Relationship between early proteinuria and long term outcome of kidney transplanted patients from different decades of donor age

Relevance of Proteinuria in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Allograft Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The onset of proteinuria in renal allograft recipients is frequently associated with an increased risk for both graft failure and mortality. We investigated the risk associated with post-transplant proteinuria and its time-dynamics in a select group treated for biopsy proven antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR).

METHODS

Eighty-five patients who underwent transplantation were enrolled in our study and followed up from transplantation until October 31, 2020, death, or the date of the return to dialysis. We created two main groups: the ABMR group (n = 19) and an ABMR-negative control group with stable kidney function (n = 52) without donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and a subgroup with DSAs but stable graft function (n = 14) without ABMR. Differences in patient, donor, and transplant graft characteristics between the groups were assessed by Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Death-censored graft loss was evaluated with the help of Kaplan-Meier analysis using log risk statistics.

RESULTS

Proteinuria decreased after treatment in the ABMR group (P < .0009). Pre-treatment every 10 mg/mmol increase in proteinuria was associated with a 7% increase in the risk for graft failure in the ABMR group. The estimated 3-year graft survival was 87.5% in the ABMR group, compared to 93% in the group without ABMR but with pre-formed DSA, and 100% in the DSA negative subgroup (log-rank probe P < .0666).

CONCLUSION

Proteinuria is an independent predictor for graft failure, can be lowered by treatment for ABMR but ABMR is associated with lower graft survival in our study population.

Development of a checklist framework for kidney transplantation

Background

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for end-stage kidney disease, and a fast-growing transplant procedure worldwide. Diverse clinical practices for recipients and donors' selection and management between transplant centers hinder the creation and dissemination of an anesthesia-surgical checklist.

Methods

Components of the anesthesia-surgical checklist were selected after a review of the English literature using PubMed search for donor, recipient and graft protocols and outcomes of existing practices in the field of kidney transplantation. Key elements of the most relevant articles were combined with our own center's experience and formulated into the proposed checklist. The checklist is intended to be used perioperatively, once patient receives an offer.

Results

The perioperative checklist centers primarily on the following donor and recipient's factors: (i) Review of the pretransplant candidate workup; (ii) Assessment of donor/graft status; (iii) Hypothermic machine perfusion parameters; (iv) Operating room management; (v) Sign out. The proposed kidney transplant checklist was designed to ensure consistency and completeness of diverse tasks and facilitates team communication and coordination.

Conclusion

We present a novel standardized combined anesthesia-surgical checklist framework for kidney transplant aimed at increasing perioperative safety and streamline the perioperative care of recipients. Future validation studies will determine its clinical feasibility and post-implementation efficacy.

Kidney transplants from elderly donors: what we have learned 20 years after the Crystal City consensus criteria meeting

Based on the current projection of the general population and the combined increase in end-stage kidney disease with age, the number of elderly donors and recipients is increasing, raising crucial questions about how to minimize the discard rate of organs from elderly donors and improve graft and patient outcomes. In 2002, extended criteria donors were the focus of a meeting in Crystal City (VA, USA), with a goal of maximizing the use of organs from deceased donors. Since then, extended criteria donors have progressively contributed to a large number of transplanted grafts worldwide, posing specific issues for allocation systems, recipient management, and therapeutic approaches. This review analyzes what we have learned in the last 20 years about extended criteria donor utilization, the promising innovations in immunosuppressive management, and the molecular pathways involved in the aging process, which constitute potential targets for novel therapies.

Donor Proteinuria and Allograft Function in Kidney Transplantation: Short- and Long-Term Results From a Retrospective Cohort Study

Donor proteinuria (DP) is a common but rarely evaluated aspect of today's kidney transplant allocation process. While proteinuria after kidney transplantation is a risk factor for impaired graft function and survival, the long-term effects of DP in kidney transplantation have not yet been evaluated. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of DP on the long-term outcome after kidney transplantation. A total of 587 patients were found to be eligible and were stratified into two groups: (1) those receiving a graft from a donor without proteinuria (DP-) and (2) those receiving a graft from a donor with proteinuria (DP+). At 36 months, there was no difference in the primary composite endpoint including graft loss and patient survival (log-rank test, p = 0.377). However, the analysis of DP+ subgroups showed a significant decrease in overall patient survival in the group with high DP (p = 0.017). DP did not adversely affect patient or graft survival over 36 months. Nevertheless, this work revealed a trend towards decreased overall survival of patients with severe proteinuria in the subgroup analysis. Therefore, the underlying results suggest caution in allocating kidneys from donors with high levels of proteinuria.

