Predictors of cinacalcet discontinuation and reinitiation in hemodialysis patients: results from 7 European countries

Etelcalcetide use During Maintenance Hemodialysis and Incidence of Parathyroidectomy After Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

Etelcalcetide is an i.v. calcimimetic agent, effectively reducing parathyroid hormone levels in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The clinical impact of discontinuing etelcalcetide at the time of kidney transplantation is unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients on HD meeting predefined criteria who received a kidney transplant at our institution between January 1, 2015, and December 12, 2022. The incidence of parathyroidectomy and the evolution of calcium, phosphate, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels after transplantation was analyzed according to the type of calcimimetic treatment before transplantation (cinacalcet vs. etelcalcetide vs. none).

Results

Overall, 372 patients (aged 53 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 42-62 years) were included. At the time of transplantation, 35, 75, and 262 patients were under etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, or no calcimimetic, respectively. After 1064 (IQR: 367-1658) days, the incidences of parathyroidectomy in the etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, no calcimimetic groups were 29%, 12%, and 1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Etelcalcetide was associated with an increased incidence of parathyroidectomy after adjustment for age, sex, and HD vintage (hazard ratio [HR]: 97.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.1-493.9, P < 0.001). The incidence of parathyroidectomy was related to etelcalcetide dosage (6/11 [54.6%] in patients with ≥ 10 mg vs. 4/24 [16.7%] in patients with < 10 mg, P = 0.02). Moreover, peak calcium levels were higher (P < 0.001) and parathyroidectomy was performed earlier (median 80 vs. 480 days, P < 0.001) in the etelcalcetide compared with the cinacalcet group. Long-term graft function, graft loss, and mortality were similar.

Conclusion

Etelcalcetide use during maintenance HD is associated with an increased incidence of early parathyroidectomy after transplantation compared to cinacalcet or no calcimimetic.

Patellar and quadriceps tendon rupture are associated with hip fracture in hemodialysis patients with severe hyperparathyroidism

Spontaneous rupture of the patellar (PTR) and quadriceps (QTR) tendon is infrequent. Systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, CKD, and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) are risk factors. The present cohort study aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with tendon rupture in hemodialysis (HD) patients with SHPT, as well as outcomes including surgical complications, re-ruptures, and fracture. Baseline clinical, laboratorial data, and radiographs were analyzed. Patients were followed up from March 2012 to March 2020. One-hundred thirty-one patients (≥18 yr of age, on HD ≥ 6 mo, with SHPT) were included. Incidence rates of PTR and QTR were 2.3 and 1.7/10000 HD patients/yr, respectively. The mean age of patients with tendon rupture was 44.0 ± 11.2 yr. These patients exhibited higher serum levels of phosphorus (6.3 ± 1.5 mg/dL vs 5.6 ± 1.1 mg/dL; P = .005), PTH (2025.7 ± 667.6 pg/mL vs 1728.4 ± 684.8 pg/mL; P = .035), and C-reactive-protein (35.4 ± 32.9 mg/dL vs 17 ± 24.5 mg/dL; P = .002) compared to the group without tendon rupture. The mean follow-up was 56.7 ± 27.1 mo. No patient required a new surgical approach or experienced re-rupture. Of all patients, 31% experienced hip fracture: 50% in the group with rupture (29.5 ± 17.4 mo after the tendon rupture) vs 26% without tendon rupture (P = .015). After adjustment, the hazard ratio for hip fracture was 2.87 (95% CI, 1.27-6.49; P = .012). Patients with SHPT and high levels of phosphorus, PTH, and inflammatory markers were at greater risk for tendon rupture. Surgical complication rates were low. However, results suggest that tendon rupture of knee extensor mechanism in HD patient with SHPT should be regarded as a "red flag" for future hip fracture.

Etelcalcetide Versus Cinacalcet in Hemodialysis Patients in the United States: A Facility Calcimimetic Approach to Assess Real-World Effectiveness

Rationale & Objective

Some US hemodialysis (HD) facilities switched from oral cinacalcet to intravenous etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy to control parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels after the introduction of etelcalcetide in 2017. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of etelcalcetide versus cinacalcet, evidence comparing real-world effectiveness is lacking.

Study Design

Prospective cohort.

Setting & Participants

Patients receiving HD enrolled in US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study facilities.

