Are women in Singapore gaining weight appropriately during pregnancy: a prospective cohort study

Attitudes and practices of exercise among pregnant mothers in Singapore

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing evidence demonstrating the safety and benefits of physical activity (PA) in uncomplicated pregnancies. Literature has shown that pregnant women around the world do not engage in adequate exercise. This study aims to assess the current practices of exercise among pregnant women in Singapore, determine the proportion of women meeting different PA targets and evaluate the factors influencing the practice of exercise.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, pregnant women in different trimesters of pregnancy from KK Women's and Children's Hospital and Singapore General Hospital were surveyed. Information regarding patient demographics, attitudes and perceptions of exercise, and practice of exercise was collected. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to determine the amount of PA.

RESULTS

A total of 201 pregnant women aged 20-44 years were surveyed. Almost all (99.0%) participants thought that exercise was beneficial in pregnancy. Only 31.6% of them engaged in any moderate or vigorous leisure-time PA (LTPA) and they were active for a median of 120 min/week. Only 12.6% of the pregnant women met the national recommendations of at least 150 min of moderate exercise per week. The amount of total PA performed was lower among women in later trimesters of pregnancy and higher among working mothers.

CONCLUSION

Although most Singaporean pregnant women perceived exercise as beneficial, the majority did not engage in PA. Most of the participants did not meet the international PA targets and recently published national guidelines. More can be done to promote the uptake of exercise in pregnancy and optimise metabolic management of pregnant women in Singapore.

Weight progression and adherence to weight gain target in women with vs. without gestational diabetes: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Weight management has been an important component of the service in obstetric care offered to pregnant women. Current gestational weight gain recommendations were primarily for the general obstetric population, raising concern about the applicability to women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aimed to assess the difference in weight progression and adherence to the recommended gestational weight gain targets between women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT).

METHODS

This was a hospital-based retrospective study of 56,616 pregnant women (9,430 GDM women and 47,186 NGT women) from Guangzhou between 2017 and 2021. The average change in weight progression was estimated based on serial weight measurements throughout pregnancy, using a mixed effects model with a random intercept to account for repeated measures of the same individual.

RESULTS

Women with GDM gained less weight (12.07 [SD 5.20] kg) than women with NGT (14.04 [SD 5.04] kg) throughout pregnancy. Before OGTT, a small difference was observed in the average change in weight progression between the two groups (GDM, 0.44 kg/week vs. NGT, 0.45 kg/week, p < 0.001), however, this gap widened significantly after the test (0.34 vs. 0.50 kg/week, p < 0.001). GDM individuals were identified with an approximately 4-fold increased proportion of insufficient weight gain (41.1% vs. 10.4%) and a 2-fold decreased proportion of excessive weight gain (22.6% vs. 54.2%) compared to NGT individuals. These results were consistently observed across different BMI categories, including underweight (insufficient: 52.7% vs. 19.9%; excessive: 15.6% vs. 35.3%), normal weight (insufficient 38.2% vs. 7.4%; excessive: 22.2% vs. 57.3%), and overweight/obese (insufficient: 43.1% vs. 9.8%; excessive: 30.1% vs. 68.8%).

CONCLUSION

Weight progression varied significantly between GDM and NGT individuals, resulting in a substantial difference in identifying insufficient and excessive weight gain between the two groups under current gestational weight gain guidelines.

Determinants of excessive gestational weight gain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain (EGWG) during pregnancy is increasing, and it is extremely harmful to pregnant women and newborns. Previous studies have suggested that EGWG is associated with various factors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify, quantify and analyze determinants of EGWG and evaluate the effect of these determinants on EGWG.

Methods

We searched for articles, from January 2009 to November 2020, related to the determinants of EGWG during pregnancy using four Chinese and four English databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was utilized to guide the systematic review and meta-analysis process.

Results

Seventy studies, which identified EGWG factors in pregnant women (58 factors, 3 themes: individual [7 aspects, 37 factors]; family [4 aspects, 8 factors]; and social [4 aspects, 13 factors]), were included and analyzed in the systematic review. A meta-analysis was conducted for 13 factors (including 10 individual factors, 2 family factors, and 1 social factor) and revealed that pre-pregnancy overweight (including obesity), younger age (≤ 30 years old), unemployed, primiparity, smoking, and being unmarried (including divorced) were risk factors for EGWG, while prepregnancy underweight and inadequate antenatal care were protective factors for EGWG. There was no significant correlation between EGWG and education level, alcohol consumption, planning pregnancy, food security, and whether access to nutrition guidance during pregnancy.

Conclusions

EGWG was prevalent in pregnant women, and its prevalence seemed to be high and similar in many countries. Based on observational studies with medium-level and high-level evidence, some individual, family, and social factors were found to be associated with EGWG using qualitative and quantitative methods. In the future, exposure of pregnant women to risk factors for EGWG should be avoided, and interventions should be developed around the identified factors.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13690-022-00864-9.