Management of an aneurysmal arteriovenous fistula in kidney transplant recipients

Aneurysms remain the most common complication of an arteriovenous fistula created for dialysis access. The management of an aneurysmal arteriovenous fistula (AAVF) in kidney transplant recipients remains contentious with a lack of clear clinical guidelines. Recipients of a functioning graft do not require the fistula for dialysis access, however risk of graft failure and needing the access at a future date must be considered. In this review we outline the current evidence in the assessment and management of a transplant recipient with an AAVF. We will describe our recommended five-step approach to assessing an AAVF in transplant patients; 1.) Define AAVF 2.) Risk assess AAVF 3.) Assess transplant graft function and future graft failure risk 4.) Consider future renal replacement therapy options 5.) Vascular mapping to assess future vascular access options. Then we will describe the current therapeutic options and when they would most appropriately be employed.

Dialysis after kidney transplant failure: how to deal with this daunting task?

The best treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease is kidney transplantation, which, if successful provides both a reduction in mortality and a better quality of life compared to dialysis. Although there has been significant improvement in short-term outcomes after kidney transplantation, long-term graft survival still remains insufficient. As a result, there has been an increase in the number of individuals who need dialysis again after kidney transplant failure, and increasingly contribute to kidney transplant waiting lists. Starting dialysis after graft failure is a difficult task not only for the patients, but also for the nephrologists and the care team. Furthermore, recommendations for management of dialysis after kidney graft loss are lacking. Aim of this narrative review is to provide a perspective on the role of dialysis in the management of patients with failed kidney allograft. Although numerous studies have reported higher mortality in patients undergoing dialysis following kidney allograft failure, reports are contrasting. A patient-centered, individualized approach should drive the choices of initiating dialysis, dialysis modality, maintenance of immunosuppressive drugs and vascular access.

Clinical indicators of slow graft function and outcome after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Lesser degrees of perioperative ischemia-reperfusion injury that does not require dialysis may nonetheless influence allograft outcomes, necessitating evaluation of suitable surrogate indicators of perioperative allograft injury.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of pediatric kidney transplants evaluated two indicators representing pace and completeness of recovery, for association with 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and first-year rate of eGFR decline: time to creatinine nadir (TTN) and ratio of recipient/donor unadjusted GFR (uGFR_R/D ) at 1-month post-transplant. Donor, recipient, and perioperative risk factors were tested further for association with these 2 indicators.

RESULTS

179 patients (190 transplants) aged 13 (IQR 7-17) years and 56% male were included. Twelve-month eGFR was strongly associated with unadjusted GFR at 1 month (uGFR_1M , p < .001) and uGFR_R/D (p = .003), but not with TTN. None of the indicators was associated with the rate of subsequent eGFR decline after 1-month post-transplant. As a potential surrogate indicator, uGFR_1M is effectively modeled by TTN and uGFR_R/D (adjusted R²  = 0.57) and is associated with 12-month eGFR (β = 0.81 ± 0.08; p < .001). Clinical factors associated with uGFR_R/D included donor uGFR (p < .001), BSA (p = .026), age (p = .074), and recipient BSA (p < .001). Factors associated with pace of recovery (TTN) included donor uGFR (p = .018), type (p = .019), and recipient BSA (p = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

The uGFR_R/D ratio, but not TTN, is a useful indicator of perioperative allograft damage that is associated with one-year functional outcome; and uGFR_1M is a potential early surrogate outcome. Donor, recipient, and perioperative factors that are associated with slow allograft function are identified.

