Li Z, Tang Y, Wang P, Ren J. Diagnosis and Treatment of Retroperitoneal Infection.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2020;
22:477-484. [PMID:
33146587 DOI:
10.1089/sur.2020.126]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Retroperitoneal infection is a persistent and widespread infectious disease that is difficult to treat. It is usually caused by secondary complications such as inflammation, damage, or perforation of adjacent organs in the retroperitoneal space. Pathogenic bacteria invade the retroperitoneal space through retroperitoneal and interstitial organs, peripheral tissue, and the blood. As a result, infections mostly arise from severe acute pancreatitis, acute colonic diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, kidney abscess, and biliary tract injury. Initially manifested by the presence of lumbago, this disease spreads easily, is persistent, and is often misdiagnosed. Methods: Review and synthesis of pertinent literature and guidelines pertaining to abdominal infection and retroperitoneal infection. Results: Recent data indicate that mortality rates associated with retroperitoneal infection have been increasing annually. Early diagnosis and treatment have been shown to improve the prognosis. In the early stage, infection is insidious and lacks typical symptoms, and is primarily diagnosed with computed tomography (CT). Strategies that control the source of infection, rational use of antibiotic agents, and nutritional interventions are the primary approaches to treat the infections. Emergence of minimally invasive drainage technologies, including the ultrasound/CT-guided puncture and drainage, percutaneous nephroscope puncture and drainage, and drainage using a catheter through an abdominal puncture device (trocar) have shortened the treatment cycle and disease burden. However, current diagnosis and treatment for retroperitoneal infection are not sufficiently effective because some patients do not show typical clinical manifestations. Moreover, sensitivity and specificity of available auxiliary examination methods are not supported by sufficient evidence-based medical research. Additionally, there are no uniform standards on the timing of surgical intervention and treatment options. Therefore, we summarized the progresses on current diagnosis and treatment approaches for retroperitoneal infection.
Collapse