1
|
Rosberg V, Jessen M, Qvortrup C, Smith HG, Krarup PM. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term overall survival in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1076-1082. [PMID: 37725517 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2251086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival in unselected patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer including an analysis of each high-risk feature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, the National Patient Registry and the Danish Pathology Registry from 2014 to 2018 were merged. Patients surviving > 90 days were included. High-risk features were defined as emergency presentation, including self-expanding metal stents (SEMS)/loop-ostomy as a bridge to resection, grade B or C anastomotic leakage, pT4 tumors, lymph node yield < 12 or signet cell carcinoma. Eligibility criteria for chemotherapy were age < 75 years, proficient MMR gene expression, and performance status ≤ 2. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients allocated for adjuvant chemotherapy and the time to first administration. RESULTS In total 939 of 3937 patients with stage II colon cancer had high-risk features, of whom 408 were eligible for chemotherapy. 201 (49.3%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, with a median time to first administration of 35 days after surgery. The crude 5-year overall survival was 84.9% in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 66.3% in patients not receiving chemotherapy, p < 0.001. This association corresponded to an absolute risk difference of 14%. CONCLUSION 5-year overall survival was significantly higher in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with no chemotherapy. Adjuvant treatment was given to less than half of the patients who were eligible for it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Rosberg
- Department. of Surgery K, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Jessen
- Department. of Surgery K, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kao YK, Chen HP, Liu KW, Song LC, Chen YC, Lin YC, Chen CI. Impact on inadequate lymph node harvest on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer: A would-be medical center experience in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32497. [PMID: 36595998 PMCID: PMC9803501 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Insufficient lymph node harvest (< 12) may lead to incorrect classification of stage I and II disease. Many studies have indicated a poor prognosis with inadequate lymph node harvest in stages I to III, but few studies have demonstrated the relationship between low lymph node harvest and T4 disease. This study aimed to identify the influence of insufficient number of lymph nodes harvested on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer. We enrolled patients with T4N0 colorectal cancer who underwent radical resection between 2010 and 2016. A total of 155 patients were divided into 2 groups; 142 patients had ≥ 12 harvested lymph nodes, and the other 13 had < 12 lymph nodes. All patients were followed up for at least 5 years. The primary outcome was the impact of the number of lymph nodes harvested on disease-free survival and overall survival, which were investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival techniques. There were no significant differences in recurrence rate, emergent or elective surgery, laparoscopic or open surgery, or chemotherapy between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no statistical differences in 5-year disease-free survival (P = .886) and 5-year overall survival (P = .832) between the groups. There were no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival between patients with adequate (≥ 12) and inadequate (< 12) lymph node harvest in T4N0 colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Kai Kao
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Pao Chen
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Wen Liu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Chiao Song
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chieh Chen
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Lin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-I Chen
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of General Medicine Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Chinese Medicine for Post Baccalaureate, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- * Correspondence: Chih-I Chen, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, No. 1, Yida Road, Yanchao District, Kaohsiung City 824, Taiwan (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grant RR, Khan TM, Gregory SN, Coakley BA, Hernandez JM, Davis JL, Blakely AM. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in select patients with Stage II colon cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:748-756. [PMID: 35698854 PMCID: PMC9378439 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Guidelines for Stage II colon cancer recommend adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) only for tumors with high-risk features, but long-term outcomes data are mixed. We aimed to determine if AC was associated with a survival benefit in this population. METHODS Patients were identified from the National Cancer Database and included if they met the following criteria: diagnosis of Stage II colon cancer, surgery, survival data, and complete data on six high-risk features. The cohort of 57 335 patients was stratified by receipt of AC. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients under the age of 65 years with no comorbidities. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. RESULTS An increasing number of high-risk features was associated with significantly decreased median OS. AC was associated with significantly increased OS for patients with 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 high-risk features. On subgroup analysis, receipt of AC was associated with a reduced risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.66; confidence interval: 0.59-0.74). For patients in the subgroup who had a T4 tumor, AC was associated with increased OS (92.7 vs. 83.6 months). CONCLUSIONS AC should be considered for all younger, healthy patients with Stage II colon cancer and may be associated with a survival benefit for patients with T4 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert R.C. Grant
