1
|
Deng T, Liang J, Yan C, Ni M, Xiang H, Li C, Ou J, Lin Q, Liu L, Tang G, Luo R, An X, Gao Y, Lin X. Development and validation of ultrasound-based radiomics model to predict germline BRCA mutations in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:31. [PMID: 38424620 PMCID: PMC10905812 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00676-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying breast cancer (BC) patients with germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA) mutation is important. The current criteria for germline testing for BC remain controversial. This study aimed to develop a nomogram incorporating ultrasound radiomic features and clinicopathological factors to predict gBRCA mutations in patients with BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, 497 women with BC who underwent gBRCA genetic testing from March 2013 to May 2022 were included, including 348 for training (84 with and 264 without a gBRCA mutation) and 149 for validation(36 patients with and 113 without a gBRCA mutation). Factors associated with gBRCA mutations were identified to establish a clinicopathological model. Radiomics features were extracted from the intratumoral and peritumoral regions (3 mm and 5 mm) of each image. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm was used to select the features and logistic regression analysis was used to construct three imaging models. Finally, a nomogram that combined clinicopathological and radiomics features was developed. The models were evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS Age at diagnosis, family history of BC, personal history of other BRCA-related cancers, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status were independent predictors of the clinicopathological model. The AUC of the imaging radiomics model combining intratumoral and peritumoral 3 mm areas in the validation set was 0.783 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.702-0.862), which showed the best performance among three imaging models. The nomogram yielded better performance than the clinicopathological model in validation sets (AUC: 0.824 [0.755-0.894] versus 0.659 [0.563-0.755], p = 0.007). CONCLUSION The nomogram based on ultrasound images and clinicopathological factors performs well in predicting gBRCA mutations in BC patients and may help to improve clinical decisions about genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Deng
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jianwen Liang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China
| | - Cuiju Yan
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Mengqian Ni
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Huiling Xiang
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Chunyan Li
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jinjing Ou
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Qingguang Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Lixian Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Guoxue Tang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Rongzhen Luo
- Department of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Yi Gao
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
| | - Xi Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo R, Yu Y, Huang Y, Lin M, Liao Y, Hu Y, Li Q, Peng C, Zhou J. A nomogram model combining ultrasound-based radiomics features and clinicopathological factors to identify germline BRCA1/2 mutation in invasive breast cancer patients. Heliyon 2024; 10:e23383. [PMID: 38169922 PMCID: PMC10758804 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective BRCA1/2 status is a key to personalized therapy for invasive breast cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the association between ultrasound radiomics features and germline BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with invasive breast cancer. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, 100 lesions in 92 BRCA1/2-mutated patients and 390 lesions in 357 non-BRCA1/2-mutated patients were included and randomly assigned as training and validation datasets in a ratio of 7:3. Gray-scale ultrasound images of the largest plane of the lesions were used for feature extraction. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm and multivariate logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used to select features. The multivariate logistic regression method was used to construct predictive models based on clinicopathological factors, radiomics features, or a combination of them. Results In the clinical model, age at first diagnosis, family history of BRCA1/2-related malignancies, HER2 status, and Ki-67 level were found to be independent predictors for BRCA1/2 mutation. In the radiomics model, 10 significant features were selected from the 1032 radiomics features extracted from US images. The AUCs of the radiomics model were not inferior to those of the clinical model in both training dataset [0.712 (95% CI, 0.647-0.776) vs 0.768 (95% CI, 0.704-0.835); p = 0.429] and validation dataset [0.705 (95% CI, 0.597-0.808) vs 0.723 (95% CI, 0.625-0.828); p = 0.820]. The AUCs of the nomogram model combining clinical and radiomics features were 0.804 (95% CI, 0.748-0.861) in the training dataset and 0.811 (95% CI, 0.724-0.894) in the validation dataset, which were proved significantly higher than those of the clinical model alone by DeLong's test (p = 0.041; p = 0.007). To be noted, the negative predictive values (NPVs) of the nomogram model reached a favorable 0.93 in both datasets. Conclusion This machine nomogram model combining ultrasound-based radiomics and clinical features exhibited a promising performance in identifying germline BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with invasive breast cancer and may help avoid unnecessary gene tests in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yini Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Min Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Ying Liao
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Yixin Hu
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Chuan Peng
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Jianhua Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saida T, Shikama A, Mori K, Ishiguro T, Minaguchi T, Satoh T, Nakajima T. Comparing Characteristics of Pelvic High-grade Serous Carcinomas with and without Breast Cancer Gene Variants on MR Imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2024; 23:18-26. [PMID: 36372398 PMCID: PMC10838714 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare MRI findings of high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) with and without breast cancer (BRCA) gene variants to explore the feasibility of MRI as a genetic predictor. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed MRI data from 16 patients with BRCA variant-positive (11 patients of BRCA1 and 5 patients of BRCA2 variant-positive) and 32 patients with BRCA variant-negative HGSCs and evaluated tumor size, appearance, nature of solid components, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, time-intensity curve, several dynamic contrast-enhanced curve descriptors, and nature of peritoneal metastasis. Age, primary site, tumor stage, bilaterality, presence of lymph node metastasis, presence of peritoneal metastasis, and tumor markers were also compared between the groups with the Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests. RESULTS The mean tumor size of BRCA variant-positive HGSCs was 9.6 cm, and that of variant-negative HGSCs was 6.8 cm, with no significant difference (P = 0.241). No significant difference was found between BRCA variant-positive and negative HGSCs in other evaluated factors, except for age (mean age, 53 years old; range, 32-78 years old for BRCA variant-positive and mean age, 61 years old; range, 44-80 years old for BRCA variant-negative, P = 0.033). Comparing BRCA1 variant-positive and BRCA2 variant-positive HGSCs, BRCA1 variant-positive HGSCs were larger (P = 0.040), had greater Max enhancement (P = 0.013), Area under the curve (P = 0.013), and CA125 (P = 0.038), and had a higher frequency of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.049), with significance. