Application of the BACs-on-Beads assay for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in Quanzhou, China

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analysis of pure chromosome 10p15.3 microdeletion using chromosomal microarray analysis

BACKGROUND

The literature contains exceedingly limited reports on chromosome 10p15.3 microdeletions. In the present study, two cases of fetuses with pure terminal 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome in a Chinese population were examined, with the objective of enhancing understanding of the genotype-phenotype correlation associated with 10p15.3 microdeletions.

METHODS

Two fetuses with chromosome 10p15.3 microdeletion were identified from a cohort of 5,258 cases undergoing amniocentesis. Karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was conducted to assess chromosomal abnormalities and detect copy number variations (CNVs) within the families, respectively.

RESULTS

In Family 1, the fetus exhibited a 556.2-Kb deletion in the 10p15.3 region, encompassing OMIM genes such as DIP2C and ZMYND11, and presented with increased nuchal translucency on prenatal ultrasound examination. Parental CMA analysis revealed that the 10p15.3 microdeletion was inherited from the father, who displayed mild language impairment. In Family 2, a comparable 10p15.3 microdeletion was identified in a fetus presenting with asymmetric butterfly vertebrae at T10 and T12, along with mild scoliosis of the spine. Family 1 elected to terminate the pregnancy, while Family 2 chose to continue. At a follow-up conducted at one year and eight months, the child demonstrated delays in both speech and motor development.

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first to report two cases of pure terminal chromosome 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome in fetuses, offering valuable insights for the prenatal diagnosis of 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome. Further, it is the first to describe mild clinical features, specifically limited to language impairment, in a patient with 10p15.3 microdeletion syndrome.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of isolated recurrent 4q35.2 microduplication in Chinese population: a seven-year single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

With the extensive use of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), an increasing number of variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) have been detected. The objective of the present study was to elucidate the pathogenicity and clinical variability associated with isolated recurrent 4q35.2 microduplications within the Chinese population.

METHODS

The present study involved 14 cases of isolated recurrent 4q35.2 microduplication (including 12 fetuses and 2 cases of pediatric patients) out of 5,188 subjects who sought genetic consultation at our hospital and received CMA detection. WES technology was subsequently utilized to identify additional sequence variants in a patient with multiple clinical anomalies.

RESULTS

All 14 cases exhibited isolated recurrent 4q35.2 microduplications spanning a 1.0-Mb region encompassing the ZFP42 gene. Among the 12 fetuses, 11 displayed normal clinical features, while one was born with renal duplication and hydronephrosis. Additionally, in the two pediatric patients, WES was performed for Case 1, who presented with congenital cataracts, severe intellectual disability, and seizures. This patient inherited the 4q35.2 microduplication from his phenotypically normal mother. WES identified a novel NM_000276:c.2042G > T (p.G681V) variant in the OCRL gene, which is associated with Lowe syndrome and may account for the observed phenotypic variability within this family.

CONCLUSION

A series of 14 cases with isolated recurrent 4q35.2 microduplications were investigated, highlighting a potential association with increased susceptibility to renal abnormalities. Further, the present findings may expand the mutation spectrum of the OCRL gene associated with Lowe syndrome and provide valuable insights for the genetic etiological diagnosis of patients with unexplained copy number variants.

The Impact of Chromosomal Mosaicisms on Prenatal Diagnosis and Genetic Counseling-A Narrative Review

Genetic disorders represent a high-impact diagnosis for both patients and their families. Prenatal screening methods and, when recommended, genetic testing allow parents to make informed decisions about the course a pregnancy is going to take. Although offering certainty about the potential evolution and prognosis of the pregnancy, and then the newborn, is usually not possible, genetic counseling can offer valuable insights into genetic disorders. Chromosomal mosaicisms are genetic anomalies that affect only some cell lines in either the fetus or the placenta or both. They can affect autosomal or heterosomal chromosomes, and they can be either numerical or structural. The prognosis seems to be more severe if the genetic alterations are accompanied by malformations visible in ultrasounds. Several genetic techniques can be used to diagnose certain mosaicisms, depending on their nature. A novel approach in prenatal care is non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), also known as non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which, although it does not always have diagnostic value, can provide valuable information about potential genetic anomalies, especially numerical, with high sensitivity (Se).

Detection rates of abnormalities in over 10,000 amniotic fluid samples at a single laboratory

BACKGROUND

A growing number of cytogenetic techniques have been used for prenatal diagnosis. This study aimed to demonstrate the usefulness of karyotyping, BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) assay and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array in prenatal diagnosis during the second trimester based on our laboratory experience.

METHODS

A total of 10,580 pregnant women with a variety of indications for amniocentesis were enrolled in this retrospective study between January 2015 and December 2020, of whom amniotic fluid samples were analysed in 10,320 women. The main technical indicators of participants in the three different technologies were summarized, and cases of chromosome abnormalities were further evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall abnormality detection rate of karyotyping among all the amniotic fluid samples was 15.4%, and trisomy 21 was the most common abnormality (20.9%). The total abnormality detection rate of the BoBs assay was 5.6%, and the diagnosis rate of microdeletion/microduplication syndromes that were not identified by karyotyping was 0.2%. The detection results of the BoBs assay were 100.0% concordant with karyotyping analysis in common aneuploidies. Seventy (87.5%) cases of structural abnormalities were missed by BoBs assay. The total abnormality detection rate of the SNP array was 21.6%. The detection results of common aneuploidies were exactly the same between SNP array and karyotyping. Overall, 60.1% of structural abnormalities were missed by SNP array. The further detection rate of pathogenic significant copy number variations (CNVs) by SNP was 1.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Karyotyping analysis combined with BoBs assay or SNP array for prenatal diagnosis could provide quick and accurate results. Combined use of the technologies, especially with SNP array, improved the diagnostic yield and interpretation of the results, which contributes to genetic counselling. BoBs assay or SNP array could be a useful supplement to karyotyping.