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Tahsin M. Khan
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Stephanie N. Gregory
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Brian A. Coakley
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan M. Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jeremy L. Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Andrew M. Blakely
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sahakyan AM, Aleksanyan A, Batikyan H, Petrosyan H, Sahakyan MА. Lymph Node Status and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Colon Resection in Locally Advanced Colon Cancer. Indian J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-021-02825-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractLocally advanced colon cancer is associated with poor prognosis. The aim of this report was to examine the association between the lymph node status and prognosis of locally advanced colon cancer. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were studied in patients who had undergone colectomy for colon cancer between June 2004 and December 2018. Locally advanced colon cancer was defined as stage T4a/T4b cancer. The long-term oncologic results were investigated in patients with non-metastatic locally advanced colon cancer. Of 195 patients operated for locally advanced colon cancer, 83 (42.6%), 43 (22.1%), and 69 (35.3%) had pN0, pN1, and pN2 disease, respectively. Preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA 19-9, as well as incidence of distant metastases were significantly higher in patients with pN2 compared to those with pN0 and pN1. In non-metastatic setting, a trend towards higher incidence of recurrence was observed in node-positive patients. Nodal stage was a significant predictor for survival in the univariable analysis but non-significant after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analyses among the patients with T4a and T4b cancer did not demonstrate any association between the nodal stage and survival. Preoperative CA 19-9 > 37 U/ml and adjuvant chemotherapy were the only prognostic factors in T4a and T4b colon cancer, respectively. Although a trend towards higher incidence of recurrence was observed in node-positive locally advanced colon cancer, nodal stage was not associated with survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be strongly considered in T4b stage colon cancer.
Collapse
|
5
|
Simillis C, Singh HKSI, Afxentiou T, Mills S, Warren OJ, Smith JJ, Riddle P, Adamina M, Cunningham D, Tekkis PP. Postoperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with resected high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1231-1244. [PMID: 31999888 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer. METHOD A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed comparing survival in patients with resected Stage II colorectal cancer and high-risk features having postoperative chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy. RESULTS Of 1031 articles screened, 29 were included, reporting on 183 749 participants. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, P < 0.0001], disease-specific survival (HR = 0.73, P = 0.05) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.59, P < 0.0001) compared to no chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.53, P = 0.0008) and 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.50, P = 0.001). Overall survival and disease-free survival remained significantly prolonged during subgroup analysis of studies published from 2015 onwards (HR = 0.60, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.65, P = 0.0001; respectively), in patients with two or more high-risk features (HR = 0.59, P = 0.0001; HR = 0.70, P = 0.03; respectively) and in colon cancer (HR = 0.61, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.51, P = 0.0001; respectively). Overall survival, disease-specific survival and disease-free survival during subgroup analysis of individual high-risk features were T4 tumour (HR = 0.58, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.50, P = 0.003; HR = 0.75, P = 0.05), < 12 lymph nodes harvested (HR = 0.67, P = 0.0002; HR = 0.80, P = 0.17; HR = 0.72, P = 0.02), poor differentiation (HR = 0.84, P = 0.35; HR = 0.85, P = 0.23; HR = 0.61, P = 0.41), lymphovascular or perineural invasion (HR = 0.55, P = 0.05; HR = 0.59, P = 0.11; HR = 0.76, P = 0.05) and emergency surgery (HR = 0.60, P = 0.02; HR = 0.68, P = 0.19). CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer results in a modest survival improvement and should be considered on an individual patient basis. Due to potential heterogeneity and selection bias of the included studies, and lack of separate rectal cancer data, further large randomized trials with predefined inclusion criteria and standardized chemotherapy regimens are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Simillis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - H K S I Singh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Afxentiou
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Mills
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - O J Warren
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - J J Smith
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - P Riddle
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - D Cunningham
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - P P Tekkis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.,Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk colon cancer: A 17-year population-based analysis of 6131 patients with Union for International Cancer Control stage II T4N0M0 colon cancer. Eur J Cancer 2020; 137:148-160. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
7
|
