Transplant outcomes in positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity- versus flow cytometry-crossmatch kidney transplant recipients after successful desensitization: a retrospective study

Pre-transplant crossmatch-negative donor-specific anti-HLA antibody predicts acute antibody-mediated rejection but not long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation: an analysis of the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry

Background

Pre-transplant donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (HLA-DSA) is a recognized risk factor for acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft failure. However, the clinical relevance of pre-transplant crossmatch (XM)-negative HLA-DSA remains unclear.

Methods

We investigated the effect of XM-negative HLA-DSA on post-transplant clinical outcomes using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY). This study included 2019 living donor kidney transplant recipients from 40 transplant centers in South Korea: 237 with HLA-DSA and 1782 without HLA-DSA.

Results

ABMR developed more frequently in patients with HLA-DSA than in those without (5.5% vs. 1.5%, p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified HLA-DSA as a significant risk factor for ABMR (odds ratio = 3.912, 95% confidence interval = 1.831-8.360; p<0.0001). Furthermore, the presence of multiple HLA-DSAs, carrying both class I and II HLA-DSAs, or having strong HLA-DSA were associated with an increased incidence of ABMR. However, HLA-DSA did not affect long-term clinical outcomes, such as allograft function and allograft survival, patient survival, and infection-free survival.

Conclusion

Pre-transplant XM-negative HLA-DSA increased the risk of ABMR but did not affect long-term allograft outcomes. HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation in the context of XM-negative HLA-DSA appears to be feasible with careful monitoring and ensuring appropriate management of any occurrence of ABMR. Furthermore, considering the characteristics of pre-transplant XM-negative HLA-DSA, the development of a more detailed and standardized desensitization protocol is warranted.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Efficient use of immunosuppressants for kidney transplants

A recent development of immunosuppressive protocols (or simply, suppressants) offers a new option to patients suffering from end-stage renal disease: transplants from biologically incompatible donors. Suppressants are currently being used for direct transplants within patient-donor pairs, but they can be utilized more efficiently when combined with kidney exchanges. To assess the welfare gains from doing so, we introduce the "minimum chains algorithms" for different sizes of feasible exchanges. Using these algorithms, we calculate the minimal number of suppressants needed for transplants for a group of patient-donor pairs. Our simulation results show that (i) a significant reduction of suppressants can be achieved by implementing this proposal, (ii) it suffices to arrange 2-way exchanges for the best use of suppressants, and (iii) the welfare gain varies with the ABO blood-type distribution, and the gain in Korea appears to be larger than that in the United States. Finally, we assess the value (or cost) of each patient-donor pair by comparing the outcomes of the pools with and without the pair.

European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group

This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.

Impact of low-level pretransplant donor-specific antibodies on outcomes after kidney transplantation

Background

The effect of low‐level pretransplant donor‐specific antibody (DSA) on kidney transplant outcomes is not well described. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes among patients of varying immunologic risk, based on the level of pretransplant DSA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult kidney transplant recipients who had undergone a transplant at our center between January 2013 and May 2017. Patients were grouped as negative DSA (mean fluorescence intensity, [MFI_SUM < 100]), low‐level DSA (MFI_SUM 100–1000), and positive DSA (MFI_SUM > 1000). Rejection, infection, graft, and patient survival were outcomes measured.

Results

Of 952 patients, 82.1% had negative DSA, 10.7% had low‐level DSA, and 7.1% had positive DSA. The positive DSA group had the highest rate of antibody‐mediated rejection (10.3%), followed by low‐level DSA (7.8%) and the negative DSA group (4.5%) (p = .034). The rate of BK viremia was highest in the positive DSA group (39.7%), followed by the low‐level group (30.4%) and the negative DSA group (25.6%), (p = .025). None of the other outcomes, including graft or patient survival, were different between the groups.

Conclusion

While low‐level DSA should not prevent proceeding with kidney transplantation, it should not be ignored. Future studies are needed to investigate the long‐term effects of varying levels of pre‐transplant DSA on outcomes.

Presence of a survival benefit of HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation compared to waiting or HLA-compatible deceased donor kidney transplantation with a long waiting time

HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is one of efforts to increase kidney transplantation opportunity for sensitized patients with kidney failure. However, there are conflicting reports for outcomes of HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation compared to patients who wait for HLA-compatible deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) in the United States and United Kingdom. Waiting for an HLA-compatible DDKT is relatively disadvantageous in Korea, because the average waiting time is more than five years. To study this further, we compared outcomes of HLA-incompatible LDKT with those who wait for HLA-compatible DDKT in Korea. One hundred eighty nine patients underwent HLA-incompatible LDKT after desensitization between 2006 and 2018 in two Korean hospitals (42 with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match, 89 with a positive flow cytometric cross-match, and 58 with a positive donor-specific antibody with negative cross-match). The distribution of matched variables was comparable between the HLA-incompatible LDKT group and the matched control groups (waiting-list-only group; and the waiting-list-or-HLA-compatible-DDKT groups; 930 patients each). The HLA-incompatible LDKT group showed a significantly better patient survival rate compared to the waiting-list-only group and the waiting-list-or-HLA-compatible-DDKT groups. Furthermore, the HLA-incompatible LDKT group showed a significant survival benefit as compared with the matched groups at all strength of donor-specific antibodies. Thus, HLA-incompatible LDKT could have a survival benefit as compared with patients who were waitlisted for HLA-compatible DDKT or received HLA-compatible DDKT in Korea. This suggests that HLA-incompatible LDKT as a good option for sensitized patients with kidney failure in countries with prolonged waiting times for DDKT.

Obinutuzumab in Kidney Transplantation: Effect on B-cell Counts and Crossmatch Tests

BACKGROUND

Resistance to the action of rituximab (RTX) has been documented in several diseases. More recently, obinutuzumab (OBZ) has shown promise where RTX has failed in oncology and lupus nephritis. Unlike RTX, OBZ is a weak activator of complement, which may avoid the false-positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch tests after RTX infusions.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to explore the effect of OBZ on B-cell depletion in kidney-transplant candidates and its impact on crossmatch test results. We included 12 patients: who were either highly sensitized kidney-transplant candidates or kidney-transplant recipients presenting with antibody-mediated rejection. Six received OBZ and 6 received RTX. CD-19 counts, flow cytometry and CDC crossmatch tests were run immediately before and at 2 weeks after drug infusion.

RESULTS

OBZ reduced CD-19 counts: median reduction was 98%. B-cell CDC crossmatch test results became positive following RTX infusion but were not affected by OBZ infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

OBZ effectively depleted B-cell counts in sensitized kidney-transplant candidates and, unlike RTX, had no effect on CDC crossmatch results.