Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients

Tricuspid regurgitation, right ventricular function, and renal congestion: a cardiorenal triangle

There is a growing interest in the evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation due to its increasing prevalence and detrimental impact on clinical outcomes. Historically, it has been coined the "forgotten" defect in the field of valvular heart disease due to the lack of effective treatments to improve prognosis. However, the development of percutaneous treatment techniques has led to a new era in its management, with promising results and diminished complication risk. In spite of these advances, a comprehensive exploration of the pathophysiological mechanisms is essential to establish clear indications and optimal timing for medical and percutaneous intervention. This review will address the most important aspects related to the diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment of tricuspid regurgitation from a cardiorenal perspective, with a special emphasis on the interaction between right ventricular dysfunction and the development of hepatorenal congestion.

Efficacy of peritoneal dialysis in patients with refractory congestive heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Refractory congestive heart failure (RCHF) is a common complication in the natural history of advanced heart failure. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a possible alternative in those patients, but studies are scarce, and mostly with small samples. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of PD in patients with RCHF. Articles published before July 2020 in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. Mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to generate a pooled effect size with a random effects model. We also assessed heterogeneity, risk of bias, publication bias, and quality of evidence. Twenty observational studies (n = 769) were included, with a "before and after intervention" design. PD was associated with a significant reduction in NYHA functional class (MD -1.37, 95% CI -0.78 to -1.96) and length of hospitalisation (MD -34.8, 95% CI -20.6 to -48.9 days/patient/year), a small but significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 4.3, 95%CI 1.9 to 6.8%) and a non-significant change in glomerular filtration rate (MD -3.0, 95% CI -6.0 to 0 mL/min/1.73m2). Heterogeneity among studies was significant and overall risk of bias was rated from moderate to critical. No significant publication bias was found, and the overall quality of evidence was very low for all outcomes. PD in patients with RCHF improved functional class, length of hospitalisation, and ventricular functional, and had no impact in renal function. Further randomised clinical trials are warranted to confirm our results that showed some limitations.

C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, Trimethylamine-N-Oxide, Syndecan-1, Nitric Oxide, and Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-1 in Heart Failure with Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction: a Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to synthesize the evidence on non-traditional biomarkers from proteomic and metabolomic studies that may distinguish heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-HF.

RECENT FINDINGS

Understanding the pathophysiology of HFpEF continues to be challenging. A number of inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers that have recently been suggested to be involved include C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), syndecan-1 (SDC-1), nitric oxide (NO), and tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (TNFR-1). A systematic search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science with search terms such as "HFpEF," "metabolomics," and "proteomics," and a meta-analysis was conducted. The results demonstrate significantly higher levels of TMAO, CRP, SDC-1, and IL-6 in HFpEF compared to controls without HF and significantly higher levels of TMAO and CRP in HFrEF compared to controls. The results further suggest that HFpEF might be distinguishable from HFrEF based on higher levels of IL-6 and lower levels of SDC-1 and NO. These data may reflect pathophysiological differences between HFpEF and HFrEF.

Impact of dialysis modality choice on the survival of end-stage renal disease patients with congestive heart failure in southern China: A retrospective cohort study

Background and object

Heart failure is one of the common complications in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and a major cause of death in these patients. The choice of dialysis modality for ESRD patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) is still inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to compare the prognosis of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) among ESRD patients with CHF and provide a basis for clinical decision-making.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective study conducted at Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine that included patients with CHF requiring long-term renal replacement therapy between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. The end of follow-up was December 31, 2020. All patients were divided into HD and PD groups and sub grouped by age, and we used univariate and multifactorial Cox regression analyses to calculate the relative hazard ratios (HR) of the different dialysis types and adjusted for differences in baseline data using propensity score matching (PSM).

Result

A total of 121 patients with PD and 156 patients with HD were included in this study. Among younger ESRD patients (≤65 years of age) with CHF, the prognosis of HD was worse than that of PD [HR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01–3.34], and this disadvantage remained significant in the fully adjusted model [sex, age at dialysis initiation, Charlson comorbidities index, body mass index, prealbumin, hemoglobin, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)] and after PSM. In the older group (>65 years of age), the prognosis of HD was better than that of PD (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.25–0.85), and the protective effect remained in the fully adjusted model and after PSM. The aforementioned survival differences across the cohort were maintained in patients with preserved LVEF (>55%), but could not be reproduced in patients with reduced LVEF (≤55%).

