Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study

Nipple shield use in the maternity ward increases risk of exclusive breastfeeding interruption in the first six months of infant's life

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between use of silicone nipple shields in the maternity ward and exclusive breastfeeding interruption in the first 6 months of the infant's life.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Interviews were conducted personally at the mother's home at 1 and 6 months postpartum and by telephone at 2 and 4 months.

PARTICIPANTS

287 mother-infant dyads.

METHODS

Lactating mothers were randomly selected at two maternity wards (one public, one private) in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox multivariate regression. The outcome of interest was exclusive breastfeeding interruption before 6 months of the infant's life.

FINDINGS

Nipple shields were used by 6.2 % of the women in the public maternity ward and by 25.8 % of those in the private setting. Median duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 11 days (95 %CI 0.0-36.9) among women who used the accessory vs. 89 days (95 %CI 60.8-117.2) among those who did not. Nipple shield use in the maternity ward was associated with exclusive breastfeeding interruption before 6 months of infant's life (adjusted risk ratio = 1.47; 95 %CI 1.01-2.15). The risk was higher in the first months of breastfeeding, ranging from 2.0 to 1.47 in the first and sixth months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of silicone nipple shields in the maternity ward increased the risk of exclusive breastfeeding interruption before 6 months of the infant's life, especially in the first months. These findings suggest caution in recommending this accessory to new mothers.

Neonatal breast-suckling skills in the context of lactation and peripartum hormonal changes and additional factors-a pilot study

Background

Childbirth and lactation are intricate processes, involving several hormones, the most important of which are prolactin (a protein hormone) and cortisol (one of the glucocorticoids). The early postpartum period is crucial for both mother and newborn and has an impact on the lactation and breastfeeding process.

Methods

The study included 78 patients who were admitted to the Gynecology-Obstetrics Clinical Hospital in Poznań for labor induction and/or in the active phase of the first labor stage. The levels of cortisol and prolactin in serum were assessed in these women during admission in labor, during the third labor stage, and on the second day postpartum. The levels of cortisol and prolactin in the umbilical cord serum were assessed immediately after cord clamping. The “Protocol for the assessment of breast-suckling skills” was used to assess the neonatal breast-suckling skills on the second day postpartum. Some additional parameters were evaluated in mothers via a telephone interview at three and six months postpartum. The study was conducted from January to August 2020, however the study was suspended during April–July 2020 due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, which led to restrictions in the hospital limiting access to the hospital wards unless necessary.

Results

Early breastfeeding with skin-to-skin contact was associated with low levels of hormones, cortisol levels were lower in serum (p = 0.0108) and umbilical vein (p = 0.0273) in mothers who breastfed immediately after childbirth. At three months postpartum, 88% of the mothers who did not offer a pacifier to the child during the first few days of life breastfed the child naturally (p = 0.037), and at six months, 96% of those who did not offer a pacifier continued to breastfeed (p = 0.0008). Multiple, statistically significant correlations were observed between the variables assessed according to the “Protocol for the assessment of breast-suckling skills” and breastfeeding after three months.

Conclusions

Breastfeeding immediately after childbirth, appropriate assessment of the breast-suckling skills of newborns, avoiding pacifiers and infant formula feeding, and offering support to new mothers in the early days after childbirth seem to be important factors for sustaining breastfeeding after three and six months of childbirth.

Breast Milk Production in Women Who Use Nipple Shields for Persistent Nipple Pain

OBJECTIVE

To examine relationships between nipple pain scores and 24-hour milk production volumes, breastfeeding and pumping frequencies, and breastfeeding duration in women using nipple shields for persistent nipple pain.

DESIGN

Secondary outcome analysis of a prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Research laboratory and participants' homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five breastfeeding women (6 ± 4 weeks after birth) who used nipple shields for persistent nipple pain.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial to investigate the primary outcome of milk transfer with and without nipple shields among participants with and without nipple pain. Here, we report secondary outcomes of associations between 24-hour milk production, breastfeeding and pumping frequencies, breastfeeding durations, and intake in participants using a nipple shield for nipple pain. Participants completed demographic, health and breastfeeding questionnaires and, at two monitored breastfeeding sessions, completed a pain visual analogue scale and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF; total and subscale scores for pain interference with General Activity, Mood, Sleep, and Breastfeeding). Milk production (milliliters per 24 hours), feed volumes, and percentage of available milk removed were calculated from data and milk samples obtained by participants over one 24-hour period and at study visits. Participants logged 24-hour data on a customized research website. We used descriptive statistics as well as simple and multiple linear regression for analyses.

RESULTS

Milk production and feeding duration were not associated with nipple pain scores (visual analogue scale: p = .80, BPI-SF: p = .44). An increase in BPI-SF Breastfeeding subscale score of 1 unit, indicating pain interference with breastfeeding, was associated with a 0.28 decrease in breastfeeding frequency (p = .02) and an 18.8-ml decrease in 24-hour breastfeeding intake (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

Persistent nipple pain was associated with reduced breastfeeding frequency; therefore, continuing professional support is required to ensure adequate milk removal and pain management.

Nipple shield use does not impact sucking dynamics in breastfeeding infants of mothers with nipple pain

Nipple shields (shield) may reduce pain during breastfeeding, but the impact on infant sucking dynamics is not known. We examined the effects of shield use on sucking dynamics, milk removal and nipple pain in two groups of breastfeeding dyads: pain group (PG): shield used for nipple pain; comparison group (CG): no breastfeeding difficulties. Twenty PG (6 ± 4 weeks postnatal) and 28 CG dyads (8 ± 6 weeks postnatal) attended 2 monitored breastfeeding sessions with shield use randomised. Within-subject outcomes were compared. PG: shield use did not affect intra-oral vacuum (peak p = 0.17, baseline p = 0.59), sucking frequency (p = 0.20) or milk transfer (40 mL vs 48 mL, p = 0.80; percentage of available milk removed (PAMR) 55% vs 57%, p = 0.88), and reduced McGill pain scores (p = 0.012). CG: shield use increased non-nutritive sucking (10% more, p = 0.049), and reduced nutritive sucking (18% less, p = 0.017) and milk transfer (63 mL vs 31 mL p < 0.001, PAMR 65% vs 36% p < 0.001). For both groups, feeding duration increased by 2 min (p < 0.0001) and non-nutritive portions of the feed increased with shield use.Conclusion: Nipple shield use improved maternal comfort and did not impact milk removal or sucking strength in PG, but significantly reduced milk transfer and nutritive sucking in CG. What is Known: • Mothers report that nipple shields reduce nipple pain and enable continued breastfeeding. • Concerns that nipple shield use may reduce milk transfer and alter infant sucking patterns are based on limited published evidence. What is New: • Nipple shield use is associated with a 25% reduction in pain scores in breastfeeding mothers with chronic nipple pain. • Milk transfer is not reduced in dyads that regularly use a shield for chronic nipple pain. • Intra-oral vacuums are not impacted by nipple shield use in mothers experiencing pain.