Low-dose alemtuzumab induction in a tailored immunosuppression protocol for sensitized kidney transplant recipients

Induction immunosuppression strategies and outcomes post-lung transplant: A single center experience

PURPOSE

Currently 80% of lung transplant centers use induction immunosuppression. However, there is a lack of standardization of induction protocols within and across lung transplant centers. This study explores the association of two different induction immunosuppression strategies used at our center [single dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) vs. alemtuzumab] compared to no induction with immunologic and clinical outcomes after lung transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 174 consecutive lung transplant recipients (LTR) between 2016 and 2019 were included in the analysis. Twenty nine LTR (16.7%) received no induction, 22 LTR (12.6%) received alemtuzumab, 123 LTR (70.6%) received a single dose of rATG; 1.5 mg/kg within 24 h of transplant for induction. All LTR had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch on the day of the transplant. All LTR were assessed for de novo HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) development and clinical outcomes, including the risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and overall survival post-transplant.

RESULTS

The median lung allocation score (LAS) was significantly higher in LTR that did not receive Induction immunosuppression (76; range = 35.3-94.3) compared to induction with rATG (41.6; range = 31.6-91) and alemtuzumab (51; range = 33.1-88.2) (p < 0.001). De novo HLA DSA were detected in 50/174 (28.7%) LTR within 12 months post-transplant. They were detected in 13/29 (44.8%) LTR without induction immunosuppression compared to 28/123 (22.8%) and 9/22 (40.9%) LTR with rATG and alemtuzumab induction, respectively (p = 0.02). The percent freedom from ACR rates between LTR who received alemtuzumab induction was significantly higher compared to LTR who received rATG or no induction at 1 (p = 0.02), 2 (p = 0.01) and 3 (p = 0.05) years post-transplant. In addition, the overall 1-year survival rates were significantly higher in LTR who received rATG or alemtuzumab induction compared to LTR without induction immunosuppression (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Induction immunosuppression strategies utilizing rATG or Alemtuzumab have unique and contrasting benefits in LTR. Combination of alemtuzumab induction and a lower dose of maintenance immunosuppression may reduce the incidence of ACR in LTR. Single-dose rATG or alemtuzumab induction immunosuppression may also improve the 1 year overall LTR survival compared to no induction.

Sequential administration of anti-complement component C5 eculizumab and type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab for the treatment of early antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: A proof of concept

Kidney transplant (KT) candidates with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) exhibit exceedingly high antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft loss rates. Currently, treatment of ABMR remains an unmet clinical need. We report the use of the anti-C5 eculizumab and the type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab in two patients with early ABMR. Eculizumab (900 mg IV) led to complete inhibition of the terminal complement cascade (unremarkable AP50 and CH50 activity) and prompt stoppage of complement-dependent antibody-mediated allograft injury (clearance of intra-graft C4d and C5b-9 deposition). Despite complement inhibition, obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV) determined full and long-lasting peripheral B-cell depletion, with significant reduction in all DSA. Graft function improved, remaining stable up to three years of follow-up. No signs of active ABMR and rebound DSA were detected. Obinutuzumab B-cell depletion and inhibition of DSA production were not affected by complement blockage. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit of obinutuzumab in association with complement inhibitors.

Immunosuppressants against acute kidney injury: what to prefer or to avoid?

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical global health issue associated with high mortality rates, particularly in patients undergoing renal transplants and major surgeries. These individuals often receive immunosuppressants to dampen immune responses, but the impact of these drugs on AKI remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a detailed understanding of the effects of different classes of immunosuppressants against AKI, elucidating their role in either exacerbating or mitigating the occurrence or progression of AKI.

METHODS

Several preclinical and clinical reports were analyzed to evaluate the impact of various immunosuppressants on AKI. Relevant preclinical and clinical studies were reviewed through different databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, and official websites like https://clinicaltrials.gov to understand the mechanisms underlying the effects of immunosuppressants on kidney function.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Specific immunosuppressants have been linked to the progression of AKI, while others demonstrate renoprotective effects. However, there is no consensus on the preferred or avoided immunosuppressants for AKI patients. This review outlines the classes of immunosuppressants commonly used and their impact on AKI, providing guidance for physicians in selecting appropriate drugs to prevent or ameliorate AKI.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the effects of immunosuppressants on AKI is crucial for optimizing patient care. This review highlights the need for further research to determine the most suitable immunosuppressants for AKI patients, considering both their efficacy and potential side effects.

