Analysis of pregnancy outcome after anastomosis of oviduct and its influencing factors

A novel machine learning model for predicting clinical pregnancy after laparoscopic tubal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis (LTA) is a treatment for women who require reproduction after ligation, and there are no reliable prediction models or clinically useful tools for predicting clinical pregnancy in women who receive this procedure. The prediction model we developed aims to predict the individual probability of clinical pregnancy in women after receiving LTA.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical data of patients undergoing LAT in the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from July 2017 to December 2021. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection. We incorporated the patients' basic characteristics, preoperative laboratory tests and laparoscopic tubal anastomosis procedure signature and obtained a nomogram. The model performance was evaluated in terms of its calibration, discrimination, and clinical applicability. The prediction model was further internally validated using 200 bootstrap resamplings.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were selected to build the predictive model for clinical pregnancy after LTA. The LASSO method identified age, intrauterine polyps, pelvic adhesion and thyroid stimulating hormone(TSH) as independent predictors of the clinical pregnancy rate. The prediction nomogram included the abovementioned four predictive parameters. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.752. The Hosmer‒Lemeshow test of calibration showed that χ2 was 4.955 and the p value was 0.838, which indicates a satisfactory goodness-of-fit. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful. Internal validation shows that the predictive model performs well.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a nomogram incorporating age, intrauterine polyps, pelvic adhesion and TSH based on the LASSO regression model, which can be conveniently used to facilitate the individualized prediction of clinical pregnancy in women after LTA.

Is there any difference between pregnancy results after tubal reanastamosis performed laparotomically, laparoscopically, and robotically?

INTRODUCTION

Tubal reanastamosis offers hope to conceive again. However, there are many factors that affect the success of this procedure. In our study we aimed to compare the pregnancy rates of the surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis in pregnancy requested after tubal sterilization.

METHODS

In our study we compared the rates of pregnancies after reanastamosis retrospectively in female patients under the age of 40 who underwent reanastamosis between 2010 and 2019 with laparotomic, laparoscopic and robotic methods. A single layer of 4 quadrant 6/0 number polydioxanone absorbable sutures were used in all surgical methods. A similar surgical technique was used.

RESULTS

In surgical methods (laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotics), there was a statistical difference between the three groups in terms of operation times of surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis (p < 0.05). Laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotics pregnancy rates were 52.6% (n = 41), 67.3% (n = 37), 61.2% (n = 63), respectively. There was no statistical difference between groups in terms of pregnancy rates. However, odds ratio (OR) values of the laparoscopy group and robotics group probability of conception were 1.536 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.813-2.898), 1.111 (95% CI, 0.656-1.879) higher, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no statistical difference between the surgical methods used for tubal reanastamosis, we think that the laparoscopic surgical method may be preferable due to the shorter hospital stay. We think that the previous method of bilateral tubaligastion (BTL), the site of reanastasis, and the time between BTL and reanastomosis were effective in pregnancy success.

Effectiveness of laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in tubal occlusion patients after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic tubal anastomosis for tubal occlusions associated with infertility in patients with previous laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of the pregnancy outcomes of 173 infertile patients who underwent hysteroscopy and laparoscopic tubal anastomosis treatment between January 2013 and August 2018 in the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology in West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. All patients had a history of laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy. The primary outcomes were intrauterine pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and delivery rates. We further studied the associated factors that could influence the change in pregnancy status.

RESULTS

The 24-month cumulative clinical pregnancy rate of all patients was 107/173 (61.8%). The distribution of outcomes for the entire group of pregnancies was as follows: intrauterine pregnancy rate, 76/173 (43.9%); ectopic pregnancy rate, 31/173 (17.9%); delivery rate, 68/173 (39.3%); and miscarriage rate, 8/173 (4.6%). Age, type of anastomosis, hydrosalpinx, and endometrial polyps were significant prognostic factors in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis is an effective treatment for tubal-associated infertility due to previous laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy, especially for women under 35 years of age.