Mo S, Ma X, Li Y, Zhang L, Hou T, Han-Zhang H, Qian J, Cai S, Huang D, Peng J. Somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations elicit enhanced intratumoral immune responses in stage II colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:jitc-2020-000881. [PMID: 32859741 PMCID: PMC7454238 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies found patients with POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs) in targeted exons were related to significant better outcomes in stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC). The detailed mutational profile of the entire POLE exonuclease domain, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and immune cell infiltration in POLE EDMs tumors, and the prognostic value of such mutations in stage II CRCs were largely unknown to us. This study was to clarify the characteristics, immune response and prognostic value of somatic POLE EDMs in stage II CRC. A total of 295 patients with stage II CRC were sequenced by next-generation sequencing with a targeted genetic panel. Simultaneous detection of the immune cells was conducted using a five-color immunohistochemical multiplex technique. The detailed molecular characteristics, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) and prognostic effect of POLE EDMs in stage II CRC were analyzed. For stage II CRCs, the POLE EDMs were detected in 3.1% of patients. Patients with POLE EDMs were more prone to be microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) (33.3% vs 11.2%, p=0.043), younger at diagnosis (median 46 years vs 62 years, p<0.001) and more common at right-sided location (66.7% vs 23.1%; p=0.003). All patients with POLE EMDs were assessed as extremely high TMB, with a mean TMB of 200.8. Compared with other stage II CRCs, POLE EDMs displayed an enhanced intratumoral cytotoxic T cell response, evidenced by increased numbers of CD8+TILs and CD8A expression. Patients with stage II CRCs could be classified into three risk subsets, with significant different 5 years disease-free survival rates of 100% for POLE EDMs, 82.0% for MSI-H and 63.0% for MSS, p=0.013. In conclusion, characterized by a robust intratumoral T cell response, ultramutated POLE EDMs could be detected in a small subset of stage II CRCs with extremely high TMB. Patients with POLE EDMs had excellent outcomes in stage II CRCs, regardless of MSI status. Sequencing of all the exonuclease domain of POLE gene is recommended in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaobo Mo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoji Ma
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaqi Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Long Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Ting Hou
- Burning Rock Biotech, Guangdong, China
| | | | - Juanjuan Qian
- Genecast Precision Medicine Technology Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.,Department of Cancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Huang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China .,Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Junjie Peng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43:279-287. [PMID: 31934881 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC) are recommended to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). However, whether such patients can benefit from ACT remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic parameters that are important for selecting patients for ACT in high-risk stage II CC. METHODS We systematically retrieved articles from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase that were published up to September 13, 2018. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS A total of 23 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included in our study. Overall analyses showed that ACT improved OS (HR=0.64, 95% CI=0.51-0.80, P<0.001) and DFS (HR=0.46, 95% CI=0.28-0.76, P=0.002) in patients with high-risk stage II CC. Subgroup analyses showed that ACT improved OS in patients with localized intestinal perforation and obstruction and pT4 lesions and improved OS and DFS in patients with <12 sampled lymph nodes. However, ACT had no significant effect on OS in patients with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, or poorly differentiated histology. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that not all high-risk factors (lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, poorly differentiated histology) show a benefit from ACT. Randomized controlled trials selectively targeting high-risk patients will need to be conducted in the future.
Collapse
|
9
|
Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram incorporating clinicopathological parameters into the TNM staging system to predict prognosis for stage II colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell Int 2020; 20:285. [PMID: 32655317 PMCID: PMC7339452 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01382-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Survival outcomes are significantly different in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with diverse clinicopathological features. The objective of this study is to establish a credible prognostic nomogram incorporating easily obtained parameters for stage II CRC patients. Methods A total of 1708 stage II CRC patients seen at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) from 2008 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Cases were randomly separated into a training set (n = 1084) and a validation set (n = 624). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors that were subsequently incorporated into a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by the predicted concordance index (C-index) and ROC curve to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). The clinical utility of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Results In univariate and multivariate analyses, eight parameters were correlated with disease-free survival (DFS), which were subsequently selected to generate a prognostic nomogram based on DFS. For DFS predictions, the C-index values of the nomogram were 0.842 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.710–0.980), and 0.701 (95% CI 0.610–0.770) for the training and validation sets, respectively. The AUC values of the ROC curves for the nomogram to predicted 1, 3 and 5-year survival were 0.869, 0.858, and 0.777 (training group) and 0.673, 0.714, and 0.706 (validation group), respectively. The recurrence probability calibration curve showed good consistency between actual observations and nomogram-based predictions. DCA showed better clinical