Long-term outcomes of two-dose alemtuzumab induction in pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab is a lymphocyte depleting agent used for induction in kidney transplant, but long-term information on its use in pediatric recipients remains sparse.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 57 pediatric kidney transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab 20 mg/m2/dose ×2 doses for induction immunosuppression. All patients underwent surveillance biopsies, and 91.3% underwent steroid withdrawal by day 4 post-transplant. Outcomes of interest included graft survival, development of donor specific antibodies (DSA), incidence of viremia and PTLD, and duration of lymphopenia.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 7.9 years (IQR 5-13.6 years). Median graft survival was 16.5 years (95% CI 11.6-unknown). DSA developed in 36.5% at a median of 944 days (IQR 252-2113 days). Incidences of BK polyomavirus DNAemia (BKPyV-DNAemia), CMV DNAemia, and EBV DNAemia were 38.6%, 22.8%, and 14%, respectively; one patient developed PTLD at 13.3 years post-transplant. Median duration of lymphopenia was 365 days (IQR 168-713 days); 19.3% of patients remained lymphopenic at 3 years post-transplant. There was no association between duration of lymphopenia and graft survival, rejection, DSA detection, or viremia.

CONCLUSIONS

A two-dose alemtuzumab induction protocol can have excellent outcomes with a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression regimen. More comprehensive, multicenter, comparative studies of pediatric kidney transplant are needed to improve long-term outcomes.

A Decade of Experience With Alemtuzumab Therapy for Severe or Glucocorticoid-Resistant Kidney Transplant Rejection

Alemtuzumab is used as lymphocyte-depleting therapy for severe or glucocorticoid-resistant kidney transplant rejection. However, the long-term efficacy and toxicity of alemtuzumab therapy are unclear. Therefore, all cases of alemtuzumab anti-rejection therapy between 2012 and 2022 in our institution were investigated. Graft survival, graft function, lymphocyte depletion, serious infections, malignancies, and patient survival were analyzed and compared with a reference cohort of transplanted patients who did not require alemtuzumab anti-rejection therapy. A total of 225 patients treated with alemtuzumab were identified and compared with a reference cohort of 1,668 patients. Over 60% of grafts was salvaged with alemtuzumab therapy, but graft survival was significantly poorer compared to the reference cohort. The median time of profound T- and B lymphocyte depletion was 272 and 344 days, respectively. Serious infection rate after alemtuzumab therapy was 54.1/100 person-years. The risk of death (hazard ratio 1.75, 95%-CI 1.28-2.39) and infection-related death (hazard ratio 2.36, 95%-CI 1.35-4.11) were higher in the alemtuzumab-treated cohort. In conclusion, alemtuzumab is an effective treatment for severe kidney transplant rejection, but causes long-lasting lymphocyte depletion and is associated with frequent infections and worse patient survival outcomes.

Outcomes based on induction regimens in pediatric kidney transplantation: a NAPRTCS and PHIS collaborative study

BACKGROUND

Induction agent used at the time of kidney transplant is often based upon center practice and recipient characteristics. We evaluated outcomes across induction therapies among children enrolled in the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) transplant registry with data in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of merged data from NAPRTCS and PHIS. Participants were grouped by induction agent: interleukin-2 receptor blocker (IL-2 RB), anti-thymocyte/anti-lymphocyte globulin (ATG/ALG), and alemtuzumab. Outcomes assessed included 1-, 3-, and 5-year allograft function and survival, rejection, viral infections, malignancy, and death.

