Metabolic obesity phenotypes and chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study from the RaNCD cohort study

Dietary Phytochemical Index in Relation to Metabolic Health Status, Serum Adropin, and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels in Adults

Background

Little is known about the relationship between dietary intake of phytochemicals with metabolic health status and underlying mechanisms.

Objectives

Little is known about the relationship between dietary intake of phytochemicals with metabolic health status and underlying mechanisms. We hypothesized that dietary phytochemical index (DPI) improves metabolic health status by ameliorating serum concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and adropin.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed in 527 adults (286 males and 241 females). The dietary intakes of participants were collected by a 168-item food frequency questionnaire, and DPI was estimated as a percentage of energy intake derived from phytochemical-rich foods. Anthropometric variables, blood pressure, glycemic and lipid profiles, and biochemical variables were assessed. The metabolically unhealthy (MU) phenotype was determined based on the definition presented by Wildman et al.

Results

The MU phenotype was identified in 51.4% of male and 32.0% of female participants. Participants in the third tertile of DPI had 59% lower odds of MU than those in the first tertile (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.87) after considering potential confounders. Stratified analysis by sex and body mass index indicated that DPI was inversely related to MU phenotype in females (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.97) and normal-weight individuals (OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.62). DPI was also inversely associated with hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and chronic inflammation. Nonsignificant reduced odds of low BDNF (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.42, 1.84) and adropin (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.79) were observed in individuals in the top tertile of DPI compared with those in the bottom tertile.

Conclusions

This study showed that individuals with higher dietary intake of phytochemicals had lower odds of MU, particularly females and normal-weight individuals. No significant relationship was observed between serum BDNF and adropin with phytochemical intake.

Obesity, Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure, and Left Ventricular Remodeling

Owing to the overwhelming obesity epidemic, preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly ensues in patients with severe obesity and the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is now commonplace in clinical practice. Severe obesity and preserved ejection fraction heart failure share congruent cardiovascular, immune, and renal derangements that make it difficult to ascertain whether the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is the convergence of two highly prevalent conditions or severe obesity enables the development and progression of the syndrome of preserved ejection fraction heart failure. Nevertheless, the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure provides a unique opportunity to assess whether sustained and sizeable loss of excess body weight via metabolic bariatric surgery reverses the concentric left ventricular remodeling that patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly display.

The Related Metabolic Diseases and Treatments of Obesity

Obesity is a chronic disease characterized by the abnormal or excessive accumulation of body fat, affecting more than 1 billion people worldwide. Obesity is commonly associated with other metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, and cancers. Factors such as a sedentary lifestyle, overnutrition, socioeconomic status, and other environmental and genetic conditions can cause obesity. Many molecules and signaling pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of obesity, such as nuclear factor (NF)-κB, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), adhesion molecules, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1). Commonly used strategies of obesity management and treatment include exercise and dietary change or restriction for the early stage of obesity, bariatric surgery for server obesity, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medicines such as semaglutide and liraglutide that can be used as monotherapy or as a synergistic treatment. In addition, psychological management, especially for patients with obesity and distress, is a good option. Gut microbiota plays an important role in obesity and its comorbidities, and gut microbial reprogramming by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics shows promising potential in obesity and metabolic syndrome. Many clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the therapeutic effects of different treatments. Currently, prevention and early treatment of obesity are the best options to prevent its progression to many comorbidities.

Pathogenesis, Murine Models, and Clinical Implications of Metabolically Healthy Obesity

Although obesity is commonly associated with numerous cardiometabolic pathologies, some people with obesity are resistant to detrimental effects of excess body fat, which constitutes a condition called “metabolically healthy obesity” (MHO). Metabolic features of MHO that distinguish it from metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO) include differences in the fat distribution, adipokine types, and levels of chronic inflammation. Murine models are available that mimic the phenotype of human MHO, with increased adiposity but preserved insulin sensitivity. Clinically, there is no established definition of MHO yet. Despite the lack of a uniform definition, most studies describe MHO as a particular case of obesity with no or only one metabolic syndrome components and lower levels of insulin resistance or inflammatory markers. Another clinical viewpoint is the dynamic and changing nature of MHO, which substantially impacts the clinical outcome. In this review, we explore the pathophysiology and some murine models of MHO. The definition, variability, and clinical implications of the MHO phenotype are also discussed. Understanding the characteristics that differentiate people with MHO from those with MUO can lead to new insights into the mechanisms behind obesity-related metabolic derangements and diseases.