Chronic dialysis, NAT2 polymorphisms, and the risk of isoniazid-induced encephalopathy - case report and literature review

Precision Medicine Strategies to Improve Isoniazid Therapy in Patients with Tuberculosis

Due to interindividual variability in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, traditional isoniazid fixed-dose regimens may lead to suboptimal or toxic isoniazid concentrations in the plasma of patients with tuberculosis, contributing to adverse drug reactions, therapeutic failure, or the development of drug resistance. Achieving precision therapy for isoniazid requires a multifaceted approach that could integrate various clinical and genomic factors to tailor the isoniazid dose to individual patient characteristics. This includes leveraging molecular diagnostics to perform the comprehensive profiling of host pharmacogenomics to determine how it affects isoniazid metabolism, such as its metabolism by N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2), and studying drug-resistant mutations in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome for enabling targeted therapy selection. Several other molecular signatures identified from the host pharmacogenomics as well as other omics-based approaches such as gut microbiome, epigenomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic approaches have provided mechanistic explanations for isoniazid pharmacokinetic variability and/or adverse drug reactions and thereby may facilitate precision therapy of isoniazid, though further validations in larger and diverse populations with tuberculosis are required for clinical applications. Therapeutic drug monitoring and population pharmacokinetic approaches allow for the adjustment of isoniazid dosages based on patient-specific pharmacokinetic profiles, optimizing drug exposure while minimizing toxicity and the risk of resistance. Current evidence has shown that with the integration of the host pharmacogenomics-particularly NAT2 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomics data along with isoniazid pharmacokinetic concentrations in the blood and patient factors such as anthropometric measurements, comorbidities, and type and timing of food administered-precision therapy approaches in isoniazid therapy can be tailored to the specific characteristics of both the host and the pathogen for improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes.

Drugs with a negative impact on cognitive functions (part 3): antibacterial agents in patients with chronic kidney disease

The relationship between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cognitive function has received increased attention in recent years. Antibacterial agents (ABs) represent a critical component of therapy regimens in patients with CKD due to increased susceptibility to infections. Following our reviewing work on the neurocognitive impact of long-term medications in patients with CKD, we propose to focus on AB-induced direct and indirect consequences on cognitive function. Patients with CKD are predisposed to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to altered drug pharmacokinetics, glomerular filtration decline, and the potential disruption of the blood-brain barrier. ABs have been identified as a major cause of ADRs in vulnerable patient populations. This review examines the direct neurotoxic effects of AB classes (e.g. beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and metronidazole) on the central nervous system (CNS) in patients with CKD. We will mainly focus on the acute effects on the CNS associated with AB since they are the most extensively studied effects in CKD patients. Moreover, the review describes the modulation of the gut microbiota by ABs, potentially influencing CNS symptoms. The intricate brain-gut-kidney axis emerges as a pivotal focus, revealing the interplay between microbiota alterations induced by ABs and CNS manifestations in patients with CKD. The prevalence of antibiotic-associated encephalopathy in patients with CKD undergoing intravenous AB therapy supports the use of therapeutic drug monitoring for ABs to reduce the number and seriousness of ADRs in this patient population. In conclusion, elucidating AB-induced cognitive effects in patients with CKD demands a comprehensive understanding and tailored therapeutic strategies that account for altered pharmacokinetics and the brain-gut-kidney axis.

Extracorporeal treatments for isoniazid poisoning: Systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

Isoniazid toxicity from self-poisoning or dosing errors remains common in regions of the world where tuberculosis is prevalent. Although the treatment of isoniazid poisoning is centered on supportive care and pyridoxine administration, extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs), such as hemodialysis, have been advocated to enhance elimination of isoniazid. No systematic reviews or evidence-based recommendations currently exist on the benefit of ECTRs for isoniazid poisoning. The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup systematically collected and rated the available evidence on the effect of and indications for ECTRs in cases of isoniazid poisoning. We conducted a systematic review of the literature, screened studies, extracted data on study characteristics, outcomes, and measurement characteristics, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods. Forty-three studies (two animal studies, 34 patient reports or patient series, and seven pharmacokinetic studies) met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic analysis was available for 60 patients, most treated with hemodialysis (n = 38). The workgroup assessed isoniazid as "Moderately Dialyzable" by hemodialysis for patients with normal kidney function (quality of evidence = C) and "Dialyzable" by hemodialysis for patients with impaired kidney function (quality of evidence = A). Clinical data for ECTR in isoniazid poisoning were available for 40 patients. Mortality of the cohort was 12.5%. Historical controls who received modern standard care including appropriately dosed pyridoxine generally had excellent outcomes. No benefit could be extrapolated from ECTR, although there was evidence of added costs and harms related to the double lumen catheter insertion, the extracorporeal procedure itself, and the extracorporeal removal of pyridoxine. The EXTRIP workgroup suggests against performing ECTR in addition to standard care (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence) in patients with isoniazid poisoning. If standard dose pyridoxine cannot be administered, we suggest performing ECTR only in patients with seizures refractory to GABA_A receptor agonists (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence).