Unexpected radiation pneumonitis after SIRT with significant decrease in DLCO with internal radiation exposure: a case report

The evaluation of DLCO changes in patients with relatively higher lung shunt fractions receiving TARE

OBJECTIVE

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) labeled microspheres is an effective locoregional treatment option for patients with primary and metastatic liver cancer. However, TARE is also associated with radiation-induced lung injury due to hepatopulmonary shunting. If a large proportion of the injected radionuclide microspheres (more than 15%) is shunted, a rare but lethal complication may develop: radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP). Diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a valuable test to assess lung function and a decrease in DLCO may indicate an impairment in gas exchange caused by the lung injury. Some previous researches have been reported the most consistent changes in pulmonary function tests after external beam radiotherapy are recorded with DLCO. This study aimed to examine the changes in DLCO after TARE with glass microspheres in newly treated and retreated patients with relatively higher lung shunt fractions.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed forty consecutive patients with liver malignancies who underwent lobar or superselective TARE with ⁹⁰Y glass microspheres. DLCO tests were performed at baseline and on days 15, 30, and 60 after the treatment. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically for the development of RP.

RESULTS

A statistically significant decrease was found in the DLCO after the first treatment (81.4 ± 13.66 vs. 75.25 ± 13.22, p = 0.003). The frequency of the patients with impaired DLCO at baseline was significantly increased after the first treatment (37.5 vs 57.5% p < 0.05). In the retreated group (n = 8), neither the DLCO (71.5 ± 10.82 vs. 67.50 ± 11.24, p = 0.115) nor the frequency of patients with impaired DLCO (25 vs 25%, p = 1) did not significantly change. Also, the change in DLCO values did not significantly correlate with lung shunt fraction, administered radiation dose, and absorbed lung dose after the first and second treatments (p > 0.05 for all). None of the patients developed RP.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that a significant reduction in DLCO after TARE may occur in patients with relatively higher lung shunt fractions. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better investigate the changes in DLCO in patients with high lung shunt fractions.

EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds

Primary liver tumours (i.e. hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)) are among the most frequent cancers worldwide. However, only 10-20% of patients are amenable to curative treatment, such as resection or transplant. Liver metastases are most frequently caused by colorectal cancer, which accounts for the second most cancer-related deaths in Europe. In both primary and secondary tumours, radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option. The vast potential of personalized dosimetry has also been shown, resulting in markedly increased response rates and overall survival. In a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, the role of radioembolization will be subject to changes. Therefore, the decision for radioembolization should be taken by a multidisciplinary tumour board in accordance with the current clinical guidelines. The purpose of this procedure guideline is to assist the nuclear medicine physician in treating and managing patients undergoing radioembolization treatment. PREAMBLE: The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide among individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. These guidelines are intended to assist practitioners in providing appropriate nuclear medicine care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set out in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine involves not only the science but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognised that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

Reassessment of the lung dose limits for radioembolization

Radioembolization, also known as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), is an established treatment for the management of patients with unresectable liver tumors. Advances in liver dosimetry and new knowledge about tumor dose-response relationships have helped promote the well-tolerated use of higher prescribed doses, consequently transitioning radioembolization from palliative to curative therapy. Lung dosimetry, unfortunately, has not seen the same advances in dose calculation methodology and renewed consensus in dose limits as normal liver and tumor dosimetry. Therefore, the efficacy of curative radioembolization may be compromised in patients where the current lung dose calculations unnecessarily limit the administered activity. The field is thus at a stage where a systematic review and update of lung dose limits is necessary to advance the clinical practice of radioembolization. This work summarizes the historical context and literature for origins of the current lung dose limits following radioembolization, that is, the 25-year-old, single institution, small patient cohort series that helped establish the lung shunt fraction and dose limits. Newer clinical evidence based on larger patient cohorts that challenges the historical data on lung dose limits are then discussed. We conclude by revisiting the rationale for current lung dose limits and by proposing a staged approach to advance the field of lung dosimetry and thus the practice of radioembolization as a whole.

Lung shunt fraction calculation using 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT imaging for 90Y microsphere selective internal radiation therapy of liver tumors

BACKGROUND

^99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (^99mTc-MAA) scintigraphy is utilized in treatment planning for Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) of liver tumors to evaluate hepatopulmonary shunting by calculating the lung shunt fraction (LSF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if LSF calculation using SPECT/CT instead of planar gamma camera imaging is more accurate and if this can potentially lead to more effective treatment planning of hepatic lesions while avoiding excessive pulmonary irradiation.

RESULTS

LSF calculation was obtained using two different methodologies in 85 cases from consecutive patients intended to receive ⁹⁰Y SIRT. The first method was based on planar gamma camera imaging in the anterior and posterior views with geometric mean calculation of the LSF from regions of interest of the liver and lungs. The second method was based on segmentation of the liver and lungs from SPECT/CT images of the thorax and abdomen. The differences in planar imaging versus SPECT/CT derived LSF values along with the estimated absorbed lung mean dose (LMD) were evaluated. The LSF values were higher in planar imaging versus SPECT/CT in 81/85 cases, with a mean value of 8.5% vs. 4.6% respectively; the difference was statistically significant using a paired t-test (alpha = 0.05). In those patients who received SIRT, the estimated absorbed LMD calculated with planar imaging was significantly higher than with SPECT/CT (t-test, P < 0.005). Repeated phantom experiments using an anthropomorphic torso phantom with variable ^99mTc activity concentrations for the liver and lungs were performed with the standard patient protocol, demonstrated improved accuracy of the LSF calculation based on SPECT/CT than planar imaging (mean overestimated value of 6% vs. 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that LSF calculation using planar imaging can be significantly overestimated while calculation using SPECT/CT imaging and appropriate segmentation tools can be more accurate. Minimizing the errors in obtaining the LSF can lead to more effective ⁹⁰Y SIRT treatment planning for hepatic tumors while ensuring the lung dose will not exceed the standard acceptable safety thresholds.