application value for the nomogram than the TNM staging system. Conclusion A novel nomogram was established and validated in a large population, and the nomogram is a simple-to-use tool for physicians to facilitate postoperative personalized prognostic evaluation and determine therapeutic strategies for stage II CRC patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Standard and multivisceral colectomy in locally advanced colon cancer. Radiol Oncol 2020; 54:341-346. [PMID: 32463386 PMCID: PMC7409602 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2020-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Management of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) is challenging. Surgery is the mainstay of the treatment, yet its outcomes remain unclear, especially in the setting of multivisceral resections. The aim of the study was to examine the outcomes of standard and multivisceral colectomy in patients with LACC. Patients and methods Patients demographics, clinical and perioperative data of patients operated within study period 2004–2018 were collected. LACC was defined as stage T4 colon cancer including tumor invasion either through the visceral peritoneum or to the adjacent organs/structures. Accordingly, either standard or multivisceral colectomy (SC and MVC) was performed. Results Two hundred and three patients underwent colectomy for LACC. Of those, 112 had SC (55.2%) and 91 (44.8%) had MVC. Severe morbidity and mortality rates were 5.9% and 2.5%, respectively. MVC was associated with an increased blood loss (200 ml vs. 100 ml, p = 0.01), blood transfusion (22% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.01), longer operative time (180 minutes vs. 140 minutes, p < 0.01) and postoperative hospital stay (11 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.01) compared with SC. The complication-associated parameters were similar. Male gender, presence of ≥ 3 comorbidities, tumor location in the left colon and perioperative blood transfusion were associated with complications in the univariable analysis. In the multivariable model, the presence of ≥ 3 comorbidities was the only independent predictor of complications. Conclusions Colectomy with or without multivisceral resection is a safe procedure in LACC. In experienced hands, the postoperative outcomes are similar for SC and MVC. Given the complexity of the latter, these procedures should be reserved to qualified expert centers.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang J, Jiang Y, Zhu J, Wu T, Ma J, Du C, Chen S, Li T, Han J, Wang X. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA colon cancer-associated transcript 2 is associated with advanced tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett 2017; 14:6907-6914. [PMID: 29181105 PMCID: PMC5696717 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to explore the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) colon cancer-associated transcript 2 (CCAT2) expression in human colorectal cancer (CRC). Expression levels of lncRNA CCAT2 in CRC, adjacent non-tumor and healthy colon mucosa tissues were detected by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The disease-free survival and overall survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The expression level of lncRNA CCAT2 in CRC tissues was increased significantly compared with adjacent normal tissues or non-cancerous tissues. CCAT2 expression was observed to be progressively increased between tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages I and IV. A high level of CCAT2 expression was revealed to be associated with poor cell differentiation, deeper tumor infiltration, lymph node metastasis, distance metastasis, vascular invasion and advanced TNM stage. Compared with patients with low levels of CCAT2 expression, patients with high levels of CCAT2 expression had shorter disease-free survival and overall survival times. Multivariate analyses indicated that high CCAT2 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor. Therefore, increased lncRNA CCAT2 expression maybe a potential diagnostic biomarker for CRC, and an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junling Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Yong Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Jing Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Ju Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Chuang Du
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Shanwen Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Tengyu Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| | - Jinsheng Han
- Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of Hebei, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, P.R. China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Use of a combination of CEA and tumor budding to identify high-risk patients with stage II colon cancer. Int J Biol Markers 2017; 32:e267-e273. [PMID: 28478638 DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-risk patients with stage II colon cancer may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, but identifying this patient population can be difficult. We assessed the prognosis value for predicting tumor progression in patients with stage II colon cancer, of a panel of 2 biomarkers for colon cancer: tumor budding and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). METHODS Consecutive patients (N = 134) with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative surgery from 2000 to 2007 were included. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the association of CEA and tumor budding grade with 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). The prognostic accuracy of CEA, tumor budding grade and the combination of both (CEA-budding panel) was determined. RESULTS The study found that both CEA and tumor budding grade were associated with 5-year DFS. The prognostic accuracy for disease progression was higher for the CEA-budding panel (82.1%) than either CEA (70.9%) or tumor budding grade (72.4%) alone. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that the combination of CEA levels and tumor budding grade has greater prognostic value for identifying patients with stage II colon cancer who are at high-risk for disease progression, than either marker alone.