Challenges in the Management of the Patient with a Failing Kidney Graft: A Narrative Review

Patients with a failed kidney allograft have steadily increase in recent years and returning to dialysis after graft loss is one of the most difficult transitions for chronic kidney disease patients and their assistant physicians. The management of these patients is complex and encompasses the treatment of chronic kidney disease complications, dialysis restart and access planning, immunosuppression withdrawal, graft nephrectomy, and evaluation for a potential retransplant. In recent years, several groups have focused on the management of the patient with a failing renal graft and expert recommendations are arising. A review of Pubmed, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library was performed focusing on the specific care of these patients, from the management of low clearance complications to concerns with a subsequent kidney transplant. Conclusion: There is a growing interest in the failing renal graft and new approaches to improve these patients' outcomes are being defined including specific multidisciplinary programs, individualized immunosuppression withdrawal schemes, and strategies to prevent HLA sensitization and increase retransplant rates.

Acute kidney injury secondary to urinary tract infection in kidney transplant recipients

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is a common, yet poorly investigated, complication of urinary tract infections (UTI) and urosepsis. A retrospective comparative analysis was performed, recruiting 101 KTRs with urosepsis, 100 KTRs with UTI, and 100 KTRs without history of UTI or sepsis. The incidences of AKI in the urosepsis and UTI groups were 75.2% and 41%, respectively. The urosepsis group has also presented with a significantly higher prevalence of AKI stage 2 and 3 than the UTI group. The rates of recovery from AKI stages 1, 2 and 3, were 75,6%, 55% and 26.1%, respectively. Factors independently associated with renal recovery from AKI were: AKI severity grade (AKI stage 2 with OR = 0.25 and AKI stage 3 with OR = 0.1), transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) (OR = 0.22), and the use of steroid bolus in the acute phase of treatment (OR = 4). The septic status (urosepsis vs UTI) did not influence the rates of renal recovery from AKI after adjustment for the remaining variables. The dominant cause of RBC transfusions in the whole population was upper GI-bleeding. In multivariable analyses, the occurrence of AKI was also independently associated with a greater decline of eGFR at 1-year post-discharge and with a greater risk of graft loss. In KTRs with both urosepsis and UTI, the occurrence of AKI portends poor transplantation outcomes. The local transfusion policy, modulation of immunosuppression and stress ulcer prophylaxis (which is not routinely administered in KTRs) in the acute setting may be modifiable factors that significantly impact long-term transplantation outcomes.

Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prediction of Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Systematic Review

Noninvasive tools for diagnosis or prediction of acute kidney allograft rejection have been extensively investigated in recent years. Biochemical and molecular analyses of blood and urine provide a liquid biopsy that could offer new possibilities for rejection prevention, monitoring, and therefore, treatment. Nevertheless, these tools are not yet available for routine use in clinical practice. In this systematic review, MEDLINE was searched for articles assessing urinary biomarkers for diagnosis or prediction of kidney allograft acute rejection published in the last five years (from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2020). This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles providing targeted or unbiased urine sample analysis for the diagnosis or prediction of both acute cellular and antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection were included, analyzed, and graded for methodological quality with a particular focus on study design and diagnostic test accuracy measures. Urinary C-X-C motif chemokine ligands were the most promising and frequently studied biomarkers. The combination of precise diagnostic reference in training sets with accurate validation in real-life cohorts provided the most relevant results and exciting groundwork for future studies.

Temporal changes of proteinuria after kidney transplantation: association with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is common in kidney transplant recipients and has been established as a risk factor for graft-loss and mortality. In the general population, proteinuria has also been tied to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. There is limited data exploring the association between changes in proteinuria over time and cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study we evaluated proteinuria as a time-varying covariate using urine dipstick protein values at 6 month intervals post-transplant. The primary outcome was the occurrence a major cardiovascular event (MACE). Univariate and multivariate time varying Cox model was used.

RESULTS

579 patients were included in the final cohort. 120 episodes of MACE were documented in 98 patients. Time varying proteinuria was associated with MACE by univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.76-3.93, p < 0.001) and (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.53-3.54, p < 0.001). Reduction of proteinuria to normal was associated with reduced risk of MACE compared with active proteinuria (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69, p < 0.001) and (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.3-0.76, p = 0.002) for univariate and multivariate analyses. Exposure to proteinuria for more than 1 year was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE for univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.48-3.68, p < 0.001) and (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.37-3.45, p = 0.002) respectively, in comparison to exposure of less than 1 year.

CONCLUSION

These findings may suggest that we should consider applying clinical interventions that are known to reduce cardiovascular morbidity in these patients.