Maternal age at first cesarean delivery related to adverse pregnancy outcomes in a second cesarean delivery: a multicenter, historical, cross-sectional cohort study

Association between short inter-pregnancy interval and placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum with respect to maternal age at first cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between inter-pregnancy intervals and placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum among women who had prior cesarean deliveries with respect to maternal age at first cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included clinical data from 9981 singleton pregnant women with a history of cesarean delivery at 11 public tertiary hospitals in seven provinces of China between January 2017 and December 2017. The study population was divided into four groups (<2, 2-5, 5-10, ≥10 years of the interval) according to the inter-pregnancy interval. The rate of placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum among the four groups was compared, and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between inter-pregnancy interval and placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum with respect to maternal age at first cesarean delivery.

RESULTS

Compared to women aged 30-34 years old at first cesarean delivery, the risk of placenta previa (aRR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.16-1.88) and placenta accreta spectrum (aRR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.28-2.35) were higher among women aged 18-24. Multivariate regression results showed that women at 18-24 with <2 years intervals exhibited a 5.05-fold increased risk for placenta previa compared with those with 2-5-year intervals (aRR, 5.05; 95% CI, 1.13-22.51). In addition, women aged 18-24 with less than 2 years intervals had an 8.44 times greater risk of developing PAS than women aged 30-34 with 2 to 5 years intervals (aRR, 8.44; 95% CI, 1.82-39.26).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggested that short inter-pregnancy intervals were associated with increased risks for placenta previa, and placenta accreta spectrum for women under 25 years at first cesarean delivery, which may be partly attributed to obstetrical outcomes.

Is There an Age Limit for a Trial of Vaginal Delivery in Nulliparous Women?

BACKGROUND

The number of nulliparous women over the age of 35 is consistently increasing, and the optimal delivery strategy is a subject of ongoing discussion. This study compares perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women aged ≥35 years undergoing a trial of labor (TOL) versus a planned cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all nulliparous women ≥ 35 years who delivered a single term fetus at a single center between 2007-2019. We compared obstetric and perinatal outcomes according to mode of delivery-TOL versus a planned CD, in three different age groups: (1) 35-37 years, (2) 38-40 years, and (3) >40 years.

RESULTS

Out of 103,920 deliveries during the study period, 3034 women met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 1626 (53.59%) were 35-37 years old (group 1), 848 (27.95%) were 38-40 (group 2), and 560 (18.46%) were >40 years (group 3). TOL rates decreased as age increased: 87.7% in group 1, 79.3% in group 2, and 50.1% in group 3, p < 0.001. Rates of successful vaginal delivery were 83.4% in group 1, 79.0% in group 2, and 69.4% in group 3, p < 0.001). Neonatal outcomes were comparable between a TOL and a planned CD. Using multivariate logistic regression, maternal age was found to be independently associated with slightly increased odds for a failed TOL (aOR = 1.13, CI 95% 1.067-1.202).

CONCLUSIONS

A TOL at advanced maternal age appears to be safe, with considerable success rates. As maternal age advances, there is a small additive risk of intrapartum CD.