Association between gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in a Singaporean population: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Inadequate or excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to study GWG in a Singaporean population and its association with pregnancy outcomes, including small for gestational age (SGA), macrosomia, and caesarean section secondary to failure to progress (FTP) or cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD).

STUDY DESIGN

926 women with low-risk singleton pregnancy were enrolled in a prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2014 in a Singapore tertiary maternity hospital. 704 patients without pre-existing diabetes or hypertension and had maternal weight information till term pregnancy were included in analyses. Participants were categorized according to their first antenatal visit body mass index (BMI) as underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese. Total GWG for each BMI group was calculated and compared to Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2009 GWG guidelines. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of GWG below or above IOM guidelines with pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

GWG below IOM guidelines was associated with an increased risk of SGA (adjusted OR: 2.97 [1.71, 5.15]; p < 0.0001). GWG above IOM guidelines significantly increased the risk of caesarean section due to FTP or CPD (adjusted OR: 2.10 [1.09, 4.01]; p = 0.0275). GWG above IOM guidelines was associated with an increased risk of macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio: 2.27 [1.43, 3.63]; p = 0.0006), while GWG below IOM guidelines was associated with a reduced risk of macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio: 0.18 [0.08, 0.39]; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

GWG not achieving the IOM recommendations has been found to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in Singaporean women. Inadequate GWG is associated with an increased risk of SGA whereas excessive GWG is associated with increased risks of macrosomia and caesarean section due to failure to progress or CPD. Results of the current study add to our understanding on the association of GWG with pregnancy outcomes in the South-East Asia and suggest that appropriate weight management during pregnancy is important.

Determinants of Suboptimal Gestational Weight Gain among Antenatal Women Residing in the Highest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Region of Malaysia

Suboptimal gestational weight gain has been associated with adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes, including increased risk of non-communicable diseases later in life. This study aimed to determine the proportion and determinants of suboptimal GWG. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 475 pregnant women in Selangor between January and March 2020. The study included all pregnant women at their second or third trimester who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A multistage sampling was applied. The GWG adequacy was based on recommendations from the Institute of Medicine (2009). Multinomial logistic regressions were used for data analysis. Out of the 475 respondents, 224 (47.2%) pregnant women had inadequate GWG, 142 (29.9%) had adequate GWG, and 109 (22.9%) had excessive GWG. Multinomial logistic regression showed that having diabetes in pregnancy (AdjOR 2.24, 95% CI: 1.31, 3.83, p = 0.003), middle (M40) monthly household income (AdjOR 2.33, 95% CI: 1.09, 4.96, p = 0.029), low (B40) monthly household income (AdjOR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07, 4.72, p = 0.039), and an obese pre-pregnancy BMI (AdjOR 2.77, 95% CI: 1.43, 5.35, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with inadequate GWG. Overweight (AdjOR 5.18, 95% CI: 2.52, 10.62, p < 0.001) and obese pre-pregnancy BMIs (AdjOR 17.95, 95% CI: 8.13, 36.95, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with excessive GWG. Improving maternal and perinatal outcomes requires targeted interventions focusing on these modifiable determinants.

Asia-Pacific consensus on physical activity and exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period

Physical activity and exercise in pregnancy are generally beneficial and enhance the physical and mental health of women. These benefits also prevent excessive weight gain and reduce risks of obesity in pregnancy, such as gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders, higher rates of caesarean delivery, macrosomia and stillbirth. Thus, there is a need to optimise perinatal exercise and physical activity globally. There is currently no consensus recommendation on the role of physical activity and exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period in the Asia-Pacific region. In this paper, we present seven key consensus recommendations on physical activity and exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period by 18 key members representing 10 countries in Asia-Pacific regions during an international workshop of the Asia

Diabetes in Pregnancy Conference in Singapore on 11–12 January 2020. Through these consensus recommendations, we hope to improve the metabolic health of pregnant women living in Asia-Pacific regions by educating the public and guiding healthcare professionals on the safety and importance of physical exercise and activity to benefit pregnant women and after childbirth.

Maternal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Risk of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Taiwan: A Population-Based Birth Cohort Study

Epidemiological studies have shown that maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with increased risk of perinatal outcomes. However, the evidence of such associations in Asian populations is limited. We conducted a secondary data analysis to investigate the relationships of prepregnancy BMI and GWG with the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes, including gestational diabetes (GDM), gestational hypertension (GHTN), preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), and macrosomia. We categorized prepregnancy BMI by the WHO classification and GWG by the Institute of Medicine guidelines. We performed adjusted logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratios of adverse perinatal outcomes. A total of 19,052 women were included; prepregnancy overweight and obesity were associated with a greater risk of GDM, GHTN, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and macrosomia. Women with excessive GWG had a greater risk of GHTN, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and macrosomia. In conclusion, regardless of the range of GWG during pregnancy, maternal prepregnancy BMI is significantly associated with the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in Taiwan. Public health attention regarding obesity reduction before conception and prenatal counseling for optimal GWG is needed to mitigate the risk of poor perinatal outcomes.