RESULTS

A total of 830 children transplanted between 2010 and 2019. At 1 year post-transplant, the alemtuzumab group had higher median eGFR (86 ml/min/1.73 m2) compared to IL-2 RB and ATG/ALG (79 and 75 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively; P < 0.001); at 3 and 5 years, there was no difference. Adjusted eGFR over time was similar across all induction agents. Rejection rates were lower among the alemtuzumab group vs. IL-2RB and ATG (13.9% vs. 27.3% and 24.6%, respectively; P = 0.006). Adjusted ATG/ALG and alemtuzumab had higher hazard ratio for time to graft failure compared to IL-2 RB (HR 2.48 and HR 2.11, respectively; P < 0.05). Incidence of malignancy, mortality, and time to first viral infection was similar.

CONCLUSION

Although rejection and allograft loss rates were distinct, the incidences of viral infection and malignancy were comparable across induction agents. By 3 years post-transplant, there was no difference in eGFR. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Standardized, risk-adapted induction therapy in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The choice of induction therapy in kidney transplantation is often non-standardized and centre-specific. Clinicians can choose between depleting and non-depleting antibodies, which differ in their immunosuppressive capacity and the concomitant risk of infection. We herein present a standardized risk-stratified algorithm for induction therapy that might help to balance the risk of rejection and/or serious infection.

METHODS

Prior to kidney transplantation, patients were stratified into low-risk, intermediate-risk or high-risk according to our protocol based on immunologic risk factors. Depending on their individual immunologic risk, patients received basiliximab (low risk), antithymocyte globulin (intermediate risk) or low-dose alemtuzumab (high risk) for induction therapy. We analysed the results after 3 years of implementation of our risk-stratified induction therapy protocol at our kidney transplant centre.

RESULTS

Between 01/2017 and 05/2020, 126 patients were stratified in accordance with our protocol (low risk/intermediate risk/high risk: 69 vs. 42 vs. 15 patients). The median follow-up time was 1.9 [1.0-2.5] years. No significant difference was observed in rejection rate and allograft survival (low risk/intermediate risk/high risk: 90.07% vs. 80.81% vs. 100% after 3 years (p > 0.05)) among the groups. The median eGFR at follow-up was (low risk/intermediate risk/high risk) 47 [33-58] vs 58 [46-76] vs 44 [22-55] ml/min/1.73 m2. Although the rate of viral and bacterial infections did not differ significantly, we observed a higher rate of opportunistic fungal infections with alemtuzumab induction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our strategy offers facilitated and individualized choice of induction therapy in kidney transplantation. We propose further evaluation of our algorithm in prospective trials.

Steroid Sparing Maintenance Immunosuppression in Highly Sensitised Patients Receiving Alemtuzumab Induction

This analysis reports on the outcomes of two different steroid sparing immunosuppression protocols used in the management of 120 highly sensitised patients (HSPs) with cRF>85% receiving Alemtuzumab induction, 53 maintained on tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy and 67 tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF). There was no difference in the median cRF or mode of sensitisation between the two groups, although the FK + MMF cohort received more poorly matched grafts. There was no difference in one-year patient or allograft survival, however rejection free survival was inferior with FK monotherapy compared with FK + MMF at 65.4% and 91.4% respectively, p < 0.01. DSA-free survival was comparable. Whilst there was no difference in rates of BK between the cohorts, CMV-free survival was inferior in the FK + MMF group at 86.0% compared with 98.1% in the FK group, p = 0.026. One-year post-transplant diabetes free survival was 89.6% and 100.0% in the FK and FK + MMF group respectively, p = 0.027, the difference attributed to the use of prednisolone to treat rejection in the FK cohort, p = 0.006. We report good outcomes in HSPs utilising a steroid sparing protocol with Alemtuzumab induction and FK + MMF maintenance and provide granular data on immunological and infectious complications to inform steroid avoidance in these patient groups.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive drug combination therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, namely T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, this potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic, randomized, controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.