Conclusion

In southern China, PD is a better choice for younger patients with ESRD, CHF and preserved LVEF, and HD is the better option for older patients.

Defining the Phenotypes for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) imposes a significant burden on society and healthcare. The lack in efficacious therapies is likely due to the significant heterogeneity of HFpEF. In this review, we define various phenotypes based on underlying comorbidities or etiologies, discuss phenotypes arrived at by novel methods, and explore therapeutic targets.

RECENT FINDINGS

A few studies have used machine learning methods to uncover sub-phenotypes within HFpEF in an unbiased manner based on clinical features, echocardiographic findings, and biomarker levels. We synthesized the literature and propose three broad phenotypes: (1) young, with few comorbidities, usually obese and with low natriuretic peptide levels, (2) obese with substantive cardiometabolic burden and comorbidities and impaired ventricular relaxation, (3) old, multimorbid, with high rates of atrial fibrillation, renal and coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and left ventricular hypertrophy. We also propose potential therapeutic strategies for these phenotypes.

Peritoneal dialysis in patients with refractory congestive heart failure

Chronic heart failure is a growing problem. Despite progress in its management, many patients become refractory to therapies including diuretic resistance, major congestion, and worsening renal function. The only alternative to get rid of excess water and sodium is ultrafiltration, which can be achieved via hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (PD). The majority of studies have shown multiple benefits of PD as an improvement in functional class, a reduction in hospitalization leading to increased quality of life, and even a reduction in mortality. Being a home dialysis technique, it is more favorably accepted by patients. It remains necessary to confirm these potential positive outcomes and to identify patients who would benefit the most from this treatment in the era of new therapies available to date.

Successful Treatment of Severe Heart Failure in Advanced Diabetic Kidney Disease Using Angiotensin-neprilysin Inhibitors (Sacubitril/Valsartan) - Report of Two Cases with Review of Options in Literature

Patients with heart failure (HF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitute a special population that experience poor outcomes due to poor adherence to established therapies because of potential safety concerns. Role of newer agents like angiotensin–receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) in early stages of CKD is well elucidated. We report two cases of HF with reduced ejection fraction, who received ARNI in advanced stage of CKD (stage 5) and achieved remarkable outcomes in terms of quality of life and longevity.

[Renal insufficiency in the context of cardio-pulmonary-renal pathophysiology]

Heart failure and renal insufficiency as well as pulmonary hypertension are pathophysiologically closely associated as a cardio-renal or cardio-pulmonary-renal syndrome. Due to the frequent hospitalization of patients affected by this syndrome, it is of high medical and also health economic relevance. Besides the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), multimodal treatment options are available with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors. Profound knowledge of the pathophysiology and the therapeutic options is as necessary for an optimized medical care as patient-oriented, transdisciplinary and cross-sectoral care.

Peritoneal dialysis patient selection from a comorbidity perspective

Despite many medical and socioeconomic advantages, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized dialysis modality that in most countries is used by only 5%-20% of dialysis patients, while the vast majority are treated with in-center hemodialysis. Several factors may explain this paradox, such as lack of experience and infrastructure for training and monitoring of PD patients, organizational issues, overcapacity of hemodialysis facilities, and lack of economic incentives for dialysis centers to use PD instead of HD. In addition, medical conditions that are perceived (rightly or wrongly) as contraindications to PD represent barriers for the use of PD because of their purported potential negative impact on clinical outcomes in patients starting PD. While there are few absolute contraindications to PD, high age, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, polycystic kidney disease, heart failure, and previous history of abdominal surgery and renal allograft failure, may be seen (rightly or wrongly) as relative contraindications and thus barriers to initiation of PD. In this brief review, we discuss how the presence of these conditions may influence the strategy of selecting patients for PD, focusing on measures that can be taken to overcome potential problems.