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in the MRI findings between patients with HGSCs with and without BRCA variants. Although studied in small numbers, BRCA1 variant-positive HGSCs were larger and more enhanced than BRCA2 variant-positive HGSCs with higher CA125 and more frequent lymph node metastases, and may represent more aggressive features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsukasa Saida
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ayumi Shikama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kensaku Mori
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshitaka Ishiguro
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takeo Minaguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toyomi Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takahito Nakajima
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Suzuki Y, Hanaoka S, Tanabe M, Yoshikawa T, Seto Y. Predicting Breast Cancer Risk Using Radiomics Features of Mammography Images. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1528. [PMID: 38003843 PMCID: PMC10672551 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13111528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Mammography images contain a lot of information about not only the mammary glands but also the skin, adipose tissue, and stroma, which may reflect the risk of developing breast cancer. We aimed to establish a method to predict breast cancer risk using radiomics features of mammography images and to enable further examinations and prophylactic treatment to reduce breast cancer mortality. We used mammography images of 4000 women with breast cancer and 1000 healthy women from the 'starting point set' of the OPTIMAM dataset, a public dataset. We trained a Light Gradient Boosting Machine using radiomics features extracted from mammography images of women with breast cancer (only the healthy side) and healthy women. This model was a binary classifier that could discriminate whether a given mammography image was of the contralateral side of women with breast cancer or not, and its performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. The average area under the curve for five folds was 0.60122. Some radiomics features, such as 'wavelet-H_glcm_Correlation' and 'wavelet-H_firstorder_Maximum', showed distribution differences between the malignant and normal groups. Therefore, a single radiomics feature might reflect the breast cancer risk. The odds ratio of breast cancer incidence was 7.38 in women whose estimated malignancy probability was ≥0.95. Radiomics features from mammography images can help predict breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Suzuki
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Shouhei Hanaoka
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan;
| | - Masahiko Tanabe
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Takeharu Yoshikawa
- Department of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Seto
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
He X, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Feng Y. The value, diagnostic efficacy and clinical significance of functional magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1132186. [PMID: 37064088 PMCID: PMC10102614 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer (BC) is a common malignant tumor in female. In recent years, with the change of fertility pattern and lifestyle, the incidence of breast cancer is increasing year by year, seriously endangering the health and life of women. MRI is suitable for follow-up evaluation of the course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LABC, but there are few related studies and reports. Based on the above background, it is necessary to further evaluate the value of functional magnetic resonance imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer, so as to lay a theoretical foundation for the popularization and application of this detection method. Based on this, this study was to explore the value, diagnostic efficacy and clinical importance of functional magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer. Methods A total of 62 patients with triple-negative breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our hospital from September 2017 to September 2022 were selected. To compare the differences of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) between effective and ineffective patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the related data were statistically analyzed. Results There was no significant difference between the mode of tumor withdrawal and the pathological complete remission of tumor tissue (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in anti-Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) data before and after chemotherapy between over-expressed patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) and non-over-expressed patients with HER-2 (P>0.05). The levels of ADC and Δ ADC in pathological complete remission patients after chemotherapy were significantly higher than those in non-pathological complete remission patients (P<0.05). Using the ΔADC value as the evaluation parameter, the pathological response of tumor tissue was classified as the "gold standard" to draw the ROC curve, the area under curve (AUC) was 0.673, the cut-off of ΔADC to evaluate the significant response of tumor tissue after chemotherapy was 1.418, the sensitivity of evaluating the efficacy was 71.9%, and the specificity was 55.0%. Conclusion Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has diagnostic value for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer. According to the change of ADC value, the curative effect can be predicted early and the treatment strategy can be adjusted in time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoping He
- Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zongsheng Wang
- The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Xuzhou, China
| | - Ying Zhou
- Radiology Department, The First People’ Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yongli Feng