Late-onset toxicities of monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients

Cancer therapy duration is variable and may take years, adding a new challenge of maintaining the best life quality for cancer survivors. In cancer patients, late-onset toxicities have been reported with monoclonal antibodies and may involve several body organs or systems. They are defined as an autoimmune illnesses that can happen months to years after treatment discontinuation. Late-onset toxicities have become a focus of clinical care and related research. After cancer therapy is completed, the patient should receive longitudinal follow-up to detect these late effects as early as possible. The current review summarizes the recently reported late-onset toxicities of four classes of monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD52, anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-CD20) with guidance for the diagnostic tools, appropriate management and treatment.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the prevention of kidney transplant rejection: the evidence to date

INTRODUCTION

Although early rejection episodes are successfully controlled, the problem of unrecognized production of de novo anti HLA antibodies and associated chronic rejection still persists.

AREAS COVERED

In addition to the standard induction and maintenance therapy, we present a couple of new drugs as induction (Alemtuzumab), CNI free protocol (Belatacept, Sirolimus, Everolimus), maintenance treatment in transplant patients with various type of malignancies (T cell targeted immunomodulators blocking the immune checkpoints CTLA-4, PD1/PDL1) and TMA (aHUS) -eculizimab, and IL6 receptor antagonists in antibody mediated rejection (AMR).

EXPERT OPINION

There are couple of issues still preventing improvement in kidney transplant long-term outcomes with current and anticipated future immunosuppression: patient more susceptible to infection and CNI nephrotoxicity in kidneys obtained from elderly donors, highly sensitized patients with limited chances to get appropriate kidney and a higher risk for late AMR. A lower rate of CMV/BK virus infections has been observed in everolimus treated patients. Belatacept use has been justified only in EBV seropositive kidney transplants due to the increased risk of PTLD. Eculizumab upon recurrence of aHUS is a sole cost-effective option. A new IL-6 blocking drug (clazakizumab/tocilizumab) is promising option for prevention/treatment of AMR. Clinical experience in tailoring immunosuppression for as long as possible graft and patient survival is inevitable.

Late Onset Cerebral Nocardiosis in a Sensitized Renal Transplant Recipient Following Alemtuzumab Induction: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Balancing immunosuppressive regimen to prevent rejection yet avoiding severe infectious complications remains a key challenge following renal transplantation, especially in patients sensitized after exposure to human leukocyte antigens. We herein report a late onset infection with nocardia in a sensitized renal transplant recipient.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 65-year-old male patient, who had received kidney transplantation with alemtuzumab induction due to human leukocyte antigen-sensitization 3 years ago, was admitted with headache and dizziness. A cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scan showed a right parieto-occipital brain abscess. Surgical abscess drainage was performed and microbiology analysis detected Nocardia paucivorans in the abscess fluid. Laboratory results showed persistently reduced lymphocyte and T-cell counts 3 years after transplantation. We started intravenous antibiotic therapy with high dose trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and imipenem/cilastatin. Furthermore, immunosuppression was adapted with discontinuation of mycophenolate. After 7 weeks of intravenous antibiotic therapy, the patient was switched to an oral antibiotic regimen with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and minocycline. In the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scan, cerebral lesions were substantially reduced, initial symptoms completely disappeared, and allograft function remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy with the CD52-antibody alemtuzumab enables transplantation in highly sensitized patients but leads to lymphocyte depletion for several weeks. Our patient presented with prolonged lymphopenia and a significantly reduced T-cell count 3 years after transplantation. To our knowledge, our case is the first to describe a late-onset nocardia infection 3 years after alemtuzumab induction in a renal transplant recipient. It underlines the importance of considering this rare disease in transplant patients, especially after induction therapy with depleting antibodies.

Optimal Immunosuppression Strategy in the Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipient

Patients with previous sensitization events against anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) often have circulating anti-HLA antibodies. Following organ transplantation, sensitized patients have higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) compared to those who are non-sensitized. More stringent donor matching is required for these patients, which results in a reduced donor pool and increased time on the waitlist. Current approaches for sensitized patients focus on reducing preformed antibodies that preclude transplantation; however, this type of desensitization does not modulate the primed immune response in sensitized patients. Thus, an optimized maintenance immunosuppressive regimen is necessary for highly sensitized patients, which may be distinct from non-sensitized patients. In this review, we will discuss the currently available therapeutic options for induction, maintenance, and adjuvant immunosuppression for sensitized patients.