of respiratory disorders that can be treated with oxygen therapy. Experimental data in animal sepsis models show that oxygen therapy significantly increases survival, while clinical data on the use of different oxygen therapy protocols are ambiguous. Oxygen therapy, especially hyperbaric oxygenation, in patients with sepsis can aggravate existing oxidative stress and contribute to the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation. The purpose of this article is to compare experimental and clinical data on oxygen therapy in animals and humans, to discuss factors that can influence the results of oxygen therapy for sepsis treatment in humans, and to provide some recommendations for reducing oxidative stress and preventing disseminated intravascular coagulation during oxygen therapy.

Mathematical model of the cost-effectiveness of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel molecular rapid diagnostic test compared with conventional methods for identification of Escherichia coli bloodstream infections

BACKGROUND

Gram-negative pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and increasingly demonstrate antimicrobial resistance. Molecular rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) offer faster pathogen identification and susceptibility results, but higher costs compared with conventional methods. We determined the cost-effectiveness of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel, as a type of mRDT, compared with conventional methods in the identification of E. coli BSIs.

METHODS

We constructed a decision analytic model comparing BCID with conventional methods in the identification and susceptibility testing of hospitalized patients with E. coli BSIs from the perspective of the public healthcare payer. Model inputs were obtained from published literature. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by determining the per-patient admission cost, the QALYs garnered and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) where applicable. Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model. All costs reflect 2019 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

The Monte Carlo probabilistic analyses resulted in cost savings ($27 070.83 versus $35 649.81) and improved QALYs (8.65 versus 7.10) in favour of BCID. At a willingness to pay up to $100 000, BCID had a 72.6%-83.8% chance of being cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed length of stay and cost per day of hospitalization to have the most substantial impact on costs and QALYs.

CONCLUSIONS

BCID was found to be cost-saving when used to diagnose E. coli BSI compared with conventional testing. Cost savings were most influenced by length of stay and cost per day of hospitalization.

Role of international normalized ratio in nonpulmonary sepsis screening: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is a lack of sepsis screening tools that can be widely used worldwide. Pulmonary sepsis can be of sufficient concern to physicians due to their noticeable symptoms, which usually rely less on screening tools.

AIM

To investigate the efficiency of the international normalized ratio (INR) for the early rapid recognition of adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study. A total of 108 sepsis patients and 106 nonsepsis patients were enrolled according to relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. Commonly used clinical indicators, such as white blood cell, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), platelets (PLT), prothrombin time, INR, activated partial thromboplastin time, and quick Sequential “Sepsis-related” Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores were recorded within 24 h after admission. The diagnostic performances of these clinical indicators were analyzed and compared through multivariate logistic regression analysis, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The INR value of the sepsis group was significantly higher than that of the nonsepsis group. INR has superior diagnostic efficacy for sepsis, with an area under the curve value of 0.918, when those preexisting diseases which significantly affect coagulation function were excluded. The diagnostic efficacy of the INR was more significant than that of NLCR, PLT, and qSOFA (P < 0.05). Moreover, INR levels of 1.17, 1.20, and 1.22 could be used to categorize the relative risk of nonpulmonary infections sepsis into three categories: low, medium and high risk, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The INR is a promising and easily available biomarker for diagnosis, and it can be used as one of the indicators for early screening of adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis. When its value is higher than the optimal cutoff value (1.22), high vigilance is required for adult nonpulmonary infectious sepsis.

The Patient's Gender Influencing the Accuracy of Diagnosis and Proposed Sepsis Treatment in Constructed Cases

Background

Male sex is an independent risk factor for sepsis development. In addition to immunological gender differences, women less often receive sepsis treatment once diagnosed. Gender differences have also been described in other medical conditions, such as acute coronary syndrome.

Aim

To study whether the gender of patients influenced physicians' tendency to suspect sepsis and propose correct initial sepsis treatment in constructed cases.

Method

Four cases were constructed to fulfil the sepsis-3 criteria as well as raise clinical suspicions of other common medical differential diagnoses. Two of the cases were drafted in two versions, only differing in the gender of the patient. The two versions were randomly distributed to all clinical physicians in a medical region in Sweden. The responding physicians were asked to state the three most important diagnoses and the three most important initial treatments for each case. If sepsis were among the stated diagnoses together with fluids and antibiotics, the case was considered as correctly identified and initially treated sepsis.

Results

120 hospital physicians answered the cases. In the case the patient was a female, the respondents correctly identified and treated sepsis significantly more often than if the patient was of the male sex (Case 1: 12/58 vs 2/62, p < 0.01 and Case 2: 25/62 vs 13/58, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

A low proportion of Swedish physicians identified and proposed treatment for sepsis in four constructed cases. In the case the patient strongly mimicked other diagnoses common in the male sex, the male cases were less often correctly identified and treated for sepsis.