- Radiology Department, The First People’ Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schulmeyer CE, Fasching PA, Häberle L, Meyer J, Schneider M, Wachter D, Ruebner M, Pöschke P, Beckmann MW, Hartmann A, Erber R, Gass P. Expression of the Immunohistochemical Markers CK5, CD117, and EGFR in Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Correlated with Prognosis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13030372. [PMID: 36766486 PMCID: PMC9914743 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular-based subclassifications of breast cancer are important for identifying treatment options and stratifying the prognosis in breast cancer. This study aimed to assess the prognosis relative to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and other subtypes, using a biomarker panel including cytokeratin 5 (CK5), cluster of differentiation 117 (CD117), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This cohort-case study included histologically confirmed breast carcinomas as cohort arm. From a total of 894 patients, 572 patients with early breast cancer, sufficient clinical data, and archived tumor tissue were included. Using the immunohistochemical markers CK5, CD117, and EGFR, two subgroups were formed: one with all three biomarkers negative (TBN) and one with at least one of those three biomarkers positive (non-TBN). There were significant differences between the two biomarker subgroups (TBN versus non-TBN) in TNBC for DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.02), with higher survival rates (DFS and OS) in the non-TBN subgroup. In this study, we found the non-TBN subgroup of TNBC lesions with at least one positive biomarker of CK5, CD117, and/or EGFR, to be associated with longer DFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla E. Schulmeyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julia Meyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Schneider
- Würzburg University Hospital, Institut für Pathologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany
| | - David Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Weiden Hospital, Weiden in der Oberpfalz, 92637 Weiden in der Oberpfalz, Germany
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Patrik Pöschke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)9131-85-33553; Fax: +49-(0)9131-85-33938
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lipkova J, Chen RJ, Chen B, Lu MY, Barbieri M, Shao D, Vaidya AJ, Chen C, Zhuang L, Williamson DFK, Shaban M, Chen TY, Mahmood F. Artificial intelligence for multimodal data integration in oncology. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:1095-1110. [PMID: 36220072 PMCID: PMC10655164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In oncology, the patient state is characterized by a whole spectrum of modalities, ranging from radiology, histology, and genomics to electronic health records. Current artificial intelligence (AI) models operate mainly in the realm of a single modality, neglecting the broader clinical context, which inevitably diminishes their potential. Integration of different data modalities provides opportunities to increase robustness and accuracy of diagnostic and prognostic models, bringing AI closer to clinical practice. AI models are also capable of discovering novel patterns within and across modalities suitable for explaining differences in patient outcomes or treatment resistance. The insights gleaned from such models can guide exploration studies and contribute to the discovery of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. To support these advances, here we present a synopsis of AI methods and strategies for multimodal data fusion and association discovery. We outline approaches for AI interpretability and directions for AI-driven exploration through multimodal data interconnections. We examine challenges in clinical adoption and discuss emerging solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Lipkova
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard J Chen
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bowen Chen
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Computer Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ming Y Lu
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Matteo Barbieri
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Shao
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology (HST), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Anurag J Vaidya
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology (HST), Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Chengkuan Chen
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luoting Zhuang
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Drew F K Williamson
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Muhammad Shaban
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tiffany Y Chen
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cancer Program, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA; Data Science Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Data Science Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shen WQ, Guo Y, Ru WE, Li C, Zhang GC, Liao N, Du GQ. Using an Improved Residual Network to Identify PIK3CA Mutation Status in Breast Cancer on Ultrasound Image. Front Oncol 2022; 12:850515. [PMID: 35719907 PMCID: PMC9204315 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.850515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The detection of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase catalytic alpha (PIK3CA) gene mutations in breast cancer is a key step to design personalizing an optimal treatment strategy. Traditional genetic testing methods are invasive and time-consuming. It is urgent to find a non-invasive method to estimate the PIK3CA mutation status. Ultrasound (US), one of the most common methods for breast cancer screening, has the advantages of being non-invasive, fast imaging, and inexpensive. In this study, we propose to develop a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to identify PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer based on US images. Materials and Methods We retrospectively collected 312 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer who underwent genetic testing. All US images (n=800) of breast cancer patients were collected and divided into the training set (n=600) and test set (n=200). A DCNN-Improved Residual Network (ImResNet) was designed to identify the PIK3CA mutations. We also compared the ImResNet model with the original ResNet50 model, classical machine learning models, and other deep learning models. Results The proposed ImResNet model has the ability to identify PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer based on US images. Notably, our ImResNet model outperforms the original ResNet50, DenseNet201, Xception, MobileNetv2, and two machine learning models (SVM and KNN), with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775. Moreover, the overall accuracy, average precision, recall rate, and F1-score of the ImResNet model achieved 74.50%, 74.17%, 73.35%, and 73.76%, respectively. All of these measures were significantly higher than other models. Conclusion The ImResNet model gives an encouraging performance in predicting PIK3CA mutations based on breast US images, providing a new method for noninvasive gene prediction. In addition, this model could provide the basis for clinical adjustments and precision treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Qian Shen
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affifiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yanhui Guo
- Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois Springfield, Springfield, IL, United States
| | - Wan-Er Ru
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.,College of Medicine, Shantou University, Shantou, China
| | - Cheukfai Li
- Department of Breast Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Chun Zhang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ning Liao
- Department of Breast Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Qing Du
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|