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang B, Yang J, Li S, Lv M, Chen Z, Li E, Yi M, Yang J. Tumor location as a novel high risk parameter for stage II colorectal cancers. PLoS One 2017. [PMID: 28644878 PMCID: PMC5482466 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Current studies do not accurately evaluate the influence of tumor location on survival of colorectal cancer patients. This study aimed to explore whether tumor location could be identified as another high-risk factor in stage II colorectal cancer by using data identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. All colorectal cancer patients between 2004 and 2008 were grouped into three according to tumor location. Of 33,789 patients diagnosed with stage II colorectal cancer, 46.8% were right colon cancer, 37.5% were left colon cancer and 15.7% were rectal cancer. The 5-year cancer specific survivals were examined. Right colon cancer was associated with the female sex, older age (> 50), and having over 12 lymph nodes resected. Conversely, rectal cancer was associated with the male sex, patients younger than 50 years of age and insufficient lymph node resection. The characteristics of left colon cancer were between them and associated with Asian or Pacific Islander populations, T4 stage, and Grade II patients. The prognostic differences between three groups were significant and retained after stratification by T stage, histological grade, number of regional nodes dissected, age at diagnose, race and sex. Furthermore, the significant difference of location was retained as an independent high-risk parameter. Thus, stage II colorectal cancers of different locations have different clinic-pathological features and cancer-specific survivals, and tumor location should be recognized as another high-risk parameter in stage II colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biyuan Wang
- Department of 1Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Jiao Yang
- Department of 1Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Shuting Li
- Department of 1Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Meng Lv
- Department of 1Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Zheling Chen
- Department of 1Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Enxiao Li
- Department of 1Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Min Yi
- Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Jin Yang
- Department of 1Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Gerken M, Barlag H, Hofstädter F, Benz S. Bedeutung von Krebsregistern für die Versorgungsforschung. DER ONKOLOGE 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00761-016-0181-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
15
|
Miles A, Chronakis I, Fox J, Mayer A. Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e012935. [PMID: 28341685 PMCID: PMC5372112 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer, and examine perceived usefulness, acceptability and areas for improvement of the DA. DESIGN Mixed methods. SETTING Single outpatient oncology department in central London. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive recruitment of 13 patients with stage II colorectal cancer, 12 of whom completed the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years; complete resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; patients within 14-56 days after surgery; no contraindication to adjuvant chemotherapy; able to give written informed consent. Exclusion criterion: previous chemotherapy. PRIMARY OUTCOMES Patient perceived usefulness (assessed by the PrepDM questionnaire) and acceptability of the DA. RESULTS PrepDM scores, measuring the perceived usefulness of the DA in preparing the patient to communicate with their doctor and make a health decision, were above those reported in other patient groups. Patient acceptability scores were also high; however, interviews showed that there was evidence of a lack of understanding of key information among some patients, in particular their baseline risk of recurrence, the net benefit of combination chemotherapy and the rationale for having chemotherapy when cancer had apparently gone. CONCLUSIONS Patients found the DA acceptable and useful in supporting their decision about whether or not to have adjuvant chemotherapy. Suggested improvements for the DA include: sequential presentation of treatment options (eg, no treatment vs 1 drug, 1 drug vs 2 drugs) to enhance patient understanding of the difference between combination and single therapy, diagrams to help patients understand the rationale for chemotherapy to prevent a recurrence and inbuilt checks on patient understanding of baseline risk of recurrence and net benefit of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Miles
- Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - J Fox
- University College London, London, UK
- Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - A Mayer
- Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstädter F, Gerken M, Benz S. [The contribution of clinical cancer registries to benefit assessments: Requirements and first results]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2016; 112 Suppl 1:S3-S10. [PMID: 27320026 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Following the adoption of the Cancer Screening and Registry Act (KFRG) to advance the development of the early detection of cancer and to promote quality assurance through Clinical Cancer Registries according to Sect. 65c SGB V, the question is raised as to what extent population-based clinical cancer registries may contribute not only to direct patient treatment benefits, but also to the requirements of health research and to other issues such as, for example, the evaluation of the benefit of new pharmaceutical products. Efforts to improve a nationwide quality management for oncology have so far not been successful in the development of comprehensive documentation at all levels of care. New organizational structures such as population-based clinical cancer registries were supposed to solve this problem more sufficiently, but they must be accompanied by valid trans-sectorial documentation and evaluation of clinical data. The need for specific real-life outcomes (effectiveness) of specific therapies has led to calls for data from outside randomised clinical trials (efficacy). First results are demonstrated in the present article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stefan Benz
- Klinik für Allgemeine-Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Böblingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Gerken M, Barlag H, Teufel A. Nutzung von Krebsregisterdaten zur Messung der Qualität in der klinischen Onkologie und für Versorgungsforschung. DER ONKOLOGE 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s00761-015-2940-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|