Exposure

We classified HD facilities on the basis of whether >75% of calcimimetic users were prescribed etelcalcetide (“etelcalcetide-first”) or cinacalcet (“cinacalcet-first”) from March-August 2019.

Outcomes

PTH, calcium, and phosphorus levels among calcimimetic users, all averaged in the 6 months after the exposure assessment period.

Analytical Approach

We used adjusted linear regression to compare outcomes using 2 approaches: (1) cross-sectional comparison of etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities; (2) pre-post comparison of HD facilities that switched from cinacalcet-first to etelcalcetide-first using facilities that remained cinacalcet-first as a comparison group.

Results

We identified 45 etelcalcetide-first and 67 cinacalcet-first HD facilities; etelcalcetide-first (vs cinacalcet-first) facilities were more likely to be from small or independent dialysis organizations (86% vs 22%) and had higher total calcimimetic use (43% vs 29%) and lower active vitamin D use (66% vs 82%). In the cross-sectional analysis comparing etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities, the adjusted mean difference in PTH levels was −115 pg/mL (95% CI, −196 to −34) and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL was lower (prevalence difference, −11.4%; 95% CI, −19.3% to −3.5%). Among facilities that switched to etelcalcetide-first, the mean PTH level decreased from 671 to 484 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL decreased from 39% to 21%. Among facilities that remained cinacalcet-first, the mean PTH level increased from 632 to 698 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL increased from 37% to 43%. The adjusted difference-in-difference between the switch to etelcalcetide-first and the continuation of cinacalcet-first was −169 pg/mL (−249 to −90 pg/mL) for the mean PTH and −14.4% (−22.0% to −6.8%) for a PTH level of >600 pg/mL. We also observed slightly lower serum calcium levels and minimal differences in serum phosphorus levels between the etelcalcetide-first and the cinacalcet-first facilities.

Limitations

Residual confounding.

Conclusions

We observed better PTH control in HD facilities that switched from using cinacalcet to etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy. Further research is needed to investigate how the greater real-world effectiveness of intravenous etelcalcetide (vs oral cinacalcet) may affect clinical outcomes.

Etelcalcetide Utilization, Dosing Titration, and Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disease (CKD-MBD) Marker Responses in US Hemodialysis Patients

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical trial data have demonstrated the efficacy of etelcalcetide for reducing parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We provide a real-world summary of etelcalcetide utilization, dosing, effectiveness, and discontinuation since its US introduction in April 2017.

STUDY DESIGN

New-user design within prospective cohort.

SETTING PARTICIPANTS

2596 new users of etelcalcetide from April 2017 through August 2019 in a national sample of adult, chronic HD patients in the US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

PREDICTORS

Baseline PTH, prior cinacalcet use, initial etelcalcetide dose.

OUTCOME(S)

Trajectories of etelcalcetide dose, use of mineral bone disorder (MBD) medications, and levels of PTH, serum calcium, and phosphorus in the 12 months following etelcalcetide initiation.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Cumulative incidence methods for etelcalcetide discontinuation and linear generalized estimating equations for trajectory analyses.

RESULTS

By August 2019 etelcalcetide prescriptions increased to 6% of HD patients from their first use in April 2017. Starting etelcalcetide dose was 15 mg/week in 70% of patients and 7.5 mg/week in 27% of patients; 49% of new users were prescribed cinacalcet in the prior 3 months. Etelcalcetide discontinuation was 9%, 17%, and 27% by 3, 6, and 12 months post-initiation. One year after etelcalcetide initiation, mean PTH levels declined by 40%, from 948 to 566 pg/mL, and the proportion of patients with PTH within target (150-599 pg/mL) increased from 33% to 64% overall, from 0% to 60% among patients with baseline PTH ≥600 pg/mL, and from 30% to 63% among patients with prior cinacalcet use. The proportion of patients with serum phosphorus >5.5 mg/dL decreased from 55% to 45%, while the prevalence of albumin-corrected serum calcium <7.5 mg/dL remained at 1%-2%. Use of active vitamin D (from 77% to 87%) and Ca-based phosphate binders (from 41% to 50%) increased in the 12 months following etelcalcetide initiation.