Extended application of BACs-on-Beads technique in prenatal diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

This study explored the application of bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs)-on-Beads (BoBs) technique, especially its ability to detect microdeletion/microduplication regions with a single probe.

METHODS

Both chromosome karyotyping and BoBs technique were applied on a total of 2218 pregnant women. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on patients whose cells were reported as being abnormal by BoBs technique with a single probe.

RESULTS

Twenty-two cases were detected as microdeletion/microduplication with a single probe, which was consistent with the CMA results.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that the microdeletion/microduplication results detected by BoBs technique with a single probe provide comprehensive guidance for prenatal diagnosis.

Identification of a Rare Variant of c.1777G>A (p.G593S) in the COL1A1 Gene as the Etiology of Recurrent Osteogenesis Imperfecta by Whole-Exome Sequencing

BACKGROUND

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare heterogeneous disorder typically featured by fragile bones and susceptibility to fracture. The aim of the present study was to explore the genetic etiology of familial recurrent OI and the genotype-phenotype correlation.

METHODS

Karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) were performed to determine the genetic etiology of OI in the enrolled family. Western blotting analysis was carried out using the fetal skin tissue for type I collagen production analysis.

RESULTS

At the first pregnancy, a c.1777G>A mutation in the COL1A1 gene was detected in the fetus who exhibited skeletal dysplasia. In this second pregnancy, severe fetal skeletal dysplasia was also presented without significant chromosomal abnormality detected by karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis in the fetus. Further WES results demonstrated a de novo missense mutation of c.1777G>A (p.G593S) in the fetus, which was classified as a pathogenic variant according to the ACMG guidelines. The recurrent mutation in the two fetuses hinted at the possible existence of gonadal mosaicism in the parents, while no mutation in the COL1A1 gene was identified in the DNA from the father's sperm. In addition, Western blot results demonstrated no reduced type I procollagen production in the affected fetus compared with the age-matched controls.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that identified a rare variant of c.1777G>A in the COL1A1 gene that led to recurrent OI in the Chinese population. Additionally, we believe that this rare variant of c.1777G>A in the COL1A1 gene will lead to OI type II. The results of the present study further verify the application value of WES in identifying fetuses with ultrasound anomalies.

Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis

Background

Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to conduct genetic counseling and choose further prenatal diagnosis methods for pregnant women who failed non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on pregnant women who had failed NIPS tests.

Results

Among the 123,291 samples, 394 pregnant women did not obtain valid results due to test failures. A total of 378 pregnant women were available for follow-up, while 16 patients were lost to follow-up. Of these 378, 135 pregnant women chose further prenatal diagnosis through amniocentesis, and one case of dysplasia was recalled for postpartum chromosome testing. The incidence rate of congenital chromosomal abnormalities in those who failed the NIPS was 3.97% (15/378), which was higher than that of the chromosomal abnormalities in the common population (1.8%). Among the pregnant women who received prenatal diagnosis, the positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the chromosomal microarray analysis/copy number variation sequencing (CMA/CNV-seq) group and in the karyotyping group were 15.28 and 4.76%, respectively.

Conclusion

Prenatal diagnosis should be strongly recommended in posttest genetic counseling for pregnant women with NIPS failures. Further, high-resolution detection methods should be recommended for additional prenatal diagnoses.

BACs-on-Beads Assay for the Prenatal Diagnosis of Microdeletion and Microduplication Syndromes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical value of BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) assay in detection of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.

METHODS

A total of 6,814 cases of amniotic fluid cells collected from January 2015 to July 2020 in our hospital were analyzed by chromosomal karyotyping and BoBs assay. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) provided further validation for the cases of microdeletion and microduplication.

RESULTS

Thirty microdeletion and microduplication syndromes were identified by BoBs with an incidence of ~1/227, including 22q11.2 microduplication (0.044%, 3/6814), DiGeorge I syndrome (0.044%, 3/6814), 17p11.2 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Smith-Magenis syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), 17p11.2p11.3 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Williams-Beuren syndrome (0.088%, 6/6814), 7q11.2 microduplication (0.029%, 2/6814), DiGeorge II syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), 18p11.32p11.21 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (0.029%, 2/6814), 4p16.3 microduplication (0.015%, 1/6814), Langer-Giedion syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), Miller-Dieker syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), Cri du Chat syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814), Xp22.31 microdeletion (0.059%, 4/6814), Prader-Willi syndrome (0.015%, 1/6814). High concordance was obtained between BoBs and FISH or CMA. However, only four cases were detected by chromosomal karyotyping.

CONCLUSION

BoBs assay can rapidly detect microdeletion and microduplication syndromes, which compensates the shortcomings of conventional chromosomal karyotyping and greatly improves the efficiency and accuracy of prenatal diagnosis.