LIMITATIONS

Data unavailable for provider dosing protocols, dose holds, or reasons for discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 12 months following etelcalcetide initiation, patients had large and sustained reductions in PTH levels. These results support the utility of etelcalcetide as an effective therapy to achieve the KDIGO recommended guidelines for CKD-MBD markers in HD patients.

Severe hypercalcaemia early after kidney transplantation in two patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism previously treated with etelcalcetide

Cinacalcet and, more recently, etelcalcetide revolutionized the treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney transplant (KT) usually improves CKD-MBD. However, a significant proportion of KT recipients have high serum calcium levels, not requiring any treatment. We report two patients previously treated with etelcalcetide who developed severe (>3.3 mmol/L) hypercalcaemia in the early post-KT course, requiring parathyroidectomy. Pathological studies showed parathyroid adenomas and hyperplasia. One patient had a graft biopsy showing numerous intratubular calcium phosphate crystals. These observations should prompt pharmacovigilance studies and careful follow-up of KT recipients previously treated with etelcalcetide.

Real World Use and Effects of Calcimimetics in Treating Mineral and Bone Disorder in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Calcimimetics are used to treat mineral and bone disorder by reducing parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (Phos). The study objectives were to assess the control of PTH, Ca, and Phos over time in patients receiving cinacalcet or etelcalcetide as well as dosing and time to discontinuation for etelcalcetide.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from small and independent dialysis centers. Adults ≥18 years of age were identified as cinacalcet or etelcalcetide users based on the first calcimimetic received in 2018 (index date). Patients were followed from the index date until parathyroidectomy, kidney transplant, death, or end of data (December 31, 2018). Analyses of mean PTH, Ca, and Phos, as well as target achievement of PTH, Ca, and Phos were conducted over a 9-month period. Discontinuation with etelcalcetide was measured with the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

There were 1,346 cinacalcet patients (mean age 60.5 years, 43.5% female, and 47.1% Black) and 1,255 etelcalcetide patients (mean age 63.4 years, 46.6% female, and 38.5% Black). At baseline, the proportions in target were similar for etelcalcetide versus cinacalcet: 36 versus 38% for PTH, 79 versus 80% for Ca, and 43 versus 44% for Phos. Overall, 40-47% of cinacalcet users and 48-62% of etelcalcetide users were observed to be in target for PTH over 9 months. The proportion in target for Phos ranged from 41 to 46% for cinacalcet and 46-51% for etelcalcetide. The proportion in target for Ca ranged from 74 to 78% for cinacalcet and 60-73% for etelcalcetide. Etelcalcetide 12-month discontinuation was 37.4%.

CONCLUSION

Both calcimimetics were effective in keeping PTH, Ca, and Phos levels within target. Patients receiving etelcalcetide tended to have lower laboratory values for PTH, Ca, and Phos over time, while patients receiving cinacalcet tended to be more likely to be in target for Ca over time.

Cinacalcet adherence in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism in Lombardy Region: clinical implications and costs

Background

Patients on dialysis often have secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), a disorder associated with renal osteodystrophy, progressive vascular calcification, cardiovascular disease, and death. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate, in dialysis patients with SHPT, the impact of different levels of adherence to cinacalcet therapy on hospitalisations and direct healthcare costs charged to the Lombardy Regional Health Service (Italy).

Methods

Data recorded in the administrative databases on all citizens undergoing dialysis between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2011 were selected. For the aim of this study, patients with SHPT already on dialysis in the first 6 months of 2009 who had been treated with cinacalcet for at least 365 days were selected and retrospectively analysed through to end of 2012. Healthcare resource utilisation, cinacalcet adherence, and costs for medication, hospitalisations, and diagnostic/therapeutic procedures were estimated.

Results

A total of 994 patients were identified (mean age 63.0 years, females 43.5%). The first patient tertile had an adherence to cinacalcet of <64.1%, whereas the third had an adherence of over 91.5%. Patients in the third adherence tertile experienced fewer all-causes hospitalisations than those in the first tertile (-19.2%; p=0.01423), fractures (-37.1%; p=0.59422), cardiovascular disease (-23.8%; p=0.04025), and sepsis (-32.3%; p=0.01386). The increase in costs for cinacalcet-adherent patients is almost completely offset by the reduction in costs for hospitalisations.

Conclusions

The results of the analysis suggest that there may be some correlation between a high level of cinacalcet adherence and a decrease in hospitalisations.